One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Some real truths about the Zimmerman trial.
Page <<first <prev 16 of 17 next>
Jul 29, 2013 21:18:39   #
herrick9
 
Can you possibly help me with a translation anyone?

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 21:19:30   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
herrick9 wrote:
Can you possibly help me with a translation anyone?


Try Google Translate.

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 21:44:17   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
whitebeard wrote:
I see that you have missed the point altogether. I take it that you surmise that if one black uses the N word to another black or uses cracker to a white, it is alright for you to use it to all blacks or they to all whites. Am I correct there? Like all whites are exactly the same and should be treated accordingly, and all blacks are exactly identical and should be treated the same ? Isn`t this just an excuse to use a degrading term, to make yourself feel better than another human? Do you need to resort to name calling to make yourself feel superior? So you do the research to justify your calling them a name that they have indicated they don`t want to be called. In your heart, you know that it is derogatory but you need to search for a way to justify you using it. Really, are you that unsure of yourself. It reminds me of a fat person, hanging out in a crowd of even fatter people, so they can feel good about themselves.
I see that you have missed the point altogether. I... (show quote)


I believe you have missed the point. Perhaps you have heard a black call a white a "cracker," or a "white boy," with something other than derogatory intent. I have not. There is no difference a black's use of these insults, and a white's use of the word "nigger." NO difference. They are both intended as insults, except that it is somehow acceptable for blacks to denigrate whites, but not vice-versa. Is it your contention that it is acceptable for a black to call me a cracker or white boy, but unacceptable for me to call him a nigger? If so, on what do you base this opinion?

Reply
 
 
Jul 29, 2013 21:44:50   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
For herrick9

¿Qué idioma?

Welche Sprache? Deutscher oder Spanisch? Das ist alles, das ich weiß.

I can only assist in Spanish or German.

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 21:47:28   #
herrick9
 
Hell, I'm still working on English...:-)

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 21:47:48   #
herrick9
 
10/4

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 21:48:15   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
herrick9 wrote:
Hell, I'm still working on English...:-)


Me too. :oops: :roll: :)

Reply
 
 
Jul 29, 2013 21:51:00   #
herrick9
 
Divertido?

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 21:52:40   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
herrick9 wrote:
Divertido?


Spanish for "entertaining".

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 22:00:52   #
BIGEAGLE Loc: Washington State
 
whitebeard wrote:
I agree with you 100%, if you are able to work you shouldn`t get paid for something you "choose" not to do. I was crippled by work, but worked on, for another 5 years, crippling me even more, but I could so I did. I am on S.S. now, but I have never been on medicaid or any other government program. I never accepted work/comp either.


_____________________________________________
That tells me you are a "special" type of man...!!!
:thumbup:

Reply
Jul 30, 2013 01:11:36   #
whitebeard
 
banjojack wrote:
I believe you have missed the point. Perhaps you have heard a black call a white a "cracker," or a "white boy," with something other than derogatory intent. I have not. There is no difference a black's use of these insults, and a white's use of the word "nigger." NO difference. They are both intended as insults, except that it is somehow acceptable for blacks to denigrate whites, but not vice-versa. Is it your contention that it is acceptable for a black to call me a cracker or white boy, but unacceptable for me to call him a nigger? If so, on what do you base this opinion?
I believe you have missed the point. Perhaps you ... (show quote)


Maybe I wasn`t clear, it is NOT acceptable for blacks to call white people any name such as those, even if you choose to call yourself that, which you shouldn`t. Because if someone of ANY race calls another person of ANY race one of those denigrating names, it is still unacceptble, for you , me or them. Personally, I don`t call anyone a denigrating name. There are people of every race that give the rest of their race a bad name, that doesn`t mean that the rest of their race feel the same way. Everyone is responsible for their own actions, we are not spokesmen for the rest of our race, nor are they. I`m sorry if I gave you a different opinion of what I meant. I usually call a person Mr. or Mrs. or Sir, Misses, Miss, or Ms.

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2013 00:38:38   #
intime
 
carolyn wrote:
Your quote is the reason I am more of an advocate of the Old Testament than the new. I do not believe in awarding anyone a living simply because he/she does not want to work. I do believe we should support our aged and handicapped, and we should grant our workers a better retirement than what they are getting. I do not believe the biblical adage of turning the other cheek, whether it be toward a person or country. I do believe in the Golden Rule... Do Unto Others As You Would Have Others Do Unto You. Which brings us back to the "N" word. Why is it so terrible to call someone an "N", but all right to call them a "cracker", or "cracka.? This was displayed on National T.V. after the M/Z allocation.

The word "N" originated as a neutral term referring to black people, as a variation of the Spanish/Portuguese noun "negro," which is a descendant of the Latin adjective niger (color black). This"N" word slangingly means that it's target is extremely unsophisticated.

On the other hand, the word "cracker" is used by blacks as a RACIAL SLUR intended toward Caucasians. It goes back to slavery times to describe the slave masters cracking a whip over the backs of their slaves.

Now I want anyone with any semblance of an open mind or intelligence to tell me which of these words would be the most inappropriate to use in our modern times?
Your quote is the reason I am more of an advocate ... (show quote)


So, where did "Honky" come from?

Reply
Sep 1, 2013 03:04:14   #
BIGEAGLE Loc: Washington State
 
intime wrote:
So, where did "Honky" come from?


____________________________________________
"Honky" is a term blacks used for a white , who when they crossed the street in front of a car full of blacks, they "honked, "LOUDLY"
to scare the 'whitey' into a "Fright, while laughing, ....They have a herd of "terms",.... "Honky" only being one of them.....
It is always used in the "negative " and (laughable ) manner....:roll: :roll:

Unfortunately, when a white uses a neg. term about "Blacks, They do not take it in jest either, so it is a
"tit for "tat" situation, which should be totally "dissolved between ALL, however,

We have a paid of "spades" to draw to, who keep racism alive, only because it is a "money-maker" for them...
( Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton) You know, the 2
( REVERENDS) who don't even have any churches, nor do they preach, except when and where there is a white ON black situation.

This keeping "racism" alive is their way of making money, such as Jackson who has been receiving $25,000 a month from TOTOTA, because they did NOT have the proper # of blacks working at the plants, Jackson sued, and Toyota settled for the aboved mentioned sum, as for Sharpton,

His mouth is constantly fighting very hard "spewing" hate to keep in the news, in an effort to find a deal like the
"REV....J.J.

Its like Hawaii, ANYONE could get a Birth announcement, because the State gets (more Fed money),
for the more "citizens" they have....

Corruption is alive and well ALL over the World, now even in the Catholic church, (I am a Catholic) because the church is worth BILLIONS and it is NOT all invested....
EX. : They are now starting a campaign to ( HELP THE "ILLEGALS" get American citizenship.....) :evil:

If any of you are Christians, and (believe) in the Bible...
Please read : LEV. 19....33-34 ( Legal Immigrants)
who ask and apply at Ellis Island, ..................

Now read: JOHN 10-1, ( "ILLEGALS") ///////////////////

Who is a fool enough, besides a few we all know like Ric Santorum, M. Rubio, Chis Christie, and N.Y.'s (ASS-IDIOT
.... C. Schumann....
who all figure they are smarter and wiser than JESUS CHRIST'S AND His own Word's ..?????????????????

This is for the Idiots who use it for their own purposes, like J. McCain, who says "They are God's children,"
if only he believed it himself....
He has been in the pocket of Geo. Soros since 2006....
RINO>>RINO>>>RINO>>> Phony .....!!!

All of the afore-mentioned "ASS-WIPES" honestly believe they are wiser and more Powerful then the Creator's Son,
who says the "ILLEGALS" are nothing but," thieves and Robbers"......:shock: :shock: :shock:

Reply
Sep 1, 2013 03:35:13   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Adagio wrote:


1. Just because the items that Trayvon bought at the store may be the ingredients that are used in this concoction, is not proof that this is what he bought it for. No, there is no proof that he planned to use those to make the drug. But, if he had never used the drug, explain the autopsy. He was buying these for his younger, soon to be, step brother. Where is the proof of this claim? Any kid can buy them, so unless you want to assume that every kid that buys Skittles and an Ice tea is trying to get high, you really have no case here. You are still saying Ice Tea. Why?

2. Stand Your Ground was NOT the defense in the trial, and the reason is that if George had lost, O'Mara would appeal the verdict by using the Stand Your Ground law. Since you can only use it once, he was saving it for the appeal. But aside from that, the Stand Your Ground law WAS brought up in the jury deliberation as stated by juror B37. She voted for acquittal from the very start, and spoke openly about that very law in the jury sequester. She stated in her interview with Anderson Cooper that George had a right to stand his ground, directly referring to the law. This is speculation on your part. Can not be proven, and is completely immaterial because the verdict came back Not Guilty.
Unfortunately she didn't seem to think that Trayvon also had that right. Who is the "she" you reference? There were witnesses, and they testified that Mr. Zimmerman was the person having the stuffing beat out of him. And the photographs of Mr. Zimmerman's head and face, are also evidence of what happened. She bought Georges story, despite the fact that nobody could support it as an eye witness to what happened. So...what appears obvious to you, has no substance in fact. But, I suppose if you hate Obama and Holder enough, it's not a stretch to think that you'd go there. It is blatantly clear that the color of the skin did play a major role in the pretrial of Mr. Zimmerman. Even Obama came out supporting Martin. This has noting to do with how I think of Obama or Holder, it is a fact. The black population tried Mr Zimmerman and was ready to hang him without a trial and without even examining the facts. They snapped and the results of gangs, beatings, and murders after the trial really show that the black population wanted Mr. Zimmerman to hang. And failing that, they would take their revenge on any white person who was unlucky enough to be walking alone. Most of the mobs were such cowards that they attacked the elderly, people who were alone, and they murdered for pleasure."

As for getting rid of that law. It should be dumped immediately. As we can all see, it's a license to kill. If you kill a kid, or anybody else...as long as there is no witness, you can claim Stand Your Ground, and get off. Check the facts, the stand your ground law is more often used by blacks as a defense. At least in Florida. That's exactly what Zimmerman did, and there was no reason to accept his story. Do you think for a moment that George Zimmerman gave an objective account of what took place? I doubt that you would be that naïve. Unless you're predisposed to accepting his word for some other reason, you have no logical or rational reason to accept the totally subjective account of what happened.
br br 1. Just because the items that Trayvon bou... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 1, 2013 03:49:55   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Man I was in your corner and say, yes this person is so right and then you have to be demeaning at the end of your narrative. You chastise an individual by asking "isn't that an excuse for using a derogatory term?" And then straight away draw a parody about "fat people." How dare you set yourself up to judge others when you are prejudiced against fat people!

It is also worthwhile to mention, blacks calling whites "cracka" is pervasive in their society! Also among the black youth, hearing one refer to another as "nigga" is also very common. But, because of people who are similar to yourself, this is acceptable. But, turn the tables and a white person could be arrested. Is that justice?

whitebeard wrote:
I see that you have missed the point altogether. I take it that you surmise that if one black uses the N word to another black or uses cracker to a white, it is alright for you to use it to all blacks or they to all whites. Am I correct there? Like all whites are exactly the same and should be treated accordingly, and all blacks are exactly identical and should be treated the same ? Isn`t this just an excuse to use a degrading term, to make yourself feel better than another human? Do you need to resort to name calling to make yourself feel superior? So you do the research to justify your calling them a name that they have indicated they don`t want to be called. In your heart, you know that it is derogatory but you need to search for a way to justify you using it. Really, are you that unsure of yourself. It reminds me of a fat person, hanging out in a crowd of even fatter people, so they can feel good about themselves.
I see that you have missed the point altogether. I... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 16 of 17 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.