One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Enough?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Apr 28, 2024 12:18:30   #
keepuphope Loc: Idaho
 
Lily wrote:
If it is chemical, I looked it up; AU is gold and H20 is water.


Thanks 😉

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 14:12:20   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
keepuphope wrote:
Thanks 😉


You can call him Barry.

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 14:13:33   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
You can call him Barry.


After seeing where AuH20 attended high school, I can assure you she is female!

Reply
 
 
Apr 28, 2024 14:42:41   #
RickyDCUSMC
 
Maybe most of you are too young, "Goldwater" as in senator Berry Goldwater, also Republican candidate for president in 1964 against Johnson. There is a college scholarship named for him. I saw the handle and quickly read Goldwater!

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 14:53:11   #
AuH20
 
RickyDCUSMC wrote:
Maybe most of you are too young, "Goldwater" as in senator Berry Goldwater, also Republican candidate for president in 1964 against Johnson. There is a college scholarship named for him. I saw the handle and quickly read Goldwater!


On my paternal side, a relative attended Staunton Military Academy with Senator Goldwater, and they remained close friends. I was quite fond of the old Sherry Lewis Lamb Chop programs. Senator Goldwater gifted me a stuffed Lamb Chop animal. Hé became one of my favorites with such a gift.

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 14:53:56   #
AuH20
 
AuntiE wrote:
After seeing where AuH20 attended high school, I can assure you she is female!


As of this AM, I remain such.

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 15:06:23   #
Justice101
 
RickyDCUSMC wrote:
AuH2O, I love your handle and the play on the table, I only wonder if others caught it?


Goldwater.

Reply
 
 
Apr 28, 2024 15:18:56   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
AuH20 wrote:
As of this AM, I remain such.


Your absence of pronouns and certainty of gender convinces me you are NOT a Liberal more than your username. LOL

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 15:28:25   #
AuH20
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Your absence of pronouns and certainty of gender convinces me you are NOT a Liberal more than your username. LOL


I heard about you, prior to joining. You live up to the information provided.

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 17:42:31   #
MidnightRider
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
***It already TO much!
>>>Agreed


$1. was too much. Don't you see that the fruity comedian, Pentagon, what many have called our "leaders" Congress and Bribem are playing you?

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 18:17:34   #
LindaK
 
AuH20 wrote:
Enough?
Liz Wolfe4.25.2024

Cash infusion still not enough: Despite the $60 billion in Ukraine aid that was just authorized by Congress and signed by President Joe Biden, U.S. government officials are quietly voicing their skepticism that this chunk of change will be effective at helping Ukraine beat Russia.

"Russia maintains a manpower and weapons advantage, and it would take a lot to reverse months and years of territorial losses," reported Politico. It's not just a question of winning or losing, in other words, but also whether Ukraine is able to seize back the parts of its territory that Russia had seized in years prior, like Crimea, or Donbas, which Russia seized at the start of the war in 2022. "There's lots of debate about what a winning endgame for Ukraine looks like at this point," a senior Democratic staffer in the Senate told Politico.

Meanwhile, lots of White House staffers claim that the aid package being stalled for as long as it was has resulted in massive Russian gains that will be even harder for Ukraine to make up for. "It's going to take some time for us to dig out of the hole that was created by six months of delay," saidJake Sullivan, the national security adviser.

But massive pressure was reportedly exerted by the White House in order to ensure the aid bill's passage. Per a Washington Post report, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.) was summoned to the Oval Office in late February—along with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R–Ky.), Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.), and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D–N.Y.)—under the guise of discussing how to avoid a government shutdown. The meeting was actually "a plan to pressure Johnson to push through a Ukraine aid package that was deeply dividing House Republicans," per the Post.

The tradeoffs are awful no matter how you slice it. The White House, and the bipartisan consensus in favor of endlessly depleting America's coffers to pay for wars elsewhere, was able to get its way. But even if you were gunning for the right-wing flank of the GOP that was looking to cut foreign aid, it's also worth contending with the real tradeoffs that would come there, in terms of Ukraine struggling to defend itself from Russia's unjust invasion. European allies have come to its aid, yes, but it's an open question as to whether any of this will be enough.

It already TO much!
b Enough? /b br Liz Wolfe4.25.2024 br br Cash i... (show quote)



Agree. Almost a Trillion dollars handed to the Ukrainians for THEIR war against Russia, yet the Ukrainian beggar continues coming back for more from American taxpayers thanks to Biden, he’s giving it to them.

Let more of the other nations pay for the side they want to win and give taxpaying Americans a break, stop carrying most of the weight.

Both Biden and pelosi have pledged to continue funding their war with Russia until it ends. What 20 years?????

Reply
 
 
Apr 28, 2024 18:21:37   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
LindaK wrote:
Agree. Almost a Trillion dollars handed to the Ukrainians for THEIR war against Russia, yet the Ukrainian beggar continues coming back for more from American taxpayers thanks to Biden, he’s giving it to them.

Let more of the other nations pay for the side they want to win and give taxpaying Americans a break, stop carrying most of the weight.

Both Biden and pelosi have pledged to continue funding their war with Russia until it ends. What 20 years?????


As long as they continue to benefit financially, yes.

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 20:46:38   #
ed4short Loc: New Hampshire
 
FJB is laughing like crazy at the stupid congress he has and he is getting a cut of the
$$$$ the US has sent to Ukraine

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 21:16:00   #
okie don
 
It's called CON guess.
They won't let us know what the borrowed funds are for so we are Conned by
Con gress.
Simple...🤔

Reply
Apr 28, 2024 22:35:59   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
LindaK wrote:
Agree. Almost a Trillion dollars handed to the Ukrainians for THEIR war against Russia, yet the Ukrainian beggar continues coming back for more from American taxpayers thanks to Biden, he’s giving it to them.

Let more of the other nations pay for the side they want to win and give taxpaying Americans a break, stop carrying most of the weight.

Both Biden and pelosi have pledged to continue funding their war with Russia until it ends. What 20 years?????


Funding a war is expensive; especially when billions of dollars of said funding disappears down assorted rabbit holes with no accounting.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.