One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Dave Weigel's Hand Waving Will Not Make Benghazi Go Away
May 8, 2014 10:51:42   #
carolyn
 
Right now the left is attempting to minimize the significance of the investigation into the attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya. These attempts follow three basic rubrics that the Left-wing liberals use...

Controversialization: CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson pointed out that this means when one tries to make the subject a controversial rather than the object of empirical examination. The Left does this regularly. This is how we got to Homosexual marriage and why the regime is obsessed with defending the pseudo-religion of climate change.

Bureaucratic Infighting: The Benghazi investigation is just an attempt by Speaker John Boehner to gain control over a fractious caucus. This view was floated by the iridescent bag of pus from Maryland, Elijah Cummings. Cummings, it seems, still has his panty twisted over his being unable to run roughshod over Darryl Issa. But this was dutifully and approvingly reported on by the left-wing Washington Post's Greg Sargent. Imagine that! A left-wing newspaper reporting favorably on the left-wing liberals.

Hand Waving: The best job of hand waving thus far is by Slate's faux conservative, journo-lister Dave Weigel. Weigel is using the "search-replace" function for articles published during the Watergate and Monica Lewinsky scandals. So he writes "The Umpteenth Guide To The Impenetrable Benghazi Outrage and pretends the whole thing is silly.

This whole thing is about the Obama Administration's lying to the American people by telling them, even when they knew it was a blatant lie, that the embassy being overrun was caused by an amateur video.

This administration has been caught up in so many lies that it is now the laughing stock of the world. Third world countries make all matter of fun of us, and this bunch of Washington crooks could not care less. I feel this investigation is just the beginning of an all out attempt to once again bring these elected servants back to their sole job of serving the people, the real government. And I will stand by everything that might once again bring this country back to it's former greatness before corruption kills us all.

When I read the posts by the GREAT (ask him. He'll tell you) CWO and other brainwashed idiots such as Kevyn, I see the rubrics listed above in full force. They simply don't have the common sense to see where this administration is taking us. But I can guarantee when we are the total subjects of this tyrannical government, they will be the biggest crybabies of all.

Reply
May 8, 2014 11:02:30   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
carolyn wrote:
Right now the left is attempting to minimize the significance of the investigation into the attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya. These attempts follow three basic rubrics that the Left-wing liberals use...

Controversialization: CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson pointed out that this means when one tries to make the subject a controversial rather than the object of empirical examination. The Left does this regularly. This is how we got to Homosexual marriage and why the regime is obsessed with defending the pseudo-religion of climate change.

Bureaucratic Infighting: The Benghazi investigation is just an attempt by Speaker John Boehner to gain control over a fractious caucus. This view was floated by the iridescent bag of pus from Maryland, Elijah Cummings. Cummings, it seems, still has his panty twisted over his being unable to run roughshod over Darryl Issa. But this was dutifully and approvingly reported on by the left-wing Washington Post's Greg Sargent. Imagine that! A left-wing newspaper reporting favorably on the left-wing liberals.

Hand Waving: The best job of hand waving thus far is by Slate's faux conservative, journo-lister Dave Weigel. Weigel is using the "search-replace" function for articles published during the Watergate and Monica Lewinsky scandals. So he writes "The Umpteenth Guide To The Impenetrable Benghazi Outrage and pretends the whole thing is silly.

This whole thing is about the Obama Administration's lying to the American people by telling them, even when they knew it was a blatant lie, that the embassy being overrun was caused by an amateur video.

This administration has been caught up in so many lies that it is now the laughing stock of the world. Third world countries make all matter of fun of us, and this bunch of Washington crooks could not care less. I feel this investigation is just the beginning of an all out attempt to once again bring these elected servants back to their sole job of serving the people, the real government. And I will stand by everything that might once again bring this country back to it's former greatness before corruption kills us all.

When I read the posts by the GREAT (ask him. He'll tell you) CWO and other brainwashed idiots such as Kevyn, I see the rubrics listed above in full force. They simply don't have the common sense to see where this administration is taking us. But I can guarantee when we are the total subjects of this tyrannical government, they will be the biggest crybabies of all.
Right now the left is attempting to minimize the s... (show quote)


Did you mention that the right is attempting to use the deaths of four Americans as a political card? Have you looked at the numbers of attacks by Jihadists on Americans in the last 4 presidencies? Obama has the least attacks and the least deaths.
Do you think that our government aided the terrorists? Did Obama or Clinton plan the attack? Did these four Americans count more than the hundreds that died in three separate attacks during Reagan's presidency? How about the world trade center attacks during Bush 2? Perhaps your "outrage" is just politics.

Reply
May 8, 2014 11:18:50   #
marjorie
 
skott Maybe you need to follow the Benghazi back before the actual alQaeda attack and the running of guns. Why? Where? Who? What for? Then the various visits by the "commander-in-chief" to the many areas where the guns were to be sent. Just also followwwwwwwww the money through it all.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2014 01:16:10   #
carolyn
 
skott wrote:
Did you mention that the right is attempting to use the deaths of four Americans as a political card? Have you looked at the numbers of attacks by Jihadists on Americans in the last 4 presidencies? Obama has the least attacks and the least deaths.
Do you think that our government aided the terrorists? Did Obama or Clinton plan the attack? Did these four Americans count more than the hundreds that died in three separate attacks during Reagan's presidency? How about the world trade center attacks during Bush 2? Perhaps your "outrage" is just politics.
Did you mention that the right is attempting to us... (show quote)


My outrage is the lies that YOUR liars told about what happened and the actual reason it happened. And don't try to use politics against me because it was politics and lies that that caused the deaths of these men. The fear that Obama would lose the election after he had LIED and said that his administration had terrorism under control and that he had al Qaida on the run. Then when the embassy was attacked, he could not afford to send in help because then he would be found out to be the liar that he is. He had to try and make it out to be a local disturbance over a amateur video because he and Hillary could not afford to have the truth known so soon before the all important election. So, my brainwashed Democrat, if you want to accuse anyone of using politics, then accuse your great Barack and Hillary because these men were killed because of the all important election that was coming up in two months.

He is still the biggest liar that has ever sat in the Oval Office. He could not recognize the truth if it stared him in his bloodshot eyes. How many lies has he been caught up in? And why does he act as if there is not a thing wrong when he is caught lying through his teeth. There is an old adage that you young punks probably have never heard but it states that a liar is more dangerous that a cocked gun. Now try and figure this out if you can.

Reply
May 9, 2014 08:59:41   #
Snoopy
 
skott wrote:
Did you mention that the right is attempting to use the deaths of four Americans as a political card? Have you looked at the numbers of attacks by Jihadists on Americans in the last 4 presidencies? Obama has the least attacks and the least deaths.
Do you think that our government aided the terrorists? Did Obama or Clinton plan the attack? Did these four Americans count more than the hundreds that died in three separate attacks during Reagan's presidency? How about the world trade center attacks during Bush 2? Perhaps your "outrage" is just politics.
Did you mention that the right is attempting to us... (show quote)


Scott

The difference between Benghazi and the others you mentioned is: Obama and Clinton could have done something about the situation. Chose NOT to help!

Snoopy

Reply
Jun 8, 2014 23:47:42   #
squirrelmender Loc: Florida
 
carolyn wrote:
Right now the left is attempting to minimize the significance of the investigation into the attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya. These attempts follow three basic rubrics that the Left-wing liberals use...

Controversialization: CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson pointed out that this means when one tries to make the subject a controversial rather than the object of empirical examination. The Left does this regularly. This is how we got to Homosexual marriage and why the regime is obsessed with defending the pseudo-religion of climate change.



I totally agree with you.

Bureaucratic Infighting: The Benghazi investigation is just an attempt by Speaker John Boehner to gain control over a fractious caucus. This view was floated by the iridescent bag of pus from Maryland, Elijah Cummings. Cummings, it seems, still has his panty twisted over his being unable to run roughshod over Darryl Issa. But this was dutifully and approvingly reported on by the left-wing Washington Post's Greg Sargent. Imagine that! A left-wing newspaper reporting favorably on the left-wing liberals.

Hand Waving: The best job of hand waving thus far is by Slate's faux conservative, journo-lister Dave Weigel. Weigel is using the "search-replace" function for articles published during the Watergate and Monica Lewinsky scandals. So he writes "The Umpteenth Guide To The Impenetrable Benghazi Outrage and pretends the whole thing is silly.

This whole thing is about the Obama Administration's lying to the American people by telling them, even when they knew it was a blatant lie, that the embassy being overrun was caused by an amateur video.

This administration has been caught up in so many lies that it is now the laughing stock of the world. Third world countries make all matter of fun of us, and this bunch of Washington crooks could not care less. I feel this investigation is just the beginning of an all out attempt to once again bring these elected servants back to their sole job of serving the people, the real government. And I will stand by everything that might once again bring this country back to it's former greatness before corruption kills us all.

When I read the posts by the GREAT (ask him. He'll tell you) CWO and other brainwashed idiots such as Kevyn, I see the rubrics listed above in full force. They simply don't have the common sense to see where this administration is taking us. But I can guarantee when we are the total subjects of this tyrannical government, they will be the biggest crybabies of all.
Right now the left is attempting to minimize the s... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 9, 2014 00:43:20   #
carolyn
 
skott wrote:
Did you mention that the right is attempting to use the deaths of four Americans as a political card? Have you looked at the numbers of attacks by Jihadists on Americans in the last 4 presidencies? Obama has the least attacks and the least deaths.
Do you think that our government aided the terrorists? Did Obama or Clinton plan the attack? Did these four Americans count more than the hundreds that died in three separate attacks during Reagan's presidency? How about the world trade center attacks during Bush 2? Perhaps your "outrage" is just politics.
Did you mention that the right is attempting to us... (show quote)


My outrage is not politics. My outrage is the fact that these people begged for help and this POS president and his SOS ignored their pleas for help. And, Mr. Died-In-The-Wool Democrat, there is nothing you can conjure up to change this fact. And when they, as the cowards they were, lied to the American people that it was all about a two-bit video, and told this same lie for two weeks after the attack, then this has nothing to do with anything that happened in past administrations, as you evidently believe. They lied through their teeth and it was all about the upcoming election and being caught up in the lies that Al Qaida was history and the Taliban was on the run. These lies to make the people believe these two lying dogs had rid the country of Taliban and Al Qaida threats.

Try and find some other BS to try and change the fact that your man Obama and SOS are more than the liars that they proved themselves to be.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.