One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Something disturbs me . .......
Page <<first <prev 8 of 12 next> last>>
Nov 21, 2019 11:50:39   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Doug61 wrote:
"I say vote out all the Republicans and Democrats, as well as the rinos out of office, If the can’t get along and pass legislation that helps this country’s problems, then get the hell out of that seat and lets put someone in it who will. The veterans, the homeless, the national debt( which has been caused by both rep and dem’s) has to be addressed not just put on the back burner'

That will never happen.

The best we can do is to do some weeding.
Mostly socialists that don't know what has made this Republic great.
Doug61 wrote: br "I say vote out all the Repu... (show quote)


Oh, so now the republic is great eh? Then what's with the MAGA hats you Trump turds are always wearing that suggests the republic needs work to be great again? Do you just change your mind depending on your conversation or do you just spew words without really knowing what they mean?

I tell ya what - all banter aside, why don't you tell me what YOU think made our republic so great, I'd LOVE to hear this.

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 11:52:59   #
debeda
 
straightUp wrote:
That doesn't explain the difference between being polite and being PC deb. That's OK, I'll just wait for the Canadian to respond, I get a feeling he will have a little more to offer than stupid insults.


Perhaps. He certainly does better than you. But you do exemplify the PC culture well. Anyone who doesn't think like you do is "stupid". That also illustrates the difference between PC and civil rather well. In PC culture, certain words, phrases and narratives are VERBOTEN. In a civil culture, everything is open to discussion. It's the difference between suppression of thought and exchange of ideas and free thought and exchange of ideas.

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 11:58:20   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I believe it was Beto who suggested that churches that don't accept gay marriage lose their tax exemption status...

OK, so a suggestion from a candidate on a campaign trail... And how is maximus calling this a law? Or did he just not expect anyone to actually call him out on his claim?

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Do you believe all churches are corrupt?

Of course not.

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2019 13:07:20   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
debeda wrote:
Perhaps. He certainly does better than you.

Well, I suppose I enjoy a good insult here and there, but they are always in response to someone else's insult. I never use insults as a way to escape an argument I can't counter, so I guess that means I do better than you. ;)

debeda wrote:

But you do exemplify the PC culture well. Anyone who doesn't think like you do is "stupid".

Yeah, I'm pretty used to that mischaracterization. I've never suggested any such thing, nor is that what I think but it seems a common response on this site from people who disagree with me... For some reason they can't just say "I disagree" they have to go into this "you think I'm stupid" nonsense.

So... you think PC is specifically a left-wing process of shutting down alternate opinions. Well, as best I can tell, that's a distortion of the truth caused by that all too familiar "I'm a victim of mean liberals that tell me what to do" syndrome.

Here's the definition found on Britannica...

Political correctness (PC), term used to refer to language that seems intended to give the least amount of offense, especially when describing groups identified by external markers such as race, gender, culture, or sexual orientation.

That's pretty much all there is to it, which in my opinion is just being polite. When people have a problem with PC it means they don't want to be told it's wrong to call black people niggers or gay men faggots, etc... OR they lost track of what PC actually means, which I think may be the case for you and Canuckus.

Britannica goes on to say...

The concept has been discussed, disputed, criticized, and satirized by commentators from across the political spectrum.

At this point it's almost a meaningless term.

debeda wrote:

That also illustrates the difference between PC and civil rather well. In PC culture, certain words, phrases and narratives are VERBOTEN. In a civil culture, everything is open to discussion. It's the difference between suppression of thought and exchange of ideas and free thought and exchange of ideas.

One of perhaps millions of differing opinions on what PC means. Nevertheless, this does explain YOUR view on the matter, so I'll just address it as such...

First of all, your use of the word VERBOTEN is misplaced. PC culture is NOT enforced by the law. If you want to talk about niggers you might be asking for a punch in the mouth or a rash of insults but you are not going to be punished or shutdown by the government. So it's pretty simple - you can choose to be PC or you can choose not to - it's up to you.

Also, a civil culture has ALWAYS been characterized by self-imposed limits on language, which I will simply call politeness. That doesn't mean subject matters are off limits, it just means offensive insults are avoided which in many cases leads to more open discussions.

As for shutting down alternate opinions, PC has nothing to do with that unless the opinion has no redeeming value other than to insult a demographic. There is no reason for any true argument to be insulting. Every constructive opinion in existence can be expressed within the confines of PC language and that includes opinions on the right.

Yes, alternate opinions are routinely shut down by people on all sides. My views are constantly dismissed by the right-wing on this site, usually with unimaginative insults, absurd suggestions or both. It's not a big deal - if that sort of thing bothered me, I wouldn't be here. But not once have I ever blamed someones dismissal of my opinion on being PC.

Honestly, I think you folks are just looking for things to blame and your version of PC takes a lot of your intangible frustrations and puts it in a nice target to shoot at.

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 13:09:44   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
straightUp wrote:
I can understand the reasons for suggesting limits on free speech. This doesn't mean I agree. I'm probably the strongest advocate of free speech on this forum because unlike almost every conservative here, I also oppose the ban on four-letter words. So I can claim to be a true advocate of free speech, while all those self-proclaimed champions of free-speech that run to the moderator whenever I say "fuck" are really just hypocrites.

I understand their reasons too, they want conversations to be polite, but that doesn't change the fact that all that is is another form of PC. As for those who want to ban hate speech the reasons are just as clear... They know hate speech CAN encourage physical violence. We've seen it happen. I would say that's a far stronger case for PC than wanting polite conversations.

But at the end of the day, I agree with your statement... "If speech invokes violence, then punish the offenders..." assuming that by "offenders" you mean the perpetrators of violence. But because I do understand their reasoning, I don't treat the advocates of limiting or banning hate speech as unreasonable or ridiculous people. Just people with valid concerns that conflict with my extreme position on free speech.
I can understand the reasons for suggesting limits... (show quote)


How about when the speech encouraging violence or harassment comes from someone like waters or Pelosi I havent heard any complaints about their tirades during their rallies but let someone else say anything like they do you end up in jail

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 13:19:18   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
bggamers wrote:
How about when the speech encouraging violence or harassment comes from someone like waters or Pelosi I havent heard any complaints about their tirades during their rallies but let someone else say anything like they do you end up in jail

I'm not familiar with anything Waters or Pelosi said that intentionally encourages violence or would put another person in jail if they were to say it. Perhaps you can provide a sample?

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 13:38:40   #
debeda
 
straightUp wrote:
One of perhaps millions of differing opinions on what PC means. Nevertheless, this does explain YOUR view on the matter, so I'll just address it as such...

First of all, your use of the word VERBOTEN is misplaced. PC culture is NOT enforced by the law. If you want to talk about niggers you might be asking for a punch in the mouth or a rash of insults but you are not going to be punished or shutdown by the government. So it's pretty simple - you can choose to be PC or you can choose not to - it's up to you.

Also, a civil culture has ALWAYS been characterized by self-imposed limits on language, which I will simply call politeness. That doesn't mean subject matters are off limits, it just means offensive insults are avoided which in many cases leads to more open discussions.

As for shutting down alternate opinions, PC has nothing to do with that unless the opinion has no redeeming value other than to insult a demographic. There is no reason for any true argument to be insulting. Every constructive opinion in existence can be expressed within the confines of PC language and that includes opinions on the right.

Yes, alternate opinions are routinely shut down by people on all sides. My views are constantly dismissed by the right-wing on this site, usually with unimaginative insults, absurd suggestions or both. It's not a big deal - if that sort of thing bothered me, I wouldn't be here. But not once have I ever blamed someones dismissal of my opinion on being PC.

Honestly, I think you folks are just looking for things to blame and your version of PC takes a lot of your intangible frustrations and puts it in a nice target to shoot at.
One of perhaps millions of differing opinions on w... (show quote)


Interesting you specifically called me stupid - for not agreeing with you, apparently - and now deny it. Your self serving dissertation is boring and illustrated even more strongly your programming. God bless you.

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2019 13:40:19   #
debeda
 
bggamers wrote:
How about when the speech encouraging violence or harassment comes from someone like waters or Pelosi I havent heard any complaints about their tirades during their rallies but let someone else say anything like they do you end up in jail


Cuz they're on the right side of PC - at the moment...

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 13:41:38   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
straightUp wrote:
Fair and balanced doesn't mean both sides win JW. That's like saying football isn't fair if one team wins and the other loses. If the truth falls squarely on one side or another it means the other side didn't do such a good job of reporting the truth. Is that fair? Yes, it is.


Interesting, your using football as an analogy.


Two teams are playing...th Reps and the Dems.
The Reps win.
The Dems refuse to accept it, they attack the referees, attack the crowd, and tear up the playing field. They vow to have the end result reversed.

That's where we are today.

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 13:43:31   #
debeda
 
maximus wrote:
Interesting, your using football as an analogy.


Two teams are playing...th Reps and the Dems.
The Reps win.
The Dems refuse to accept it, they attack the referees, attack the crowd, and tear up the playing field. They vow to have the end result reversed.

That's where we are today.


Absolutely right on, Max

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 13:47:08   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
straightUp wrote:
I'm not familiar with anything Waters or Pelosi said that intentionally encourages violence or would put another person in jail if they were to say it. Perhaps you can provide a sample?


I'll provide one for you;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJCDe7vdFfw

If you would listen to the REAL news, you would have a basis in reality. If you really don't know about Waters calling for violence, that doesn't mean it didn't happen. It just means you chose to ignore it.

Reply
 
 
Nov 21, 2019 13:52:00   #
Ricktloml
 
marinevet73 wrote:
The US Congress gave 391 mil to Ukraine. They are fighting a war against Russia, a slightly larger country. A country Trump loves. A country opposed to all democratic countries.

Russia already took part of the country when they took Crimeria from Ukraine. Are you proposing that we give them the entire country? I actually remember when proud Republicans were opposed to Russia because they were our enemies. I think they still are, as all true Republicans do. Trump doesn't. That is one of the reasons I consider him a TRAITOR to our country.
The US Congress gave 391 mil to Ukraine. They are... (show quote)


Gee WHEN did Russia take part of Ukraine? That would be when OBAMA was president. And Obama was caught on an open mike telling Dimitry Medvedev, "After my election I have more flexibility". Medvedev responded, "I will transmit this information to Vladimir". Flexibility about what? Ukrainian missile defense systems, that's what. Obama promised Ukraine if they gave up the massive amounts of arms they had left from the Soviet Union, that the U.S. would be there to protect them. When Russia invaded, WHILE OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT, and Ukraine asked for the help Obama promised...Obama sent them BLANKETS and MREs. President Trump DID send weapons to the Ukraine, President Trump HAS sanctioned Russia much more than other presidents. It was the Democrat/socialist Party, and their propaganda wing ,(the laughably called mainstream media,) that have worked with the Russians, (the unverified, and unverifiable Steels Dossier, and more,) AND the Ukrainian government, (the DNC sent operatives, Politico covered this, to manufacture dirt on the Trump campaign,) all while Obama was president to interfere in the 2016 elections. Any feelings of sedition and treason for these verifiable actions? Or is the propaganda put out by Obama, the Democrat/socialist Party and their accomplice and collaborators in the media enough to sway your opinion.

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 14:13:51   #
debeda
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Gee WHEN did Russia take part of Ukraine? That would be when OBAMA was president. And Obama was caught on an open mike telling Dimitry Medvedev, "After my election I have more flexibility". Medvedev responded, "I will transmit this information to Vladimir". Flexibility about what? Ukrainian missile defense systems, that's what. Obama promised Ukraine if they gave up the massive amounts of arms they had left from the Soviet Union, that the U.S. would be there to protect them. When Russia invaded, WHILE OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT, and Ukraine asked for the help Obama promised...Obama sent them BLANKETS and MREs. President Trump DID send weapons to the Ukraine, President Trump HAS sanctioned Russia much more than other presidents. It was the Democrat/socialist Party, and their propaganda wing ,(the laughably called mainstream media,) that have worked with the Russians, (the unverified, and unverifiable Steels Dossier, and more,) AND the Ukrainian government, (the DNC sent operatives, Politico covered this, to manufacture dirt on the Trump campaign,) all while Obama was president to interfere in the 2016 elections. Any feelings of sedition and treason for these verifiable actions? Or is the propaganda put out by Obama, the Democrat/socialist Party and their accomplice and collaborators in the media enough to sway your opinion.
Gee WHEN did Russia take part of Ukraine? That wou... (show quote)



Reply
Nov 21, 2019 15:16:38   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
debeda wrote:
Interesting you specifically called me stupid - for not agreeing with you, apparently - and now deny it. Your self serving dissertation is boring and illustrated even more strongly your programming. God bless you.

I don't think so deb. Don't forget, you can always link to my quotes so that being the case, I'll assume you're just lying until you do.

And don't assume that just because you're programmed, everyone else is too. My opinions are my own, arrived at through my own analysis. I might agree with political narratives to one degree or another but I am certainly not programmed nor do I blindly subscribe.

When people are programmed deb, they don't have explanations for their conclusions, which is often why their posts tend to be brief and not elaborate as mine usually are (which I know is the reason why some of you go off on this "he thinks he's so smart" bullshit). But that's what happens when you converse with someone who DOES think for himself. Not used to that are you?

Also, when I challenge someone to explain their view and in return I get insults, or nothing at all well, it's pretty obvious who the programmed poster is. So you might want to think about that. In the meantime, say it all you want if it makes you feel better but I'm just going to read it an empty insult which says more about you than it does me.

Reply
Nov 21, 2019 15:36:05   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Gee WHEN did Russia take part of Ukraine? That would be when OBAMA was president. And Obama was caught on an open mike telling Dimitry Medvedev, "After my election I have more flexibility". Medvedev responded, "I will transmit this information to Vladimir". Flexibility about what? Ukrainian missile defense systems, that's what. Obama promised Ukraine if they gave up the massive amounts of arms they had left from the Soviet Union, that the U.S. would be there to protect them. When Russia invaded, WHILE OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT, and Ukraine asked for the help Obama promised...Obama sent them BLANKETS and MREs. President Trump DID send weapons to the Ukraine, President Trump HAS sanctioned Russia much more than other presidents. It was the Democrat/socialist Party, and their propaganda wing ,(the laughably called mainstream media,) that have worked with the Russians, (the unverified, and unverifiable Steels Dossier, and more,) AND the Ukrainian government, (the DNC sent operatives, Politico covered this, to manufacture dirt on the Trump campaign,) all while Obama was president to interfere in the 2016 elections. Any feelings of sedition and treason for these verifiable actions? Or is the propaganda put out by Obama, the Democrat/socialist Party and their accomplice and collaborators in the media enough to sway your opinion.
Gee WHEN did Russia take part of Ukraine? That wou... (show quote)


Ukraine Crisis - What You're Not Being Told
https://youtu.be/fWkfpGCAAuw

Trump: Russia Uranium Deal Sealed ‘With Clinton Help’ is Biggest Story ‘Fake Media’ Won’t Cover
https://www.westernjournalism.com/trump-slams-fake-media-ignoring-russia-uranium-deal-sealed-clinton-help/

BY The Way; ONLY FOX Cable News covered the Russian collusion. The CNNABCNBCCBS network is trying like hell to ignore the collusion of the Justice Department in covering for the colluders.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.