One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What the aliens are saying
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 16, 2023 17:42:45   #
Mikeyavelli
 
My social security number is 000 00 0001

Reply
Feb 16, 2023 18:14:37   #
Nelson7
 
JFlorio wrote:
Can't imagine a "gatling gun" not taking out a balloon. Most inept administration in my lifetime. these guys make Jimmy Carter look like a genius.




You do not have to imagine. Just look up the august 1998 example of a pair of Canadian CF-18 fighters expending over 1000 rounds of 20mm cannon ammo against a large weather balloon over Newfoundland. Not enough mass in the balloon canopy to detonate the cannon ammo. A high altitude balloon canopy is not pressurized like a kid’s party balloon. So when you punch a bunch of relatively small holes in it the helium just slowly leaks out. It drifted another 700 miles before it finally came down. So that method is a proven bad idea.

Reply
Feb 16, 2023 18:16:53   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Nelson7 wrote:
You do not have to imagine. Just look up the august 1998 example of a pair of Canadian CF-18 fighters expending over 1000 rounds of 20mm cannon ammo against a large weather balloon over Newfoundland. Not enough mass in the balloon canopy to detonate the cannon ammo. A high altitude balloon canopy is not pressurized like a kid’s party balloon. So when you punch a bunch of relatively small holes in it the helium just slowly leaks out. It drifted another 700 miles before it finally came down. So that method is a proven bad idea.
You do not have to imagine. Just look up the augus... (show quote)

Hmmm, makes sense.

Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2023 18:17:41   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Good to know. Thanks.
Nelson7 wrote:
You do not have to imagine. Just look up the august 1998 example of a pair of Canadian CF-18 fighters expending over 1000 rounds of 20mm cannon ammo against a large weather balloon over Newfoundland. Not enough mass in the balloon canopy to detonate the cannon ammo. A high altitude balloon canopy is not pressurized like a kid’s party balloon. So when you punch a bunch of relatively small holes in it the helium just slowly leaks out. It drifted another 700 miles before it finally came down. So that method is a proven bad idea.
You do not have to imagine. Just look up the augus... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 16, 2023 18:41:57   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
The real proven bad idea was idiot Joes administration allowing the thing to cross the country.

Nelson7 wrote:
You do not have to imagine. Just look up the august 1998 example of a pair of Canadian CF-18 fighters expending over 1000 rounds of 20mm cannon ammo against a large weather balloon over Newfoundland. Not enough mass in the balloon canopy to detonate the cannon ammo. A high altitude balloon canopy is not pressurized like a kid’s party balloon. So when you punch a bunch of relatively small holes in it the helium just slowly leaks out. It drifted another 700 miles before it finally came down. So that method is a proven bad idea.
You do not have to imagine. Just look up the augus... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 16, 2023 18:42:45   #
Nelson7
 
AuntiE wrote:
One has to wonder why the guns on the jets were not utilized. Would they not have accomplished the same thing?




No, the pertinent example is the 1998 instance where a pair of Canadian CF-18 fighters expended over 1000 rounds of 20mm cannon ammo against a rogue high altitude balloon over Newfoundland. There is not enough mass in the balloon canopy to detonate the cannon shell so they just punched smaller than one inch holes in the balloon. The helium is not pressurized like a kid’s toy balloon so it just slooowly migrates out the holes. In this example it drifted over 700 miles more before it finally came down. Not good enough. It is good to learn from history.

Reply
Feb 16, 2023 18:56:57   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
https://theaviationgeekclub.com/heres-why-the-usaf-f-22-used-the-aim-9x-rather-than-the-gun-to-shoot-down-the-chinese-spy-balloon-and-why-the-sidewinder-dont-need-to-see-something-hot-in-order-to/amp/




Nelson7 wrote:
No, the pertinent example is the 1998 instance where a pair of Canadian CF-18 fighters expended over 1000 rounds of 20mm cannon ammo against a rogue high altitude balloon over Newfoundland. There is not enough mass in the balloon canopy to detonate the cannon shell so they just punched smaller than one inch holes in the balloon. The helium is not pressurized like a kid’s toy balloon so it just slooowly migrates out the holes. In this example it drifted over 700 miles more before it finally came down. Not good enough. It is good to learn from history.
No, the pertinent example is the 1998 instance whe... (show quote)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.