Check out topic: The Democrat convention
Small town press editorial
May 18, 2014 16:52:28 #
http://conservativeamericanvet.wordpress.com/2011/05/14/a-small-michigan-newspaper-editorial%E2%80%8F/
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
May 18, 2014 17:02:53 #
Elwood wrote:
http://conservativeamericanvet.wordpress.com/2011/05/14/a-small-michigan-newspaper-editorial%E2%80%8F/
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
*********
Elwood, do you understand the difference between a newspaper editorial and a letter to the editor???
:? :? :? :? :? :?
May 18, 2014 17:13:42 #
Brian Devon wrote:
*********
Elwood, do you understand the difference between a newspaper editorial and a letter to the editor???
:? :? :? :? :? :?
Elwood, do you understand the difference between a newspaper editorial and a letter to the editor???
:? :? :? :? :? :?
I understand that you are a schmuck and that closes my conversation with you. :hunf:
May 18, 2014 17:24:50 #
Elwood wrote:
I understand that you are a schmuck and that closes my conversation with you. :hunf:
*********
Typical GOP illiterate goober.
May 18, 2014 17:30:59 #
Elwood wrote:
I understand that you are a schmuck and that closes my conversation with you. :hunf:
He is very good at insolence and deflection isn't he. If he was this way as a child then he probably had a miserable childhood which explains his behavior today. It was a very good article thanks.
May 18, 2014 17:32:10 #
bahmer wrote:
He is very good at insolence and deflection isn't he. If he was this way as a child then he probably had a miserable childhood which explains his behavior today. It was also a very good article thanks.
May 18, 2014 17:39:28 #
bahmer wrote:
He is very good at insolence and deflection isn't he. If he was this way as a child then he probably had a miserable childhood which explains his behavior today. It was a very good article thanks.
*********
Insolence??? There's a word you don't hear every day. It's right up there with impudent, cheeky, and sassy.
My stars!
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
May 18, 2014 19:06:13 #
bahmer wrote:
He is very good at insolence and deflection isn't he. If he was this way as a child then he probably had a miserable childhood which explains his behavior today. It was a very good article thanks.
Probably getting his lunch money stolen everyday scarred him for life.
May 18, 2014 19:10:31 #
Brian Devon wrote:
*********
Insolence??? There's a word you don't hear every day. It's right up there with impudent, cheeky, and sassy.
My stars!
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Insolence??? There's a word you don't hear every day. It's right up there with impudent, cheeky, and sassy.
My stars!
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Not to mention arrogant, condescending, self-righteous, cynical, myopic, hypocritical prick. Now that I think about it, you probably do hear those every day, or would if you lived anywhere but LaLa Land.
May 18, 2014 19:16:10 #
Loki wrote:
Not to mention arrogant, condescending, self-righteous, cynical, myopic, hypocritical prick. Now that I think about it, you probably do hear those every day, or would if you lived anywhere but LaLa Land.
:lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup:
May 18, 2014 23:48:52 #
Elwood wrote:
http://conservativeamericanvet.wordpress.com/2011/05/14/a-small-michigan-newspaper-editorial%E2%80%8F/
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
This came around in email awhile ago - like a year or so - it's still right on the mark. Thanks for the reminder, Elwood.
May 18, 2014 23:49:31 #
Elwood wrote:
http://conservativeamericanvet.wordpress.com/2011/05/14/a-small-michigan-newspaper-editorial%E2%80%8F/
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
This came around in email awhile ago - like a year or so - it's still right on the mark. Thanks for the reminder, Elwood.
May 18, 2014 23:59:35 #
Elwood wrote:
http://conservativeamericanvet.wordpress.com/2011/05/14/a-small-michigan-newspaper-editorial%E2%80%8F/
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
This editorial just about covers it all. Too bad it wasn't in the the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times, but then those liberal rags are not known for publishing anything contrary to the progressive view. :hunf:
It is not the hapless left or right of we the people but Congress! Get very clear and focused. The system has to drastically change in that branch. The SPCOTUS is a disgrace. Corporations are not people. Dollars are not citizens! Wake the F up! Teddy Roosevelt saw this problem at the turn of the century and was totally right: the end of our republic and democracy.
The "robber barons" did everything in their huge power and influence to discredit Teddy but he busted them.
May 19, 2014 00:31:43 #
dennisimoto wrote:
This came around in email awhile ago - like a year or so - it's still right on the mark. Thanks for the reminder, Elwood.
You are welcome. :-D
May 19, 2014 00:32:32 #
rumitoid wrote:
It is not the hapless left or right of we the people but Congress! Get very clear and focused. The system has to drastically change in that branch. The SPCOTUS is a disgrace. Corporations are not people. Dollars are not citizens! Wake the F up! Teddy Roosevelt saw this problem at the turn of the century and was totally right: the end of our republic and democracy.
The "robber barons" did everything in their huge power and influence to discredit Teddy but he busted them.
The "robber barons" did everything in their huge power and influence to discredit Teddy but he busted them.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :-D
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: Government plans $1,000 fines for VICTIMS of gun crime!