Witnesses are necessary and here is why.
Jan 28, 2020 09:06:12 #
straightUp wrote:
Ah, that's right - I keep forgetting how Fox keeps telling you this is a political stunt related to the 2020 elections and not a response to the clear evidence of abuse that surfaced only 4 months ago. 
I need no one to tell me it is a political stunt......i've watched your clown car running this game for over 3 years........now the game has new rules....and you don't like it???? imagine that!!
I am sorry you are blind to it.....maybe you should pull up off Rachel and watch some FOX news.
Clear evidence...Hahahahahahhaaha.........yea, right.
Jan 28, 2020 09:40:57 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Kevyn wrote:
In an unpublished manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security adviser said that President Trump told him firsthand that he wanted to continue freezing military aid to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. We need to hear from Bolton and others under oath.
You are a self proclaimed authority on the presidential bowel movements.
Maybe the House will call you in to articulate your infatuation.
Jan 28, 2020 09:43:40 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I don't care what anybody else on this thread says---Yes Bolton should testify and yes it is a cover up to not allow witnesses. It is a rigged court far from impartial.
Absolutely bring on the Biden's too. No fairness in avoiding the real culprits in this national embarrassment.
Jan 28, 2020 10:25:21 #
Jan 28, 2020 10:29:01 #
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
I need no one to tell me it is a political stunt......i've watched your clown car running this game for over 3 years........
This "game" only started 4 month ago willy. Apparently, you're suffering from the same hatred that drives others to the kind of delusion that blurs everything into one big war with the "libtards".
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
now the game has new rules....and you don't like it???? imagine that!!
now the game has new rules....and you don't like it???? imagine that!!
Oh, you mean the new rules that say the president is above the law and he can do whatever he wants? Or do you mean the new rules that say in a trial only the defense is allowed to call witnesses?
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
I am sorry you are blind to it.....maybe you should pull up off Rachel and watch some FOX news.
I am sorry you are blind to it.....maybe you should pull up off Rachel and watch some FOX news.
Well, that explains YOUR ignorance. LOL
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Clear evidence...Hahahahahahhaaha.........yea, right.
Clear evidence...Hahahahahahhaaha.........yea, right.
"Now class... as you can see there are three apples on my desk. Can everyone see them?"
"Yes."
"Now, if I take one away, how many are left?"
"2"
"That's right Johnny"
"WRONG!"
"Who said that? Was that you Willy?"
"Yes."
"Why do you think Johnny's answer is wrong?"
"Because you say he's right and you're a libtard and I hate libtards."
"Oh..."
Jan 28, 2020 10:30:21 #
byronglimish wrote:
You are a self proclaimed authority on the presidential bowel movements.
Maybe the House will call you in to articulate your infatuation.
Maybe the House will call you in to articulate your infatuation.
LOL... do you even know what "infatuation" means?
Jan 28, 2020 10:36:49 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
straightUp wrote:
LOL... do you even know what "infatuation" means?
Yes, when you briefly admire your narcissistic self in the mirror...and get stimulated.
The President's bowel movements are infatuation with your good buddy, because of his short attention span.
Jan 28, 2020 10:45:07 #
byronglimish wrote:
Absolutely bring on the Biden's too. No fairness in avoiding the real culprits in this national embarrassment.
The Bidens have nothing to do with any of this. Trump was caught bribing Zellensky, which is a clear violation of the Constitution and now his defense is actually trying to justify it by claiming it was a legitimate request for an investigation into something for which there is no evidence whatsoever.
Even if the Bidens are guilty of... well, anything... it wouldn't make any difference because there are already procedures and protocols for initiating investigations abroad and Trump didn't follow ANY of them. Instead, he chose to bribe Zellensky, which is STILL a violation of the Constitution.
So keep firing off lame excuses and distractions... I'll be right here to bat everyone of them out of the park... I gotta say winning arguments is sooo easy when the other side is trying to hide the truth.
Jan 28, 2020 10:49:10 #
byronglimish wrote:
Yes, when you briefly admire your narcissistic self in the mirror...and get stimulated.
The President's bowel movements are infatuation with your good buddy, because of his short attention span.
The President's bowel movements are infatuation with your good buddy, because of his short attention span.
Ha, ha, ha... That doesn't even make any sense. Look, it's obvious that you thought you were saying flatulation.
Jan 28, 2020 10:51:02 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
straightUp wrote:
The Bidens have nothing to do with any of this. Tr... (show quote)
All bullschitt to cover-up for your heroes.
Jan 28, 2020 10:51:32 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
straightUp wrote:
Ha, ha, ha... That doesn't even make any sense. Look, it's obvious that you thought you were saying flatulation.
Are you a meth-head too?
Jan 28, 2020 10:54:29 #
byronglimish wrote:
All bullschitt to cover-up for your heroes.
Bullschitt... how clever. You should call Trump and ask if he needs any help with his defense. You can say that you come up with clever names for people. ;)
Jan 28, 2020 10:57:48 #
byronglimish wrote:
Are you a meth-head too?
Of course I am, sweetheart. But I'm jonesing right now 'cause my suppliers are busy on Capitol Hill defending Trump. LOL
Jan 28, 2020 11:01:16 #
straightUp wrote:
"Now class... as you can see there are three apples on my desk. Can everyone see them?"
"Yes."
"Now, if I take one away, how many are left?"
"2"
"That's right Johnny"
"WRONG!"
"Who said that? Was that you Willy?"
"Yes."
"Why do you think Johnny's answer is wrong?"
"Because you say he's right and you're a libtard and I hate libtards."
"Oh..."
"Yes."
"Now, if I take one away, how many are left?"
"2"
"That's right Johnny"
"WRONG!"
"Who said that? Was that you Willy?"
"Yes."
"Why do you think Johnny's answer is wrong?"
"Because you say he's right and you're a libtard and I hate libtards."
"Oh..."
You can break down your skewed vision of what's happening however you like.......does not change the fact this is a partisan, political show......nothing more.
The voters see what is happening, watch how you pay for this absurd show in November.
Jan 28, 2020 11:03:55 #
byronglimish wrote:
Are you a meth-head too?
Nah...he's too focused....wrong on most of it, but focused on what he feels is right.
Kevvy is the lone meth head here on forum........straitUp does not deserve to be thrown in there with kevvy....nobody does.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.