When a State’s Secretary of State is in on Voter Fraud: There remain many "See no evil, Speak no evil, Hear no evil" types here on OPP when the subject of election fraud is raised. I...

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

There remain many "See no evil, Speak no evil, Hear no evil" types here on OPP when the subject of election fraud is raised.

I will not waste my time asking them to read the linked article below, because they will not do so. They will reiterate the same refrain that there is "no proof" of election fraud. It is the "That's my story, and I'm sticking to it" mentality.

But for all the rest of you independent thinkers seeking answers and evidence please check out these two links:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/01/when_a_states_secretary_of_state_is_in_on_voter_fraud.html

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/01/no_author/did-over-100000-people-older-than-124-years-vote-in-wisconsin/

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Of course there was fraud. Besides these articles simple statistics prove it. That and common sense. 81 million votes for Biden. Right.

ACP45 wrote:

There remain many "See no evil, Speak no evil... (show quote)

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

JFlorio wrote:

Of course there was fraud. Besides these articles simple statistics prove it. That and common sense. 81 million votes for Biden. Right.

Where’s the proof ?
Suppositions and innuendos are still not proof. 65 times the Court has found No evidence .
Is that message just Not getting out there
Or is it just ricocheting off all their pointy little heads ?

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

ACP45 wrote:

There remain many "See no evil, Speak no evil... (show quote)

It's a load of crap. Why do you keep beating that poor dead horse?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Milosia2 wrote:

Where’s the proof ?
Suppositions and innuendos are still not proof. 65 times the Court has found No evidence .
Is that message just Not getting out there
Or is it just ricocheting off all their pointy little heads ?

Another lie. No court found no proof. They found no standing. Get some education dimwit.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Milosia2 wrote:

Where’s the proof ?
Suppositions and innuendos are still not proof. 65 times the Court has found No evidence .
Is that message just Not getting out there
Or is it just ricocheting off all their pointy little heads ?

All you need to do is simply open your eyes and look. Your problem is you don't want to see... what you don't want to see!
"If you’ve been wondering about the extent of voter fraud in America, we may be seeing a staggering amount of either fraud or grotesque negligence in Wisconsin voter rolls. A review of the state’s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918. Of that number, 20% of these people, all of whom must be at least 124 years old, voted last November. Biden “won” in Wisconsin by 20,682 votes...."

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/01/no_author/did-over-100000-people-older-than-124-years-vote-in-wisconsin/

Big Kahuna

JFlorio wrote:

Of course there was fraud. Besides these articles simple statistics prove it. That and common sense. 81 million votes for Biden. Right.

When the final Presidential vote was read, the presenter of the final tally was dyslexic. Slo joe only had 18 million votes and not 81 million but the Supreme Court said there was no standing since the presenter was seated at the time of the declaration. Statute #132087 was quoted as being the go to previous Supreme Court decision in a 609 B.C. Babylonian case but since all the current statues were torn down by BLM and Antifa, no current statutes were available to make a ruling and Justice Sotomayor said she didn't know the difference between a statue and a statute as spelling was not her strong point but discrimination was. Mike Lindell proved the election was a fraud but the Chinese voted him down.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

ACP45 wrote:

There remain many "See no evil, Speak no evil... (show quote)

Wish they had identified the state rather than how they choose to report their findings in your first cite..

And what if anything will be done?? Those State Secretary's have already answered haven't they…Clean up voting rolls, ha, they need them as they are!!! Pathetic…

Wonttakeitanymore

ACP45 wrote:

There remain many "See no evil, Speak no evil... (show quote)

It worked in cally! Biggest crooks of all! Ground zero for fraud!

Wonttakeitanymore

Milosia2 wrote:

Where’s the proof ?
Suppositions and innuendos are still not proof. 65 times the Court has found No evidence .
Is that message just Not getting out there
Or is it just ricocheting off all their pointy little heads ?

Open ur eyes!

DamnYANKEE

ACP45 wrote:

There remain many "See no evil, Speak no evil... (show quote)

Well , it is over the top of their heads

DamnYANKEE

Milosia2 wrote:

Where’s the proof ?
Suppositions and innuendos are still not proof. 65 times the Court has found No evidence .
Is that message just Not getting out there
Or is it just ricocheting off all their pointy little heads ?

BS the Court would not hear for a tiny technicality . Which is BS . Too many of them hated Tump too . and that is a REAL Bunch of BS . The USSC was In on the FRAUD Election

DamnYANKEE

lpnmajor wrote:

It's a load of crap. Why do you keep beating that poor dead horse?

NWR NWR NWR

Big Kahuna

DamnYANKEE wrote:

BS the Court would not hear for a tiny technicality . Which is BS . Too many of them hated Tump too . and that is a REAL Bunch of BS . The USSC was In on the FRAUD Election

Sure looks like it.

DamnYANKEE

ACP45 wrote:

All you need to do is simply open your eyes and lo... (show quote)

YYYUPPERS