Geo wrote:
New Research Points to OBAMACARE SUCCESS in improving Cancer Treatment as Trump Administration Pushes for repeal
BY JASON LEMON ON 6/2/19 AT 1:19 PM EDT
He needs to pay for the 2.1 Trillion dollar giveaway to the rich, so why not take it from people that don't matter to Trump, everyone else.
Two new research studies have shown that the Affordable Care Act—the 2010 legislation commonly referred to as "Obamacare"—had successfully curbed disparities in cancer treatment and allowed many to receive treatment at an earlier stage, while the administration of President Donald Trump has continued to fight to repeal the healthcare legislation.
There will be No Repeal and Replace, Just Repeal and Suffer.
The separate studies, led by researchers at Yale and Johns Hopkins University, showed ways that thousands of cancer patients had benefited following the passage of the ACA.
Through the Yale study, it was revealed that in states where the ACA was used to expand access to Medicaid, racial disparities in how quickly cancer patients were treated nearly disappeared. The Johns Hopkins research showed that women with ovarian cancer, which is generally difficult to detect, received diagnoses at an earlier stage after Obamacare went into effect.
Melissa Wheeler, director of disparities and the outreach program at the Levine Cancer Institute in North Carolina, explained that the two studies made sense.
"It was a great thing to see for the first time thousands and thousands of people really access what they needed — to be able to go through the door of a doctor's office," she said, according to Financial Times. However, she warned that the Trump administration's efforts to repeal the ACA could have dire consequences.
"If [Americans] don't have insurance, they won't have a screening test — and then they turn up in the emergency department with stage-four cancer," she warned.
While the research shows a promising connection between expanded care and better cancer treatment, Amy Davidoff, a senior research scientist at the Yale School of Public Health and in the university's cancer center, cautioned that more studies need to be done to fully understand the potential benefits.
"I see this as contributing to our understanding of how the ACA might be affecting the process of cancer care, and how it might affect disparities in that care," she said, according to Yale News.
Anna Jo Smith, a lead author of the Johns Hopkins study, pointed out that greater access to healthcare has a major role in treatment outcomes.
"Detecting and treating ovarian cancer at an early stage saves lives and lowers healthcare costs compared with treatment of cancer at a more advanced, incurable stage," Smith said, according to OncLive. "Having health insurance plays a major role in whether or not a woman has access to care providers who can monitor symptoms and act on those symptoms if necessary," she explained.
President Donald Trump Asks Courts to End Obamacare in Its Entirety
Iowa Woman Tells Senator his Obamacare Votes Are “Threatening My Life”
Sarah Sanders Blames ‘Radical’ Dems for Obamacare Delay
Meanwhile, Trump reignited the fight against Obamacare in March when his administration chose to support a lawsuit challenging the legislation's constitutionality. The move came after unsuccessful efforts to repeal and replace the landmark act through Congress, despite Republicans having control of both bodies of the legislative branch during Trump's first two years in office.
New Research Points to OBAMACARE SUCCESS in improv... (
show quote)
Good morning, Geo,
Interesting article. No point in refuting what, in my opinion, is incorrect. I'll just mention this; Obamacare was a plan to insure those who couldn't afford private health care. Simply put, that means that those who CAN afford private healthcare are now paying for those who can't. The result was and is rising health care prices. I'm not blaming Obamacare in itself, but big Pharma, which is like a giant money vacuum aimed at all of our bank accounts. Here's a good example; my wife.....she has an incurable terminal disease called Alpha One. To control this disease and continue living, she gets an infusion once per week for the rest of her life. The cost of this medicine is...
$18,000 per month. This medicine makes her immune system go down and she was getting sick a lot. To combat this, she gets an immune booster once per week for the rest of her life. The cost of this medicine is
$5,000 per month. That is
$23,000 per month for the rest of her life.
Here's a little stab at universal health care...in the UK, she would be dead in less than two years because the UK just won't cover the medicine cost.
But Trump DID want to repeal and replace but republicans failed to back him, and he just can't do it alone. I'll give the democrats this, they stick together. When republicans had the power, they failed to get their wagons in a circle.
Here was my idea..they said there were 30,000,000 uninsured workers in America. Let them join into one group, nation wide. The premium would have been so low that all 30 million could have afforded it. For those on Medicare and Medicade, expand the programs or start a new one, but don't put these people in the same group as those who work because THEN the cost start to go up, up, up. Obama should have negated the laws that stop people from shopping nationwide for a good deal on insurance.
Anyway, Obamacare is what it is. Two years down the road and it has NOT been repealed OR replaced. I also don't see that happening any time in the near future because the republicans missed their window of opportunity.
I think Obamacare was a good NEW idea, but brought about in all the OLD ways that got some uninsured people insured, fined some people who couldn't afford the high costs, made people change their plan that they liked, and put a huge burden of cost on American workers.