Maddow: Trump Will ‘Execute Us’ If Reelected President
Oct 23, 2023 10:29:04 #
Damn, another one! Sure wish l could find the rock that all these idiots crawl out from under and bury it some place. Would someone please tell me one thing Trump did while President that hurt the country!
Oct 23, 2023 10:33:35 #
pegw wrote:
Both Faux News and Newsmax are far right wing news sources that are unreliable, but are giving you the misinformation you crave, rather than the truth. Media Bias rates them as having a low credibility rating, and the other fact checking organizations all rate them as very conservative.
You are the model for this!
Oct 23, 2023 10:36:33 #
[quote=AmericanEagle]Far right my ass. Anytime they report the truth I guess is labeled far right.
Here's the dirt on your media bias boy...
number-2.jpg Media Bias Fact Check
MediaBIasFactCheck.com describes itself as “the most comprehensive media bias resource in the Internet.” The site is owned by Dave Van Zandt from North Carolina, who offers no biographical information about himself aside from the following: “Dave has been freelancing for 25+ years for a variety of print and web mediums (sic), with a focus on media bias and the role of media in politics. Dave is a registered Non-Affiliated voter who values evidence based reporting” and, “Dave Van Zandt obtained a Communications Degree before pursuing a higher degree in the sciences. Dave currently works full time in the health care industry. Dave has spent more than 20 years as an arm chair researcher on media bias and its role in political influence.”
WND was unable to locate a single article with Van Zandt’s byline. Ironically, the “fact checker” fails to establish his own credibility by disclosing his qualifications and training in evaluating news sources.
Asked for information concerning his expertise in the field of journalism and evaluating news sources, Van Zandt told WND: “I am not a journalist and just a person who is interested in how media bias impacts politics. You will find zero claims of expertise on the website.”
Concerning his purported “25+ years” of experience writing for print and web media, he said: “I am not sure why the 25+ years is still on the website. That was removed a year ago when I first started the website. All of the writing I did was small print news zines from the ’90s. I felt that what I wrote in the ’90s is not related to what I am doing today so I removed it. Again, I am not a journalist. I simply have a background in communications and more importantly science where I learned to value evidence over all else. Through this I also became interested in research of all kinds, especially media bias, which is difficult to measure and is subjective to a degree.”
WND asked: Were your evaluations reviewed by any experts in the industry?
“I can’t say they have,” Van Zandt replied. “Though the right-of-center Atlantic Council is using our data for a project they are working on.”
MBFC-banner.jpg
Van Zandt says he uses “three volunteers” to “research and assist in fact checking.” However, he adds that he doesn’t pay them for their services.
Van Zandt lists WND on his “Right Bias” page , alongside news organizations such as Fox News, the Drudge Report, the Washington Free Beacon, the Daily Wire, the Blaze, Breitbart, Red State, Project Veritas, PJ Media, National Review, Daily Caller and others.
“These media sources are highly biased toward conservative causes,” Van Zandt writes. “They utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Sources in this category may be untrustworthy.”
His special notes concerning WND link to Snopes.com and PolitiFact.com, websites that have their own questionable reputations and formulas as so-called “fact checkers.” (See the “Snopes” and “PolitiFact” entries below.)
Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!
Van Zandt says he uses a “strict methodology” in determining which news sources are credible , but his website offers vague and typo-ridden explanations of his criteria, such as the following:
VanZandt-categories.jpg
Asked if his own political leanings influence his evaluations, Van Zandt said: “Sure it is possible. However, our methodology is designed to eliminate most of that. We also have a team of 4 researchers with different political leanings so that we can further reduce researcher bias.”
Bill Palmer of the website Daily News Bin accused Van Zandt of retaliating when the Daily News Bin contacted him about his rating. Palmer wrote :
“[I]t turns out Van Zandt has a vindictive streak. After one hapless social media user tried to use his phony ‘Media Bias Fact Check’ site to dispute a thoroughly sourced article from this site, Daily News Bin, we made the mistake of contacting Van Zandt and asking him to take down his ridiculous ‘rating’ – which consisted of nothing more than hearsay such as ‘has been accused of being satire.’ Really? When? By whom? None of those facts seem to matter to the guy running this ‘Media Bias Fact Check’ scam.
“But instead of acknowledging that he’d been caught in the act, Van Zandt retaliated against Daily News Bin by changing his rating to something more sinister. He also added a link to a similar phony security company called World of Trust, which generates its ratings by allowing random anonymous individuals to post whatever bizarre conspiracy theories they want, and then letting these loons vote on whether that news site is ‘real’ or not. These scam sites are now trying to use each other for cover, in order to back up the false and unsubstantiated ‘ratings’ they semi-randomly assign respected news outlets. …
“‘Media Bias Fact Check’ is truly just one guy making misleading claims about news outlets while failing to back them up with anything, while maliciously changing the ratings to punish any news outlets that try to expose the invalidity of what he’s doing.”
But Van Zandt accused Palmer of threatening him , and he said MediaBiasFactCheck welcomes criticism. If evidence is provided, he said, the site will correct its errors.
“Bottom line is, we are not trying to be something we are not,” he said. “We have disclaimers on every page of the website indicating that our method is not scientifically proven and that there is [sic] subjective judgments being used as it is unavoidable with determining bias.”[/quote]
I know!
Peg lives in oz and is made of straw!
Here's the dirt on your media bias boy...
number-2.jpg Media Bias Fact Check
MediaBIasFactCheck.com describes itself as “the most comprehensive media bias resource in the Internet.” The site is owned by Dave Van Zandt from North Carolina, who offers no biographical information about himself aside from the following: “Dave has been freelancing for 25+ years for a variety of print and web mediums (sic), with a focus on media bias and the role of media in politics. Dave is a registered Non-Affiliated voter who values evidence based reporting” and, “Dave Van Zandt obtained a Communications Degree before pursuing a higher degree in the sciences. Dave currently works full time in the health care industry. Dave has spent more than 20 years as an arm chair researcher on media bias and its role in political influence.”
WND was unable to locate a single article with Van Zandt’s byline. Ironically, the “fact checker” fails to establish his own credibility by disclosing his qualifications and training in evaluating news sources.
Asked for information concerning his expertise in the field of journalism and evaluating news sources, Van Zandt told WND: “I am not a journalist and just a person who is interested in how media bias impacts politics. You will find zero claims of expertise on the website.”
Concerning his purported “25+ years” of experience writing for print and web media, he said: “I am not sure why the 25+ years is still on the website. That was removed a year ago when I first started the website. All of the writing I did was small print news zines from the ’90s. I felt that what I wrote in the ’90s is not related to what I am doing today so I removed it. Again, I am not a journalist. I simply have a background in communications and more importantly science where I learned to value evidence over all else. Through this I also became interested in research of all kinds, especially media bias, which is difficult to measure and is subjective to a degree.”
WND asked: Were your evaluations reviewed by any experts in the industry?
“I can’t say they have,” Van Zandt replied. “Though the right-of-center Atlantic Council is using our data for a project they are working on.”
MBFC-banner.jpg
Van Zandt says he uses “three volunteers” to “research and assist in fact checking.” However, he adds that he doesn’t pay them for their services.
Van Zandt lists WND on his “Right Bias” page , alongside news organizations such as Fox News, the Drudge Report, the Washington Free Beacon, the Daily Wire, the Blaze, Breitbart, Red State, Project Veritas, PJ Media, National Review, Daily Caller and others.
“These media sources are highly biased toward conservative causes,” Van Zandt writes. “They utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Sources in this category may be untrustworthy.”
His special notes concerning WND link to Snopes.com and PolitiFact.com, websites that have their own questionable reputations and formulas as so-called “fact checkers.” (See the “Snopes” and “PolitiFact” entries below.)
Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!
Van Zandt says he uses a “strict methodology” in determining which news sources are credible , but his website offers vague and typo-ridden explanations of his criteria, such as the following:
VanZandt-categories.jpg
Asked if his own political leanings influence his evaluations, Van Zandt said: “Sure it is possible. However, our methodology is designed to eliminate most of that. We also have a team of 4 researchers with different political leanings so that we can further reduce researcher bias.”
Bill Palmer of the website Daily News Bin accused Van Zandt of retaliating when the Daily News Bin contacted him about his rating. Palmer wrote :
“[I]t turns out Van Zandt has a vindictive streak. After one hapless social media user tried to use his phony ‘Media Bias Fact Check’ site to dispute a thoroughly sourced article from this site, Daily News Bin, we made the mistake of contacting Van Zandt and asking him to take down his ridiculous ‘rating’ – which consisted of nothing more than hearsay such as ‘has been accused of being satire.’ Really? When? By whom? None of those facts seem to matter to the guy running this ‘Media Bias Fact Check’ scam.
“But instead of acknowledging that he’d been caught in the act, Van Zandt retaliated against Daily News Bin by changing his rating to something more sinister. He also added a link to a similar phony security company called World of Trust, which generates its ratings by allowing random anonymous individuals to post whatever bizarre conspiracy theories they want, and then letting these loons vote on whether that news site is ‘real’ or not. These scam sites are now trying to use each other for cover, in order to back up the false and unsubstantiated ‘ratings’ they semi-randomly assign respected news outlets. …
“‘Media Bias Fact Check’ is truly just one guy making misleading claims about news outlets while failing to back them up with anything, while maliciously changing the ratings to punish any news outlets that try to expose the invalidity of what he’s doing.”
But Van Zandt accused Palmer of threatening him , and he said MediaBiasFactCheck welcomes criticism. If evidence is provided, he said, the site will correct its errors.
“Bottom line is, we are not trying to be something we are not,” he said. “We have disclaimers on every page of the website indicating that our method is not scientifically proven and that there is [sic] subjective judgments being used as it is unavoidable with determining bias.”[/quote]
I know!
Peg lives in oz and is made of straw!
Oct 23, 2023 10:38:24 #
Phantom one wrote:
Damn, another one! Sure wish l could find the rock that all these idiots crawl out from under and bury it some place. Would someone please tell me one thing Trump did while President that hurt the country!
Nope.....plus we had a real FIRST LADY instead of a first bitch
A Tribute to First Lady Melania Trump
http://vernirwin.net/VIDEOS/A%20Tribute%20to%20First%20Lady%20Melania%20Trump%20202.mp4
Oct 23, 2023 10:41:08 #
Oct 23, 2023 10:43:51 #
Phantom one wrote:
Damn, another one! Sure wish l could find the rock that all these idiots crawl out from under and bury it some place. Would someone please tell me one thing Trump did while President that hurt the country!
Mean tweets dontcha know🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Oct 23, 2023 12:20:31 #
kemmer wrote:
in whose world is that happening?? By all rights MSNBC should have been cancelled out for lack of viewership years ago, and regarding Rachel Maddow, she still hasn’t admitted to the fact that Trump was innocent in the Russian Collusion case, she’s just another parasite that has a job not because she has talent!!Don’t know about executions, but wannabe Fuhrer Trump has promised to dismantle the DOJ, FBI, CIA, etc. in his reach for absolute power.
BTW, many are turning off the loons on Fox in favor of MSNBC including the Maddow program.
BTW, many are turning off the loons on Fox in favor of MSNBC including the Maddow program.
Oct 23, 2023 12:24:40 #
debeda wrote:
Mean tweets dontcha know🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Trump was so mean to those people who were trying to destroy him. A good republican is supposed to take their punishment from the lefties quietly and graciously. But that mean Trump didn't do it, and he still doesn't respect his executioners! What a horrible man!
Oct 23, 2023 12:25:52 #
GPJohn wrote:
in whose world is that happening?? By all rights MSNBC should have been cancelled out for lack of viewership years ago, and regarding Rachel Maddow, she still hasn’t admitted to the fact that Trump was innocent in the Russian Collusion case, she’s just another parasite that has a job not because she has talent!!
👍👍👍👍👍
Oct 23, 2023 12:27:10 #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Trump was so mean to those people who were trying to destroy him. A good republican is supposed to take their punishment from the lefties quietly and graciously. But that mean Trump didn't do it, and he still doesn't respect his executioners! What a horrible man!
YES, you're right. He did not know his place as a Republican. Bend over, boys🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Oct 23, 2023 12:50:26 #
GPJohn wrote:
in whose world is that happening?? By all rights MSNBC should have been cancelled out for lack of viewership years ago, and regarding Rachel Maddow, she still hasn’t admitted to the fact that Trump was innocent in the Russian Collusion case, she’s just another parasite that has a job not because she has talent!!
You got that right....liberal run stations don't require talent. Just be very homely and stupid and hate America. MadCow qualifies on all accounts.
Oct 23, 2023 13:44:51 #
Oct 23, 2023 14:01:42 #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
You got that right....liberal run stations don't require talent. Just be very homely and stupid and hate America. MadCow qualifies on all accounts.
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Oct 23, 2023 14:03:42 #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
You got that right....liberal run stations don't require talent. Just be very homely and stupid and hate America. MadCow qualifies on all accounts.
Oct 23, 2023 14:08:47 #
The DOJ , The CIA, FBI (not all of them) have become puppets and working for the democratic party and Biden. They have become. I remember when under Obama, they put them all together I knew there would be trouble and it proved to be right. They need to be reoriented into what they were supposed to be.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.