Rose42 wrote:
Yes. But there was no need for waving arms.
LOL
Rose42 wrote:
I know it doesn't matter to you. Yet your imagination only goes so far. And no I'm not confused one bit.
1. If you know faith in being right doesn't matter to me then why did you stress the "greater leap of faith" it takes to be believe I'm right?
2. MY imagination is boundless but thank you for confirming my point that it atrophies in religious cultures.
And...
3. just what exactly do you think I am saying you're confused about?
Rose42 wrote:
Many non believers make the same mistake you make here. That we are "beaten down". Quite the opposite. A lot of us - myself included - used to believe as you do. What changed it started with examining self. Man isn't inherently good. Children aren't taught to lie, steal and be selfish. That's man's nature.
Well, you're certainly welcome to your opinion. We disagree on every point there. ;)
I can't really say I appreciate your baseless assumption either, that I think the way you used to. It's one of those overused "I learned, you didn't" colloquialisms that perhaps you didn't give much thought to, but I am highly doubtful that our history of thoughts have ANY similar patterns.
straightUp wrote:
Insisting that there HAS to be a design is an inability to let go of our own limitations as humans. Some people think that because humans rely on designs to build things, God does too.
Rose42 wrote:
No it isn't.
So, either we disagree again or you're just being contrary. I'll assume the former.
Rose42 wrote:
And we cannot understand the mind of God whose intelligence is far beyond anything we could ever grasp.
So in the same sentence you state that we can NOT understand the mind of God AND proceed to describe it anyway. ;)
Maybe our thought histories do overlap a little, when I was a kid I used to say the same thing about God and his unfathomable intelligence.
Rose42 wrote:
He didn't have to sit down and plan it out.
Well, I suppose there wasn't a chair to sit in before he created the universe, right?
In any case... did those dusty scribes actually state that God didn't have to plan out his creation or are you just imagining He didn't? That's pretty much what I was doing as a kid, thinking about God's expansive intellect. It's not that I had seen any proof, or even the slightest evidence... I just wanted it to be true.
straightUp wrote:
Seems to me that it takes even more faith to believe that out of the thousands of stories about how the world was created the one you chose to believe, the one where God created the universe like a magic trick is even farther fetched than Big Bang.
Rose42 wrote:
Is it? You would have people believe that out of nothing came the magic of life. That somehow it evolved into what we have now. That's its own magic trick - a magic explosion out of nothing.
So you are actually telling me that a magic explosion out of nothing is somehow not as feasible as a magic God who has always existed?
See, this is why scientists don't care. They focus on reality as they discover it and speculate about the rest. They don't have time for white-knuckled arguments about which magic doodad is the Holy Grail.
Rose42 wrote:
You believe people accept it without question but they don't.
Many of them do Rose... I know a lot of religious people personally and they TELL me they do NOT question their faith. They might question themselves, or the world around them. But they don't question their faith. And it makes sense because once they do, it becomes speculation and speculation doesn't have the same power as faith.
Rose42 wrote:
What you're exploring is not reality because you don't know what that reality is - with regards to creation.
With regard to ANYTHING Rose... Not just creation. This has been my point all along. These far-reaching theories are speculations... They are not claims on reality.
Seriously, go back and read through our conversation... You are the only one between us who is claiming to be right about reality. You are the only one claiming that anyone else along with their theories are wrong... Perhaps it's you're obsession with being right that makes you assume that I am too.
But I'm not. So, I don't care if it takes a greater leap of faith to believe the universe came from an explosion because I don't care if it's true or not.
Rose42 wrote:
What many of us have come to see is Creationism makes much more sense especially given that scientists go through all kinds of gyrations to avoid acknowledging its possibility.
Those gyrations are the various tests that science uses for deduction, which is how science works, it's a process of testing and discrediting. Big bang and evolution are famous theories because they have lasted for so long under the constant assault of scientific testing. Creationism failed to pass the first round because it doesn't have a testable explanation in the first place. Which is why you need faith to believe it. Folks like you get upset with these "gyrations" fo the same reason kids get upset with the teacher that gave them an F on their test.
"Stupid scientists... they just don't want me to be right."
Rose42 wrote:
As already mentioned, many scientists are Christians. They just don't believe in a magical big bang because it really doesn't make sense.
Maybe not to you.
And yes, many scientists are Christians and they don't "believe" in a magical big bang for the same reasons NONE of the scientists do... As I've said so many times already, scientists don't cling to "beliefs" that their theory is "correct".
I wonder if you'll ever get that.
Rose42 wrote:
And you do realize that what's valid is quite often subjective.
Yes, a question can be both at the same time.