Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming.
The continuing propaganda of the media about the so-called “global warming” attributed to the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, as a product of human actions, is of concern and it is intimidating for those people who lack the most elementary knowledge of science. It is said that thousands of scientists ensure it is real; but it is not said that another equal or greater number of scientists say it is a hoax.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a very important molecule for life on the planet itself. If CO2 is so bad, why many farmers who have greenhouses buy CO2 generators and thereby double the growth of plants. Even in aquariums they use these generators so that the marine flora grows correctly. There cannot be a world in which CO2 is eliminated because there would be no life, the vegetable kingdom would die without this molecule. Scientists who claim that the "climate change" attributed to CO2 is a hoax, say that a considerable reduction of that molecule can generate major problems for the planet and for the climate, which dissipates the idea that warming by CO2 is harmful to the atmosphere; and it can be said that the catastrophism that is imputed to this molecule, serves the organisms that live from the chimera of global warming, by means of subsidies and fines that are imposed on those who break the regulations.
Taking Spain as an example, for having signed the Kyoto treaty it had to pay between 2008 and 2012 more than 800 million euros to the various agencies, for having breached the aforementioned treaty. Car companies and airlines that fail to comply with CO2 emission regulations must pay millionaire fines. Here it is clear that everything comes down to raising money and that the objective is economic. There is a relationship of more than 30,000 scientists who oppose what Al Gore says, that politician and show man, who was the one who spread the idea of “global warming”, and was given a Nobel Peace Prize (as well as the that given to Obama, without any merit, just because of the color of his skin), having known later that much of what is stated in his documentary is not true, since the figures and data were falsified to give credibility to the forgery assembled (equal to Obama’s case and the war in Libya and the Middle East).
Antarctica does not melt, NASA says the opposite; and the number of polar bears has not decreased, as specialists and biologists in Canada have detected an increase in these bears. Al Gore is a faker, who presents himself as a champion of nature, a savior of the planet, when this millionaire contaminates it greatly, with the zinc companies he owns. He proposes that the rest of humanity do the opposite of what he does.
Now, "environmental pollution" is something different: and this is what must be fought. Fukushima radiation is worrisome, because it continues to pollute the environment and they don't know how to stop it. This nuclear plant continues to pour 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day, having totally contaminated this ocean and will continue to do so indefinitely since the source of the leak cannot be sealed, because it is inaccessible to both humans and robots, due to extremely high temperatures. This could be the worst environmental disaster in the history of mankind and is hardly mentioned by politicians, conventional scientists, or the news.
There is the authentic "environmental pollution" in China, which is the first producer of items in the world (considering that almost everything that is acquired in the West comes from that country) not in Europe or in the USA, where that pollution is a thing of the past.
"Environmental pollution" is what must be fought and not the CO2 that is the basis of our biology; of course, this is not considered in the Kyoto treaty, which responds to a mafia that seeks economic performance by skillfully taking advantage of directing social claims for camouflaged lobbies as an NGO so that they can openly justify these enormous economic sanctions. Here it has to be kept track of money and see who are the ones who get the most benefit from all this deception.
As we have already said, CO2 is fundamental for life, in times like the Jurassic era the planet was a vergel of life and the carbon dioxide rates were immense, much larger than the current ones and nature was constantly growing.
In order to explain better what CO2 represents in the atmosphere, it is necessary to analyze its composition considering 100% of the atmosphere as 1,000,000 parts. With this method, Wikipedia using NASA data says that: 780,840 perts would be Nitrogen, 209,460 Oxygen, 9,340 Argon, which added would give us 999,640 (99.964%), leaving 360 parts (0.036%) that are Trace of Gases, where CO2 is a part with other gases.
Of the 360 parts corresponding to trace gases: 95% (342 parts) are Water Vapor, 3% (11 parts) are CO2, 1% (4 parts) are Neon and 1% (3 parts) are other gases (Helium, Methane, Krypton, Hydrogen, Nitrous Oxide, Zenon, Carbon Monoxide, Ammonia and Ozone) that are practically negligible.
However, Wikipedia, that publishes what suits the Ministry of Truth, says that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04% and if this % were of what the Trace of Gases represent, it would be acceptable, since it would be between 14 or 15 parts in one million; but Wikipedia says that would be equivalent to 400 parts instead of 11, what seems to be a way to inflate the CO2 problem and because of that, it has to be given credit to the argument of skeptical scientists who says as follow: “The oceans contain 37.4 billion tons (37,400 GT) of carbon in suspension, the terrestrial biomass has 2,000-3,000 GT. The atmosphere contains 720,000 million tons of CO2 and the human being contributes only 6 GT. The oceans, land, and atmosphere continually exchange CO2, so the additional burden on humans is incredibly small. A small change in the balance between oceans and air would cause an increase much stronger than anything we could produce."
Thus, it will be possible to calculate how much CO2 is falsely attributed to human activity in the composition of the atmosphere and how many billions of dollars are collected through this deception.
After explaining all of the above, it is necessary to analyze the intimidation that we are being subjected daily through the media and how this intimidation is used to advance certain political ideas such as the New Green Deal, which will create a disastrous situation, tending to force the implementation of Socialism.
It can be said, that the story of the possible end of the world (that has been used so many times to intimidate humanity) is being told now by the leftists in a new way, using a new deception, speaking about “climate change”, because “global warming” has been discredited
It is to be thought that behind this farce of “climate change” that was originated by the communist as “global warming”, popularized by Al Gore, is Mr. Soros; and that it is very possible that the NGOs he promote, benefit in some way from the proceeds of fines for violations of the Kyoto treaty, that amount to billions.
Alber wrote:
The continuing propaganda of the media about the so-called “global warming” attributed to the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, as a product of human actions, is of concern and it is intimidating for those people who lack the most elementary knowledge of science. It is said that thousands of scientists ensure it is real; but it is not said that another equal or greater number of scientists say it is a hoax.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a very important molecule for life on the planet itself. If CO2 is so bad, why many farmers who have greenhouses buy CO2 generators and thereby double the growth of plants. Even in aquariums they use these generators so that the marine flora grows correctly. There cannot be a world in which CO2 is eliminated because there would be no life, the vegetable kingdom would die without this molecule. Scientists who claim that the "climate change" attributed to CO2 is a hoax, say that a considerable reduction of that molecule can generate major problems for the planet and for the climate, which dissipates the idea that warming by CO2 is harmful to the atmosphere; and it can be said that the catastrophism that is imputed to this molecule, serves the organisms that live from the chimera of global warming, by means of subsidies and fines that are imposed on those who break the regulations.
Taking Spain as an example, for having signed the Kyoto treaty it had to pay between 2008 and 2012 more than 800 million euros to the various agencies, for having breached the aforementioned treaty. Car companies and airlines that fail to comply with CO2 emission regulations must pay millionaire fines. Here it is clear that everything comes down to raising money and that the objective is economic. There is a relationship of more than 30,000 scientists who oppose what Al Gore says, that politician and show man, who was the one who spread the idea of “global warming”, and was given a Nobel Peace Prize (as well as the that given to Obama, without any merit, just because of the color of his skin), having known later that much of what is stated in his documentary is not true, since the figures and data were falsified to give credibility to the forgery assembled (equal to Obama’s case and the war in Libya and the Middle East).
Antarctica does not melt, NASA says the opposite; and the number of polar bears has not decreased, as specialists and biologists in Canada have detected an increase in these bears. Al Gore is a faker, who presents himself as a champion of nature, a savior of the planet, when this millionaire contaminates it greatly, with the zinc companies he owns. He proposes that the rest of humanity do the opposite of what he does.
Now, "environmental pollution" is something different: and this is what must be fought. Fukushima radiation is worrisome, because it continues to pollute the environment and they don't know how to stop it. This nuclear plant continues to pour 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day, having totally contaminated this ocean and will continue to do so indefinitely since the source of the leak cannot be sealed, because it is inaccessible to both humans and robots, due to extremely high temperatures. This could be the worst environmental disaster in the history of mankind and is hardly mentioned by politicians, conventional scientists, or the news.
There is the authentic "environmental pollution" in China, which is the first producer of items in the world (considering that almost everything that is acquired in the West comes from that country) not in Europe or in the USA, where that pollution is a thing of the past.
"Environmental pollution" is what must be fought and not the CO2 that is the basis of our biology; of course, this is not considered in the Kyoto treaty, which responds to a mafia that seeks economic performance by skillfully taking advantage of directing social claims for camouflaged lobbies as an NGO so that they can openly justify these enormous economic sanctions. Here it has to be kept track of money and see who are the ones who get the most benefit from all this deception.
As we have already said, CO2 is fundamental for life, in times like the Jurassic era the planet was a vergel of life and the carbon dioxide rates were immense, much larger than the current ones and nature was constantly growing.
In order to explain better what CO2 represents in the atmosphere, it is necessary to analyze its composition considering 100% of the atmosphere as 1,000,000 parts. With this method, Wikipedia using NASA data says that: 780,840 perts would be Nitrogen, 209,460 Oxygen, 9,340 Argon, which added would give us 999,640 (99.964%), leaving 360 parts (0.036%) that are Trace of Gases, where CO2 is a part with other gases.
Of the 360 parts corresponding to trace gases: 95% (342 parts) are Water Vapor, 3% (11 parts) are CO2, 1% (4 parts) are Neon and 1% (3 parts) are other gases (Helium, Methane, Krypton, Hydrogen, Nitrous Oxide, Zenon, Carbon Monoxide, Ammonia and Ozone) that are practically negligible.
However, Wikipedia, that publishes what suits the Ministry of Truth, says that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04% and if this % were of what the Trace of Gases represent, it would be acceptable, since it would be between 14 or 15 parts in one million; but Wikipedia says that would be equivalent to 400 parts instead of 11, what seems to be a way to inflate the CO2 problem and because of that, it has to be given credit to the argument of skeptical scientists who says as follow: “The oceans contain 37.4 billion tons (37,400 GT) of carbon in suspension, the terrestrial biomass has 2,000-3,000 GT. The atmosphere contains 720,000 million tons of CO2 and the human being contributes only 6 GT. The oceans, land, and atmosphere continually exchange CO2, so the additional burden on humans is incredibly small. A small change in the balance between oceans and air would cause an increase much stronger than anything we could produce."
Thus, it will be possible to calculate how much CO2 is falsely attributed to human activity in the composition of the atmosphere and how many billions of dollars are collected through this deception.
After explaining all of the above, it is necessary to analyze the intimidation that we are being subjected daily through the media and how this intimidation is used to advance certain political ideas such as the New Green Deal, which will create a disastrous situation, tending to force the implementation of Socialism.
It can be said, that the story of the possible end of the world (that has been used so many times to intimidate humanity) is being told now by the leftists in a new way, using a new deception, speaking about “climate change”, because “global warming” has been discredited
It is to be thought that behind this farce of “climate change” that was originated by the communist as “global warming”, popularized by Al Gore, is Mr. Soros; and that it is very possible that the NGOs he promote, benefit in some way from the proceeds of fines for violations of the Kyoto treaty, that amount to billions.
The continuing propaganda of the media about the s... (
show quote)
There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GX1e_uU5u3A
Alber wrote:
The continuing propaganda of the media about the so-called “global warming” attributed to the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, as a product of human actions, is of concern and it is intimidating for those people who lack the most elementary knowledge of science. It is said that thousands of scientists ensure it is real; but it is not said that another equal or greater number of scientists say it is a hoax.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a very important molecule for life on the planet itself. If CO2 is so bad, why many farmers who have greenhouses buy CO2 generators and thereby double the growth of plants. Even in aquariums they use these generators so that the marine flora grows correctly. There cannot be a world in which CO2 is eliminated because there would be no life, the vegetable kingdom would die without this molecule. Scientists who claim that the "climate change" attributed to CO2 is a hoax, say that a considerable reduction of that molecule can generate major problems for the planet and for the climate, which dissipates the idea that warming by CO2 is harmful to the atmosphere; and it can be said that the catastrophism that is imputed to this molecule, serves the organisms that live from the chimera of global warming, by means of subsidies and fines that are imposed on those who break the regulations.
Taking Spain as an example, for having signed the Kyoto treaty it had to pay between 2008 and 2012 more than 800 million euros to the various agencies, for having breached the aforementioned treaty. Car companies and airlines that fail to comply with CO2 emission regulations must pay millionaire fines. Here it is clear that everything comes down to raising money and that the objective is economic. There is a relationship of more than 30,000 scientists who oppose what Al Gore says, that politician and show man, who was the one who spread the idea of “global warming”, and was given a Nobel Peace Prize (as well as the that given to Obama, without any merit, just because of the color of his skin), having known later that much of what is stated in his documentary is not true, since the figures and data were falsified to give credibility to the forgery assembled (equal to Obama’s case and the war in Libya and the Middle East).
Antarctica does not melt, NASA says the opposite; and the number of polar bears has not decreased, as specialists and biologists in Canada have detected an increase in these bears. Al Gore is a faker, who presents himself as a champion of nature, a savior of the planet, when this millionaire contaminates it greatly, with the zinc companies he owns. He proposes that the rest of humanity do the opposite of what he does.
Now, "environmental pollution" is something different: and this is what must be fought. Fukushima radiation is worrisome, because it continues to pollute the environment and they don't know how to stop it. This nuclear plant continues to pour 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day, having totally contaminated this ocean and will continue to do so indefinitely since the source of the leak cannot be sealed, because it is inaccessible to both humans and robots, due to extremely high temperatures. This could be the worst environmental disaster in the history of mankind and is hardly mentioned by politicians, conventional scientists, or the news.
There is the authentic "environmental pollution" in China, which is the first producer of items in the world (considering that almost everything that is acquired in the West comes from that country) not in Europe or in the USA, where that pollution is a thing of the past.
"Environmental pollution" is what must be fought and not the CO2 that is the basis of our biology; of course, this is not considered in the Kyoto treaty, which responds to a mafia that seeks economic performance by skillfully taking advantage of directing social claims for camouflaged lobbies as an NGO so that they can openly justify these enormous economic sanctions. Here it has to be kept track of money and see who are the ones who get the most benefit from all this deception.
As we have already said, CO2 is fundamental for life, in times like the Jurassic era the planet was a vergel of life and the carbon dioxide rates were immense, much larger than the current ones and nature was constantly growing.
In order to explain better what CO2 represents in the atmosphere, it is necessary to analyze its composition considering 100% of the atmosphere as 1,000,000 parts. With this method, Wikipedia using NASA data says that: 780,840 perts would be Nitrogen, 209,460 Oxygen, 9,340 Argon, which added would give us 999,640 (99.964%), leaving 360 parts (0.036%) that are Trace of Gases, where CO2 is a part with other gases.
Of the 360 parts corresponding to trace gases: 95% (342 parts) are Water Vapor, 3% (11 parts) are CO2, 1% (4 parts) are Neon and 1% (3 parts) are other gases (Helium, Methane, Krypton, Hydrogen, Nitrous Oxide, Zenon, Carbon Monoxide, Ammonia and Ozone) that are practically negligible.
However, Wikipedia, that publishes what suits the Ministry of Truth, says that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04% and if this % were of what the Trace of Gases represent, it would be acceptable, since it would be between 14 or 15 parts in one million; but Wikipedia says that would be equivalent to 400 parts instead of 11, what seems to be a way to inflate the CO2 problem and because of that, it has to be given credit to the argument of skeptical scientists who says as follow: “The oceans contain 37.4 billion tons (37,400 GT) of carbon in suspension, the terrestrial biomass has 2,000-3,000 GT. The atmosphere contains 720,000 million tons of CO2 and the human being contributes only 6 GT. The oceans, land, and atmosphere continually exchange CO2, so the additional burden on humans is incredibly small. A small change in the balance between oceans and air would cause an increase much stronger than anything we could produce."
Thus, it will be possible to calculate how much CO2 is falsely attributed to human activity in the composition of the atmosphere and how many billions of dollars are collected through this deception.
After explaining all of the above, it is necessary to analyze the intimidation that we are being subjected daily through the media and how this intimidation is used to advance certain political ideas such as the New Green Deal, which will create a disastrous situation, tending to force the implementation of Socialism.
It can be said, that the story of the possible end of the world (that has been used so many times to intimidate humanity) is being told now by the leftists in a new way, using a new deception, speaking about “climate change”, because “global warming” has been discredited
It is to be thought that behind this farce of “climate change” that was originated by the communist as “global warming”, popularized by Al Gore, is Mr. Soros; and that it is very possible that the NGOs he promote, benefit in some way from the proceeds of fines for violations of the Kyoto treaty, that amount to billions.
The continuing propaganda of the media about the s... (
show quote)
Yea!!!! Good stuff keep writing you are not alone. The fake hamburgers are terrible you have to really spice them up big time or I call them snot burgers.
Wake up people wake up. Do your homework.
Alber wrote:
The continuing propaganda of the media about the so-called “global warming” attributed to the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, as a product of human actions, is of concern and it is intimidating for those people who lack the most elementary knowledge of science. It is said that thousands of scientists ensure it is real; but it is not said that another equal or greater number of scientists say it is a hoax.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a very important molecule for life on the planet itself. If CO2 is so bad, why many farmers who have greenhouses buy CO2 generators and thereby double the growth of plants. Even in aquariums they use these generators so that the marine flora grows correctly. There cannot be a world in which CO2 is eliminated because there would be no life, the vegetable kingdom would die without this molecule. Scientists who claim that the "climate change" attributed to CO2 is a hoax, say that a considerable reduction of that molecule can generate major problems for the planet and for the climate, which dissipates the idea that warming by CO2 is harmful to the atmosphere; and it can be said that the catastrophism that is imputed to this molecule, serves the organisms that live from the chimera of global warming, by means of subsidies and fines that are imposed on those who break the regulations.
Taking Spain as an example, for having signed the Kyoto treaty it had to pay between 2008 and 2012 more than 800 million euros to the various agencies, for having breached the aforementioned treaty. Car companies and airlines that fail to comply with CO2 emission regulations must pay millionaire fines. Here it is clear that everything comes down to raising money and that the objective is economic. There is a relationship of more than 30,000 scientists who oppose what Al Gore says, that politician and show man, who was the one who spread the idea of “global warming”, and was given a Nobel Peace Prize (as well as the that given to Obama, without any merit, just because of the color of his skin), having known later that much of what is stated in his documentary is not true, since the figures and data were falsified to give credibility to the forgery assembled (equal to Obama’s case and the war in Libya and the Middle East).
Antarctica does not melt, NASA says the opposite; and the number of polar bears has not decreased, as specialists and biologists in Canada have detected an increase in these bears. Al Gore is a faker, who presents himself as a champion of nature, a savior of the planet, when this millionaire contaminates it greatly, with the zinc companies he owns. He proposes that the rest of humanity do the opposite of what he does.
Now, "environmental pollution" is something different: and this is what must be fought. Fukushima radiation is worrisome, because it continues to pollute the environment and they don't know how to stop it. This nuclear plant continues to pour 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day, having totally contaminated this ocean and will continue to do so indefinitely since the source of the leak cannot be sealed, because it is inaccessible to both humans and robots, due to extremely high temperatures. This could be the worst environmental disaster in the history of mankind and is hardly mentioned by politicians, conventional scientists, or the news.
There is the authentic "environmental pollution" in China, which is the first producer of items in the world (considering that almost everything that is acquired in the West comes from that country) not in Europe or in the USA, where that pollution is a thing of the past.
"Environmental pollution" is what must be fought and not the CO2 that is the basis of our biology; of course, this is not considered in the Kyoto treaty, which responds to a mafia that seeks economic performance by skillfully taking advantage of directing social claims for camouflaged lobbies as an NGO so that they can openly justify these enormous economic sanctions. Here it has to be kept track of money and see who are the ones who get the most benefit from all this deception.
As we have already said, CO2 is fundamental for life, in times like the Jurassic era the planet was a vergel of life and the carbon dioxide rates were immense, much larger than the current ones and nature was constantly growing.
In order to explain better what CO2 represents in the atmosphere, it is necessary to analyze its composition considering 100% of the atmosphere as 1,000,000 parts. With this method, Wikipedia using NASA data says that: 780,840 perts would be Nitrogen, 209,460 Oxygen, 9,340 Argon, which added would give us 999,640 (99.964%), leaving 360 parts (0.036%) that are Trace of Gases, where CO2 is a part with other gases.
Of the 360 parts corresponding to trace gases: 95% (342 parts) are Water Vapor, 3% (11 parts) are CO2, 1% (4 parts) are Neon and 1% (3 parts) are other gases (Helium, Methane, Krypton, Hydrogen, Nitrous Oxide, Zenon, Carbon Monoxide, Ammonia and Ozone) that are practically negligible.
However, Wikipedia, that publishes what suits the Ministry of Truth, says that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04% and if this % were of what the Trace of Gases represent, it would be acceptable, since it would be between 14 or 15 parts in one million; but Wikipedia says that would be equivalent to 400 parts instead of 11, what seems to be a way to inflate the CO2 problem and because of that, it has to be given credit to the argument of skeptical scientists who says as follow: “The oceans contain 37.4 billion tons (37,400 GT) of carbon in suspension, the terrestrial biomass has 2,000-3,000 GT. The atmosphere contains 720,000 million tons of CO2 and the human being contributes only 6 GT. The oceans, land, and atmosphere continually exchange CO2, so the additional burden on humans is incredibly small. A small change in the balance between oceans and air would cause an increase much stronger than anything we could produce."
Thus, it will be possible to calculate how much CO2 is falsely attributed to human activity in the composition of the atmosphere and how many billions of dollars are collected through this deception.
After explaining all of the above, it is necessary to analyze the intimidation that we are being subjected daily through the media and how this intimidation is used to advance certain political ideas such as the New Green Deal, which will create a disastrous situation, tending to force the implementation of Socialism.
It can be said, that the story of the possible end of the world (that has been used so many times to intimidate humanity) is being told now by the leftists in a new way, using a new deception, speaking about “climate change”, because “global warming” has been discredited
It is to be thought that behind this farce of “climate change” that was originated by the communist as “global warming”, popularized by Al Gore, is Mr. Soros; and that it is very possible that the NGOs he promote, benefit in some way from the proceeds of fines for violations of the Kyoto treaty, that amount to billions.
The continuing propaganda of the media about the s... (
show quote)
===================================
Thanks for posting this! I have believed the same thing for years.
CO2 is essential to life on this planet.
CO2 is good for the atmosphere. That's one of the reasons not to wear a mask. Breathing it back into our lungs from putting something over our mouths can be harmful. Let the "mask brigade" learn the hard way. Apparently what we all learned in elementary school didn't stick in the minds of some of the "special" kids.
Alber wrote:
The continuing propaganda of the media about the so-called “global warming” attributed to the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, as a product of human actions, is of concern and it is intimidating for those people who lack the most elementary knowledge of science. It is said that thousands of scientists ensure it is real; but it is not said that another equal or greater number of scientists say it is a hoax.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a very important molecule for life on the planet itself. If CO2 is so bad, why many farmers who have greenhouses buy CO2 generators and thereby double the growth of plants. Even in aquariums they use these generators so that the marine flora grows correctly. There cannot be a world in which CO2 is eliminated because there would be no life, the vegetable kingdom would die without this molecule. Scientists who claim that the "climate change" attributed to CO2 is a hoax, say that a considerable reduction of that molecule can generate major problems for the planet and for the climate, which dissipates the idea that warming by CO2 is harmful to the atmosphere; and it can be said that the catastrophism that is imputed to this molecule, serves the organisms that live from the chimera of global warming, by means of subsidies and fines that are imposed on those who break the regulations.
Taking Spain as an example, for having signed the Kyoto treaty it had to pay between 2008 and 2012 more than 800 million euros to the various agencies, for having breached the aforementioned treaty. Car companies and airlines that fail to comply with CO2 emission regulations must pay millionaire fines. Here it is clear that everything comes down to raising money and that the objective is economic. There is a relationship of more than 30,000 scientists who oppose what Al Gore says, that politician and show man, who was the one who spread the idea of “global warming”, and was given a Nobel Peace Prize (as well as the that given to Obama, without any merit, just because of the color of his skin), having known later that much of what is stated in his documentary is not true, since the figures and data were falsified to give credibility to the forgery assembled (equal to Obama’s case and the war in Libya and the Middle East).
Antarctica does not melt, NASA says the opposite; and the number of polar bears has not decreased, as specialists and biologists in Canada have detected an increase in these bears. Al Gore is a faker, who presents himself as a champion of nature, a savior of the planet, when this millionaire contaminates it greatly, with the zinc companies he owns. He proposes that the rest of humanity do the opposite of what he does.
Now, "environmental pollution" is something different: and this is what must be fought. Fukushima radiation is worrisome, because it continues to pollute the environment and they don't know how to stop it. This nuclear plant continues to pour 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day, having totally contaminated this ocean and will continue to do so indefinitely since the source of the leak cannot be sealed, because it is inaccessible to both humans and robots, due to extremely high temperatures. This could be the worst environmental disaster in the history of mankind and is hardly mentioned by politicians, conventional scientists, or the news.
There is the authentic "environmental pollution" in China, which is the first producer of items in the world (considering that almost everything that is acquired in the West comes from that country) not in Europe or in the USA, where that pollution is a thing of the past.
"Environmental pollution" is what must be fought and not the CO2 that is the basis of our biology; of course, this is not considered in the Kyoto treaty, which responds to a mafia that seeks economic performance by skillfully taking advantage of directing social claims for camouflaged lobbies as an NGO so that they can openly justify these enormous economic sanctions. Here it has to be kept track of money and see who are the ones who get the most benefit from all this deception.
As we have already said, CO2 is fundamental for life, in times like the Jurassic era the planet was a vergel of life and the carbon dioxide rates were immense, much larger than the current ones and nature was constantly growing.
In order to explain better what CO2 represents in the atmosphere, it is necessary to analyze its composition considering 100% of the atmosphere as 1,000,000 parts. With this method, Wikipedia using NASA data says that: 780,840 perts would be Nitrogen, 209,460 Oxygen, 9,340 Argon, which added would give us 999,640 (99.964%), leaving 360 parts (0.036%) that are Trace of Gases, where CO2 is a part with other gases.
Of the 360 parts corresponding to trace gases: 95% (342 parts) are Water Vapor, 3% (11 parts) are CO2, 1% (4 parts) are Neon and 1% (3 parts) are other gases (Helium, Methane, Krypton, Hydrogen, Nitrous Oxide, Zenon, Carbon Monoxide, Ammonia and Ozone) that are practically negligible.
However, Wikipedia, that publishes what suits the Ministry of Truth, says that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04% and if this % were of what the Trace of Gases represent, it would be acceptable, since it would be between 14 or 15 parts in one million; but Wikipedia says that would be equivalent to 400 parts instead of 11, what seems to be a way to inflate the CO2 problem and because of that, it has to be given credit to the argument of skeptical scientists who says as follow: “The oceans contain 37.4 billion tons (37,400 GT) of carbon in suspension, the terrestrial biomass has 2,000-3,000 GT. The atmosphere contains 720,000 million tons of CO2 and the human being contributes only 6 GT. The oceans, land, and atmosphere continually exchange CO2, so the additional burden on humans is incredibly small. A small change in the balance between oceans and air would cause an increase much stronger than anything we could produce."
Thus, it will be possible to calculate how much CO2 is falsely attributed to human activity in the composition of the atmosphere and how many billions of dollars are collected through this deception.
After explaining all of the above, it is necessary to analyze the intimidation that we are being subjected daily through the media and how this intimidation is used to advance certain political ideas such as the New Green Deal, which will create a disastrous situation, tending to force the implementation of Socialism.
It can be said, that the story of the possible end of the world (that has been used so many times to intimidate humanity) is being told now by the leftists in a new way, using a new deception, speaking about “climate change”, because “global warming” has been discredited
It is to be thought that behind this farce of “climate change” that was originated by the communist as “global warming”, popularized by Al Gore, is Mr. Soros; and that it is very possible that the NGOs he promote, benefit in some way from the proceeds of fines for violations of the Kyoto treaty, that amount to billions.
The continuing propaganda of the media about the s... (
show quote)
Every one thinks their religion is better than any other , and the global warming gods are no different
Gatsby, Osca Louks, Manning5, Doctor Dave, Currahe506, Bevvy.
Your comments are very appropriate. It would have been interesting to receive the comments of those who support the whole story of climate change created by human beings, to impose the Green New Deal on us, but they seem to have no arguments.
The data used was taken from Wikipedia, which defends the entire story of CO2 as being responsible for global warming and, like Winston Smith in Orwell's novel "1984", works for the Ministry of Truth adapting reality to the convenience of Big Brother.
Among some real data extracted from NASA reports, Wikipedia places a totally false one, saying that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04%, which in the example would be equivalent to 400 parts of the total atmosphere, when it is known that CO2 can fluctuate between 3 and 4% OF THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF TRACE GASES, which in the example can be seen amounts to 360 parts; and even if CO2 were taken to 10%, which would mean an increase of more than double, it would only reach 36 parts in a million, never 400 parts.
I just wish everyone would read “Hot Talk and Cold Science”. It would clear a lot of this man made climate change hoax up.
Alber wrote:
Gatsby, Osca Louks, Manning5, Doctor Dave, Currahe506, Bevvy.
Your comments are very appropriate. It would have been interesting to receive the comments of those who support the whole story of climate change created by human beings, to impose the Green New Deal on us, but they seem to have no arguments.
The data used was taken from Wikipedia, which defends the entire story of CO2 as being responsible for global warming and, like Winston Smith in Orwell's novel "1984", works for the Ministry of Truth adapting reality to the convenience of Big Brother.
Among some real data extracted from NASA reports, Wikipedia places a totally false one, saying that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04%, which in the example would be equivalent to 400 parts of the total atmosphere, when it is known that CO2 can fluctuate between 3 and 4% OF THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF TRACE GASES, which in the example can be seen amounts to 360 parts; and even if CO2 were taken to 10%, which would mean an increase of more than double, it would only reach 36 parts in a million, never 400 parts.
Gatsby, Osca Louks, Manning5, Doctor Dave, Currahe... (
show quote)
The marxist socialist progressive liberal leftist communist Democrats either aren't good at math or they just don't like your math. They do know how to lie in order to tax/steal money that they funnel into their own pockets though.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
