Ah dear LJ, what has me really upset is the Mueller Hoax that we taxpayers got STUCK with. Why can't we file a lawsuit requiring them to repay US, the American taxpayers?
BearK wrote:
Ah dear LJ, what has me really upset is the Mueller Hoax that we taxpayers got STUCK with. Why, as taxpayers, can't we file a lawsuit req
They are immune from action conducted “ for the country”. Although this far exceeds the exceptions to the law, they will argue immunity.. proof is already shown in their intended malice criminal activities but you can bet immunity will claim their innocence... Look at Barrs dismissal saying bo snd mueller will not be involved.. No balls republicans the main cause it will never happen! Certainly not because these criminals behind bars is where they should be!!!
The sad truth is it's past time for a 3rd party, but so difficult to get traction for that. ...and, in no time, they too would be in the pocket of the money providers.
Maybe it's time for that 'constitutional convention,' and take the politicians to task by informing them they not only have to live under their laws, but each state will dictate to their representatives, and senators exactly what their salaries and pensions will be. Any state rep who would suggest that - would probably end up having a fatal "ACCIDENT."
BearK wrote:
The sad truth is it's past time for a 3rd party, but so difficult to get traction for that. ...and, in no time, they too would be in the pocket of the money providers.
Maybe it's time for that 'constitutional convention,' and take the politicians to task by informing them they not only have to live under their laws, but each state will dictate to their representatives, and senators exactly what their salaries and pensions will be. Any state rep who would suggest that - would probably end up having a fatal "ACCIDENT."
The sad truth is it's past time for a 3rd party, b... (
show quote)
I’d like to see an article v forcing true term limits. Four years maximum and then they are out, no lobby and no waiting a certain number of years before they could go back in etc. I mean literally four years service and then out, the only one to maintain an eight year term is the president...
Will keep the lobbyist from filling the pockets of the people they have to constantly be buying up once the old is out and get things moving in this country if they want to achieve anything they do it in that four term time, Or go bye-bye.
lindajoy wrote:
While he is not by definition morbidly obese I do wish he would drop a few pounds for better health overall..
As for Pelosi that one needs to take a look at her own mirror.... Make up she wears is horrendous and often enough less is better and it certainly is in her situation...
If piglosi has one more facelift she will have a goatee !!!!!!
lindajoy wrote:
I’d like to see an article v forcing true term limits. Four years maximum and then they are out, no lobby and no waiting a certain number of years before they could go back in etc. I mean literally four years service and then out, the only one to maintain an eight year term is the president...
Will keep the lobbyist from filling the pockets of the people they have to constantly be buying up once the old is out and get things moving in this country if they want to achieve anything they do it in that four term time, Or go bye-bye.
I’d like to see an article v forcing true term lim... (
show quote)
I would certainly agree with that and also extend the time limit before they could become lobbyist! The current limits are only 1 year for the House & 2 years for the Senate...should be extended to at least 5 years or more for both! Also for Congressional staff members! Issues are more likely to change over a 5 yr period, so that their influence would be decreased.
lindajoy wrote:
While he is not by definition morbidly obese I do wish he would drop a few pounds for better health overall..
As for Pelosi that one needs to take a look at her own mirror.... Make up she wears is horrendous and often enough less is better and it certainly is in her situation...
That's not makeup, Linda. She has had so many facelifts that giving her a peck on the cheek is really kissing her ass.
lindajoy wrote:
While he is not by definition morbidly obese I do wish he would drop a few pounds for better health overall..
As for Pelosi that one needs to take a look at her own mirror.... Make up she wears is horrendous and often enough less is better and it certainly is in her situation...
Is it the amenachrome that makes her look 90?
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
What is wrong with Pelosi? So much surgeries and renovations on her face to make her look young. Without her face renovations and makeup, she looks 90-years old. Hypocrite!
President Trump does not have all those. He is natural. The doctor rated him with excellent health. There is nothing you could complain about him Pelosi, first, look at yourself without your makeup, to see the real you.
Even with makeup she looks 90 and she's 81. Yep Trump just being Trump has served him well.
American Vet wrote:
It has been reported that she does not drink. Thus her problems might be more related to a neurological disorder such as dementia.....
Hmm could be or even a mild form of epilepsy. That would explain her teeth.
American Vet wrote:
Whether or not it is due to prolonged alcohol consumption or some type of neurological disorder, it's quite obvious she needs to be moved from "the House" to a "home".....
I just realized, with any neurological problem they tell you not to drink.
American Vet wrote:
It has been reported that she does not drink. Thus her problems might be more related to a neurological disorder such as dementia.....
Why worry with the wicked witch of the west just throw water on her.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.