How come democrats lack balls? Serious question, folks (Page 3): A rib o' dukey!

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Old_Gringo wrote:

All my starch has disappeared for the day. I am now seeking some rack time. See y'all mañana.

A rib o' dukey!

rumitoid

Old_Gringo wrote:

No, but it is difficult to sit.

Loose fitting underwear is recommended for all men of all ages.

This has to be my clearest and most insightful post yet. Yet was I Liberal or Conservative?

rjoeholl

Now, now Brucie, you know that you don't like them because they see things differently than you. There are actually quite a few republicans who are scientists and what liberals call education we call indoctrination. You can't seem to stick to the three R's.

Bruce Kennedy wrote:

Why do Republican Presidential candidates lack bra... (show quote)

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

rumitoid wrote:

Loose fitting underwear is recommended for all men of all ages.

This has to be my clearest and most insightful post yet. Yet was I Liberal or Conservative?

This what I've been saying about the uselessness of labeling. Your statement was both liberal AND conservative. By allowing liberal room in the under britches, results in conserving the balls, both the left AND the right. A good example of bipartisanship, where the left and right hang together in harmony, both overseen by a big d*@*k. That's good politics.

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

rjoeholl wrote:

Now, now Brucie, you know that you don't like them because they see things differently than you. There are actually quite a few republicans who are scientists and what liberals call education we call indoctrination. You can't seem to stick to the three R's.

:lol:

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

lpnmajor wrote:

No it isn't, but it IS a place for the self righteous to shine. :shock:

And, they do shine! :roll:

Skyhook

Bruce Kennedy wrote:

Why do Republican Presidential candidates lack bra... (show quote)

Hyperbolic opinion-only. Lashing out will not change the irrefutable facts.. Hillary seems to not have balls, Warren seems to lack the same. Howl, gnash, whatever... there it is, deal with it.

jjb2012

Skyhook wrote:

The question is based upon the absolute fact that there seems to be a shortage of men in the democrat possibles.

It seems to be they have but two possibles for 2016- Hillary or that Indian chief woman.. (in the vernacular) whatever.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/203915-warren-fills-void-for-democrats-as-hillary-stays-on-the-sidelines

Serious reply as soon as we reinstate the DRAFT and make it so every politicians son or daughter has to serve the you can come back and speak of "BALLS".

What exactly have we gained from Bush's' "BALLS" ??

And just the Mention of Warrens heritage in the manner you choose to word it shows your true nature. What will you say about Jeb's wife when he runs??

Loki Loc: Georgia

Brian Devon wrote:

I am not impressed with people who would degrade t... (show quote)

Perhaps from now on, you son-of-a-bitch, I will start giving you my unsolicited opinion on how you should talk about Jews. I could not care less what you think, you nosy, self righteous bastard, and neither does my wife. She wanted me to ask you if your mother had any children who lived?

dukeofsc

Just as LBJ predicted,

Patty wrote:

Almost 75% of black families are fatherless families. They made up a vast number of the democratic vote as 90 some % are democrats. Psychologically this could lead one to believe that they are playing the Mother issue. Who knows.

Loki Loc: Georgia

jjb2012 wrote:

Serious reply as soon as we reinstate the DRAFT and make it so every politicians son or daughter has to serve the you can come back and speak of "BALLS".

What exactly have we gained from Bush's' "BALLS" ??

And just the Mention of Warrens heritage in the manner you choose to word it shows your true nature. What will you say about Jeb's wife when he runs??

Which heritage? Her true one, or the fake one she used for college preference? Your statement about politicians' kids, however, is true, and Mrs. Bush really is of Hispanic descent, unlike Pocahantas Warren. She is not the object of ridicule because she claims Native American descent, but because she claims it falsely.

stevenkalka

Skyhook wrote:

The question is based upon the absolute fact that there seems to be a shortage of men in the democrat possibles.

It seems to be they have but two possibles for 2016- Hillary or that Indian chief woman.. (in the vernacular) whatever.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/203915-warren-fills-void-for-democrats-as-hillary-stays-on-the-sidelines

I'm not sure if there's a shortage of qualified men or they're responding to the "War on Women" issue that they're currently tauting. They like to throw out this 77% figure that they claim is the average woman's wage compared to an average man's. That figure doesn't account for the shorter hours, less experience, and different jobs women do to balance career and children. After adjusting for those factors, women average 90 + % of men, but that woudn't stir them. The 77% hyperbole does.

What that tells is group identity matters more than individual circumstance on the left.

dukeofsc

well then this should settle the argument that "BALLS" have anything to do with being a man and standing up for yourself whether they be friendly or enemy, eh?? how metro-sexual of you all...

jjb2012 wrote:

Serious reply as soon as we reinstate the DRAFT and make it so every politicians son or daughter has to serve the you can come back and speak of "BALLS".

What exactly have we gained from Bush's' "BALLS" ??

And just the Mention of Warrens heritage in the manner you choose to word it shows your true nature. What will you say about Jeb's wife when he runs??

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

Skyhook wrote:

Hyperbolic opinion-only. Lashing out will not change the irrefutable facts.. Hillary seems to not have balls, Warren seems to lack the same. Howl, gnash, whatever... there it is, deal with it.

I didn't realize truth about the "Loons", the Republicans are offering, for President, was "Hyperbolic". Please we both know your assertions are "opinion" and my assertions are "opinion", let's not pretend that they are anything else.

jjb2012

Loki wrote:

Which heritage? Her true one, or the fake one she used for college preference? Your statement about politicians' kids, however, is true, and Mrs. Bush really is of Hispanic descent, unlike Pocahantas Warren. She is not the object of ridicule because she claims Native American descent, but because she claims it falsely.

What percentage on American Indian in your bloodline qualifies you as "native". And how do any of us really know our heritage without the information provide by our own ancestors. How many conveniently leave out a part of their heritage because they did not want to be associated with it??

Here are the arguments I assume you claim to be true.

Barnes also debunked much of the family lore used by Warren to justify claiming Native American status. One of my favorites was Barnes discovery that Warrens maternal great grandfather, on the supposedly Cherokee bloodline, was featured in the local newspaper in 1906 as being white and having shot an Indian.

So who wrote the 1906 account?? Did her grandfather choose to claim to be white ( outwardly) at a time when to be a half breed was considered by many too be worse then being black.