Liberty Tree wrote:
The SCOTUS may take one of the following actions.
1. Refuse to hear the case.
2. Hear the case and then dismiss it.
3. Decide laws were broken but unable to show it affected the outcome of the election, but order states to prevent a reoccurrence.
4. Invalidate the votes in the targeted states and order either new votes or let the state legislatures decide on the remedy.
Since I believe the Justices are intimidated and fear great violence from the left more so than than the right I believe they will take option 3.
The SCOTUS may take one of the following actions. ... (
show quote)
6. pull trumps and his lawyers pants down and spank that ass for wasting the courts time.
First problem the court will ask why now ware were you weeks ago ,why did you wait till the last minute. Then they will stamp it denied
It appears that SCOTUS is the sole branch of the US gov't that has stood firmly on the side of democracy in 2020, we end the year in a spotlight of hope. SCOTUS and a vaccine, the brightness at the finish of the year.
GoCubs wrote:
Yeah, to hell with democracy, right?
Well, I was wrong! Standing and procedure won. However, the merits of the case were not considered, and the evidence of fraud was not heard. True democracy requires that fraudulent voting be suppressed and it obviously was not. So much for your unwise comment.
What is happening in the USA? I agree Trump tweets too much and has a big ego. None of which I see was detrimental to the country. Look at what he did that improved the country. The economy was booming, unenployeement was at all time low, and countries stopped pushing our buttons. That made democrats angry? Why? The only job old Joe has created in 47 years was for his son, Hunter. What do you think you will have to pay Hunter now for contact with Dad? With the deals Pelosi pulled with post office, and others in congress who have helped family members in government business the democrats called Trump a crook? Give me a break!
What is happening in the USA? I agree Trump tweets too much and has a big ego. None of which I see was detrimental to the country. Look at what he did that improved the country. The economy was booming, unenployeement was at all time low, and countries stopped pushing our buttons. That made democrats angry? Why? The only job old Joe has created in 47 years was for his son, Hunter. What do you think you will have to pay Hunter now for contact with Dad? With the deals Pelosi pulled with post office, and others in congress who have helped family members in government business the democrats called Trump a crook? Give me a break!
Cherokee38 wrote:
What is happening in the USA? I agree Trump tweets too much and has a big ego. None of which I see was detrimental to the country. Look at what he did that improved the country. The economy was booming, unenployeement was at all time low, and countries stopped pushing our buttons. That made democrats angry? Why? The only job old Joe has created in 47 years was for his son, Hunter. What do you think you will have to pay Hunter now for contact with Dad? With the deals Pelosi pulled with post office, and others in congress who have helped family members in government business the democrats called Trump a crook? Give me a break!
What is happening in the USA? I agree Trump tweet... (
show quote)
trump has greatly lowered the level of respect that other countries had for the U.S. trump is only called a crook because he is one.
It is easy to call people names. If you know personally what he has done illegally as president then list it or shut up. I can give you very specific instances the democrats are breaking laws and nothing is being done about it.
Comment wrote:
U are ignorant as to interpreting the Cnstitution, I am sorry to say,
Well, I was right about the Supreme Court wasn't I?
Cherokee38 wrote:
It is easy to call people names. If you know personally what he has done illegally as president then list it or shut up. I can give you very specific instances the democrats are breaking laws and nothing is being done about it.
Not sure who you're talking to?
manning5 wrote:
Well, I was wrong! Standing and procedure won. However, the merits of the case were not considered, and the evidence of fraud was not heard. True democracy requires that fraudulent voting be suppressed and it obviously was not. So much for your unwise comment.
They stood by the rule of law.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.