RascalRiley wrote:
AV does not have time for a job. To busy educating people.
That is my job. It is an ugly thing to have to try and educate you and your ilk - but someone has to do it. Though we can have a debate about your ability to actually learn; seems you have some type of disconnect in that area.
American Vet wrote:
That is my job. It is an ugly thing to have to try and educate you and your ilk - but someone has to do it.
Said our wise old sage who is still a bit bias.
RascalRiley wrote:
Said our wise old sage who is still a bit bias.
You would do well to listen to the wise old sage.
And everyone has a bias. The difference is that most people can still reach a logical decision in spite of that - you are not 'most people'.
American Vet wrote:
You would do well to listen to the wise old sage.
And everyone has a bias. The difference is that most people can still reach a logical decision in spite of that - you are not 'most people'.
Stretch your imagination occasionally. Entertaining a thought does not require that you adopt it.
publican wrote:
Jerry, just a gentle reminder: Donald Trump is no longer the president.
Too bad he's not, the world would be a much better place.
RascalRiley wrote:
Stretch your imagination occasionally. Entertaining a thought does not require that you adopt it.
And you are trapped by your own small mind. many have 'imagined' some of the tenets you espouse - and completely rejected those radical, ill-conceived ideas.
You suffer from a common ailment most leftists have: "I know a lot more than others".
microphor wrote:
Too bad he's not, the world would be a much better place.
It would be different. Short term gain. Long term pain.
RascalRiley wrote:
It would be different. Short term gain. Long term pain.
What exactly are you basing your assessment on? Other than hate
microphor wrote:
What exactly are you basing your assessment on? Other than hate
A couple.
Less air and water regulations. Cheaper products short term. Polluted environment long term.
Less safety regulations. More profits short term. More damage long term.
RascalRiley wrote:
A couple.
Less air and water regulations. Cheaper products short term. Polluted environment long term.
Less safety regulations. More profits short term. More damage long term.
You are operating under the incorrect assumption that all the regulations are needed and are effective.
And, as usual, you aren’t smart enough to consider that there might be other, more cost-effective methodologies.
RascalRiley wrote:
A couple.
Less air and water regulations. Cheaper products short term. Polluted environment long term.
Less safety regulations. More profits short term. More damage long term.
Better regulations versus more regulations will serve everybody better
microphor wrote:
Better regulations versus more regulations will serve everybody better
What would be better than regulations that make trains safer.
The Trump administration rolled back various train safety regulations during its time in office. These rollbacks included delaying the requirement for new heavy trucks to have life-saving software, rescinding rules that would have mandated annual inspections of commercial bus operators and two crew members on trains, and repealing a rule for electronically controlled pneumatic brakes on high hazard trains. Additionally, the administration withdrew a proposal for two-person crews on all trains and revised minimum safety requirements for railroad tracks.
Why. Money from railroad companies and pressure from shareholders. It is all about greed.
What would be the better regulations you speak of?
RascalRiley wrote:
Off hand I would think that he would have to be convicted of a crime for that to work.
And of course he would first have to commit a crime...you know like the bribem family
RascalRiley wrote:
What would be better than regulations that make trains safer.
The Trump administration rolled back various train safety regulations during its time in office. These rollbacks included delaying the requirement for new heavy trucks to have life-saving software, rescinding rules that would have mandated annual inspections of commercial bus operators and two crew members on trains, and repealing a rule for electronically controlled pneumatic brakes on high hazard trains. Additionally, the administration withdrew a proposal for two-person crews on all trains and revised minimum safety requirements for railroad tracks.
Why. Money from railroad companies and pressure from shareholders. It is all about greed.
What would be the better regulations you speak of?
What would be better than regulations that make tr... (
show quote)
Fact check: Brake mandate reversed by Trump not a factor in East Palestine train derailment
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/02/27/fact-check-ecp-brake-mandate-applied-high-hazard-flammable-trains-trump-obama/11338461002/I know you want to blame everything bad on Trump - part of your psychosis. Better try again.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.