One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Lou Dobbs: Americans Don’t Understand Their Obligation To Serve Donald Trump
Page <<first <prev 21 of 27 next> last>>
Mar 22, 2020 11:17:47   #
Milosia
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"How does a minority continue to win elections?"
An upheld Constitution.

You would have to study the Constitution to know why.
No lesson today, Milo.


An upheld constitution???
Well , that was a seemingly exacting answer?
Is it the Russian Constitution whereby their plan is to destroy this country?

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 11:20:40   #
Milosia
 
Milosia wrote:
An upheld constitution???
Well , that was a seemingly exacting answer?
Is it the Russian Constitution whereby their plan is to destroy this country?


Are you trying to tell me, it’s ok if your vote doesn’t matter?
The one thing your peoples are willing to die for?
Well now I’m curious, why should it not matter according to the constitution?

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 11:27:53   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Milosia wrote:
An upheld constitution???
Well , that was a seemingly exacting answer?
Is it the Russian Constitution whereby their plan is to destroy this country?


How did the Russian "Constitution" get in this.
They have one?

"Is it the Russian Constitution whereby their plan is to destroy this country?" - Milosia

Where in the Russian "constitution" is that stated?

Reply
 
 
Mar 22, 2020 11:34:23   #
Milosia
 
World dominance by Russia was written everywhere.
Russians only believe , all for Mother Russia.
All.
You have a right in Russia to starve to death or be shot by the police
Waiting in line for toilet paper?

Wait,
Maybe they’re already here?

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 11:46:30   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Milosia2 wrote:
There is Freedom in insanity
Just ask Donald!


Look at what you write, Trump, as a millionaire has won over 20 other professional politicians to win the Presidency, is to you Insane! Yes, you lack smarts. So, since that is so obvious I have to ask who tells you what to write? Do they give you little notes to copy? lol

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 12:00:49   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
MR Mister wrote:
Look at what you write, Trump, as a millionaire has won over 20 other professional politicians to win the Presidency, is to you Insane! Yes, you lack smarts. So, since that is so obvious I have to ask who tells you what to write? Do they give you little notes to copy? lol


I think you are on to something, Mr Mister.
Milo isn't embarrassed!

Reply
Mar 24, 2020 10:16:49   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
MR Mister wrote:
Look at what you write, Trump, as a millionaire has won over 20 other professional politicians to win the Presidency, is to you Insane!

Yes, it is... literally. Trump (the millionaire) beat all those other Republican candidates because the people got tired of being screwed by Republican politicians and they're too stupid to know how to choose better politicians so they decided a businessman would be better. That makes as much sense as asking a car mechanic to perform your open heart surgery because you don't trust doctors, which would also be insane.

Business and government are not any more the same than a car and a human body. Both take money to maintain, both require energy to operate, but a sane person would not assume those similarities are enough to qualify a car mechanic as a surgeon or vice versa

MR Mister wrote:

Yes, you lack smarts.

Milosia2 is the only one making any sense on this moronic thread.

MR Mister wrote:

So, since that is so obvious I have to ask who tells you what to write? Do they give you little notes to copy? lol

LOL - I've never quite figured this one out... It's become quite common for uptight deplorables to throw that out there but is it because they know it's more insulting to people who think for themselves or is it because they really don't understand how independent thought works and they can't imagine it's possible for people to have original thoughts?

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2020 13:12:24   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
straightUp wrote:
LOL - I've never quite figured this one out... It's become quite common for uptight deplorables to throw that out there but is it because they know it's more insulting to people who think for themselves or is it because they really don't understand how independent thought works and they can't imagine it's possible for people to have original thoughts?


You are showing your ignorance of congress. Most all have failed at business and now we elected them to run the biggest company in the world. The best leader America can find is one that has been in business and been Succesful. Not anything like Obama, he was the worst you would want to do the job!
Trump showed his honesty by not taking a dime for pay, did you see Obama do then or Bubba Clinton? No, you did not.
I wager your education was by a commie that hates this country.
You need a new name, like "straightDown"

Reply
Mar 24, 2020 17:39:34   #
Milosia
 
MR Mister wrote:
Look at what you write, Trump, as a millionaire has won over 20 other professional politicians to win the Presidency, is to you Insane! Yes, you lack smarts. So, since that is so obvious I have to ask who tells you what to write? Do they give you little notes to copy? lol


Trump lied cheated stole and even had foreign goats help him win.
Why. Why WHY DOESNT THAT BOTHER ANY REPUBLICANS????

Reply
Mar 24, 2020 20:00:25   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
MR Mister wrote:
You are showing your ignorance of congress. Most all have failed at business and now we elected them to run the biggest company in the world.

First of all, Trump isn't in Congress and secondly, if your going to be the expert on it you might want to consider spelling it with a capital "C" because it *IS* a proper noun. And in case you do catch the joke, let me just point out that there are a lot of legislators in Congress who are incredibly successful capitalists and most of them are far businessmen than Trump could ever be. They just know that business and government are not the same thing.

MR Mister wrote:

The best leader America can find is one that has been in business and been Succesful.

That's what some businessmen with an interest in corrupting our republic will tell you. They're hoping enough of us will be dumb enough to fall for it. It's that simple.

Look, government and commerce are completely different animals. One has a very simple bottom line, which gives almost every decision a default value, the other has no bottom line at all. This is why business decisions are increasingly being automated... money is easy to calculate. Governing a democracy on the hand has no bottom line. Feel free to post me an algorithm to drive King Solomon's decision on the baby and two mothers, if you feel like proving me wrong.

I do realize that many politicians fail, so I understand the frustration, but I just wish people would think about it a little more before they start redefining the role to suit the underqualified.

MR Mister wrote:

Not anything like Obama, he was the worst you would want to do the job!

I hate to remind you but Obama inherited an economy in its worst state since 1929 and war debt not seen since WW2. Under his presidency, our economy recovered and drove it's way to the heights that we see Trump taking bows for. There's no way a rational person can dismiss this elephant in the room. We all know what the hatred toward Obama is about.

MR Mister wrote:

Trump showed his honesty by not taking a dime for pay, did you see Obama do then or Bubba Clinton? No, you did not.

LOL - Are you for real? Yeah, Trump just decided to do America a favor and be president pro-bono. Wow.

MR Mister wrote:

I wager your education was by a commie that hates this country.
You need a new name, like "straightDown"

Ugh... zzz.

Reply
Mar 25, 2020 10:28:59   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
MR Mister wrote:
You are showing your ignorance of congress. Most all have failed at business and now we elected them to run the biggest company in the world. The best leader America can find is one that has been in business and been Succesful. Not anything like Obama, he was the worst you would want to do the job!
Trump showed his honesty by not taking a dime for pay, did you see Obama do then or Bubba Clinton? No, you did not.
I wager your education was by a commie that hates this country.
You need a new name, like "straightDown"
You are showing your ignorance of congress. Most a... (show quote)


sUp is a limey.
He hasn't figured out what America had to overcome to become a Constitutional Republic..

sUp doesn't appreciate what America is.

Reply
 
 
Mar 25, 2020 11:59:27   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Milosia wrote:
Trump lied cheated stole and even had foreign goats help him win.
Why. Why WHY DOESNT THAT BOTHER ANY REPUBLICANS????


Let's SEE SOME PROOF.

So, you are going to vote for a retard senile old man for President, lol..
Why, WHY DOESNT THAT BOTHER ANY DEMOCRAT?

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 21:08:24   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
eagleye13 wrote:
sUp is a limey.
He hasn't figured out what America had to overcome to become a Constitutional Republic..

sUp doesn't appreciate what America is.


This is probably the 5th time that I've seen you do this. LOL... So, were you one of those kids in grade school that went around spreading rumors about other kids behind their backs? Ya know, it's kind of a weasel thing to do.

But since you brought it up... Sure, I immigrated here from the UK with my parents when I was a baby. If we came illegally I would be what you call a Dreamer. But not only did we come here legally, we were invited here because the U.S. aerospace industry was desperate for qualified engineers, which they had to get from Europe. My dad was one of them. In fact, they gave him citizenship and national security clearance almost immediately.

I had to wait until I turned 18 to naturalize as a U.S. citizen, which means I had to pass that U.S. civics test that natural born citizens are not required to take but studies have found that when they do the vast majority of them fail miserably.

But enough about me... Let's talk about what America had to overcome to become a constitutional republic (which is not a proper noun, so you don't have to capitalize).

Let's start with the fact that Britain was already a constitutional monarchy, where the king might have been the head of state but the government was controlled by representatives in Parliament and the biggest influence on those representatives was the merchant class that basically owned the colonies through corporate charters.

What this means is that before America became a republic or even a sovereign nation it was a profit seeking business and as such, many unfair policies were deployed, mostly based on maximizing profit for the owners at the expense of both the colonists in America producing the raw material and the workers producing finished products in Britain (where the Industrial Revolution was already starting). And if that wasn't bad enough, Britain was also starting it's abolition movement which threatened to squeeze the plantations even more.

So... some local slave-owning businessmen got together and started forming a resistance movement. This created a division on both sides of the pond as the conservatives (Tories) we're concerned about protecting the business and the liberals (Whigs) were excited about sticking it to the Tories.

The resistance movement gathered momentum (at least among the Whigs) and recruited militias from 13 of the 29 colonies then wrote an FU letter to the king. So the king sent in some troops that basically kicked ass, but then the French, who were still smarting from losing the last war to Britain saw the opportunity to screw them out of their colonies... So THEY sent in some troops and advisors and that changed the game. In response, the king (who was actually German) hired some German mercenaries (Hessians) to supplement his regiments and of course all the slaves that weren't chained down jumped on the British side. There was a bunch of smoke and blood and flags and eventually, The redcoats cut their losses and left. Kinda like we did in Vietnam and for much the same reason. Political pressure. The Whigs (in Britain) were opposed to the war.

I know this isn't the version you're familiar with and it makes sense that it wouldn't be. Most countries resulting from a revolution take the same approach to their own history... The revolution is always glorious and the peasants always drive the highly trained military forces out with their pitchforks and the will of God. It's just not a proper birth of nation if it doesn't in some way retell the story of David and Goliath.

In any case, we're not at the republic yet. The second part of what America had to "overcome", was the disputes among their own leaders as to how to take over the business. They needed a new system of authority to replace the Crown. But should that be left up the 13 colonies states as individual sovereignties? Or should they go with a confederacy, which was kind of the default at the time?

In the end, they decided on a more centralized but federated government. So the next question... Monarchy or republic? Indeed, there was a serious argument for making George Washington the new King of America, which invalidates all that glorious nonsense about the revolution being a war against monarchy. They decided to make Washington a president, thereby making the new nation a republic. (Republic = ANY form of government where the head of state is an elected president).

Everything else they pretty kept the same but with new names... so the House of Lords became the Senate and the House of Commons became the House of Representatives... Common Law of course and a judicial branch to uphold it. A Constitution with a Bill of Rights... all adopted from the old British system in the interest of minimizing disruption to the business they were now in charge of.

A few years later the Tories became Federalists with close ties to the British corporations that continued to profit from the plantations even though they could no longer force their will through the Crown.

In the end, nothing really changed. America is still primarily a business where we toil under a centralized authority that serves the corporations that serve the wealthy class. Maybe we're a little more delusional now because we are told we can vote, but being flooded with so much misinformation, many of us don't really know if we are actually voting in our interest or against our interests and half of us don't even bother. We don't even elect our president... the EC does... on behalf of Congress. Technically, a vote for the president is a vote for which party gets the electoral vote for your district, but the EC can still dissent, so ultimately we get what we get... and how different is that really from a monarchy?

Reply
Mar 27, 2020 08:54:27   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
straightUp wrote:
This is probably the 5th time that I've seen you do this. LOL... So, were you one of those kids in grade school that went around spreading rumors about other kids behind their backs? Ya know, it's kind of a weasel thing to do.

But since you brought it up... Sure, I immigrated here from the UK with my parents when I was a baby. If we came illegally I would be what you call a Dreamer. But not only did we come here legally, we were invited here because the U.S. aerospace industry was desperate for qualified engineers, which they had to get from Europe. My dad was one of them. In fact, they gave him citizenship and national security clearance almost immediately.

I had to wait until I turned 18 to naturalize as a U.S. citizen, which means I had to pass that U.S. civics test that natural born citizens are not required to take but studies have found that when they do the vast majority of them fail miserably.

But enough about me... Let's talk about what America had to overcome to become a constitutional republic (which is not a proper noun, so you don't have to capitalize).

Let's start with the fact that Britain was already a constitutional monarchy, where the king might have been the head of state but the government was controlled by representatives in Parliament and the biggest influence on those representatives was the merchant class that basically owned the colonies through corporate charters.

What this means is that before America became a republic or even a sovereign nation it was a profit seeking business and as such, many unfair policies were deployed, mostly based on maximizing profit for the owners at the expense of both the colonists in America producing the raw material and the workers producing finished products in Britain (where the Industrial Revolution was already starting). And if that wasn't bad enough, Britain was also starting it's abolition movement which threatened to squeeze the plantations even more.

So... some local slave-owning businessmen got together and started forming a resistance movement. This created a division on both sides of the pond as the conservatives (Tories) we're concerned about protecting the business and the liberals (Whigs) were excited about sticking it to the Tories.

The resistance movement gathered momentum (at least among the Whigs) and recruited militias from 13 of the 29 colonies then wrote an FU letter to the king. So the king sent in some troops that basically kicked ass, but then the French, who were still smarting from losing the last war to Britain saw the opportunity to screw them out of their colonies... So THEY sent in some troops and advisors and that changed the game. In response, the king (who was actually German) hired some German mercenaries (Hessians) to supplement his regiments and of course all the slaves that weren't chained down jumped on the British side. There was a bunch of smoke and blood and flags and eventually, The redcoats cut their losses and left. Kinda like we did in Vietnam and for much the same reason. Political pressure. The Whigs (in Britain) were opposed to the war.

I know this isn't the version you're familiar with and it makes sense that it wouldn't be. Most countries resulting from a revolution take the same approach to their own history... The revolution is always glorious and the peasants always drive the highly trained military forces out with their pitchforks and the will of God. It's just not a proper birth of nation if it doesn't in some way retell the story of David and Goliath.

In any case, we're not at the republic yet. The second part of what America had to "overcome", was the disputes among their own leaders as to how to take over the business. They needed a new system of authority to replace the Crown. But should that be left up the 13 colonies states as individual sovereignties? Or should they go with a confederacy, which was kind of the default at the time?

In the end, they decided on a more centralized but federated government. So the next question... Monarchy or republic? Indeed, there was a serious argument for making George Washington the new King of America, which invalidates all that glorious nonsense about the revolution being a war against monarchy. They decided to make Washington a president, thereby making the new nation a republic. (Republic = ANY form of government where the head of state is an elected president).

Everything else they pretty kept the same but with new names... so the House of Lords became the Senate and the House of Commons became the House of Representatives... Common Law of course and a judicial branch to uphold it. A Constitution with a Bill of Rights... all adopted from the old British system in the interest of minimizing disruption to the business they were now in charge of.

A few years later the Tories became Federalists with close ties to the British corporations that continued to profit from the plantations even though they could no longer force their will through the Crown.

In the end, nothing really changed. America is still primarily a business where we toil under a centralized authority that serves the corporations that serve the wealthy class. Maybe we're a little more delusional now because we are told we can vote, but being flooded with so much misinformation, many of us don't really know if we are actually voting in our interest or against our interests and half of us don't even bother. We don't even elect our president... the EC does... on behalf of Congress. Technically, a vote for the president is a vote for which party gets the electoral vote for your district, but the EC can still dissent, so ultimately we get what we get... and how different is that really from a monarchy?
This is probably the 5th time that I've seen you d... (show quote)


Good history lesson, sUp.
In short; The cattle get manipulated by special interests, without knowing, or bothering to know what is really going on, and for what.

"so ultimately we get what we get... and how different is that really from a monarchy?" - straightUp

We don't have a King or Queen.
England's is pretty much for show now. Little power there.

BTW; When I mention that you are Limey, I am having fun with you and your liberal take on things.

Reply
Mar 27, 2020 09:07:07   #
Milosia
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Thanks for bringing up Benghazi, Milo.
You gave the CNN take.
Now here is my saved research:


Benghazi embassy attack cover up

This was better than a Clancy novel.

This is a concise description of what happened and the reason for all the secrecy with respect to destroying personal computers, cell phones and computer servers and the anxiety of Hillary/Obama /Brennan and Clapper, as well as the exchange of Bowe Bergdahl for four Taliban chieftains spending life sentences in Guantanamo Bay Prison.

(BERGDAHL WAS RELEASED IN EXCHANGE FOR 5 TALIBAN GENERALS IN ORDER TO COVER UP THE OBAMA/HILLARY STINGER MISSILE SALES TO LIBYA.)

BENGHAZI AND THE MATCHING SERIAL NUMBERS.

So here's the REAL story: Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission.

Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA.

Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy.

It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”
Obama and Hillary committed TREASON!

THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not.

Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo.

Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal.

So we had a traitor as POTUS, that was not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that was a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: Because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles; that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.
Thanks for bringing up Benghazi, Milo. br You gave... (show quote)



I forgot to mention the Taliban was employed by the CIA as a force against the Russians. Bin Laden was on the payroll too. Shocking I know.
Benghazi Embassy had a prison in the basement of the Embassy.
Cut it and dice however makes you happy, but, bottom line is you don’t know, and never will.

The other thing is this, how can we maintain perpetual war without generals to fight back, without them having weapons to fight with.
I hope this. Shines a little light your misinformation campaign.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 21 of 27 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.