One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who reads information put on the internet?
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Apr 25, 2014 09:36:19   #
Randall_S Loc: Big Apple
 
I did an analysis of web traffic for a blog of a local Republican club. You may be surprised to see how far words typed into a website can go around the world, and who finds these things interesting. I always suspected, but never took the time to look at the visitor list.

Keep this in mind the next time you feel inclined to waste your time telling off a fellow poster. If instead you write something meaningful and researched, you might just get the attention of the Army, Navy, Harvard, Yale, or the CIA!

***
They say you can judge a man by the company he keeps. With that maxim in mind, below is a (very) abridged list of domains that visited the NYYRC Blog, based on an analysis of Google Analytics since January 1, 2014.

Thank you to our readership, who represent the majority of peoples on earth. There is cross-appeal in reporting and analyzing news from a post-ideological perspective. We are living in dangerous times, when many countries are at war – both officially and unofficially. When transnational organized crime poses as much of a threat as any standing armies. And when American power looks ever more dim, as the president is not up to the challenge of navigating through complex, multidimensional problems involving religion, narcotics, human trafficking, development, and espionage.

Here are some highlights…

Visitors from the Central Intelligence Agency, Army and Navy intelligence, Brazilian intelligence, and the CIA’s open source organization (Foreign Broadcast Information Services);

from Harvard, Yale, Cornell, Columbia, MIT, and Princeton; from University of Oslo, Moscow State University, University of Warsaw, and Oxford University;

from the governments of China, Brazil, Taiwan, Portugal, Croatia, Canada, and the Vatican;

from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Boeing, Northrup Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Halliburton; from the Democrat National Committee, the Smithsonian, the IRS, and the International Maritime Board.

Locales

114 countries
All 50 U.S. states
More than 2,400 cities and municipalities worldwide (nearly 1,800 in the U.S.)
72 languages

Military and Intelligence

dod network information center
navy network information center (nnic)
headquarters usaisc (U.S. Army Communications Engineering and Installation Agency)
foreign broadcast information services (CIA)
agencia brasileira de inteligencia (Brazilian intelligence)
central intelligence agency

Federal Agencies (networks taken from Google Analytics)

national archives and records administration
nib (national internet backbone)
u.s. securities & exchange commission
u.s. house of representatives
united states senate
u.s. department of state
federal aviation administration
us dept of justice
department of transportation
department of veterans affairs
department of interior
internal revenue service
library of congress information technology services
u.s. center for disease control and prevention
u.s. department of transportation
u.s. environmental protection agency
u.s. government accountability office

Universities

the new school
suny maritime college
columbia university
university at albany state university of new york
massachusetts institute of technology
university of michigan stephen m. ross school of business
new york university
princeton university
california state university network
albert einstein college of medicine
university of nebraska-lincoln
brigham young university
michigan state university
university of wisconsin madison
ave maria university
carnegie mellon university
college of william and mary
cornell university
harvard university
university of alaska
university of california at berkeley
university of notre dame
yale university

Universities – Foreign

mykolo romerio universitetas – Lithuania
universidade estadual do oeste do parana – Brazil
oxford university
royal melbourne institute of technology
university of oslo norway
instituto tecnol gico y de estudios superiores de monterrey
universidade de sao paulo (Brazil)
the university of reading uk
universidade federal de minas gerais
ufpr (universidade federal do paran )
university of jyvaskyla network (Finland)
anglo-american-school-lan (Russia)
instituto politecnico nacional (Mexico)
lomonosov moscow state university (Russia)

Foreign Governments (and affiliated institutions)

chinanet sichuan province network (China)
rio grande do sul procuradoria geral de justica (Brazil)
junta de andalucia (Andalusia)
emprel – empresa municipal de informatica (Brazil, Recife)
ministerio publico federal – procuradoria geral da (Brazil)
cesan – cia espirito santense de saneamento (Brazil)
haringey (UK)
british consulate
taipei taiwan
welsh assembly government
instituto de informatica ip – ministerio da solidariedade e seg (Portugal)
assembleia legislativa de minas gerais
australian postal corporation (Australia)
departamento de policia federal (Brazil)
province of british columbia (Canada)
republic of croatia
the ministry of internal affairs (Russia)

Press

voice of america
british broadcasting corporation
the economist
the new york times company
singapore press holdings ltd./information technology division
oxford university press

Associations & Institutions

association of users of ukrainian research & academic network u
instituto de pesquisas eldorado (Brazil)
ukranian assc
association of american medical colleges

Other

infrastructure for vatican internet services
pakistan telecommuication company limited
american registry for internet numbers
halliburton company
democratic national committee
northrop grumman corp.
smithsonian institution
the boeing company
lockheed martin corporation
argonne national laboratory
international air transport association
international maritime organization
international mission board
taiwan academic network

READ ORIGINAL ARTICLE:
http://nyyrc.com/blog/2014/04/who-reads-the-nyyrc-blog-just-about-every-country-in-the-world/

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 10:01:14   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Randall_S wrote:
I did an analysis of web traffic for a blog of a local Republican club. You may be surprised to see how far words typed into a website can go around the world, and who finds these things interesting. I always suspected, but never took the time to look at the visitor list.

Keep this in mind the next time you feel inclined to waste your time telling off a fellow poster. If instead you write something meaningful and researched, you might just get the attention of the Army, Navy, Harvard, Yale, or the CIA!

***
They say you can judge a man by the company he keeps. With that maxim in mind, below is a (very) abridged list of domains that visited the NYYRC Blog, based on an analysis of Google Analytics since January 1, 2014.

Thank you to our readership, who represent the majority of peoples on earth. There is cross-appeal in reporting and analyzing news from a post-ideological perspective. We are living in dangerous times, when many countries are at war – both officially and unofficially. When transnational organized crime poses as much of a threat as any standing armies. And when American power looks ever more dim, as the president is not up to the challenge of navigating through complex, multidimensional problems involving religion, narcotics, human trafficking, development, and espionage.

Here are some highlights…

Visitors from the Central Intelligence Agency, Army and Navy intelligence, Brazilian intelligence, and the CIA’s open source organization (Foreign Broadcast Information Services);

from Harvard, Yale, Cornell, Columbia, MIT, and Princeton; from University of Oslo, Moscow State University, University of Warsaw, and Oxford University;

from the governments of China, Brazil, Taiwan, Portugal, Croatia, Canada, and the Vatican;

from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Boeing, Northrup Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Halliburton; from the Democrat National Committee, the Smithsonian, the IRS, and the International Maritime Board.

Locales

114 countries
All 50 U.S. states
More than 2,400 cities and municipalities worldwide (nearly 1,800 in the U.S.)
72 languages

Military and Intelligence

dod network information center
navy network information center (nnic)
headquarters usaisc (U.S. Army Communications Engineering and Installation Agency)
foreign broadcast information services (CIA)
agencia brasileira de inteligencia (Brazilian intelligence)
central intelligence agency

Federal Agencies (networks taken from Google Analytics)

national archives and records administration
nib (national internet backbone)
u.s. securities & exchange commission
u.s. house of representatives
united states senate
u.s. department of state
federal aviation administration
us dept of justice
department of transportation
department of veterans affairs
department of interior
internal revenue service
library of congress information technology services
u.s. center for disease control and prevention
u.s. department of transportation
u.s. environmental protection agency
u.s. government accountability office

Universities

the new school
suny maritime college
columbia university
university at albany state university of new york
massachusetts institute of technology
university of michigan stephen m. ross school of business
new york university
princeton university
california state university network
albert einstein college of medicine
university of nebraska-lincoln
brigham young university
michigan state university
university of wisconsin madison
ave maria university
carnegie mellon university
college of william and mary
cornell university
harvard university
university of alaska
university of california at berkeley
university of notre dame
yale university

Universities – Foreign

mykolo romerio universitetas – Lithuania
universidade estadual do oeste do parana – Brazil
oxford university
royal melbourne institute of technology
university of oslo norway
instituto tecnol gico y de estudios superiores de monterrey
universidade de sao paulo (Brazil)
the university of reading uk
universidade federal de minas gerais
ufpr (universidade federal do paran )
university of jyvaskyla network (Finland)
anglo-american-school-lan (Russia)
instituto politecnico nacional (Mexico)
lomonosov moscow state university (Russia)

Foreign Governments (and affiliated institutions)

chinanet sichuan province network (China)
rio grande do sul procuradoria geral de justica (Brazil)
junta de andalucia (Andalusia)
emprel – empresa municipal de informatica (Brazil, Recife)
ministerio publico federal – procuradoria geral da (Brazil)
cesan – cia espirito santense de saneamento (Brazil)
haringey (UK)
british consulate
taipei taiwan
welsh assembly government
instituto de informatica ip – ministerio da solidariedade e seg (Portugal)
assembleia legislativa de minas gerais
australian postal corporation (Australia)
departamento de policia federal (Brazil)
province of british columbia (Canada)
republic of croatia
the ministry of internal affairs (Russia)

Press

voice of america
british broadcasting corporation
the economist
the new york times company
singapore press holdings ltd./information technology division
oxford university press

Associations & Institutions

association of users of ukrainian research & academic network u
instituto de pesquisas eldorado (Brazil)
ukranian assc
association of american medical colleges

Other

infrastructure for vatican internet services
pakistan telecommuication company limited
american registry for internet numbers
halliburton company
democratic national committee
northrop grumman corp.
smithsonian institution
the boeing company
lockheed martin corporation
argonne national laboratory
international air transport association
international maritime organization
international mission board
taiwan academic network

READ ORIGINAL ARTICLE:
http://nyyrc.com/blog/2014/04/who-reads-the-nyyrc-blog-just-about-every-country-in-the-world/
I did an analysis of web traffic for a blog of a l... (show quote)


Hmm.....the NYYRC must've made an impression.
That is quite a long list.
Makes you wonder who else is paying attention when you're on any site.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 10:08:20   #
Randall_S Loc: Big Apple
 
bdamage wrote:
Hmm.....the NYYRC must've made an impression.
That is quite a long list.
Makes you wonder who else is paying attention when you're on any site.


Sure does! When you start a project, you never know where you'll end up. I think (I hope) that the audience reflects the quality of the information and analysis. We are a small team of people who discuss these topics, collect and analyze the news, and try to be as succinct and fact-based as possible

I'm sure that we were to see the visitors to 1pp, there would be people from every country and dozens of intelligence agencies. At the end of the day, these people have to get their information from somewhere. And seeing as how the world is pretty much on fire at the moment, they need all the help they can get!

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2014 10:26:25   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Randall_S wrote:
Sure does! When you start a project, you never know where you'll end up. I think (I hope) that the audience reflects the quality of the information and analysis. We are a small team of people who discuss these topics, collect and analyze the news, and try to be as succinct and fact-based as possible

I'm sure that we were to see the visitors to 1pp, there would be people from every country and dozens of intelligence agencies. At the end of the day, these people have to get their information from somewhere. And seeing as how the world is pretty much on fire at the moment, they need all the help they can get!
Sure does! When you start a project, you never kn... (show quote)


It is pretty evident that many are watching OPP.

I've noticed that approx 10% of all that look in on a topic respond to a thread.
One thread I started had over 8,000 looks, but only about 800 responded.
I kind of wondered who ARE all these people?

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 10:29:53   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
bdamage wrote:
It is pretty evident that many are watching OPP.

I've noticed that approx 10% of all that look in on a topic respond to a thread.
One thread I started had over 8,000 looks, but only about 800 responded.
I kind of wondered who ARE all these people?


Many of them are us. We can't & don't want to respond to every post. But we do like to see what is being said.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 10:33:38   #
Randall_S Loc: Big Apple
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
Many of them are us. We can't & don't want to respond to every post. But we do like to see what is being said.


Undoubtedly true. I read/glance at lots of threads, and respond only about 10% of the time. I didn't intend to make anyone paranoid. Just aware that out of the hundreds or thousands of pairs of eyes, a handful might be more powerful than the rest.

Honestly, it surprised me to see the list above.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 10:39:42   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
Many of them are us. We can't & don't want to respond to every post. But we do like to see what is being said.


I usually only look in to the topics that are of interest to me and will respond 9 out of 10 times.
There are too many topics posted on a daily basis for me to look in on.
At this point I'm looking at the poster first and then the topic.
I've kind of weeded out threads I've already read about in my own news sources.

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2014 11:15:46   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
bdamage wrote:
I usually only look in to the topics that are of interest to me and will respond 9 out of 10 times.
There are too many topics posted on a daily basis for me to look in on.
At this point I'm looking at the poster first and then the topic.
I've kind of weeded out threads I've already read about in my own news sources.


I would say that the tone of the post is the key to following it.

I do check out many that are just rants. But I close to seek out post where people are shown respect.

For if one wished to be respected one must show respect.

Some times one has to call out a person when they get a bit out of line. It should be done with a bit of kindness though.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 11:27:56   #
JimMe
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
Many of them are us. We can't & don't want to respond to every post. But we do like to see what is being said.


Yes...specially quiet if my points are already given... or if replies have gotten personal & the original topic "is lost"... But I DO REPLY SUPPORTING ANY USA MILITARY FOLK & THEIR FAMILIES... They DESERVE It!!!

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 11:35:08   #
Randall_S Loc: Big Apple
 
I find the worst people are those who argue strictly based on emotion, and lack factual references. You can't have a political conversation with a hack for very long before you yourself end up sounding like a hack. Things that turn personal, when in fact the two people arguing have nothing to do with these situations first hand.
Case in point. Obama's cooperation with and encouragement of the Muslim Brotherhood. The facts are plain, they tell a consistent story of Obama pushing an Islamist agenda. The story is the same regarding Turkey, and Qatar, and Syria, and Egypt. At all times the administration has come down on the side of the Islamists.
Yet people absolutely freak out emotionally when you point this out, although it's documented in the most mainstream of sources.
What's the sense in arguing with someone who has immunized themselves to facts? There is no point. A hangover is more pleasant.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 12:08:09   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Randall_S wrote:
I find the worst people are those who argue strictly based on emotion, and lack factual references. You can't have a political conversation with a hack for very long before you yourself end up sounding like a hack. Things that turn personal, when in fact the two people arguing have nothing to do with these situations first hand.
Case in point. Obama's cooperation with and encouragement of the Muslim Brotherhood. The facts are plain, they tell a consistent story of Obama pushing an Islamist agenda. The story is the same regarding Turkey, and Qatar, and Syria, and Egypt. At all times the administration has come down on the side of the Islamists.
Yet people absolutely freak out emotionally when you point this out, although it's documented in the most mainstream of sources.
What's the sense in arguing with someone who has immunized themselves to facts? There is no point. A hangover is more pleasant.
I find the worst people are those who argue strict... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2014 12:42:16   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
Randall_S wrote:
I find the worst people are those who argue strictly based on emotion, and lack factual references. You can't have a political conversation with a hack for very long before you yourself end up sounding like a hack. Things that turn personal, when in fact the two people arguing have nothing to do with these situations first hand.
Case in point. Obama's cooperation with and encouragement of the Muslim Brotherhood. The facts are plain, they tell a consistent story of Obama pushing an Islamist agenda. The story is the same regarding Turkey, and Qatar, and Syria, and Egypt. At all times the administration has come down on the side of the Islamists.
Yet people absolutely freak out emotionally when you point this out, although it's documented in the most mainstream of sources.
What's the sense in arguing with someone who has immunized themselves to facts? There is no point. A hangover is more pleasant.
I find the worst people are those who argue strict... (show quote)


We have two choices. We can seek understanding with others peacefully or we can use our might to get our way.

What is being over looked is that if some one ends up with a chance to become President in this Country there is strong support from people with power who lend their support to those chosen. Lets just say that there was this sort of support for Obama.

If you wish to get to the bottom of the issue you need to find out who & why this power has been lent to Obama. It is more than my & others votes have given.

Obama has been lent this power to do what those that lent him the power want.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 18:15:39   #
engaged Loc: New York City and Broward County Florida
 
Sorry to say, but this stream is sounding very one-sided to me.

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 19:18:08   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
engaged wrote:
Sorry to say, but this stream is sounding very one-sided to me.


I guess that that brings the question just what is the other side?

Reply
Apr 25, 2014 19:31:04   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
engaged wrote:
Sorry to say, but this stream is sounding very one-sided to me.

Then you don't sound very "engaged" to me.

What's your side of it?

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.