Big Kahuna wrote:
Wrong, the current literature shows a direct positive correlation between administering Ivermectin and beneficial patient outcomes.
Wrong again. SOME of the "current literature" supports that claim. Meanwhile, there is plenty of the current literature which shows the claim to be without foundation. Until a strong consensus emerges, it is just plain wrong to say that there is any proof.
A genius like you, with a half-dozen degrees, shouldn't need to have that explained. Maybe you made up all that s**t?
publican wrote:
For someone who claims to be a "darn good" scientist, you don't know that anecdotal evidence of this kind is totally meaningless.
Actually anecdotal evidence points us to a hypothesis that should be tested. Only a foolish doc would not listen to all the success stories his patients were discussing with him. Are you trying to discredit my superior knowledge? Good try, but your condescending attitude is nothing but rubbush. Try some scientific studies on your rubbish and get back to me with your tainted results. Now run along.
publican wrote:
In other words, you don't know what you are talking about. Or anything else, for that matter.
A dumba$$ like you may come to those unscientific results.
padremike wrote:
Until you can see yourself as the overwhelming number of folks on this forum see you, an asswhole, and a sorry excuse for an American citizen worthy of any respect, you're going to spend all your time stomping your feet and trying to justify yourself to people who will never believe you.
She's about as believable as David Copperfield pulling out a Lamborghini from his hat.
Big Kahuna wrote:
Actually anecdotal evidence points us to a hypothesis that should be tested. Only a foolish doc would not listen to all the success stories his patients were discussing with him. Are you trying to discredit my superior knowledge? Good try, but your condescending attitude is nothing but rubbush. Try some scientific studies on your rubbish and get back to me with your tainted results. Now run along.
You better believe I am discrediting your "superior knowledge". Sure, anecdotal evidence may very well be a source of a fruitful hypothesis, but that's all it is. A hypothesis. The anecdotes themselves, which is what you are using, are in no way proof of anything.
Now YOU run along and play with your fantasies that you understand science at all.
padremike wrote:
Holy moly, BK, I had no idea it was that severe. And to think part of the agreement was that these manufacturers could not be held culpable or liable. That one is on the Trump Administration although since Biden is taking credit for the vaccine well, just saying.
The *mandates were ordered* by Biden, not President Trump who followed the recommendations from Fauci/CDCuntil the cases of them not working as we were lied to about.
People lost their jobs for refusing Bidenβs mandated jabs, people in our military were forced to leave their service and we the people were lied to by Biden/Fauci about this keeping people from becoming infected. Their take one jab lies didnβt come to fruition. Then they ordered multiple jabs because their lie was being exposed. Now the CDC is recommending even more jabs, on a continual basis.
People are experiencing all kinds of major health issues now. Some dying from them. (Not being tracked of course.). Young once healthy athletes are dying from heart problems. So forth and so on.
Now theyβre threatening another *killer* disease will be coming here. I wouldnβt trust them after what they pulled with Covid 19. And question why all these Chinese illegals are also entering our nation. What jobs did they hold in China??? More scientists???
On the Lamborghini: the hope for planned parenthood executives goal. Caught on video.
publican wrote:
Emily, I am no atheist, but I am also not an idiot.
You have your way.
I have my way.
As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.
Friedrich Nietzsche
EmilyD wrote:
πππππ
π―π―π―π―π―
..
. I second that
πππππ
π―π―π―π―π―
Plus I very much worry for the future health of our youth who also were injected with their *experimental* drug. Especially when our doctors were threatened with the loss of their medical licenses if they dared to mention/post their opposing views to the public. More censorship from this administration. ππ
publican wrote:
For someone who claims to be a "darn good" scientist, you don't know that anecdotal evidence of this kind is totally meaningless.
Its only meaningless to those who blindly believe what theyβre told. There are untold stories like this.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.