What are you talking about? That's a horrible rationalization! Where's the reason?
You gotta have the reason or it's not a rationalization.
Pro-choice is helping to minimize the suffering of the unborn by...
Preventing the situation that prohibition would create where the same number of unwanted pregnancies occur because it's not illegal to GET pregnant, it's illegal to UNGET pregnant. Therefore...
* Of those unwanted pregnancies (due to the compliance of the mothers) some number will carry through to birth resulting in a wave of inconvenient babies.
* Other unwanted pregnancies will be terminated illegally. Due to the delays typical in illegal activity, most of them will be late-term or even full-term which we know means
more suffering for the fetus. Continuing with the scenario... without any regulation there is no guarantee that these abortions won't kill both the baby and the mother. And no one will even know because illegal activities don't get recorded.
I won't make assumptions about the numbers but I think it's safe to say that the notion that any significant number of women get pregnant simply because they know they can get an abortion is retarded. Even the idiots that get pregnant repeatedly aren't doing it for that reason - they're just idiots that keep getting pregnant. So, I think it's safe to say there won't be any significant decrease in unwanted pregnancies.
I won't make assumptions about how many mothers will choose which path either, but I'm pretty certain that the number of illegal abortions will be significant and whatever that number is - that would be the number of unborn babies saved from greater suffering by the humanists on the pro-choice side.
...As the religious fanatics snarl and howl, waving their crosses and scriptures in thunderous persecution.
What are you talking about? That's a horrible rati... (