One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
I have something positive to say about the Cuban government
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Feb 26, 2020 00:23:22   #
JW
 
Hug wrote:
I am alone in my opinion, but I have thought since January 1st, 1959, that President Ike should have helped Castro. If the American business man had been turned loose on Cuba, Cuba would be an American territory or even a state today. My opinion


Half of the problem pre-1958 in Cuba was the American businessmen operating there. They and the Mafia used Cuba as personal bank accounts. Castro was seen as a friendly until he tied the knot with Khrushchev.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 01:20:24   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
They have created an environment where a guy can still work on his own car.

I'll bet they have some of the best carburetor people in the world there!!😂


My first truck was a old Ford straight six cylinder.

I could actually get inside of the engine compartment, under the open hood and change the spark plugs in the rain without getting wet.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 01:56:14   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Hug wrote:
Castro was a communist, but not a Russian communist at that point. Ike was afraid of communism and branded Castro as an enemy. Ike did not understand Castro. Truman stated at the time that if he had been President he would have helped Castro. Castro got mean and turned to the Russians because he needed help. P.S. I agreed with Obama on Cuba.


I also agreed with him on this issue...

Reply
 
 
Feb 26, 2020 04:53:19   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
archie bunker wrote:
I'd rather have a 70 year old Chevy myself. But not government forced.

Out of necessity, my wife just got a newer vehicle. It's a 2009 model, and even if I did want to turn a wrench on it.......I wouldn't know where to use the wrench!


I remember the seventies. I remember motors that even I could work on. Manual transmissions and windows. I only drive an automatic because I got such a good deal on the vehicle.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 04:55:26   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
My first truck was a old Ford straight six cylinder.

I could actually get inside of the engine compartment, under the open hood and change the spark plugs in the rain without getting wet.


'74 F-100 here. I wish to hell they still made them. I wish manual transmissions were still standard and automatics had to be special ordered. I can work on a straight shift. I don't even know where to start on an automatic.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 06:12:07   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
archie bunker wrote:
I did find the dipstick on this one!


Most of our oil is in Texas.
Where do you find the most dipsticks?
DC.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 09:16:55   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
archie bunker wrote:
They have created an environment where a guy can still work on his own car.

I'll bet they have some of the best carburetor people in the world there!!😂


Yep, if you've got a vehicle built no later than 1951, they can rebuild it from the tires up.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 10:36:13   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
archie bunker wrote:
They have created an environment where a guy can still work on his own car.

I'll bet they have some of the best carburetor people in the world there!!😂


I love all the classic cars I see in pictures of Cuba. To me it is proof that cars were better made as well as much nicer to look at then.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 16:21:48   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
archie bunker wrote:
I'd rather have a 70 year old Chevy myself. But not government forced.

Out of necessity, my wife just got a newer vehicle. It's a 2009 model, and even if I did want to turn a wrench on it.......I wouldn't know where to use the wrench!


You can always use the wrench on your rear bumper, come close to taking it off. Then you'll have to take it to a repair shop which is what they wanted all along. Expensive, but that's what happens with newer vehicles. I drive a 1999 jeep. Jostle me around? Hell yes, that's part of the fun.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 16:23:10   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Hug wrote:
I am alone in my opinion, but I have thought since January 1st, 1959, that President Ike should have helped Castro. If the American business man had been turned loose on Cuba, Cuba would be an American territory or even a state today. My opinion


Considering almost half of Cuba is in Miami it makes perfect sense.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 16:26:19   #
Alber
 
Hug wrote:
I am alone in my opinion, but I have thought since January 1st, 1959, that President Ike should have helped Castro. If the American business man had been turned loose on Cuba, Cuba would be an American territory or even a state today. My opinion


It seems to me that you are not well informed about what happened in Cuba in the 50s of the past century. It is true that the mistakes of the US governments brought Castro to power. First, the coup d'etat by Fulgencio Batista was promoted, which was totally bloodless and if not with the sympathy with acceptance of a good part of the population that, after two corrupt governments of the authentic revolutionary party, wanted a change. Only a small portion of the people expressed some discontent and these were rather related to politics, who wanted power and saw that it escaped them.
In the years that Batista ruled the economy flourished and the country improved dramatically. It cannot be denied that Batista ruled for personal gain and that he did business with the mafia. Fidel Castro was a Don Nobody, a gang member who wanted to climb by any means. There are witnesses that he even suggested Batista to give the coup d'etat, in a visit he made to the country estate (Kukine) of this one to which his brother-in-law Rafael DĂ­az Balart Jr. took him, who later became part of the Batista regime. Rafael DĂ­az Balart Sr. was president of the Senate with Batista.
All this clique came from the province of Oriente and it is known that RaĂșl Castro's godfather of baptism was Fulgenco Batista. Equally known is Batista's gift to Fidel Castro for his wedding with Mirta DĂ­az-Balart and as how he amnesty him after the assault to the Moncada barracks where some people died.
Fidel Castro as a good communist was a master of propaganda and deception and he worried that the history was told at his convenience so in the style of Orwell’s book “1984” he made a great effort to change the facts in his favor. Nothing is said about his past as a gang member or of his stay in Colombia when the Bogotazo occurred.
I remember that someone already deceased who knew him during those days told me that it was very likely that he was recruited by the CIA because it was suspected that at the Pan-American meeting somebody had the idea of killing someone and it was feared that the attack was against the Secretary of State or the Ambassador of USA.
It seems that nobody remembers how the Eisenhower administration dictated an arms embargo against the Batista government or how the journalist Herbert Mathews known agent, first of the OSS and after of the CIA went to the Sierra Maestra to interview Castro and the New York Times made him famous.
The Cuban government was forbidden to use the weapons and troops related to the TIAR and therefore the constitutional army could not fight against the Castro guerrillas. Batista had to recruit and train young people to oppose them to the guerrillas, who at that time were called "casquitos" (little helmet). The Cuban army with more than 50,000 troops was defeated by a guerrilla that never had more than 2,000 men. In an Italian magazine I could see some fascimiles of crossed letters between Fidel Castro and Frank PaĂ­s (Chief of the insurrection in the cities) in which he informed the bearded man that he had met with American diplomats (the CIA?) And that they would deliver him explosives and weapons through the base of Guantanamo. The bearded man's response was: "the explosives have been delivered to me, the weapons will come by air."
The true story about what happened in Cuba in the last 70 years has not been written yet.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 17:02:39   #
Hug
 
Alber wrote:
It seems to me that you are not well informed about what happened in Cuba in the 50s of the past century. It is true that the mistakes of the US governments brought Castro to power. First, the coup d'etat by Fulgencio Batista was promoted, which was totally bloodless and if not with the sympathy with acceptance of a good part of the population that, after two corrupt governments of the authentic revolutionary party, wanted a change. Only a small portion of the people expressed some discontent and these were rather related to politics, who wanted power and saw that it escaped them.
In the years that Batista ruled the economy flourished and the country improved dramatically. It cannot be denied that Batista ruled for personal gain and that he did business with the mafia. Fidel Castro was a Don Nobody, a gang member who wanted to climb by any means. There are witnesses that he even suggested Batista to give the coup d'etat, in a visit he made to the country estate (Kukine) of this one to which his brother-in-law Rafael DĂ­az Balart Jr. took him, who later became part of the Batista regime. Rafael DĂ­az Balart Sr. was president of the Senate with Batista.
All this clique came from the province of Oriente and it is known that RaĂșl Castro's godfather of baptism was Fulgenco Batista. Equally known is Batista's gift to Fidel Castro for his wedding with Mirta DĂ­az-Balart and as how he amnesty him after the assault to the Moncada barracks where some people died.
Fidel Castro as a good communist was a master of propaganda and deception and he worried that the history was told at his convenience so in the style of Orwell’s book “1984” he made a great effort to change the facts in his favor. Nothing is said about his past as a gang member or of his stay in Colombia when the Bogotazo occurred.
I remember that someone already deceased who knew him during those days told me that it was very likely that he was recruited by the CIA because it was suspected that at the Pan-American meeting somebody had the idea of killing someone and it was feared that the attack was against the Secretary of State or the Ambassador of USA.
It seems that nobody remembers how the Eisenhower administration dictated an arms embargo against the Batista government or how the journalist Herbert Mathews known agent, first of the OSS and after of the CIA went to the Sierra Maestra to interview Castro and the New York Times made him famous.
The Cuban government was forbidden to use the weapons and troops related to the TIAR and therefore the constitutional army could not fight against the Castro guerrillas. Batista had to recruit and train young people to oppose them to the guerrillas, who at that time were called "casquitos" (little helmet). The Cuban army with more than 50,000 troops was defeated by a guerrilla that never had more than 2,000 men. In an Italian magazine I could see some fascimiles of crossed letters between Fidel Castro and Frank PaĂ­s (Chief of the insurrection in the cities) in which he informed the bearded man that he had met with American diplomats (the CIA?) And that they would deliver him explosives and weapons through the base of Guantanamo. The bearded man's response was: "the explosives have been delivered to me, the weapons will come by air."
The true story about what happened in Cuba in the last 70 years has not been written yet.
It seems to me that you are not well informed abou... (show quote)


Albee, thank you. I have obviously been wrong about a lot things pertaining to Cuba for a long time. You have a much clearer picture of what went on in Cuba. Where am l in thinking that Obama was on the right track?

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 18:21:17   #
Alber
 
Hug wrote:
Albee, thank you. I have obviously been wrong about a lot things pertaining to Cuba for a long time. You have a much clearer picture of what went on in Cuba. Where am l in thinking that Obama was on the right track?


Obama did not have a policy to continue with Cuba. When asked about his trip to Havana, he replied: "It is going to be funny." The proof is that nothing has changed in Cuba. The opening of relationships I think is correct, but after sixty years and with a leadership in decline in Cuba is something to end this situation. Kennedy promised not to invade Cuba for 25 years. That was in 1962. The term expired in 1987 and by then the USSR had only four years left. Castro-communism is a parasite that was maintained by the USSR and absolutely nothing was done to eradicate the totalitarian regime in Cuba when it disappeared. Castro was allowed to create the Sao Paulo forum. Russia and China try to establish themselves in the hemisphere. It seems that someone benefits in the high spheres with which Cuba continues its policy and was allowed to create the situation in Venezuela. The moment is conducive to solve the problems of the hemisphere at once. Bolivia has changed course and with that they have lost a source of drug financing. The payment to Russia and China of Venezuela's debt must be guaranteed, but the exit of both from that country and their support to Cuba must be demanded. When the problem of Venezuela is resolved, Cuba's situation with oil will become difficult. Nicaragua does not represent something important and without the influence of Cuba, the Ortega regime will disappear. Most of the nations of America agree in the OAS. After ending the influence of Cuba it his important to put interest in Mexico and Argentina. The establishment of order in Mexico is vital for the United States and for this, declaring drug trafficking as terrorism is a good idea, to apply the Palermo protocol. Argentina has the vice of Peronism and it is important to determine how to eradicate it.
If the hemisphere is controlled, the infiltration of the communists in the UN and in the European Union can be stopped. Eastern European countries are the best allies against the communists, because they know them well.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 18:54:32   #
Hug
 
Alber wrote:
Obama did not have a policy to continue with Cuba. When asked about his trip to Havana, he replied: "It is going to be funny." The proof is that nothing has changed in Cuba. The opening of relationships I think is correct, but after sixty years and with a leadership in decline in Cuba is something to end this situation. Kennedy promised not to invade Cuba for 25 years. That was in 1962. The term expired in 1987 and by then the USSR had only four years left. Castro-communism is a parasite that was maintained by the USSR and absolutely nothing was done to eradicate the totalitarian regime in Cuba when it disappeared. Castro was allowed to create the Sao Paulo forum. Russia and China try to establish themselves in the hemisphere. It seems that someone benefits in the high spheres with which Cuba continues its policy and was allowed to create the situation in Venezuela. The moment is conducive to solve the problems of the hemisphere at once. Bolivia has changed course and with that they have lost a source of drug financing. The payment to Russia and China of Venezuela's debt must be guaranteed, but the exit of both from that country and their support to Cuba must be demanded. When the problem of Venezuela is resolved, Cuba's situation with oil will become difficult. Nicaragua does not represent something important and without the influence of Cuba, the Ortega regime will disappear. Most of the nations of America agree in the OAS. After ending the influence of Cuba it his important to put interest in Mexico and Argentina. The establishment of order in Mexico is vital for the United States and for this, declaring drug trafficking as terrorism is a good idea, to apply the Palermo protocol. Argentina has the vice of Peronism and it is important to determine how to eradicate it.
If the hemisphere is controlled, the infiltration of the communists in the UN and in the European Union can be stopped. Eastern European countries are the best allies against the communists, because they know them well.
Obama did not have a policy to continue with Cuba.... (show quote)

Again, thanks. I do appreciate your in-debt understanding and your patience.

Reply
Feb 26, 2020 18:59:26   #
popparod Loc: Somewhere else.
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Which one was it? Wolf or AF1?

Are we still talking about cars? My bad!


You left out Kevvy!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.