permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Thanks mac... yes it turn out I had heard this before..

It is about the organization to fight republican efforts to suppress the vote, not count the vote..

and yes he said it poorly..


When podcast host Dan Pfeiffer asked, “What’s your message to the folks who have not yet voted or do not yet have a plan to vote?” Biden responded:

“Republicans are doing everything they can to make it harder for people to vote. Particularly people of color to vote. So go to iwillvote.com. Secondly, we’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for President Obama’s administration before this, we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics. What the president is trying to do is discourage people from voting by implying that their vote won’t be counted. It can’t be counted. We’re going to challenge it and all these things.’

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

Am not foolish enough to take the word of Democratic National Committee on a page that was thrown up Oct. 02, 2020 and will come down Nov. 23 2020.

ImLogicallyRight

Was it a gaff or slip up?

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

Who cares?

Eleni5958

The guy did not recant his story. He was on Tik Tok 11 hours after The Post released the article, denying that he recanted. He even did an interview with Veritas Project after the committee hearing and said he didn’t recant

nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert

I also heard him say I don't need your votes to win. Now what politician don't need every vote they can get? A cheating one . This helps prove that he was in on it. And. OK with it.
GUILTY!!! I say if fraud is proven the perpetrator s should be disqualified. No matter if it was enough to change the election or not
Cheating Can Never Be Tolerated.

Patriot1

You get what you pay for.

John Meoff

Have you noticed, that for months, Trump was warning about fraud in the mail-in ballots. Of course, the liberals scoffed.

Last evening, Tucker Carlson listed about 6 people who voted in Georgia although they were dead, one since 1984. now, in concert, these same liberals, in spite of incontrovertible evidence, are claiming no fraud. They are shameless.

JoyV

So why are they against completing the counting or having recounts? And just how does pointing out evidence of fraud make it harder for people to vote, whether they are minorities or not? Or do you mean it makes it harder for ineligible or illegal votes to be accepted?

JoyV

I myself am a victim of voter irregularities or fraud. Where I live if it rains I cannot drive out my road. So I use an absentee ballot and have done so for years. Since there is a span of time to return your ballot, and not just a particular day, the weather isn't a problem. I do not return the ballot in the mail because so long as I receive mail for other people multiple times a month, I don't trust my ballot will get to where it is supposed to. So instead I bring my ballot to the county recorders office and place it in a locked drop box. A week before the election, I began seeing posts from people on a community forum for my town saying they dropped their ballot off and the ballot tracking portal set up by the state election officials can't find any record of their ballots being received. So I checked on mine and found it was confirmed as being received. But on the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 9th; the portal ballot tracker could find no record a ballot was received. About 50 people from my town have posted the same. Who knows how many others who never checked. Other towns in my county have had similar experiences. But it isn't just absentee ballots. Our State uses paper ballots at the polling places which need to be filled out by hand on both sides. Bubbles beside each candidate or proposition must be filled in with dark ink so the scanning machines can read them. When completed, the voter feeds them into the scanner and the vote is recorded. But in many polling places, poll workers were handing out either sharpies or red pens to Republican voters. Democrats did not receive them. The scanners cannot scan red ink and sharpies bleed through and mark the other side of the ballot causing an overvote when the voter marks his choices and the bleedthrough makes another mark. When voters asked for an undamaged ballot, they were refused. The scanners reject the ballots which are overvoted so the voter is disenfranchised.

John Meoff

You should send this story to the various liberals in this venue who have been trying to deny any fraud. It's really amusing because it was the Democrats who developed big-city voting fraud.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

No one is against counting the votes other then trump... he was the one who demanded counts be stopped in the states in which he was ahead..

The constant drone of voter fraud coming from trump cultist is drowned out by the dancing in the streets by the winning and legal voters..

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

'Tis astounding how you manage to reinterpret a statement to protect the Saints of Socialism, the Priests of Progressivism, and the Angels of Anarchy.

"We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
Joe Biden, October, 2020

Democrats spent the entire Trump presidency, particularly the last six months to a year, going into states and filing lawsuits, or colluding with democrat lawmakers and governors to change their laws to accommodate their nominee and the democrat party.

In September, Joe Biden's campaign formally assembled a war room ostensibly to fight voter suppression. To head this war room, he brought in Marc Elias, former general counsel for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and whose law firm, Perkins Coie, was involved in the creation of the infamous Steele dossier. Elias assembled a team of Perkins Coie lawyers as a “special litigation” unit.

Biden also brought in former AG Eric Holder, two U.S. solicitors general from the Clinton and Obama presidencies, and the former general counsel for Obama’s campaigns

320 lawsuits were filed since the primaries across 45 states, D.C. and Puerto Rico. Almost all of them were filed by progressives in the democrat party. This is a record number of law suits. These suits pushed mail-in voting, no signatures or post marks necessary, counting votes well beyond election day, and in some cases, pushed to allow voting to take place AFTER the polls close. They focused on battleground states.

Elias & Co were involved in more than 60 of the cases nationwide. In the few cases they lost, they claimed "voter suppression".



10 state Attorneys General File Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS To Rule On Pennsylvania Mail-In Ballots

Attorneys General from Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Texas filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the mail-in ballot lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania.

“Free and fair elections are the cornerstone of our Republic and it’s one of the reasons why the United States is the envy of the world,” Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt said in a press conference on Monday. “We have to ensure that every legal vote cast is counted in that every illegal vote cast is not counted.”

The lawsuit in question, Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, challenges the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision to allow mail-in ballots that arrived after Election Day to be counted, despite state laws mandating otherwise. Associate Justice Samuel Alito Jr. already granted the Republican Party of Pennsylvania’s request and temporarily ordered all counties segregate mail-in ballots that arrived after 8 p.m. on Election Day from others, but the lawsuit is still pending petition in the highest court.

“The actions taken by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court are one of the most breathtaking abuses of judicial authority that I’ve seen in my four-plus years as attorney general,” Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter said.

The attorneys’ hope is that by filing as “friends of the Court” and demonstrating a “strong interest” in the ramifications of the Supreme Court’s potential decision that SCOTUS may be more willing to take up the case.

In the brief, the Republican AGs state that they believe the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overstepped its bounds and violated the Constitution’s Election Clauses which grant state legislatures the ability and “unique role” to decide certain election procedures and not the courts.

“Our system of federalism relies on separation of powers to preserve liberty at every level of government, and the separation of powers in the Election Clauses is no exception to this principle,” the brief states.

They also believe the decision handed down by the Pennsylvania Court expanded the potential for voter fraud. This decision, the attorneys general argue, may have affected the weight of votes in states outside of Pennsylvania which is in direct violation of previous Court rulings stating that every vote must be “fairly counted without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.”

“Regardless of the election’s outcome, only legal ballots should be counted,” the brief continues, citing Anderson v. United States from 1974.

“We as attorneys general and we, as the chief legal officers of our state have a responsibility to address that kind of judicial abuse of authority because of the precedent that that decision represents can affect the outcome of elections, not only in Pennsylvania but national elections,” Hunter said.

screwdriver

Thats not true. Trump beat Biden by much more than that when the illegal votes are discarded.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

We will be cleaning the white house in a matter of weeks.. Get rid of the orange dust..