One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
President Trump and Other Conservatives Drop “Incredible” Mugshot Memes on Social Media Mocking and Blasting Democrats’ Attempts to Destroy
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Aug 26, 2023 20:50:43   #
Knightlady
 
albertk wrote:


Probably. The problem is they can't control Trump like they do Biden.

Reply
Aug 26, 2023 20:51:38   #
PZG1225 Loc: Florida
 
albertk wrote:


Of course they are. Not a surprise to anyone. 98.9 % of the Republican party is swampy deep state. Get rid of the three Mc's and we would be on the way to a good cleansing of our party. Right now it's rotten to the core.

Reply
Aug 26, 2023 21:18:17   #
Knightlady
 
EmilyD wrote:
She "grows" pot....this happens every now and then....



Reply
Aug 27, 2023 07:04:21   #
rk
 
https://familyprotection.org/trump-mugshot1692902257585

T shirts coming out the that evening after 45 visits the Kangaroos.

Reply
Aug 27, 2023 14:35:38   #
Tessie
 
You all are puppets of the ruling government. When you have no freedoms left it will be a different story. God is listening to every one of you all and I pray for you souls.

Reply
Aug 27, 2023 15:10:18   #
pegw
 
Trump's posed mug shot looks like a promo for his ads. I do see it as a win for Trump. However, it doesn't change the fact that there hasn't been any other president that was a career criminal.

Reply
Aug 27, 2023 15:41:35   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
BIRDMAN wrote:
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍


I love that meme

Reply
Check out topic: Saudi TV Mocks Biden (video)
Aug 27, 2023 16:49:38   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
pegw wrote:
Trump's posed mug shot looks like a promo for his ads. I do see it as a win for Trump. However, it doesn't change the fact that there hasn't been any other president that was a career criminal.


What was Trump convicted of making him a career criminal??

Reply
Aug 27, 2023 16:57:16   #
Puds Loc: So Centrl MN
 
albertk wrote:


Without a doubt!

Reply
Aug 27, 2023 17:13:34   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
pegw wrote:
Trump's posed mug shot looks like a promo for his ads. I do see it as a win for Trump. However, it doesn't change the fact that there hasn't been any other president that was a career criminal.


Yeah, until biden. He sure broke that mold. Crooked since before he ever won political office and getting worse now that he really has that presidential power going for himself.

Reply
Aug 27, 2023 17:15:51   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Ri-chard wrote:
What was Trump convicted of making him a career criminal??


Oh, I'm sure she meant biden. She can't be that stupid. Can she? Maybe I just answered my own question if you read my question backwards.

Reply
 
 
Aug 27, 2023 17:17:33   #
Drue-Marie
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Never Surrender


Except... Trump DID surrender.

Reply
Aug 27, 2023 17:37:05   #
Cornflakes Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
inmate number P01135809


I saw this file photo you have turned into a meme..Yea Hilary was laughing because Obama choked up laughing when she showed him her favorite dildo after Obama admitted he was gay-makes you wander if all democrats are so perverse 🤠

Reply
Aug 27, 2023 18:35:39   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Drue-Marie wrote:
Except... Trump DID surrender.
No, he didn't. He's as defiant as he has always been, even more so now, and that defiance extends to the growing number of Americans, including many democrats, who are awakening to what is really going on.

'The Great Realignment': Democrats Leave Party in Droves, and What It Could Mean for GOP in November

Troubling sign for Democrats: "Party switchers" trending strongly Republican, especially in suburbs

More than 1 million voters switch to GOP, raising alarm for Democrats

CNN: Trump leads in polls, money – and understanding the delegate race

CBS News poll finds Trump's big lead grows, as GOP voters dismiss indictments


By answering the indictments in court, Trump is playing their game, he is allowing the DOJ to reveal the extent of its corruption. And the damned fools aren't even aware of it.

Senators and reps in committee hearings are grilling AG Garland with case pertinent questions focused on partisan politics, weaponization of federal agencies, unconstitutional indictments, and illegal grand juror selections.
Garland's responses to these critical questions are nothing short of pathetic.

FYI: From 1965 to 1996, former presidents were entitled to lifetime Secret Service protection, for themselves, spouses, and children under 16. A 1994 statute, Pub. L. 103–329, limited post-presidential protection to ten years for presidents inaugurated after January 1, 1997. On January 10, 2013, President Barack Obama signed the Former Presidents Protection Act of 2012, reinstating lifetime Secret Service protection for all ex presidents.

Do you have any idea what the Secret Service would have to do if they put Trump in jail?


Jack Smith’s Corruption of the Justice System
An indictment filled with lies of commission and omission.

Trump’s Third Indictment Is Ludicrous
George Parry, a former federal and state prosecutor.

The case should be dismissed for failure to state an offense.

Under the brave new theory of criminal liability set forth in the election conspiracy indictment of former President Donald Trump, former Vice President Al Gore and the members, advisers, and lawyers of his 2000 presidential campaign belong in prison. The same goes for actor Martin Sheen and other Hollywood celebrities for their actions in the wake of the 2016 election.

Let me explain.

The indictment, filed Tuesday, charges three counts of conspiracy and one substantive count of obstruction related to an alleged effort to overturn the outcome of the 2020 election. The indictment avers that this effort was based on “dishonesty, fraud, and deceit” because Trump and his unindicted co-conspirators knew that their claims of election fraud were untrue.

The indictment magnanimously allows that Trump “had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won.”

But Trump supposedly violated the law by acting on those false claims. He and his co-conspirators allegedly became felons by urging state officials to search for voter fraud, proposing substitute electors in swing states, and attempting to persuade then–Vice President Mike Pence that he could legally refuse to count certain electoral votes when he presided over the Electoral College on Jan. 6.

Although the indictment acknowledges that none of these efforts were successful, it nevertheless avers that they constituted “three criminal conspiracies,” to wit:

A conspiracy to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified….

A conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the January 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified….

A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one’s vote counted.

To put it mildly, this indictment stretches the law of conspiracy to the breaking point and beyond. It effectively criminalizes constitutionally protected political discourse and election challenges.

While the indictment specifies Trump’s alleged deceptions, it fails to describe any actions that constitute criminal fraud. Under federal law, fraud is a scheme or plan to swindle victims — including the United States — out of money or tangible property. Trump’s alleged lies to change the outcome of the election may be many things, but they do not establish a legally cognizable criminal fraud.

As for the alleged conspiracy to “corruptly obstruct and impede” the Jan. 6 Electoral College vote count — where is the legally recognized criminal corruption? Trump and his lawyer co-conspirators considered, advocated, and acted on many controversial and highly questionable legal theories regarding the use of alternative slates of electors, but where is the law that says that acting on such theories is legally corrupt? And where does the criminalization of such behavior leave otherwise legally protected political speech and the right to challenge official actions?

And then there is the alleged conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one’s vote counted. This is based on the theory that Trump tried to nullify the votes of swing-state voters by advocating the use of alternative electors.

But that supposed civil-rights violation is based on 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241, a statute that traces its origins to the post–Civil War Reconstruction era when the Ku Klux Klan committed acts of force, terrorism, and violence to discourage blacks from voting. Indeed, one alternative provision in that statute outlaws two or more persons going “in disguise [read KKK masks and robes] on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent to hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any right” such as the right to vote.

In short, the application of this statute to Trump seems to be a stretch too far.

Finally, Trump is charged with one substantive count of obstructing the proceedings of the Electoral College on Jan. 6. This is despite the fact that he has not been charged with instigating the Capitol Hill riot that delayed the electoral vote count.

So where does this lead, and what does it portend? If this legal theory is allowed to stand, then a politically partisan prosecutor could criminally charge anyone mounting a future election challenge. All it would take would be for the prosecutor to allege that the challenge was undertaken in bad faith.

The danger to free speech and the chilling effect on the willingness of candidates to seek public office can’t be overstated. The damage to our already onerous politics and electioneering would be incalculable.


Consider, for example, the 2000 presidential election and the Supreme Court case of Bush v. Gore. Recall that the election’s outcome hinged on the narrow margin of victory in Florida. In that case, candidate Al Gore refused to concede the election and demanded a recount limited to heavily Democrat counties in Florida. It was anticipated that this would find additional votes for Gore.

From a legal, ethical, and commonsense standpoint, Gore’s proposal was utterly dishonest and unfair. He and his lawyers had to have known that what they were advocating was underhanded and fraudulent. Nevertheless, in and out of court, they kept fighting for this one-sided recount until the Supreme Court mandated a statewide recount in all counties that included Republican as well as Democrat strongholds.

So, under the theory of the Trump indictment, wouldn’t Gore and his team be criminally prosecuted?

Similarly, recall that in the wake of the 2016 election, actor Martin Sheen and other celebrities appeared in television ads urging electors from states carried by Trump not to vote for him in the Electoral College. Applying the Trump indictment’s legal standards, shouldn’t these celebrities be prosecuted for conspiring to deprive Trump’s supporters of the right to have their votes counted? (READ MORE: Did a Hunter Biden Lawyer Break the Law in a Really Bizarre Way?)

These are but two examples of where the expansive legal theory underlying the charges against Trump can take us.

Given the ludicrous and outrageous nature of the indictment, I expect that Trump’s legal team will promptly move to dismiss the charges for failure to state an offense. That will set in motion years of litigation and appeals. But, even if Trump ultimately prevails in having the charges dismissed, the political and financial damage will have been done.

For, in our system of criminal justice, the process is the punishment.



Reply
Aug 27, 2023 20:30:24   #
dwp66
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Nope head shots to your guys.


"Head shots to your guys"?

Are you effing serious?

Whether you are or not, don't be surprised if that kind of shit gets you reported to OPP admin.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.