lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Well anything is possible, exaggerated or reality who the heck knows??

Good day to you, nice to see you again hope all is well in your world.💫✨

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

My gosh slatt, 42 pages I do believe everything that could be said probably has been said so I will only add this, the summation of everything everyone said in here stands in your first paragraph.


"When you're attacking FBI agents because you're under criminal investigation, you're losing."

Absolutely great to see you, I have missed you but been out living life loving every minute of it.🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️💫✨💥

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

Well, they must be doing something right! 😂😂😂😂😂😂


https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/these-are-the-top-rated-cable-news-shows-for-august-2022/513419/


News’ The Five marked yet another month at No. 1 in average total viewers, averaging 3.39 million total viewers in the 5 p.m. hour during the month of August 2022. That’s now eight out of the past nine months that the panel news-talk program has averaged more viewers than any other cable news show; a remarkable achievement for a non-primetime show. The Five also averaged the second-largest A25-54 audience on cable news (427,000), according to Nielsen live-plus-same-day data.

Tucker Carlson Tonight remains the second-most-watched show on cable news. In August, the 8 p.m. opinion news-talk show averaged 3.32 million viewers, up from its July average.

Hannity moved up to No. 3 in total primetime viewers, averaging 2.915 million total viewers during the month of August. The 7 p.m. Jesse Watters Primetime was the fourth-most-watched cable news show in August (2.86 million), with MSNBC’s now-weekly edition of The Rachel Maddow Show (2.73 million) rounding out the top five in average total viewers for August 2022.

All in all, Fox News Channel is home to the top four cable news shows in total viewers—and the top seven cable news shows among adults 25-54 for the month of August.

Fox News’ Gutfeld! is cable news’ eighth-most-watched show and No. 4 show among adults 25-54. It had its highest-rated month since April 2021 launch, averaging 2.19 million total viewers and 358,000 adults 25-54 at 11 p.m. ET.

Anderson Cooper 360 is CNN’s most-watched show in August (No. 25 overall), averaging 950,000 total viewers at 8 p.m.

MSNBC’s Alex Wagner Tonight launched in August at 9 p.m., airing Tuesdays-Fridays. It was the network’s fourth-most-watched show through two weeks, finishing behind TRMS, The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell and MSNBC Prime. The show has averaged 1.55 million total viewers at 9 p.m.

Here are the 10 most-watched cable news shows for Aug. 2022, as per live-plus-same-day data from Nielsen.

Fox News | 5 p.m. /The Five: 3,389,000 / 20 telecasts
Fox News | 8 p.m. / Tucker Carlson Tonight: 3,316,000 / 14 telecasts
Fox News | 9 p.m./ Hannity: 2,915,000 / 15 telecasts
Fox News | 7 p.m./Jesse Watters Primetime: 2,856,000 / 15 telecasts
MSNBC | 9 p.m./The Rachel Maddow Show: 2,726,000 / 4 telecasts
Fox News | 10 p.m./The Ingraham Angle: 2,484,000 / 15 telecasts
Fox News | 6 p.m. / Special Report with Bret Baier: 2,386,000 / 20 telecasts
Fox News | 11 p.m./Gutfeld! : 2,191,000 / 17 telecasts
Fox News | 12 p.m. / Outnumbered: 1,891,000 / 20 telecasts
Fox News | 11 a.m. / The Faulkner Focus: 1,714,000 / 20 telecasts
Below, the cable news show ranker that’s sorted by most to fewest average total viewers:
How about the top cable news shows among adults 25-54? After all, this is a demographic that advertisers of TV news traditionally focus their ad dollars on.

After Tucker Carlson Tonight and The Five, Hannity averaged the third-most adults 25-54, followed by Gutfeld! The Ingraham Angle, Jesse Watters Primetime, Special Report with Bret Baier, TRMS, Outnumbered and America’s Newsroom.

Fox News had the top seven shows on cable news among adults 25-54 this past month. The once-weekly The Rachel Maddow Show ranked No. 8 for the second consecutive month with a 292,000 A25-54 average.

Here are the top 10 cable news shows among adults 25-54 for August ’22, as per live-plus-same-day data from Nielsen:

Fox News| 8 p.m./ Tucker Carlson Tonight: 482,000 / 14 telecasts
Fox News | 5 p.m. / The Five: 427,000 / 20 telecasts
Fox News | 9 p.m. / Hannity: 397,000 / 15 telecasts
Fox News | 11 p.m./Gutfeld!: 358,000 / 17 telecasts
Fox News | 10 p.m./The Ingraham Angle: 358,000 / 15 telecasts
Fox News | 7 p.m. / Jesse Watters Primetime: 356,000 / 15 telecasts
Fox News | 6 p.m. / Special Report with Bret Baier: 306,000 / 20 telecasts
MSNBC | 9 p.m. / The Rachel Maddow Show: 292,000 / 4 telecasts
Fox News | 12 p.m./Outnumbered: 254,000 / 20 telecasts
Fox News | 9-10 a.m.,10-11 a.m./America’s Newsroom: 226,000 / 41 telecasts

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Yes it is--- They can't speak the truth and they have to back track their lies---

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

Oh my goodness, Hunter wasn’t playing with his “fingers” when he was in the pool! Is there such a thing as a “penis” print? How can you ignore all the evidence that has been revealed on that laptop?

Unfreakingbelievable! 🤯

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

This is just one of CNN’s problems with being a credible news source!

https://theintercept.com/2018/08/28/cnn-credibly-accused-of-lying-to-its-audience-about-a-key-claim-in-its-blockbuster-cohen-story-refuses-to-comment/

CNN’S BLOCKBUSTER July 26 story – that Michael Cohen intended to tell Special Counsel Robert Mueller that he was present when Donald Trump was told in advance about his son’s Trump Tower meeting with various Russians – includes a key statement about its sourcing that credible reporting now suggests was designed to have misled its audience. Yet CNN simply refuses to address the serious ethical and journalistic questions raised about its conduct.

The substance of the CNN story itself regarding Cohen – which made headline news all over all the world and which CNN hyped as a “bombshell” – has now been retracted by other news outlets that originally purported to “confirm” CNN’s story. That’s because the anonymous source for this confirmation, Cohen lawyer Lanny Davis, now admits that, in essence, his “confirmation” was false. As a result, both the Washington Post and the NY Post outed Davis as their anonymous source and then effectively retracted their stories “confirming” parts of CNN’s report.


CNN, however, has retracted nothing. All inquiries to the network are directed to a corporate spokesperson, who simply says: “We stand by our story, and are confident in our reporting of it.” A newsletter sent Sunday night from CNN’s two media reporters, Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy, contained the same corporate language, but addressed none of the questions raised about CNN’s report.

It’s certainly possible that CNN had other sources for this story besides Davis, who now repudiates it. It’s hard to see how CNN’s story could be true given that Davis, Cohen’s own lawyer, explicitly says that Cohen has no information that Trump had prior knowledge of the Trump Tower meeting, that Cohen cannot and will not tell Mueller that this happened, and that Davis’ prior claims about Cohen’s knowledge and intentions are false.

Axios reported that Cohen testified under oath to Congress that he has no knowledge that Trump had prior knowledge of the meeting and repeated this to leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee again after CNN’s report. Davis now says Cohen – rather than intending to tell Mueller he has such information – stands by his long-time claim that he has none. So the key people with knowledge on what CNN reported – Cohen and his own lawyer – insist that CNN’s reporting about what Cohen knows and intends to tell Mueller is false.

Nonetheless, it’s possible that other sources did tell CNN that Cohen does have this information and intends to share it with Mueller, and that Cohen’s own lawyer is either unaware of this or is lying about it. It’s not likely, obviously, but it’s theoretically possible. Unfortunately, CNN refuses to tell us anything about what it itself said was a “blockbuster” story, so it’s impossible to know.

But there’s an entirely separate, and more significant, question about CNN’s behavior here; namely, the very specific claim they made about their sourcing for that blockbuster story. Last night, BuzzFeed reported that Davis explicitly confessed that he was one of the anonymous sources for CNN’s July 26 story, just as he was for the stories from the Washington Post and the New York Post. Last week, CNN put Davis on the air with Anderson Cooper to deny that he was the source for that CNN story – a denial Cooper did not contest – but Davis now admits he was one of CNN’s sources, if not their main source.

Yet remarkably, CNN, in its July 26 story, specificaly claimed that Davis refused to talk to CNN about the story or provide any comment whatsoever:

Only one of two things can be true here, and either is extremely significant: (1) CNN deliberately lied to its audience about Davis refusing to comment on the story when, in fact, Davis was one of the anonymous sources on which the CNN report depended, and CNN claimed Davis refused to comment in order to hide Davis’ identity as one of their anonymous sources; or (2) Davis is lying now to BuzzFeed when he confessed to having been one of CNN’s sources for the story.

How can CNN possibly justify refusing to address these questions, and refrain from informing the public about these critical matters on a story that they themselves hyped for days as a “blockbuster,” one of the most significant stories yet in the Trump/Russia saga? Questions about this massive discrepancy from the Intercept to Stelter have not been answered, nor has CNN addressed this on air or with any other media outlets who have inquired. Darcy told the Intercept he was not aware of sourcing issues on the story and suggested inquiries be directed to CNN’s Public Relations department.

If CNN lied about Davis having refused comment (when, in fact, he was one of their anonymous sources), then this is obviously a major journalism scandal. If, by contrast, Davis – who has been treated by the U.S. media as a reliable source despite decades of lying (and who leveraged that treatment to raise more than $150,000 in a GoFundMe “Truth Fund” campaign for Cohen to pay Davis) – is lying about having spoken to CNN about the July 26 report, that is also a major story.

Yet CNN, the only ones with the ability to inform the public about what happened here, is silent. This despite the incomparable importance which CNN breathlessly told its viewers the story carried:

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

And this is another problem!

Reporting v. “Media Criticism”

Media outlets have invented a deceitful term to discredit and trivialize any reporting on their own wrongful conduct. Such reporting, they say, is nothing more than “media criticism,” in contrast to the “real reporting” they do. A New Yorker profile published yesterday that was designed to malign my own work on this story over the last two years – which has involved ample reporting on the conduct of media outlets in circulating false information – invoked this term of insult to dismiss such reporting as worthless.

This term is self-serving nonsense from media outlets, seeking to render their own behavior off-limits from journalistic scrutiny. Media outlets such as CNN and MSNBC are highly powerful corporate actors. Their behavior can generate immense consequences for society. When they engage in journalistically deceitful or unethical practices, or when they report consequential claims that end up being false as a result of their recklessness or bias, that produces highly harmful outcomes.

Examples of what does actually merit the diminishing term “media criticism” are columns expressing one’s opinions about the on-camera charisma of various TV hosts, or whether new website designs are aesthetic improvements. But documenting false claims from powerful corporate media outlets or describing their wrongful behavior helps the public understand what is and isn’t true regarding key political controversies: the very definition of “real reporting.” Such reporting is vital for dispelling propaganda and deceit. It is clarifying on the most vital issues.

Doing so is “real reporting” in every sense of the word. Media outlets aren’t special or immune. Reporting on their bad and deceitful acts is indistinguishable from reporting on the bad and deceitful acts of any other powerful actor in society.

The term “media criticism” – when juxtaposed with the term “real reporting” (by which mainstream journalists usually mean: “giving official sources anonymity, writing down what they say, and then uncritically repeating it to the public”) – is intended to discredit those who expose the bad and deceitful acts of media outlets and to imply that doing so is trivial or worthless. Nobody who reports on powerful corporate media outlets should be deterred by this transparently manipulative term.

The Media’s Chronic Misreporting on the Trump/Russia Story

The other self-serving tactic media outlets use in situations like this is to claim that their errors are just good faith and rare mistakes, and that those who report on their mistakes are exaggerating their significance. This claim was also prominently featured in the New Yorker’s critique of my work, and is reflexively applied to anyone who has critiqued the dominant media narrative on this story.

This tactic is also itself highly deceitful. The reality is that from the start of the Trump/Russia story, the U.S. media has repeatedly and frequently – not rarely and periodically – gotten major stories completely wrong, always in the same direction: exaggerating the threat posed by Russia to the U.S., and concocting evidence of Trump/Russia collusion even when such evidence did not exist.

Last December, I reported on what I call (and still believe) was the U.S. media’s “most humiliating debacle in ages”: a blatantly false and equally hyped CNN story claiming that an unknown person had emailed Donald Trump Jr. access to the WikiLeaks email archive before it was published: a story that MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian purported to “confirm.”

That story – predictably and by design – generated huge headlines around the world, and was given breathless coverage on cable news given its obvious significance. In fact, the email in question was sent after WikiLeaks had published that archive to the entire world, rendering the magic-bullet email utterly worthless, not a massive scoop proving collusion.

In that case, it seems that CNN and MSNBC’s sources somehow all got the date of the email wrong in exactly the same way by accident, though nobody knows how this could possibly have happened because then – as now – these media outlets refuse to come clean with the public about what they did. Then, as now, the same outlets that demand transparency from everyone else refuse to provide any themselves.

When reporting on that story, I detailed just some of the similarly significant and false stories major outlets have published on this story over the last eighteen months, notably always in the same direction, pushing the same narrative interests:

Russia hacked into the U.S. electric grid to deprive Americans of heat during winter (Wash Post)

An anonymous group (PropOrNot) documented how major U.S. political sites are Kremlin agents (Wash Post)

WikiLeaks has a long, documented relationship with Putin (Guardian)

A secret server between Trump and a Russian bank has been discovered (Slate)

RT hacked C-SPAN and caused disruption in its broadcast (Fortune)

Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app (Crowdstrike)

Russians attempted to hack elections systems in 21 states (multiple news outlets, echoing Homeland Security)

Links have been found between Trump ally Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation (CNN)

Whatever words one wishes to use to defend the U.S. media’s conduct here, “rare” and “isolated” are not among those that can be credibly invoked. Far more accurate are “chronic,” “systematic” and “reckless.”

And when it comes to discrediting journalism in the U.S., thousands of mean Donald Trump tweets about Chuck Todd and Wolf Blitzer can’t accomplish even a fraction of what this media behavior has done to themselves, particularly when their behavior is followed by secrecy and refusals to comment so brazen and unjustified that it would make even security state spokespeople blush with shame.

moldyoldy

In these days of photoshop and photo manipulation I would like to have some forensic verification.

moldyoldy

The knuckle draggers all have one news channel to watch. The rest of the world has choices.

moldyoldy

I was wondering where you have been. Glad to see you are ok.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

He hates Trump and it shows. He was not always like this.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

LJ, I would guess that those with whom you are "out living life, loving every minute of it" are also loving it.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

NY Post How would you take anything written or printed by the NY Times.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

Indeed

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

https://www.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/86dbd832-95aa-4eee-86e2-b71d518562ce