One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Supreme Court hands 2024 election to Democrats!
Page <<first <prev 13 of 25 next> last>>
Jul 1, 2023 20:34:18   #
Kevyn
 
JoyV wrote:
So who doesn't have those alternatives? If you are referring to rape victims, those are almost always excluded from abortion restrictions. Especially in the first trimester. If someone gets pregnant by rape and doesn't want to carry the rapists child, I would think they would know so before the pregnancy is late term. But most states allow even late term abortions for rape victims.


This is no longer true in a dozen states.

Reply
Jul 1, 2023 21:27:23   #
kemmer
 
Parky60 wrote:
You believe in man's word... I have a higher authority.

So, were the Neanderthals a mistake or an experiment?

Reply
Jul 1, 2023 21:32:54   #
kemmer
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
Nowhere in the Bible does God, the Father, nor Jesus the Son, ordain marriage between 2 men or 2 women.

Where in the Bible does it say women are forbidden to head congregations? The Southern Baptists say women belong at home with the babies and making sure dinner is ready when hubby gets home.

Reply
Jul 1, 2023 22:37:09   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
kemmer wrote:
Where in the Bible does it say women are forbidden to head congregations? The Southern Baptists say women belong at home with the babies and making sure dinner is ready when hubby gets home.

God's plan... no queers...



Reply
Jul 2, 2023 00:56:12   #
JoyV
 
dwp66 wrote:
YOU: " If you are referring to rape victims, 𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒂𝒓𝒆 π’‚π’π’Žπ’π’”π’• π’‚π’π’˜π’‚π’šπ’” 𝒆𝒙𝒄𝒍𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒅 from abortion restrictions. Especially in the first trimester. If someone gets pregnant by rape and doesn't want to carry the rapists child, I would think they would know so before the pregnancy is late term. But most states allow even late term abortions for rape victims." (Really? Well, name a few "red" states that allow that today, if you can.) Many if not most of the States that do allow exceptions after 24 weeks are only for cases where the mother's life or baby's viability is in danger.

When I pointed out that a whole bunch of red states that have jumped on the anti-abortion bandwagon (eleven at last count) since Dobbs have 𝒛𝒆𝒓𝒐 exceptions for rape or incest, you said to "List the states." So I did - and your only comment was regarding Arizona.

And this: "...there was also no exceptions given for rape in Roe v Wade either." Sure, but you had 24 weeks! Not 12, not 15, not 6 (N. Dakota) And, up to that 24 weeks, nobody needed an "exception"! Right? 𝑻𝒉𝒂𝒕 π’˜π’‚π’” 𝒍𝒆𝒇𝒕 𝒖𝒑 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔, and most did have exceptions...then. Not so much today: "Exceptions generally fall into four general categories: to prevent the death of the pregnant person, to preserve the health of the pregnant person, when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, and where the embryo or fetus has lethal anomalies incompatible with life." IMO, your argument leaks like a sieve. Please explain how Roe was more restrictive than Arizona's law? Or how it's now better in, say, Oklahoma or Texas (or Arizona) now than prior to Dobbs?

https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/a-review-of-exceptions-in-state-abortions-bans-implications-for-the-provision-of-abortion-services/#:~:text=Exceptions%20to%20state%20abortion%20bans,lethal%20anomalies%20incompatible%20with%20life.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html
YOU: " If you are referring to rape victims, ... (show quote)


Better check your math. One trimester of a human pregnancy is 12 weeks.

You quoted me accurately. I was mistaken about the AZ exception for rape. But I believe no rape victim has been denied an abortion in AZ. Though not due to the letter of the law. I was not mistaken that the current AZ laws are more lenient than Roe v Wade.

But while one of my replies addressed the issue of rape victims, my main point overall was to address the false narrative that the loss of Roe v Wade meant women would no longer have the "rights" imparted by Roe. I responded to the claim that abortions are banned in most red states by referencing my own state, AZ and how it's abortion laws are more lenient than Roe v Wade.

I note that your info on abortion laws in different states are not links to the actual laws. The lists published by some left wing organizations or news media are rarely accurate. Even when the lists include the actual wording of the laws, often they are explained with a spin. Depending on the issue, the same can be said for many right wing sources. So instead of getting a third party take on the abortion laws of various states, why not look up the actual laws.

How was Roe v Wade decision more restrictive in AZ? I thought I already stated so. But I'll repeat the main points.

1. Under Roe a woman did not have the right to choose to get an abortion. Her doctor had the authority to choose for her.

2. The doctor did not have to show cause to be allowed to provide or prescribe an abortion. [This one is only more restrictive than the current AZ law because it is the doctor who doesn't need to show cause, i.e. "on demand ", rather than the pregnant woman. ]

3. Abortions were only allowed during the first trimester (first 12 weeks), unless the woman's health or life are at risk in the second trimester or her life in the third.

Where Roe and the current AZ law are equal are abortions could be protected after the first trimester in cases of the woman's health or life. But not in the case of rape.

The practice of abortions on demand during the entire pregnancy at the choice of the woman was not because Roe v Wade required it. Restrictions were gradually reduced after Roe v Wade until just before the overturn by SCOTUS, some places expanded abortions be legal through the perinatal period. (Perinatal period is 1 to 4 weeks after birth.) That abortion restrictions reduced over time does not mean that these reductions were in Roe v Wade.

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 00:57:22   #
JoyV
 
Kevyn wrote:
This is no longer true in a dozen states.


I said most. A dozen out of 50 is not most.

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 06:11:54   #
kemmer
 
Parky60 wrote:
God's plan... no queers...

Uh-huh. Then why are there untold millions of us, huh?
Sounds to me like part of the plan.

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 06:14:36   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
kemmer wrote:
Where in the Bible does it say women are forbidden to head congregations? The Southern Baptists say women belong at home with the babies and making sure dinner is ready when hubby gets home.


Women in office is a much different topic than the topic of this thread and the Biblical reasoning behind the answer cannot be compared to that of abortion. Your topic involves a matter of interpretation. Not too many sociologists would hold that society would not be better off today if we had adhered to the Biblical instructions on the family structure, whereas the stopping of life is pretty clear-cut to anyone with a functioning brain who is looking for the truth rather than a reason to justify his belief.

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 06:21:10   #
kemmer
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Women in office is a much different topic than the topic of this thread and the Biblical reasoning behind the answer cannot be compared to that of abortion. Your topic involves a matter of interpretation. Not too many sociologists would hold that society would not be better off today if we had adhered to the Biblical instructions on the family structure, whereas the stopping of life is pretty clear-cut to anyone with a functioning brain who is looking for the truth rather than a reason to justify his belief.
Women in office is a much different topic than the... (show quote)

Social structures were better in the 19th century, right? When everyone knew their place and stayed there.

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 06:26:17   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
kemmer wrote:
Social structures were better in the 19th century, right?


The family structure certainly was. The disappearance of the father from the family, for one, was definitely a prime factor in the proliferation of crime we are experiencing today. There are other factors as well.

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 07:03:30   #
Big Kahuna
 
kemmer wrote:
Where in the Bible does it say women are forbidden to head congregations? The Southern Baptists say women belong at home with the babies and making sure dinner is ready when hubby gets home.


Why change the subject?

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 07:04:32   #
kemmer
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
The family structure certainly was. The disappearance of the father from the family, for one, was definitely a prime factor in the proliferation of crime we are experiencing today. There are other factors as well.

You’re quite a simple soul, aren’t you.

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 07:07:51   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
kemmer wrote:
You’re quite a simple soul, aren’t you.


Does that mean that you disagree with my conclusion as to one result of family structure breakup?

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 07:24:50   #
DASHY
 
Parky60 wrote:
If that were the case it would have been mentioned. Like I said, you read into the text what you WANT to.


And you read into the text what you want to. That is what we all do. We are told that about 40% of man/woman marriages today end in divorce. What is the biblical penalty for ending a marriage?

Reply
Jul 2, 2023 07:49:12   #
DASHY
 
nonalien1 wrote:
The doctor is not only a witness , but also an accomplish. Most states consider killing a pregnant woman as two murders. So where's the difference?


Over 90% of abortions occur during the first trimester. Many women safely manage their own abortions with pills. So far, most abortion laws don't directly punish women for seeking or self-inducing abortions. A woman's privacy is protected in these cases. No peek...no murder.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 25 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: The Fifty Dollar Lesson
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.