Milosia2 wrote:
Here’s my take
1. Money in politics
2. Citizens United influencing elections legally
3. The loss of the Fairness Doctrine - allowing channel Fsux Nouse to spew hatred daily
4. Reaganomics- supply side economics didn’t work for anyone but already rich people. we need to manufacture something.
5. The ignored Sherman Anti Trust Act
6. The cap on CEOs pay must be replaced.
7. Government is essential. To pay for infrastructure, to put money into the game that would not otherwise be there.
8. Indict trump .lock him up , and tell him to shut the Fock Up !
He isnt sane , he isn’t rational ☠️ He has one party …himself !!!
And no others.
A terrible choice for anything.
Here’s my take br 1. Money in politics br 2. Citi... (
show quote)
Do you really think we care what your take is??
Milosia2 wrote:
Why didn’t we get little explanation paragraphs like the rich guys did ?
These are only your opinions. Outside of that they mean nothing.
Truth and facts here , scare the crap out of youz.
Don't need no steeenking blurbs, yer all anti American kommiecrats.
Milosia2 wrote:
Here’s my take
1. Money in politics
2. Citizens United influencing elections legally
3. The loss of the Fairness Doctrine - allowing channel Fsux Nouse to spew hatred daily
4. Reaganomics- supply side economics didn’t work for anyone but already rich people. we need to manufacture something.
5. The ignored Sherman Anti Trust Act
6. The cap on CEOs pay must be replaced.
7. Government is essential. To pay for infrastructure, to put money into the game that would not otherwise be there.
8. Indict trump .lock him up , and tell him to shut the Fock Up !
He isnt sane , he isn’t rational ☠️ He has one party …himself !!!
And no others.
A terrible choice for anything.
Here’s my take br 1. Money in politics br 2. Citi... (
show quote)
Ten most dangerous PEOPLE . Your list is incoherent. Much like yourself. Citizens United is a George Soros funded group so you got one we agree on. It's not a person but I agree on CEO caps. Not talking about hats now. Reaganomics or as Bush called it voodoo economics is just a different way of looking at spending money. Give it to someone high enough up the totem pole and everyone below benefits. This has been proven to work but I liked the idea of instead of bailing out the banks, give the money to the people and within two months the banks would have it anyway but the people would have paid off debts and bought house and cars and everyone would be a lot happier
Milosia2 wrote:
Here’s my take
1. Money in politics
2. Citizens United influencing elections legally
3. The loss of the Fairness Doctrine - allowing channel Fsux Nouse to spew hatred daily
4. Reaganomics- supply side economics didn’t work for anyone but already rich people. we need to manufacture something.
5. The ignored Sherman Anti Trust Act
6. The cap on CEOs pay must be replaced.
7. Government is essential. To pay for infrastructure, to put money into the game that would not otherwise be there.
8. Indict trump .lock him up , and tell him to shut the Fock Up !
He isnt sane , he isn’t rational ☠️ He has one party …himself !!!
And no others.
A terrible choice for anything.
Here’s my take br 1. Money in politics br 2. Citi... (
show quote)
Everyone of these the result of big government.
Milosia2 wrote:
You didn’t have a point to make.
you're just not smart enough to see it.
nonalien1 wrote:
Ten most dangerous PEOPLE . Your list is incoherent. Much like yourself. Citizens United is a George Soros funded group so you got one we agree on. It's not a person but I agree on CEO caps. Not talking about hats now. Reaganomics or as Bush called it voodoo economics is just a different way of looking at spending money. Give it to someone high enough up the totem pole and everyone below benefits. This has been proven to work but I liked the idea of instead of bailing out the banks, give the money to the people and within two months the banks would have it anyway but the people would have paid off debts and bought house and cars and everyone would be a lot happier
Ten most dangerous PEOPLE . Your list is incohere... (
show quote)
Nope.
CU was written by ALEC - Koch family oriented.
*** Give it to someone high enough up the totem pole and everyone below benefits. This has been proven to work but I liked the idea of instead of bailing out the banks, ***
You can’t be serious.
How has that worked out for everyone below ?
You’ve lost all the wealth that was accumulated by the middleclass working and saving .
Taken by the rich as though it was their own. So , that didn’t work.
Since 1980 zero has been spent on infrastructure. The money has gone straight up the chute. None of it has trickled down the way Reagan promised it would.
The wealth this country had at one time is gone . Are you aware of this?
Because you sound oblivious to what is happening around you.
Milosia2 wrote:
Nope.
CU was written by ALEC - Koch family oriented.
*** Give it to someone high enough up the totem pole and everyone below benefits. This has been proven to work but I liked the idea of instead of bailing out the banks, ***
You can’t be serious.
How has that worked out for everyone below ?
You’ve lost all the wealth that was accumulated by the middleclass working and saving .
Taken by the rich as though it was their own. So , that didn’t work.
Since 1980 zero has been spent on infrastructure. The money has gone straight up the chute. None of it has trickled down the way Reagan promised it would.
The wealth this country had at one time is gone . Are you aware of this?
Because you sound oblivious to what is happening around you.
Nope. br CU was written by ALEC - Koch family orie... (
show quote)
You appear reasonably bright until you open your mouth of dimwittedness.
Wealth is not static. What goes in here doesn't come out there. You lost wealth because of Biden's policies that brought about recession and stagflation, ala Jimmy Carter. The rich didn't become wealthier by taking from the middle class. The entire economy grew during Reagan. The wealth that is gone from this country is the result of all the money spent on programs that don't work, sending money to other countries where it is robbed by dictators, leaving military hardware and infrastructure in countries such as Afghanistan, spending more money on Ukraine, and sending money to OPEC when we could be producing energy ourselves, etc, etc, etc.
It's not the federal government's job to spend on infrastructure. That falls under the prerogative and purview of states and localities. Big government is less efficient and costs more.
As long as democrats want to give away the family farm and people want the government to bail them out you will continue to lose your freedom and wealth.
However, since you are an ideologue, you'll never see or understand this.
Milosia2 wrote:
You didn’t have a point to make.
Repeating falsehoods never makes them true. You do that a lot.
dtucker300 wrote:
10 MOST DANGEROUS PEOPLE ON OPP (In no particular order):
1) Milosia
2) Kevyn
3) Air Force 1
4) Rascal Riley
5) Peter S
6) Pegw
7) Woodguru
8) Bad Bob
9) Saltwind
10) Moldy Oldy
Honorable mentions:
Haski 123
Geo
...and too many others to mention.
Though they are not as active as they were in the past, I want to put in a good word for Rumitoid and Permafrost. They are the veterans of the Left on OPP.
dtucker300 wrote:
You appear reasonably bright until you open your mouth of dimwittedness.
Wealth is not static. What goes in here doesn't come out there. You lost wealth because of Biden's policies that brought about recession and stagflation, ala Jimmy Carter. The rich didn't become wealthier by taking from the middle class. The entire economy grew during Reagan. The wealth that is gone from this country is the result of all the money spent on programs that don't work, sending money to other countries where it is robbed by dictators, leaving military hardware and infrastructure in countries such as Afghanistan, spending more money on Ukraine, and sending money to OPEC when we could be producing energy ourselves, etc, etc, etc.
It's not the federal government's job to spend on infrastructure. That falls under the prerogative and purview of states and localities. Big government is less efficient and costs more.
As long as democrats want to give away the family farm and people want the government to bail them out you will continue to lose your freedom and wealth.
However, since you are an ideologue, you'll never see or understand this.
You appear reasonably bright until you open your m... (
show quote)
Big Government is Fascism.
"See that guy behind the tree? He has a lot of money. Vote for me and I will take his money and give it to you."
That's the kommiecrat platform.
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Kemmer too.
You are so right. I'm getting senile. I should have thought of him.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.