One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
41 Democrats have signed on to repealing the First Amendment.
Page <<first <prev 8 of 20 next> last>>
May 27, 2014 18:49:59   #
Alicia Loc: NYC
 
jaydee wrote:
Unions served their purpose in early 1900's. The communist have taken over them like they did with Hitler.
They are corrupt. Has been for a long time. Can't depend on um anymore.
Hitler used them for his good.

***************
I am amazed at the amount of ignorance you display. Get a history book you dimwitted ass. Your head must be very small because it doesn't have very much in the size of its brain to hold!

It was the influence of the unions that brought about the labor laws. Are you aware of the problems with the quick food industry? These people are striking not just to have fun. I remember my own father having to go on strike for ANY improvement in working conditions! How do you think OSHA came about - or do you even know what that means!

I am ashamed that there are people still existing with as little intelligence that you proudly display. I assume you must be a "hill" person. SHAME!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
May 27, 2014 18:50:39   #
Don Overton Loc: Southwest USA
 
Ya know numb nuts you should read the Constitution and have it explained to to. They are following the procedures. You have to be an idiot to ignore that.


oldroy wrote:
Maybe old Don and BD should take a peek at Article V of the Constitution of the United States. That one tells us how we amend the Constitution and Chunk Schumer really doesn't understand it. I don't care how many Democrats and Independents in the Senate vote for this thing it would take all of them since 2/3 of the Senators along with 2/3 of the House would have to vote for it to put it out to the states for ratification. Now 2/3 of the House is Republicans and I don't think they would go along even though there may be enough RINOs in the Senate to pass it there.

You have read Article V haven't you? If not maybe you need to do so.
Maybe old Don and BD should take a peek at Article... (show quote)

Reply
May 27, 2014 18:53:29   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Moldy oldy is right about the drive to eliminate labor unions. Reagon gave amnesty to illegal aliens during his term but I would like to think it was humanitarian.
Billhuggins wrote:
Moldy, you need to take a pill. Your crazy.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2014 18:54:50   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Without unions you would still be working 16 hours a day 7 days a week.


Horse feathers!!!

Reply
May 27, 2014 18:55:58   #
Mr Shako Loc: Colo Spgs
 
moldyoldy wrote:
We had a middle class until reagan destroyed all the unions leaving only government unions while destroying most trade unions. He allowed all the latinos to enter and drive down wages to kill the unions. After that he was finished with them.


Wrong. Union membership was on the decline right after WW II, mostly due to overreach. Taft-Hartley was the end result although Truman vetoed it once but veto was overridden.

PS: We still have a middle class.

Reply
May 27, 2014 18:57:42   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
moldyoldy wrote:
facts don't lie.


That is true, but you do.

Reply
May 27, 2014 19:00:17   #
Alicia Loc: NYC
 
moldyoldy wrote:
We had a middle class until reagan destroyed all the unions leaving only government unions while destroying most trade unions. He allowed all the latinos to enter and drive down wages to kill the unions. After that he was finished with them.

*******************
I gather you mean he was finished with the middle class, don't you? I agree. He had to get rid of the unions so that large corporations could regain all the power they had originally.

There was a period where unions overstepped themselves but without them, workers had no unity and no power. The people have no power unless they join together. That is the purpose of unions.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2014 19:01:57   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Alicia wrote:
*******************
I gather you mean he was finished with the middle class, don't you? I agree. He had to get rid of the unions so that large corporations could regain all the power they had originally.

There was a period where unions overstepped themselves but without them, workers had no unity and no power. The people have no power unless they join together. That is the purpose of unions.


:thumbup:

Reply
May 27, 2014 19:02:43   #
moldyoldy
 
fom wrote:
What did you mean by that? I vote Democraticly and I am a Catholic.


It was a reply to someone talking about godless sodomites.

Reply
May 27, 2014 19:08:07   #
Alicia Loc: NYC
 
Caboose wrote:
Your mind is very very moldy.

**************
No, Caboose. It's your mind that is very moldy.
:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Reply
May 27, 2014 19:15:47   #
Alicia Loc: NYC
 
moldyoldy wrote:
You offered an opinion, there was no violence, or physical attack, along with your opinion. That is the difference, in my opinion. By the way , I think all religions are screwed up, and the fundamentalists here are becoming more like the taliban everyday.

*******
I AGREE!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2014 19:23:23   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Ok
moldyoldy wrote:
It was a reply to someone talking about godless sodomites.

Reply
May 27, 2014 19:25:57   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Sometimes I see it that way.
Alicia wrote:
*******
I AGREE!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 27, 2014 19:46:26   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Billhuggins wrote:
"No law prohibiting the free exercise thereof." For over 350 years religion was practiced in America and it was legal. No one brought suit to the SCOTUS. But, after the free love movement in democrat, Diane Feinstein's lovely San Francisco and Earl Warren's socialist California. Socialist have dominated the courts. We have gone from an activity being legal to the same activity as being in violation of the Constitution. By the actual words, " Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise thereof." the courts are violating the constitution by no permitting prayers in schools, public meeting, etc. Courts are not allowing the free exercise but the opposite. They do this to appease the Atheists. A cross on public land is legal as to a free exercise thereof but, the courts rule that the words in the constitution mean nothing. If Atheists want to make a statement on city hall by all means put it up. I won't look at it. For the most part Christians are not sodomites but, Atheists are a different result.
"No law prohibiting the free exercise thereof... (show quote)




The truth is spoken!.thanks

Reply
May 27, 2014 20:17:21   #
jaydee
 
moldyoldy wrote:
We had a middle class until reagan destroyed all the unions leaving only government unions while destroying most trade unions. He allowed all the latinos to enter and drive down wages to kill the unions. After that he was finished with them.


This nation has always had many differrnt classes. It's communism that has only two classes. The haves the have nots. No middle class. Oh and unions are not the middle clasd

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 20 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.