One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Was Hitler a Socialist? Was Hitler a Left-Winger? Was Hitler a Liberal?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Feb 24, 2019 03:53:12   #
emarine
 
JoyV wrote:
Yup. Sounds like Obama. While Trump has been carrying out his campaign promises and has NOT continued the usurpation of powers which previous presidents, especially Bush and Obama, have done. Not once has he made a "signing statement" where portions of a bill are altered, eliminated, or added to; then signed! This practice was done by both Bush and Obama. Trump has worked within the Constitutional framework.



Ok so Mexico not paying for Trumps campaign promise & declaring a national crisis to steal funds from taxpayers from our Military... sounds more like a con job to me... Reminds me of Regan swiping SS funds to cover his butt... it might be legal but its still bad business...

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 04:17:55   #
JoyV
 
PeterS wrote:
A different brand of socialism? So you are continuing to just make it up as you go I see. Try as you might you can't rewrite history simply because you don't like how it paints you. Look at the characteristics of Fascism and then tell me how it can be a left wing ideology?

1) Nationalism. Trump is the one who proudly called himself a Nationalist. Are you going to say he was wrong?

2) Militarism. Conservatives worship the military yet you are going to tell me that the opposite is true and it's we liberals who glorify all things military.

3) Identifying enemies as a unifying cause. Why don't we start with illegal aliens then throw in Muslims and add Blacks and finally liberals. All enemies that you conservative minions love to rally against.

4) Rampant Sexism. Do I need to say anything?

5) Obsession with national security. Again, do I need to add anything here?

6) Religion and government are intertwined. Again, it's you CC's who are always crying that we were founded as a Christian nation and that nowhere in the constitution does it say separation of church and state. It's we liberals who fight for secularism...something the Nazi's would ever do.

7) Corporate power is protected. Again a solid trait of you conservatives.

8) Labor power is suppressed. There is nary a union that you conservatives ever embraced.

9) Disdain for intellectualism. This should be obvious.

10) Rampant cronyism and corruption. Trump and his cronies will be the most litigated against since Reagan.

11) Fraudulent elections. The biggest voter fraud case in the past 50 years just occurred in NC and was carried out by a conservative politician who, ironically, was also a pastor.


And I do love that you think that Right-Wing neo-nazis aren't fascist but those who oppose them are. It's the behavior, not rhetoric that defines what and who you are. Right now your position is that if you oppose fascism that marks you as a fascist. ANTIFA was founded to stand in opposition to right-wing fascism and they do that very well. I assume that's why you think they are fascist but even if they were fascist you have but one example where I have an entire list of what makes you conservatives fascist by your ideology...
A different brand of socialism? So you are continu... (show quote)


1) Nationalism is Patriotism in action. It has been a characteristic of both socialist countries, republics, monarchies, and even dictatorships.
2) Militarism is also found in socialist countries as much as in republics.
3) Identifying enemies as a unifying cause. Like today's left wing practice of identifying ICE, CBP, and police as enemies? While the right identifying terrorist as enemies is simply because they ARE enemies!!!!
4) Rampant sexism. If you mean Trump then, hiring more women in high level positions than men, paying women equal wages, and giving more than the average maternity leave; is sexist.
5) Obsession with national security. Any country which doesn't pay attention to national security will not last long as a sovereign nation. Ii don't believe inviting attacking or invading enemies to sing Kumbaya will work.
6) Religion and government are entwined. Just where did you read that was the case in Nazi Germany? Both the Nazis, Maoists, and the Soviets suppressed and even abolished religion. Our Bill of rights clearly guarantees our government will not infringe on religion. This is the opposite of suppressing religion, which is what liberals and progressives have been advocating. I'mm not a Christian but AM a Constitutionalist!
7) Corporate power is protected. No. Private property and capitalism is protected. This means ALL, whether rich or poor, are protected by the same guarantees. But in Nazi Germany, Corporate power was NOT protected. The government controlled businesses completely!
8) Labor power is suppressed. Yes. We prefer to protect the laborer instead of a powerful organization which has authority over the laborer and suppressing the laborer from advancement and can actually become even more oppressive than what they are supposed to be protecting the laborer from.
9) Disdain for intellectualism. Yes. We value engineers over liberal arts any day. Science over philosophy. Mathematics over psychology.
10) Massive cronyism and corruption. These, especially the latter, have been far more prevalent under Democrat administrations than Republican ones.
11) Fraudulent elections. Not as big as the election stolen in my state by the democrats to put Sinema in the Senate. After the polls closed, the rules were changed which disqualified mail-in-ballots from all but three counties in the state. Those three were the counties with all the large urban populations. The rural counties rely far more on mail-in-ballots and some counties have more than 95% of the voters using mail-in-ballots. All those ballots were discarded! The reason given for the rule change was that the rural counties did not do things the same as the urban counties. There was not one example given of a county's handling of mail-in-ballot fraud or disenfranchisement. And the rural counties were not even given a chance to conform to urban practices as the new rule was written AFTER the polls closed but made retroactive.

Just because antifa's name is anti-fascist does not jive with their fascist actions! Brown-shirts or black-shirts. They and antifa behave the same!

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 04:54:58   #
Morgan
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
The full name of Hitler's political party was 'The National Socialist German Workers' Party' (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or NSDAP) called for short, Nazi. Hitler was a socialist, through and through. Get over it.


Hitler found his way in through a dying party and resurrected it, gave people what they wanted to hear, much like Trump running on the Republican ticket and bouncing back to them what they already had been chanting, along with the division of Democratic party for Bernie, he won. What I'm saying is that Hitler was about as much as a socialist as Trump is a Republican.

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 07:41:36   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
emarine wrote:
After you recover from the Trump "fake news" brainwashing you've chose to accept you may remember that the truth sometimes hurts...

Ha! You should know!

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 10:16:53   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
sbv0130 wrote:
He also said he was a Nationalist, much like someone else we all know.


You really need to find the true meaning of nationalism, then you just might change your mind. Nah, that just wouldn't fit the parameters of your TDS.

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 10:40:13   #
sbv0130
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
No, it doesn't. What you're trying to assert is both offensive and very wrong. Your President is not a fascist, nor did he lie to garner votes in the election. He has worked diligently to fulfill his campaign promises in the face of some of the worst resistance any President has ever come up against. And yes, it is 'resistance'. These people believe they are at war. What with is anybody's guess.


Trump made promises he knew he could not keep. He had two years to get his wall funded under a Republican Congress, but now that 2020 looms near, all of a sudden he's pushing a Democratic house to grant him funds he knows they will not provide, just so he can place blame on them when his promised wall is not built. Construction is still being done on the fencing funded in 2006. What makes him think HIS wall would ever be built, much less completed, within his lifetime?

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 11:13:21   #
JoyV
 
emarine wrote:
good point JoyV… war fast tracks country's to Nationalize...Only problem... we're not at war...


If you believe patriotism to ones nation is only justified during times of war, when our country or an ally is threatened, there will be no motivation by the populace to defend. This was the case in the US at the beginning of WWII. Patriotism was low. Preparations for war, both on the mechanization side and the populace willingness side; were slow to build. We were late comers to the war. If Japan hadn't attacked, who knows whether we would ever have stirred as a nation. Having a military prepared for war, is ever so much more sensible. Nor should patriotism to ones nation be relegated to war time. Without American patriotism, the upholding of our constitution becomes weak. Without our populace holding our government to the constitutional rights and restrictions, our populace will lose their guarantees of rights and eventually be enslaved to the state.

Reply
Check out topic: border illegals who got away
Feb 24, 2019 11:22:00   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
sbv0130 wrote:
Trump made promises he knew he could not keep. He had two years to get his wall funded under a Republican Congress, but now that 2020 looms near, all of a sudden he's pushing a Democratic house to grant him funds he knows they will not provide, just so he can place blame on them when his promised wall is not built. Construction is still being done on the fencing funded in 2006. What makes him think HIS wall would ever be built, much less completed, within his lifetime?

I believe they spent the majority of that time working on a few somewhat higher priorities, like the non-repeal of the ACA, for instance. One thing at a time.

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 11:23:20   #
JoyV
 
emarine wrote:
Ok so Mexico not paying for Trumps campaign promise & declaring a national crisis to steal funds from taxpayers from our Military... sounds more like a con job to me... Reminds me of Regan swiping SS funds to cover his butt... it might be legal but its still bad business...


Steal taxpayer's money? The money has already been paid out. The taxpayer's money is already spent. The military and other sources Trump is tapping would not have returned the money to the general fund. This just directs where some of it is used.

I agree regarding Reagan. But don't forget Clinton's gutting our military and pulling funding from other areas to create his one time surplus. Note that there was no lessening or plateauing of the national debt which would have been the case if he actually HAD balanced the budget. He did this to look like a hero on the short term, while leaving our military, especially navy, in shambles for years.

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 11:29:29   #
JoyV
 
sbv0130 wrote:
Trump made promises he knew he could not keep. He had two years to get his wall funded under a Republican Congress, but now that 2020 looms near, all of a sudden he's pushing a Democratic house to grant him funds he knows they will not provide, just so he can place blame on them when his promised wall is not built. Construction is still being done on the fencing funded in 2006. What makes him think HIS wall would ever be built, much less completed, within his lifetime?


All of a sudden? He has been pushing for wall funding all along. You seem to think just because there was a Republican controlled congress, Trump had only to state his will and they would all line up like socialist collectivists touting the party line. Trump had the populace behind him. He did not have the support of the elite politicians on either the left or right. They rightly saw him as a threat to their gravy train. Despite having to fight an uphill battle not only against the Democrat politicians, but against the RINOs; he was still getting much accomplished.

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 16:25:54   #
emarine
 
JoyV wrote:
If you believe patriotism to ones nation is only justified during times of war, when our country or an ally is threatened, there will be no motivation by the populace to defend. This was the case in the US at the beginning of WWII. Patriotism was low. Preparations for war, both on the mechanization side and the populace willingness side; were slow to build. We were late comers to the war. If Japan hadn't attacked, who knows whether we would ever have stirred as a nation. Having a military prepared for war, is ever so much more sensible. Nor should patriotism to ones nation be relegated to war time. Without American patriotism, the upholding of our constitution becomes weak. Without our populace holding our government to the constitutional rights and restrictions, our populace will lose their guarantees of rights and eventually be enslaved to the state.
If you believe patriotism to ones nation is only j... (show quote)




things are very different from pre WW2 to the start of the cold war... just look at our Military budget to start...we have been well prepared for war for along time now...


As opposed to patriotism, which involves social conditioning and personal opinion, nationalism involves national identity and the belief that one's nation and/or its government is supreme. [W]hile nationalism can unite people it must be noted that it unites people against other people.

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2019 17:59:03   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
emarine wrote:
[W]hile nationalism can unite people it must be noted that it unites people against other people.

That's its weakness. Patriotism unites on an internal basis, Nationalism promotes fear of outsiders and makes war far more likely. Much better to be a patriot and forego the hate and fear.

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 18:35:18   #
sbv0130
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I believe they spent the majority of that time working on a few somewhat higher priorities, like the non-repeal of the ACA, for instance. One thing at a time.


It's all part of the budget which is supposed to be done annually. ACA was never repealed, just defunded. The big tax cut reduced the amount of income for the budget so there is no money for his wall, but he's not smart enough to figure that out. If he's so head strong about national security, why take funding from the military?? If he wanted that wall so much he should have asked for funding in small portions starting back in 2017, rather than expecting to get it all in one lump sum. He's not very forward-thinking.

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 19:56:34   #
emarine
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
That's its weakness. Patriotism unites on an internal basis, Nationalism promotes fear of outsiders and makes war far more likely. Much better to be a patriot and forego the hate and fear.




I agree... but which way is it being sold here now?... we now require more wall to keep invaders out... this is a fear based pitch... & I have no problem with deporting every illegal now that's in our country … Trump is dealing with this issue poorly...

Reply
Feb 24, 2019 20:13:46   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
emarine wrote:
I agree... but which way is it being sold here now?... we now require more wall to keep invaders out... this is a fear based pitch... & I have no problem with deporting every illegal now that's in our country … Trump is dealing with this issue poorly...

He's a nationalist, for sure, but he has a good point with the southern border. You don't hear him raising the alarm on the northern border because the threat is from the south, not the north. When he says they're trafficking in people, what he means is that they're slavers, in the old school meaning that they literally deal in humans being owned and exploited by others. When he says they bring drugs, he doesn't mean a few ounces of pot for the weekend blowout, he means fentanyl and heroin, the kinds of drugs that kill people every day. When he says they bring gang violence, he means that people are being killed on a daily basis by thugs who have no business being here. When he says we need a wall on our southern border, he's not being a racist or a xenophobe, he's being a realist in his mission to secure the safety and well-being of the American people, by keeping these dangerous and harmful influences out. Get the southern border secured and see the patriotism blossom.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.