One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The ideal subject for Totalitarian Rule...can you guess who???
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
Dec 14, 2021 21:43:11   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
martsiva wrote:
I see two distinct differences between the two - one was voted for by the people and one was voted for by the party leaving no choice for the people. One of Hitler`s greatest platforms was to bring back Germany`s economy from the disastrous results of the Treaty of Versailles. Don`t forget that Zionist Jews called for the boycotting of all German goods in the world and it was the Zionist Jews who created the Treaty of Versailles. There is NO way of denying that Hitler was a globalist anymore than denying that Zionist Jews were globalists!! So my question is: does Xi have globalist intentions of wanting communism here in the US and with the communist agenda of the Democrats??
I see two distinct differences between the two - o... (show quote)


Xi, like Hitler, is a nationalist...

He could care less what form of government the?US has...

Reply
Dec 15, 2021 08:45:19   #
Alber
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Sigh...

Hitler was a populist nominated by his party and elected by his nation... His platforms involved the vilification of the League of Nations and certain groups such as communists or Jews...

XiJinping rose to power via party vote..He's not a populist and was relatively unknown before his election... His platforms involve the strengthening of China's economics and strengthening the unity of China...

The two are extremely different individuals...

And Xi has already triumphed...
Sigh... br br Hitler was a populist nominated by... (show quote)


These days 80 years ago, Hitler was at the height of success, he had Europe at his feet and had dealt a heavy blow to his "partner in crime", the Bolshevik Stalin. He had invaded the Soviet Union with great ease, reaching the gates of Moscow; but 5 years later he was a loser who had been dumped in the dustbin of history. He had made a serious mistake, had declared war on whom he should not, because like Mao later, he thought that the USA was a paper tiger. Mao was lucky that Nikita warned him of his mistake, as now Putin must be warning Xi, his "partner of convenience" (because he learned in the KGB that there is no honor among criminals and he remembers what happened to Stalin), to use as a weapon the greed of the politicians and capitalists, which gave Den Xiaoping such a good result.
Xi's story is currently being written. He has not succeeded as you say, because he is trying to expand like Adolf did, but the whole world is against him (even Russia); and that world is armed.
Both the top German Nazi leader and the Chinese fascist-communist share the fact of being genocidal Marxist totalitarian dictators, with expansionist pretensions.

Reply
Dec 15, 2021 09:05:47   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I'd be the ideal subject of a totalitarian government... Because I believe in totalitarianism...

Has nothing to do with "alternative facts"... Both Republicans and Democrats live in echo chambers full of disinformation...

It's doubtful either party could distinguish honest truth if it smacked them in the nose...


Thank you, I was going to say something similar no need to Sense so sufficiently address here.

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 01:12:40   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Alber wrote:
These days 80 years ago, Hitler was at the height of success, he had Europe at his feet and had dealt a heavy blow to his "partner in crime", the Bolshevik Stalin. He had invaded the Soviet Union with great ease, reaching the gates of Moscow; but 5 years later he was a loser who had been dumped in the dustbin of history. He had made a serious mistake, had declared war on whom he should not, because like Mao later, he thought that the USA was a paper tiger. Mao was lucky that Nikita warned him of his mistake, as now Putin must be warning Xi, his "partner of convenience" (because he learned in the KGB that there is no honor among criminals and he remembers what happened to Stalin), to use as a weapon the greed of the politicians and capitalists, which gave Den Xiaoping such a good result.
Xi's story is currently being written. He has not succeeded as you say, because he is trying to expand like Adolf did, but the whole world is against him (even Russia); and that world is armed.
Both the top German Nazi leader and the Chinese fascist-communist share the fact of being genocidal Marxist totalitarian dictators, with expansionist pretensions.
These days 80 years ago, Hitler was at the height ... (show quote)


I repeat, China has shown no aggression towards any nations.. Hence, not expansionist...

Nor was Hitler a Marxist...

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 01:50:41   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I repeat, China has shown no aggression towards any nations.. Hence, not expansionist...

Nor was Hitler a Marxist...
Communist China's Aggression in the South China Sea

Former US admiral says China 'their own worst enemy' as tensions rise in South China Sea

China’s Military Aggression in the Indo-Pacific Region

China’s Post-Coronavirus Aggression Is Reshaping Asia

China moves quickly to replace America in Afghanistan

The Unfolding Chinese Aggression against Taiwan

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 01:54:11   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 


Taiwan is not a nation... It's a province of China.. America recognizes this...

China has claimed territory in the South China Sea since 1949...And backs these claims with historical records...

China has not invaded any nation.. Not Afghanistan or anywhere else in Asia...

China and India dispute certain areas along their border... That is not aggression or invasion...

I thought you were in the military???

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 02:42:08   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
China has not invaded any nation..
Maybe not with their army they haven't, but there's more than one way to skin a cat.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2021 03:00:41   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Maybe not with their army they haven't, but there's more than one way to skin a cat.


Yes... Economic deals are certainly the same thing as invading nations militarily..

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 07:35:54   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I repeat, China has shown no aggression towards any nations.. Hence, not expansionist...

Nor was Hitler a Marxist...


Those military flights over Taiwan aren't aggressive?

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 07:45:02   #
Big dog
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Those military flights over Taiwan aren't aggressive?


Intimidation is a form of aggression, is it not ?

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 08:50:59   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Taiwan is not a nation... It's a province of China.. America recognizes this...

China has claimed territory in the South China Sea since 1949...And backs these claims with historical records...

China has not invaded any nation.. Not Afghanistan or anywhere else in Asia...

China and India dispute certain areas along their border... That is not aggression or invasion...

I thought you were in the military???


I don't think Taiwan was ever formally integrated into the ROC. China just sort of said so. They are no more a part of ROC than Japan is a part of the USA.

Reply
Check out topic: border illegals who got away
Dec 16, 2021 08:51:29   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Big dog wrote:
Intimidation is a form of aggression, is it not ?


Yes it is!!

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 09:07:46   #
Alber
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I repeat, China has shown no aggression towards any nations.. Hence, not expansionist...

Nor was Hitler a Marxist...


Canuckus Deploracus
Dec 13, 2021 19:16:37 I'd be the ideal subject of a totalitarian government... Because I believe in
totalitarianism...
Dec 13, 2021 19:34:46 I prefer China... I'm more of a fascist than a communist...

These statements allow me to understand you better. You would certainly prefer to live in China, never North Korea or Cuba; but you live in Canada. Maybe in China you are a person to respect.

The answer Blade_Runner gave you about China's expansionism is correct. It is unacceptable that China intends to take away their rights to the contiguous maritime zone and the exclusive economic zone to: Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei in the southern zone of the China Sea, going against the Convention on the Rights of the Sea. This just to insist on one case.

As for Hitler not being a Marxist, once again I will show that he was.

Let's see what Wikipedia says about Fascism: “Fascism is an EXTREME RIGHT-WING authoritarian ultra-nationalism form characterized by dictatorial power, the forced repression of the opposition and the strong regulation of society and the economy that became prominent to early 20th century in Europe ”. --------------
---------In this definition, a manipulation is made when the words: “extreme right-wing” are inserted, since the rest of what is written is not questionable, a falsehood is introduced into what is real, covering up a lie by placing it among various truths. --------Precisely we are facing the greatest propaganda success of the left in its entire history, having made believe that Fascism is an ideology of the extreme right when in reality it is a socialist ideology united to nationalist sentiment, that did not arise on the right but within of the left socialist movement after the event which supposed the coup against the social democrat Russian Revolution of February 1917, that served to propagate all kinds of revolutionary socialisms contrary to capitalism, among which we include what we know as Fascism. -------------On the other hand, the fascist leaders themselves always denied the label of belonging to the right, stressing their anti-capitalist positions, and flaunting their socialist programs and measures in favor of the workers. It is somewhat cynical that an ideology is included within a label that its promoters vehemently deny. ------------- Fascism is unquestionably the son of Marxism, noting that its founder, Benito Mussolini, was in the early twentieth century very close to Lenin and also leader of the recalcitrant Italian socialist party being a furious Marxist; he created fascism to show himself as the most revolutionary of all, since within the socialist party he expelled the so-called "revisionists" from the Social Democracy.-----------------Nicola Bombacci, founder of the Italian Communist Party in 1921, later came to the ranks of the Duce movement, stating that he found no difference between fascism and totalitarian communism, having written: “fascism has made a great social revolution, with Mussolini and Lenin, Soviet and corporate fascist state, Rome and Moscow, we had to rectify a lot, nothing to make us forgive, because today as yesterday we are driven by the same ideal, the triumph of work ". Both Mussolini and Bombacci were executed in 1945. --------------------------------- -----------------------Hitler was a leftist and he considered himself "the true director of Marxism" (H. Rauschning, in Hitler, De Cooperation, Paris, 1939, p.112); and none other than Goebbels, it was he who confessed that - "The national-socialist movement has only one teacher: Marxism" - (Kampf um Berlin, p.19); and coinciding with Marxist ideologues, he affirmed that "Socialism is the conception of the world of the future that can only be realized in the Socialist State" (Die Zweite Revolution). And it also expresses: - "We are socialists and mortal enemies of the capitalist economic system" - (Der Nationalsozialismus, Die Weltanschaung des 20 Jahrhunderts). For his part, and to be no less eloquent, Mussolini is pleased to affirm that Marx is his spiritual father. (Mussolini and fascism Ed. Que sais-je, p.31).-------------------- -------------Marxism is the source from which Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler drank; who were the developers of all socialist systems. Marx is responsible for all the misfortunes that these systems have promoted since the Bolshevik coup in October of 1917, with his totalitarian doctrine framed in the aberration of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat .------------------------------- The relationship of these characters of history with Marxism is beyond doubt. The so-called "Marxism-Leninism" is a well-known doctrine. ------------------------------------------For his part, Hitler, in his book Mein Kampf, admits that he has thoroughly read Karl Marx's Das Kapital: “I came to penetrate the content of the work of the Jew Karl Marx… he was, among millions, really the only one who with a prophet's vision discovered in the Mud of a gradually debased Humanity, the germs of social poison, grouping them together, like a genius of black magic, in a concentrated solution, in order to destroy, more quickly, the independent life of the sovereign nations of the world. ”.----------------------------------Despite the racist, anti-Jewish component that Hitler added to his socialism; recognizing the evil that the author of Das Kapital put in his work, he had no problem putting the theory of the Jew into practice; making his position regarding capitalism clearly established in his speech delivered in 1927 on Workers' Day, when he said: “We are socialists, we are enemies of the current capitalist economic system because it exploits the one that is weak from the economic point of view, with their unequal wages, with their indecent evaluation of a human being according to whether they have wealth or not, instead of evaluating the responsibility and the performance of the person, and we are determined to destroy this capitalist system in all its aspects”. ----------------These words could have been spoken, without surprise to any person, by the young congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, supporter of socialism, or by her guru, the Marxist-Leninist comrade, Senator Bernie Sanders, an admirer of the Soviets, enemies of the United States, although in the USSR there was no "paradise" for workers or the "democratic socialism" that he now proposes; knowing that socialism is contrary to democracy when the Dictatorship of the Proletariat is established, which should not be confused with social democracy. It should be remembered that Gorbachev tried to give Socialism a "human face", but failed; without forgetting that this idea produced more than 100 million deaths in only 70 years of the last century, according to “The Black Book of Communism ".----

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 09:49:13   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Those military flights over Taiwan aren't aggressive?


Flying over one's own province is now consider aggression???

Was unaware of that...

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 09:51:22   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I don't think Taiwan was ever formally integrated into the ROC. China just sort of said so. They are no more a part of ROC than Japan is a part of the USA.


Please... Look up the history of the PRC and Taiwan... It explains everything...

Taiwan has been a territory for centuries... And a province before the Japanese annexed it...

Regardless, your own nation recognizes it as a province of China...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.