One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What is a Patriot?
Page <<first <prev 12 of 19 next> last>>
Jun 19, 2019 12:06:23   #
The Critical Critic Loc: Turtle Island
 
Morgan wrote:
Show me one socialist country without a fundamental government, run strictly by socialism, go ahead, this does not mean that they identify themselves as socialists, know the differences. They will be socialists under a specific government. If I'm wrong you will have enlightened me today.

Also aside from that show me in the past where it has not been forced upon the people. Did you notice you referred to Nazi Germany, and what were they, how were the governed? Not by socialism.

Socialism is now being redefined into different groups, one being democratic.
Show me one socialist country without a fundamenta... (show quote)


Morgan, I’m just curious, why do you rush to defend attacks against socialism?

Reply
Jun 19, 2019 12:10:56   #
Morgan
 
JoyV wrote:
Socialism can be an economic system as well as political system. But is not first and foremost an economic system. The most critical defining characteristic has to do with property. Is the property privately own and controlled, publicly owned and controlled by the government (communism), or somewhere in between (socialism). For example, in NAZI Germany, property which had been privately owned and controlled before the NAZIs, were often still left in the hands of the former owners (unless they were of one of the undesirables of the state) but controlled by the government. The former owners were more like managers as it could be taken away at any time and given to another with no compensation. This included ALL types of property! It included the home you lived in, any land you used for crops or pasture, livestock, industry and business, even musical compositions and works of art as well as the tools you use to make them. It even included ideas if they were acted upon. If they could have, they would have controlled your thoughts, but they settled for shaping your thoughts. This is far more than economics!

Definition of socialism
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

Under the NAZIs, definition 1 and 2 were totally in compliance with the definitions. Definition 3 would have to eliminate the words "Marxist" and "transition" to be in compliance with that definition. In other words, 'A stage in society between capitalism and communism.'
Socialism can be an economic system as well as pol... (show quote)


Quote: This is far more than economics!

Yes, a Dictatorship is far more than economics. It strips the spirit of its people under its suppression.

Reply
Jun 19, 2019 12:13:52   #
Morgan
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
Morgan, I’m just curious, why do you rush to defend attacks against socialism?


I don't rush, but for most... socialism is misunderstood and being confused with its chains to a dictatorship, and now people fear it, Socialism is not to be fear, the tyrannical rule is, this needs clarification for most, that's all.

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2019 12:20:06   #
JoyV
 
Morgan wrote:
Fascism is the form of government, controlled by an authoritarian rule, either by a group or a person under a dictatorship, in the past, presently new forms of socialism are rising up. This new so-called Democratic Socialism is ruled by the definition of Democratic which is by the people. The "type of Socialism falls under the type of government it is under, this is something you need to understand.

Fascists under a dictatorship for socialism in order to control all the money, not the other way around.

I also never said these atrocities were done by Nationalists, but in actuality, they were... by being manipulated, just as you said. This is where blind loyalty and nationalism can become a problem. We see it also in the mindset of religious groups such as Muslims and other religious communities. Feeling of being so right in their cause to defend they feel very justified to hurt and kill people, and how millions of people have been killed.

What a piece of misinformation and misleading comment: "When the Antifa and BAMN thugs "protested" by setting fire to private property, smashing windows, and assaulting people, Obama said there actions heartened him." Shame, it goes along with " you didn't build that yourself". Intentionally misinterpreted.

I'm not getting into an anti-Obama go to conversation by the right with you, nor am I going to what did Trump do...please, the list is way too long, and here we have come full circle to Blind Loyalty, haven't we, for you to even ask that question.
Fascism is the form of government, controlled by a... (show quote)


I watched Obama respond to a reporters question on what he felt or thought (can't remember which word was used) about the BAMN protest which had just taken place the day before. Obama said, "It heartens me."

I provided a list which was far from complete. I am asking you to do the same. If the total list is far too long, surely you can provide as many as I have. Or how about at least 3?

Reply
Jun 19, 2019 12:39:36   #
Morgan
 
JoyV wrote:
I watched Obama respond to a reporters question on what he felt or thought (can't remember which word was used) about the BAMN protest which had just taken place the day before. Obama said, "It heartens me."

I provided a list which was far from complete. I am asking you to do the same. If the total list is far too long, surely you can provide as many as I have. Or how about at least 3?


No, I'm not going there with you, on some kind of useless tit for tat, and your recollection is a poor validation. Let's just stick with the topic.

Reply
Jun 19, 2019 12:48:29   #
JoyV
 
Morgan wrote:
Show me one socialist country without a fundamental government, run strictly by socialism, go ahead, this does not mean that they identify themselves as socialists, know the differences. They will be socialists under a specific government. If I'm wrong you will have enlightened me today.

Also aside from that show me in the past where it has not been forced upon the people. Did you notice you referred to Nazi Germany, and what were they, how were the governed? Not by socialism.

Socialism is now being redefined into different groups, one being democratic.
Show me one socialist country without a fundamenta... (show quote)


Yes NAZI Germany was governed by socialism. The means of production and distribution was under the control of a central government. In a socialist government there is no privately controlled property. Under the NAZIs there was no privately controlled property. In a socialist government production is controlled by the state. Under the NAZIs production was controlled by the state. In a socialist country distribution is controlled by the state. Under the NAZIs distribution was controlled by the state. So what characteristic of socialism was NOT a characteristic of Naziism?

Show me a country run strictly by democracy? Strictly by anarchy? Strictly by Tribalism,
Despotism, Feudalism, Colonialism? These are all systems of government but none are 100% run by that system. The United States is a Republic but includes socialist programs. Our economic system is capitalism, but the government is not capitalist in any way! The same cannot be said of socialism. There ARE socialist governments but no capitalist governments. Socialist governments include the governments of Laos People’s Democratic Republic, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Cuba, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. This number has dropped dramatically in recent years. Former countries under the Marxist-Leninist idea of socialism included Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, Belarus, Benin, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Congo, Czechoslovakia, Ethiopia, East Germany, Hungary, North Korea, Mongolia, Mozambique, Poland, Romania, Somalia, Russia, Ukraine, North Vietnam, South Yemen and Yugoslavia. And no, none are PURELY socialist.

Yet though there are capitalist countries, I do not believe there is such a thing as a capitalist government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_forms_of_government

Reply
Jun 19, 2019 13:12:13   #
mosteen12
 
Morgan wrote:
I won't allow them to give the left that false title, none of us should, that would be them winning with their lies. Where do they deserve that title over the rest of us. I would in return in kind not to call them Patriots, but rather traitors.


Since leftist are communist, traitor is a fitting word. So, it will be Patriots vs Traitors!!

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2019 13:13:42   #
The Critical Critic Loc: Turtle Island
 
Morgan wrote:
I don't rush, but for most... socialism is misunderstood and being confused with its chains to a dictatorship, and now people fear it, Socialism is not to be fear, the tyrannical rule is, this needs clarification for most, that's all.


Ok. I almost deleted the word, rush, but chose to stay with it because it was, in part, having to do with our very first interaction, and since then I noticed you taking part in most topics with the word socialism in the title. I also noticed that you didn’t object to my use of the word, defend...

You seem to have this almost romanticized view of socialism, like if socialism was done “correctly”, it would be rainbows, unicorns, and ice cream for everybody. Your claim is that socialism is just misunderstood by some, however, if it was fully understood, it would be recognized universally, as the disease that it is, responsible for the deaths of tens, if not hundreds of millions of people.

I’m on the flip side of the coin, and will happily, and eagerly, denounce socialism any and every opportunity I get. (But you know this about me already, lol.)

Thank you for taking the time to answer my question, Morgan.

Reply
Jun 19, 2019 15:37:40   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
Rose42 wrote:
I couldn’t vote in the primary because I wasn’t a republican.

Ah. Yeah. Many of us had the same problem so I understand, and you are forgiven for not wanting to soil your good name by such an association.

Reply
Jun 19, 2019 17:43:04   #
Morgan
 
mosteen12 wrote:
Since leftist are communist, traitor is a fitting word. So, it will be Patriots vs Traitors!!


Ok, us being the Patriots.

Reply
Jun 19, 2019 19:55:14   #
Morgan
 
The Critical Critic wrote:
Ok. I almost deleted the word, rush, but chose to stay with it because it was, in part, having to do with our very first interaction, and since then I noticed you taking part in most topics with the word socialism in the title. I also noticed that you didn’t object to my use of the word, defend...

You seem to have this almost romanticized view of socialism, like if socialism was done “correctly”, it would be rainbows, unicorns, and ice cream for everybody. Your claim is that socialism is just misunderstood by some, however, if it was fully understood, it would be recognized universally, as the disease that it is, responsible for the deaths of tens, if not hundreds of millions of people.

I’m on the flip side of the coin, and will happily, and eagerly, denounce socialism any and every opportunity I get. (But you know this about me already, lol.)

Thank you for taking the time to answer my question, Morgan.
Ok. I almost deleted the word, rush, but chose to ... (show quote)


I don't defend or support Socialism in its totalitarianism form in a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state. And anyone who believes the left believes in that is completely out of touch with reality. People throw this word around in complete ignorance of what it truly means and this goes to anyone who accuses the left as such. Which includes people who like Sanders and AOC who claim to be Democratic socialist, which I believe may be a mistake as it seems to be inaccurately interpreted.

What I endeavor to do is have people simply understand where the power is coming from and how it is used. The propaganda from the right is selling to their party that the left is the enemy because they "are socialist", that is the farthest thing from the truth, not to mention very offensive, especially when we consider how most all Americans view Socialism since WWII.

While the left may not like Trump I have not heard them disparage all people on the right as the enemy of the state, as our own president has done to the people on the left. What president would do that to its own citizens?

Every hard working person in America tries to get ahead, that is not socialism, that is free market Capitalism. Capitalism is not a form of Government, neither is Socialism. They are constructed within a governmental system. This is something JoyV cannot seem to comprehend.

Where you get that I romanticize socialism leaves me wondering why? I am completely for what we have, a free market with some social programs and amenities as our public school, emergency service, the fire dept, Dept of health, DOT and of course the military and police to name a few.

Here's one way to think of it, in a horse and wagon, it is the horse that pulls the wagon, the government being the horse, pulling the wagon ~their chosen economic system, now the big question is... who's driving the horses? Who has the reins in their hands, who's steering them? It's different for every country.

Reply
 
 
Jun 19, 2019 20:19:30   #
tactful Loc: just North of the District of LMAO
 
lindajoy wrote:
Thank You, tactful.. I agree First responders are definitely patriots.

What do you mean not being treated as they should? Are you speaking of Jon Stewart magnificent blistering to Congress regarding our first responders still waiting after 18 for benefits?? Are having to fight every step of the way to get medical treatment that came years later and after many had already died? If you are referring to that then you are absolutely correct and that was horrific, unjustified and damn sure unpatriotic..

As to your question, off the top of my head response would be government just like anything they are involved in, it never goes as expected or thought.. All that money approved for 9-11 and look how long it took! Showmanship~~ false showmanship~~ popfffttt
Thank You, tactful.. I agree First responders are ... (show quote)


that's exactly what was meant Lin .. great analysis.
as per anything gov related the gears are fundamentally fudged. good anology where funds go and went?
who knows these days.

Reply
Jun 20, 2019 01:23:21   #
JoyV
 
Morgan wrote:
Again if you say it is between Capitalism and Communism, both are economic structures... not governing, so yes, it can be said it may fall be in between, I wouldn't but someone can. A stage in a society does not speak of their governing but rather their economy, their economic structure. I hope you understand.


But it is not JUST an economic system. Capitalism is just an economic system. Our country is a Republic, not a Capitalist. But our economy is capitalist. What does having your government dictating nearly every aspect of your life to do with economy. Under the NAZIs and the USSR, you couldn't marry outside of the imposed restrictions. You couldn't teach, write, sing, act, or speak about ideas not approved. If you were disabled or considered mentally deficient, the state dictated you be sterilized or worse. These are NOT part of an economic system. And yes, a socialist state ALSO controls the economic system.

Germany did not go from a representative form of government to a socialist form overnight. As more and more people became dissatisfied with their lives, they blamed their leaders and scapegoats. More and more turned to various socialist groups. One was Marxist Communism and one was NAZI (before Hitler joined). The country went through transitional stages from representative democracy to socialism. And yes, they voted for socialism before they lost the power to vote under the government they chose.

Reply
Jun 20, 2019 01:28:45   #
JoyV
 
Morgan wrote:
I don't rush, but for most... socialism is misunderstood and being confused with its chains to a dictatorship, and now people fear it, Socialism is not to be fear, the tyrannical rule is, this needs clarification for most, that's all.


I am surprised you would say people confuse socialism with its chains to dictatorship. Yes I, and I'm sure most conservatives see socialism's chains to dictatorship. But I didn't expect you to admit it.

Reply
Jun 20, 2019 01:41:32   #
JoyV
 
Morgan wrote:
I don't defend or support Socialism in its totalitarianism form in a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state. And anyone who believes the left believes in that is completely out of touch with reality. People throw this word around in complete ignorance of what it truly means and this goes to anyone who accuses the left as such. Which includes people who like Sanders and AOC who claim to be Democratic socialist, which I believe may be a mistake as it seems to be inaccurately interpreted.

What I endeavor to do is have people simply understand where the power is coming from and how it is used. The propaganda from the right is selling to their party that the left is the enemy because they "are socialist", that is the farthest thing from the truth, not to mention very offensive, especially when we consider how most all Americans view Socialism since WWII.

While the left may not like Trump I have not heard them disparage all people on the right as the enemy of the state, as our own president has done to the people on the left. What president would do that to its own citizens?

Every hard working person in America tries to get ahead, that is not socialism, that is free market Capitalism. Capitalism is not a form of Government, neither is Socialism. They are constructed within a governmental system. This is something JoyV cannot seem to comprehend.

Where you get that I romanticize socialism leaves me wondering why? I am completely for what we have, a free market with some social programs and amenities as our public school, emergency service, the fire dept, Dept of health, DOT and of course the military and police to name a few.

Here's one way to think of it, in a horse and wagon, it is the horse that pulls the wagon, the government being the horse, pulling the wagon ~their chosen economic system, now the big question is... who's driving the horses? Who has the reins in their hands, who's steering them? It's different for every country.
I don't defend or support Socialism in its totalit... (show quote)


You wrote, "I don't defend or support Socialism in its totalitarianism form..." If it were only an economic system, how could it have a totalitarian form? Totalitarianism is a political system not an economic system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism

You wrote, "While the left may not like Trump I have not heard them disparage all people on the right as the enemy of the state, as our own president has done to the people on the left." Did you forget the deplorable label for conservatives? And when did Trump call the people on the left the enemy of the state? Not to mention, conservatives, constitutionalist, and any other Trump supporter or Trump, would not use the phrase "the state" to refer to out country. Now Trump did call reporters and media who engaged in false stories, the enemy of the people.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 12 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.