Check out topic: What so many do not know....
Ban Trump Supporters
Jan 10, 2021 17:56:37 #
American Vet wrote:
So one should simply sneak out and let the other people burn to death?
The unspoken premise Is that there was no fire!
Analogous to the fact that there was no "Steal" to stop..
I'm thinking bacon and waffles for dinner. Munching on a mini Hershey bar.
With almonds!
Jan 10, 2021 18:00:18 #
Singularity wrote:
The unspoken premise Is that there was no fire!
Analogous to the fact that there was no "Steal" to stop..
Analogous to the fact that there was no "Steal" to stop..
Is your blindness a convenience for you? Get a better crutch, the truth is your ilks biggest enemy.
Jan 10, 2021 18:00:57 #
American Vet wrote:
So one should simply sneak out and let the other people burn to death?
Overly analyzed.
My bad.
I regret not mentioning every aspect of what my point was.
I should have said a theater That was not on Fire!
Talking to these meth monkeys just makes me dizzy sometimes.
Jan 10, 2021 18:19:57 #
[quote=Singularity]The unspoken premise Is that [i] there was no fire![/i[/quote]
Unspoken does not show on a printed page. One should make complete, clear statements - not leave a comment open for assumptions.
Do you want people making assumptions about you based on incomplete data/facts?
Unspoken does not show on a printed page. One should make complete, clear statements - not leave a comment open for assumptions.
Do you want people making assumptions about you based on incomplete data/facts?
Jan 10, 2021 18:28:52 #
American Vet wrote:
Unspoken does not show on a printed page. One should make complete, clear statements - not leave a comment open for assumptions.
Do you want people making assumptions about you based on incomplete data/facts?
Do you want people making assumptions about you based on incomplete data/facts?
It is a well known meme and the associated paradigms are thus legitimately implied assuming a normal base of general knowlege. Our apologies if that was presumptuous!
~~~
An honest and rational interlocutor would abhor such a practice!?!
And be irritated by noting its practice!
Jan 10, 2021 18:32:35 #
Milosia wrote:
Overly analyzed.
My bad.
I regret not mentioning every aspect of what my point was.
I should have said a theater That was not on Fire!
Talking to these meth monkeys just makes me dizzy sometimes.
My bad.
I regret not mentioning every aspect of what my point was.
I should have said a theater That was not on Fire!
Talking to these meth monkeys just makes me dizzy sometimes.
Don't sweat it. That would be two symptoms. One more and you win a nasal swab and perhaps an unpaid vacation.
Jan 10, 2021 18:40:37 #
bilordinary wrote:
Is your blindness a convenience for you? Get a better crutch, the truth is your ilks biggest enemy.
As long as you so baldly and ungenerously consider your fellow humans to be "ilk," and the social world to be peopled with larger or smaller "enemies," you should hardly be surprised if they respond to your overtures and questions with suspicion and equal hostility.
Jan 10, 2021 19:36:16 #
Singularity wrote:
As long as you so baldly and ungenerously consider your fellow humans to be "ilk," and the social world to be peopled with larger or smaller "enemies," you should hardly be surprised if they respond to your overtures and questions with suspicion and equal hostility.
Your ilk, my ilk? Do you even know the meaning of the term?
Jan 10, 2021 20:23:23 #
bilordinary wrote:
Your ilk, my ilk? Do you even know the meaning of the term?
I believe it should be clear from the context that I was criticizing to your tone and attitude in general, rather than grammar policing.
Jan 11, 2021 01:03:55 #
Singularity wrote:
I believe it should be clear from the context that I was criticizing to your tone and attitude in general, rather than grammar policing.
You are clear, clear enough to see through.
Jan 11, 2021 01:06:24 #
Singularity wrote:
As long as you so baldly and ungenerously consider your fellow humans to be "ilk," and the social world to be peopled with larger or smaller "enemies," you should hardly be surprised if they respond to your overtures and questions with suspicion and equal hostility.
Your cat is biracial, gotta love them critters.
Jan 11, 2021 01:40:20 #
Jan 11, 2021 02:34:15 #
Quakerwidow
Loc: Chestertown, MD
ChJoe wrote:
How does one agree or disagree with a "question?"
The starting post was:
"Every Democrat should be asked:
1. Do you believe that Trump and his supporters should be banned from the Internet?
2. Do you believe that private companies should refuse to hire Trump supporters?"
Followed by an additional post with two more questions. My answer is NO to all four questions. Is that clear enough for you?
Jan 11, 2021 02:46:15 #
Quakerwidow
Loc: Chestertown, MD
ChJoe wrote:
Are you telling me that the guy who got vaccines out in under a year can't even get a room at Holiday Inn??
Actually, it was the scientists who got the vaccines out. All Trump did was to tell the FDA to allow expedition.
Jan 11, 2021 02:52:19 #
Quakerwidow
Loc: Chestertown, MD
ChJoe wrote:
I heard someone left a refrigerator open too. Trump's fault. Thinking that Trump was supposed to micro manage all the details of a fast vaccine roll out is purely naive.
Trump was the one who disbanded the group set up to deal with new viruses.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.