If you like socialism don't read this.
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislation that would massively expand mail-in voting, something that would decimate election integrity and enable increased election fraud and manipulation.
On January 28, 2021, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) introduced the “Vote at Home Act,” which has the bill numbers S. 136 and H.R. 237. Currently, S. 136 has 13 co-sponsors while H.R. 237 has 15.
Among the bill’s provisions, it would ban states from enacting any additional limitations on mail-in voting for individuals eligible to vote in federal elections, besides ballot return deadlines. Additionally, it would require states to mail ballots to every registered voter at least two weeks prior to the election, and the bill would also mandate that all voters have the ability to return their ballots via mail or drop boxes.
To make it easier to vote by mail, S. 136/H.R. 237 would have the U.S. Postal Service assume the cost of delivering mail-in ballots. According to Senator Wyden’s press release, “[t]his would allow states to save money by transitioning away from polling stations and reduce a major barrier for voters with the federal government absorbing the cost associated with USPS delivery.”
Last, but not least, the bill would require states to automatically register individuals when they apply for driver’s licenses, a change from the current federal provision that merely mandates states to give individuals the opportunity to register. Under the bill, those individuals would need to opt out prior to a three-week deadline if they wish not to be registered.
S. 136/H.R. 237 would deal a significant blow to election integrity and increase opportunities for fraud. Absentee ballots in general are prone to fraud and manipulation. For example, while the bill would mandate states to mail ballots to all registered voters, it is well-known that voter rolls are inaccurate. For example, the Public Interest Legal Foundation found in 2020 that nearly 350,000 deceased people remained on the voter rolls in over 40 states, and over 50,000 people voted more than once. Additionally, a 2012 Pew Research Center report found that about 24 million voter registrations in the U.S. were outdated or inaccurate.
Also problematic is the bill’s undermining of the precinct, which has already been diminished to an unacceptable degree. Due to its decentralized nature, the precinct is a strong deterrent to fraud, but expanding mail-in voting circumvents and undermines the precinct. Similarly, ballot drop boxes, which the bill promotes, are vulnerable to fraud and other forms of tampering.
The automatic voter registration provision in S. 136/H.R. 237 would also damage confidence in election results. This is because such a policy would result in ineligible individuals, particularly non-citizens, being accidentally registered to vote. Multiple examples already exist of non-citizen voter fraud, often because of laws giving driver’s licenses to illegal aliens and other lax driver registration policies. In one example, observers pointed out that a New York law allowing driver’s licenses for illegals could enable illegal alien voting, and in other states like Texas, no citizenship checks exist when registering to vote. A federal automatic voter registration provision would exacerbate this problem.
In addition to these problematic provisions in S. 136/H.R. 237, the bill contains zero anti-fraud measures. The John Birch Society has identified multiple steps that the states and federal government can take to strength election integrity. Not only does the “Vote at Home Act” make insecure mail-in voting easier, but it contains none of these common-sense solutions. Furthermore, the bill would accelerate the dangerous trend of federalizing all American elections, something that goes against the spirit, if not the text, of the 10th Amendment.
Urge your U.S. representative and senators to oppose S. 136/H.R. 237, titled the “Vote at Home Act,” and ask them to support measures that strengthen, rather than undermine, election integrity.
If you like freedom, get your butt in gear and fight back!
If you think mail in fraud is bad, wait for online voting.
Capt-jack wrote:
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislation that would massively expand mail-in voting, something that would decimate election integrity and enable increased election fraud and manipulation.
On January 28, 2021, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) introduced the “Vote at Home Act,” which has the bill numbers S. 136 and H.R. 237. Currently, S. 136 has 13 co-sponsors while H.R. 237 has 15.
Among the bill’s provisions, it would ban states from enacting any additional limitations on mail-in voting for individuals eligible to vote in federal elections, besides ballot return deadlines. Additionally, it would require states to mail ballots to every registered voter at least two weeks prior to the election, and the bill would also mandate that all voters have the ability to return their ballots via mail or drop boxes.
To make it easier to vote by mail, S. 136/H.R. 237 would have the U.S. Postal Service assume the cost of delivering mail-in ballots. According to Senator Wyden’s press release, “[t]his would allow states to save money by transitioning away from polling stations and reduce a major barrier for voters with the federal government absorbing the cost associated with USPS delivery.”
Last, but not least, the bill would require states to automatically register individuals when they apply for driver’s licenses, a change from the current federal provision that merely mandates states to give individuals the opportunity to register. Under the bill, those individuals would need to opt out prior to a three-week deadline if they wish not to be registered.
S. 136/H.R. 237 would deal a significant blow to election integrity and increase opportunities for fraud. Absentee ballots in general are prone to fraud and manipulation. For example, while the bill would mandate states to mail ballots to all registered voters, it is well-known that voter rolls are inaccurate. For example, the Public Interest Legal Foundation found in 2020 that nearly 350,000 deceased people remained on the voter rolls in over 40 states, and over 50,000 people voted more than once. Additionally, a 2012 Pew Research Center report found that about 24 million voter registrations in the U.S. were outdated or inaccurate.
Also problematic is the bill’s undermining of the precinct, which has already been diminished to an unacceptable degree. Due to its decentralized nature, the precinct is a strong deterrent to fraud, but expanding mail-in voting circumvents and undermines the precinct. Similarly, ballot drop boxes, which the bill promotes, are vulnerable to fraud and other forms of tampering.
The automatic voter registration provision in S. 136/H.R. 237 would also damage confidence in election results. This is because such a policy would result in ineligible individuals, particularly non-citizens, being accidentally registered to vote. Multiple examples already exist of non-citizen voter fraud, often because of laws giving driver’s licenses to illegal aliens and other lax driver registration policies. In one example, observers pointed out that a New York law allowing driver’s licenses for illegals could enable illegal alien voting, and in other states like Texas, no citizenship checks exist when registering to vote. A federal automatic voter registration provision would exacerbate this problem.
In addition to these problematic provisions in S. 136/H.R. 237, the bill contains zero anti-fraud measures. The John Birch Society has identified multiple steps that the states and federal government can take to strength election integrity. Not only does the “Vote at Home Act” make insecure mail-in voting easier, but it contains none of these common-sense solutions. Furthermore, the bill would accelerate the dangerous trend of federalizing all American elections, something that goes against the spirit, if not the text, of the 10th Amendment.
Urge your U.S. representative and senators to oppose S. 136/H.R. 237, titled the “Vote at Home Act,” and ask them to support measures that strengthen, rather than undermine, election integrity.
If you like freedom, get your butt in gear and fight back!
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislat... (
show quote)
Right, if too many citizens vote......................................
lpnmajor wrote:
Right, if too many citizens vote......................................
Right now, Illegal aliens are able to obtain drivers licenses in several states (North Carolina is one I know of first hand because my neighbors who were illegal aliens (very nice people, but not citizens) all had drivers licenses. So...if people are automatically registered when they get drivers licenses, there will be whole lot of unqualified (non-citizens) people who will be able to vote. It would take many years to update the registration rolls in most states, so there are all those dead people who will get ballots in the mail...along with people who have moved out of state or married and did not notify the registration bureaus.
But I understand why Dems want this - they don't mind cheating their way into a win. The more ways they can do it, the better for them...honesty be damned.
It does not matter over 100% of eligible voters voted in numerous places.
Capt-jack wrote:
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislation that would massively expand mail-in voting, something that would decimate election integrity and enable increased election fraud and manipulation.
On January 28, 2021, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) introduced the “Vote at Home Act,” which has the bill numbers S. 136 and H.R. 237. Currently, S. 136 has 13 co-sponsors while H.R. 237 has 15.
Among the bill’s provisions, it would ban states from enacting any additional limitations on mail-in voting for individuals eligible to vote in federal elections, besides ballot return deadlines. Additionally, it would require states to mail ballots to every registered voter at least two weeks prior to the election, and the bill would also mandate that all voters have the ability to return their ballots via mail or drop boxes.
To make it easier to vote by mail, S. 136/H.R. 237 would have the U.S. Postal Service assume the cost of delivering mail-in ballots. According to Senator Wyden’s press release, “[t]his would allow states to save money by transitioning away from polling stations and reduce a major barrier for voters with the federal government absorbing the cost associated with USPS delivery.”
Last, but not least, the bill would require states to automatically register individuals when they apply for driver’s licenses, a change from the current federal provision that merely mandates states to give individuals the opportunity to register. Under the bill, those individuals would need to opt out prior to a three-week deadline if they wish not to be registered.
S. 136/H.R. 237 would deal a significant blow to election integrity and increase opportunities for fraud. Absentee ballots in general are prone to fraud and manipulation. For example, while the bill would mandate states to mail ballots to all registered voters, it is well-known that voter rolls are inaccurate. For example, the Public Interest Legal Foundation found in 2020 that nearly 350,000 deceased people remained on the voter rolls in over 40 states, and over 50,000 people voted more than once. Additionally, a 2012 Pew Research Center report found that about 24 million voter registrations in the U.S. were outdated or inaccurate.
Also problematic is the bill’s undermining of the precinct, which has already been diminished to an unacceptable degree. Due to its decentralized nature, the precinct is a strong deterrent to fraud, but expanding mail-in voting circumvents and undermines the precinct. Similarly, ballot drop boxes, which the bill promotes, are vulnerable to fraud and other forms of tampering.
The automatic voter registration provision in S. 136/H.R. 237 would also damage confidence in election results. This is because such a policy would result in ineligible individuals, particularly non-citizens, being accidentally registered to vote. Multiple examples already exist of non-citizen voter fraud, often because of laws giving driver’s licenses to illegal aliens and other lax driver registration policies. In one example, observers pointed out that a New York law allowing driver’s licenses for illegals could enable illegal alien voting, and in other states like Texas, no citizenship checks exist when registering to vote. A federal automatic voter registration provision would exacerbate this problem.
In addition to these problematic provisions in S. 136/H.R. 237, the bill contains zero anti-fraud measures. The John Birch Society has identified multiple steps that the states and federal government can take to strength election integrity. Not only does the “Vote at Home Act” make insecure mail-in voting easier, but it contains none of these common-sense solutions. Furthermore, the bill would accelerate the dangerous trend of federalizing all American elections, something that goes against the spirit, if not the text, of the 10th Amendment.
Urge your U.S. representative and senators to oppose S. 136/H.R. 237, titled the “Vote at Home Act,” and ask them to support measures that strengthen, rather than undermine, election integrity.
If you like freedom, get your butt in gear and fight back!
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislat... (
show quote)
Freedom ?
Freedom would be helping every American that wants to vote, to vote.
Not more Republican stiflement of legal votes.
Either start acting like an American or sit down.
EmilyD wrote:
Right now, Illegal aliens are able to obtain drivers licenses in several states (North Carolina is one I know of first hand because my neighbors who were illegal aliens (very nice people, but not citizens) all had drivers licenses. So...if people are automatically registered when they get drivers licenses, there will be whole lot of unqualified (non-citizens) people who will be able to vote. It would take many years to update the registration rolls in most states, so there are all those dead people who will get ballots in the mail...along with people who have moved out of state or married and did not notify the registration bureaus.
But I understand why Dems want this - they don't mind cheating their way into a win. The more ways they can do it, the better for them...honesty be damned.
Right now, Illegal aliens are able to obtain drive... (
show quote)
They didn’t find any last time, did they ?
Bush 43 spent $72 Million seeking out voting fraud over 50 states and found
zero fraud.
Trump Lost !
Get Over it !
Capt-jack wrote:
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislation that would massively expand mail-in voting, something that would decimate election integrity and enable increased election fraud and manipulation.
On January 28, 2021, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) introduced the “Vote at Home Act,” which has the bill numbers S. 136 and H.R. 237. Currently, S. 136 has 13 co-sponsors while H.R. 237 has 15.
Among the bill’s provisions, it would ban states from enacting any additional limitations on mail-in voting for individuals eligible to vote in federal elections, besides ballot return deadlines. Additionally, it would require states to mail ballots to every registered voter at least two weeks prior to the election, and the bill would also mandate that all voters have the ability to return their ballots via mail or drop boxes.
To make it easier to vote by mail, S. 136/H.R. 237 would have the U.S. Postal Service assume the cost of delivering mail-in ballots. According to Senator Wyden’s press release, “[t]his would allow states to save money by transitioning away from polling stations and reduce a major barrier for voters with the federal government absorbing the cost associated with USPS delivery.”
Last, but not least, the bill would require states to automatically register individuals when they apply for driver’s licenses, a change from the current federal provision that merely mandates states to give individuals the opportunity to register. Under the bill, those individuals would need to opt out prior to a three-week deadline if they wish not to be registered.
S. 136/H.R. 237 would deal a significant blow to election integrity and increase opportunities for fraud. Absentee ballots in general are prone to fraud and manipulation. For example, while the bill would mandate states to mail ballots to all registered voters, it is well-known that voter rolls are inaccurate. For example, the Public Interest Legal Foundation found in 2020 that nearly 350,000 deceased people remained on the voter rolls in over 40 states, and over 50,000 people voted more than once. Additionally, a 2012 Pew Research Center report found that about 24 million voter registrations in the U.S. were outdated or inaccurate.
Also problematic is the bill’s undermining of the precinct, which has already been diminished to an unacceptable degree. Due to its decentralized nature, the precinct is a strong deterrent to fraud, but expanding mail-in voting circumvents and undermines the precinct. Similarly, ballot drop boxes, which the bill promotes, are vulnerable to fraud and other forms of tampering.
The automatic voter registration provision in S. 136/H.R. 237 would also damage confidence in election results. This is because such a policy would result in ineligible individuals, particularly non-citizens, being accidentally registered to vote. Multiple examples already exist of non-citizen voter fraud, often because of laws giving driver’s licenses to illegal aliens and other lax driver registration policies. In one example, observers pointed out that a New York law allowing driver’s licenses for illegals could enable illegal alien voting, and in other states like Texas, no citizenship checks exist when registering to vote. A federal automatic voter registration provision would exacerbate this problem.
In addition to these problematic provisions in S. 136/H.R. 237, the bill contains zero anti-fraud measures. The John Birch Society has identified multiple steps that the states and federal government can take to strength election integrity. Not only does the “Vote at Home Act” make insecure mail-in voting easier, but it contains none of these common-sense solutions. Furthermore, the bill would accelerate the dangerous trend of federalizing all American elections, something that goes against the spirit, if not the text, of the 10th Amendment.
Urge your U.S. representative and senators to oppose S. 136/H.R. 237, titled the “Vote at Home Act,” and ask them to support measures that strengthen, rather than undermine, election integrity.
If you like freedom, get your butt in gear and fight back!
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislat... (
show quote)
If you like freedom , try to get on the right bus this time.
Milosia2 wrote:
Freedom ?
Freedom would be helping every American that wants to vote, to vote.
Not more Republican stiflement of legal votes.
Either start acting like an American or sit down.
Stupid is as stupid does.
***Freedom ?
***Freedom would be helping every American that wants to vote, to vote.
>>>Freedom would be allowing every American who is eligible to be registered to vote, to get off of his dead ass and get registered, and get off of his dead ass and go vote on election day. Theft is about the Democrat options.
***Not more Republican stiflement of legal votes.
>>>More lies. Republicans are not about stiflement of legal votes, but only allow legal votes, once, and on time. Democrats are for any votes they can get in anyway possible and at any time they can get them.
***Either start acting like an American or sit down.
>>>Take your seat.
Milosia2 wrote:
They didn’t find any last time, did they ?
Bush 43 spent $72 Million seeking out voting fraud over 50 states and found
zero fraud.
Trump Lost !
Get Over it !
biden is an illegal president. Get over it.
Capt-jack wrote:
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislation that would massively expand mail-in voting, something that would decimate election integrity and enable increased election fraud and manipulation.
On January 28, 2021, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) introduced the “Vote at Home Act,” which has the bill numbers S. 136 and H.R. 237. Currently, S. 136 has 13 co-sponsors while H.R. 237 has 15.
Among the bill’s provisions, it would ban states from enacting any additional limitations on mail-in voting for individuals eligible to vote in federal elections, besides ballot return deadlines. Additionally, it would require states to mail ballots to every registered voter at least two weeks prior to the election, and the bill would also mandate that all voters have the ability to return their ballots via mail or drop boxes.
To make it easier to vote by mail, S. 136/H.R. 237 would have the U.S. Postal Service assume the cost of delivering mail-in ballots. According to Senator Wyden’s press release, “[t]his would allow states to save money by transitioning away from polling stations and reduce a major barrier for voters with the federal government absorbing the cost associated with USPS delivery.”
Last, but not least, the bill would require states to automatically register individuals when they apply for driver’s licenses, a change from the current federal provision that merely mandates states to give individuals the opportunity to register. Under the bill, those individuals would need to opt out prior to a three-week deadline if they wish not to be registered.
S. 136/H.R. 237 would deal a significant blow to election integrity and increase opportunities for fraud. Absentee ballots in general are prone to fraud and manipulation. For example, while the bill would mandate states to mail ballots to all registered voters, it is well-known that voter rolls are inaccurate. For example, the Public Interest Legal Foundation found in 2020 that nearly 350,000 deceased people remained on the voter rolls in over 40 states, and over 50,000 people voted more than once. Additionally, a 2012 Pew Research Center report found that about 24 million voter registrations in the U.S. were outdated or inaccurate.
Also problematic is the bill’s undermining of the precinct, which has already been diminished to an unacceptable degree. Due to its decentralized nature, the precinct is a strong deterrent to fraud, but expanding mail-in voting circumvents and undermines the precinct. Similarly, ballot drop boxes, which the bill promotes, are vulnerable to fraud and other forms of tampering.
The automatic voter registration provision in S. 136/H.R. 237 would also damage confidence in election results. This is because such a policy would result in ineligible individuals, particularly non-citizens, being accidentally registered to vote. Multiple examples already exist of non-citizen voter fraud, often because of laws giving driver’s licenses to illegal aliens and other lax driver registration policies. In one example, observers pointed out that a New York law allowing driver’s licenses for illegals could enable illegal alien voting, and in other states like Texas, no citizenship checks exist when registering to vote. A federal automatic voter registration provision would exacerbate this problem.
In addition to these problematic provisions in S. 136/H.R. 237, the bill contains zero anti-fraud measures. The John Birch Society has identified multiple steps that the states and federal government can take to strength election integrity. Not only does the “Vote at Home Act” make insecure mail-in voting easier, but it contains none of these common-sense solutions. Furthermore, the bill would accelerate the dangerous trend of federalizing all American elections, something that goes against the spirit, if not the text, of the 10th Amendment.
Urge your U.S. representative and senators to oppose S. 136/H.R. 237, titled the “Vote at Home Act,” and ask them to support measures that strengthen, rather than undermine, election integrity.
If you like freedom, get your butt in gear and fight back!
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislat... (
show quote)
The U. S. Constitution expressly states that it is up to the various states Legislatures to make their own rules for elections for Federal offices. The Congress does not have that right until and unless they amend the Constitution. And no state officer has the right to over rule the state Legislature on Federal election matters. One of the reasons the last election was stolen.
DaWg44 wrote:
It does not matter over 100% of eligible voters voted in numerous places.
I always give 110% of anything I am doing. Oops, that doesn't work in voting unless you count all the dead folk, illegal folk and votes run thru the fraudulent Dominion commie machines at least 3 times. Then you could come up with 200% of votes in any precinct. Of course the Supreme Court would turn down any effort to contest this and the dem party would scream there is no proof of voter fraud and anyone even saying there is voter fraud should be prosecuted and the FBI thugs will be knocking your front door down and throwing you in a demorat gulag.
Milosia2 wrote:
Freedom ?
Freedom would be helping every American that wants to vote, to vote.
Not more Republican stiflement of legal votes.
Either start acting like an American or sit down.
Freedom stops where you vote illegally and take my legal vote away from me. Wake up Milktoastia and face the facts.
LogicallyRight wrote:
Stupid is as stupid does.
***Freedom ?
***Freedom would be helping every American that wants to vote, to vote.
>>>Freedom would be allowing every American who is eligible to be registered to vote, to get off of his dead ass and get registered, and get off of his dead ass and go vote on election day. Theft is about the Democrat options.
***Not more Republican stiflement of legal votes.
>>>More lies. Republicans are not about stiflement of legal votes, but only allow legal votes, once, and on time. Democrats are for any votes they can get in anyway possible and at any time they can get them.
***Either start acting like an American or sit down.
>>>Take your seat.
Stupid is as stupid does. br ***Freedom ? br ***Fr... (
show quote)
When all is said and done, Milktoastia supports voter fraud since 98% of the fraud is always done by the demonrat party.
Capt-jack wrote:
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislation that would massively expand mail-in voting, something that would decimate election integrity and enable increased election fraud and manipulation.
On January 28, 2021, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) introduced the “Vote at Home Act,” which has the bill numbers S. 136 and H.R. 237. Currently, S. 136 has 13 co-sponsors while H.R. 237 has 15.
Among the bill’s provisions, it would ban states from enacting any additional limitations on mail-in voting for individuals eligible to vote in federal elections, besides ballot return deadlines. Additionally, it would require states to mail ballots to every registered voter at least two weeks prior to the election, and the bill would also mandate that all voters have the ability to return their ballots via mail or drop boxes.
To make it easier to vote by mail, S. 136/H.R. 237 would have the U.S. Postal Service assume the cost of delivering mail-in ballots. According to Senator Wyden’s press release, “[t]his would allow states to save money by transitioning away from polling stations and reduce a major barrier for voters with the federal government absorbing the cost associated with USPS delivery.”
Last, but not least, the bill would require states to automatically register individuals when they apply for driver’s licenses, a change from the current federal provision that merely mandates states to give individuals the opportunity to register. Under the bill, those individuals would need to opt out prior to a three-week deadline if they wish not to be registered.
S. 136/H.R. 237 would deal a significant blow to election integrity and increase opportunities for fraud. Absentee ballots in general are prone to fraud and manipulation. For example, while the bill would mandate states to mail ballots to all registered voters, it is well-known that voter rolls are inaccurate. For example, the Public Interest Legal Foundation found in 2020 that nearly 350,000 deceased people remained on the voter rolls in over 40 states, and over 50,000 people voted more than once. Additionally, a 2012 Pew Research Center report found that about 24 million voter registrations in the U.S. were outdated or inaccurate.
Also problematic is the bill’s undermining of the precinct, which has already been diminished to an unacceptable degree. Due to its decentralized nature, the precinct is a strong deterrent to fraud, but expanding mail-in voting circumvents and undermines the precinct. Similarly, ballot drop boxes, which the bill promotes, are vulnerable to fraud and other forms of tampering.
The automatic voter registration provision in S. 136/H.R. 237 would also damage confidence in election results. This is because such a policy would result in ineligible individuals, particularly non-citizens, being accidentally registered to vote. Multiple examples already exist of non-citizen voter fraud, often because of laws giving driver’s licenses to illegal aliens and other lax driver registration policies. In one example, observers pointed out that a New York law allowing driver’s licenses for illegals could enable illegal alien voting, and in other states like Texas, no citizenship checks exist when registering to vote. A federal automatic voter registration provision would exacerbate this problem.
In addition to these problematic provisions in S. 136/H.R. 237, the bill contains zero anti-fraud measures. The John Birch Society has identified multiple steps that the states and federal government can take to strength election integrity. Not only does the “Vote at Home Act” make insecure mail-in voting easier, but it contains none of these common-sense solutions. Furthermore, the bill would accelerate the dangerous trend of federalizing all American elections, something that goes against the spirit, if not the text, of the 10th Amendment.
Urge your U.S. representative and senators to oppose S. 136/H.R. 237, titled the “Vote at Home Act,” and ask them to support measures that strengthen, rather than undermine, election integrity.
If you like freedom, get your butt in gear and fight back!
Democrats in Congress are seeking to pass legislat... (
show quote)
If these psycho's aren't stoped there will be no reason to vote again
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
