One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Kavanaugh Just Got News That Could Remove Him From The Supreme Court
Page <<first <prev 3 of 9 next> last>>
Feb 2, 2019 18:43:03   #
SinnieK
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Ok I’m just reaching out and apologizing to anyone I’ve offended in the past because OPP is going to ban me permanently soon.

Sorry and you have a friend in me.


Sicil, what had you done now? Why you will be banned soon? Is this for real? Anyway we'll be in touch.

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 19:27:27   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
eagleye13 wrote:
A lot of cable services do not carry One America News Network. (OAN)
My local cable service does not.
I am now on satellite.


Not worth the trouble to get that channel.

Quote:
The channel has also been noted for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories
*

*Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_America_News_Network (last sentence of second paragraph)

Neither LWNJ sites/channels/various media/individuals nor RWNJ sites/channels/various media/individuals are worth paying any attention to and those that do... They aren't worth paying any attention to either.

I prefer to get my information from legitimate and credible sources and typically I confirm anything that even they say if I decide further scrutiny is warranted. Conspiracy theories are NOT a worthwhile source of information and are barely even entertainment even.

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 19:44:50   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
*

*Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_America_News_Network (last sentence of second paragraph)

Neither LWNJ sites/channels/various media/individuals nor RWNJ sites/channels/various media/individuals are worth paying any attention to and those that do... They aren't worth paying any attention to either.

I prefer to get my information from legitimate and credible sources and typically I confirm anything that even they say if I decide further scrutiny is warranted. Conspiracy theories are NOT a worthwhile source of information and are barely even entertainment even.
* br br *Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On... (show quote)


You think the Washington Post is a credible source to accuse and indict a competitor for biased reporting, promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories. This is a classic case of the pot calling thwe kettle "black ass".

If WAPO is an example of a legitimate and credible source than nothing further needs to be said because you are too brain dead for it to matter.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2019 19:46:33   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
woodguru wrote:

...Trump used to throw parties for his wealthy friends that had models as young as 14 and 15 that were abused by these men. Any sex, consensual or otherwise is illegal and a felony. We know this because one of his wealthy mentors was charged with felony rape of a minor that he plead guilty to for a vastly reduced sentence...and stuff your fake news crap, these are facts.

Trump has had multiple cases brought surrounding the use of underage girls at parties, and those who give cover for things like this are part of the problem. The things that can't necessarily be proved are well supported by things that can.
br ...Trump used to throw parties for his wealthy... (show quote)


I could be wrong but I believe those parties were thrown by Jeffrey Epstein and since Trump supporters will NEVER believe anything taken from any source not deemed ultra-conservative, I will supply a link to a RWNJ site that posted their own story on the alleged incident.

Source for Trump supporters: https://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/04/29/donald-trump-named-lawsuit-alleging-rape-teen-girl/


P.S. I have seen the legal documents supporting those allegations though I don't recall where I actually found them anymore so take that tidbit with the credibility you think it deserves since, at this time, I can not offer proof.

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 19:50:48   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
pafret wrote:
You think the Washington Post is a credible source to accuse and indict a competitor for biased reporting, promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories. This is a classic case of the pot calling thwe kettle "black ass".

If WAPO is an example of a legitimate and credible source than nothing further needs to be said because you are too brain dead for it to matter.


Wow, fail to read much? I made no mention of the Washington Post. The only mention of the Washington Post I can detect is the previous sentence which is referring to the Channel being a Trump supporter, NOT that it spews conspiracy theories. Learn to read BEFORE making such outlandish accusations.

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 20:12:36   #
Sicilianthing
 
PaulPisces wrote:
C'Mon, S. You can exercise a little restraint and stay in the fold!


>>>

Well I thought I was doing really well after last years 6months suspension but it appears he just doesn’t like me and says I dont benefit him or OPP ?

Wow I mean what does one say to that ?

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 20:15:04   #
Sicilianthing
 
SinnieK wrote:
Sicil, what had you done now? Why you will be banned soon? Is this for real? Anyway we'll be in touch.


>>>

Content and foul language and he says I dont benefit him or OPP anymore.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2019 20:55:06   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Wow, fail to read much? I made no mention of the Washington Post. The only mention of the Washington Post I can detect is the previous sentence which is referring to the Channel being a Trump supporter, NOT that it spews conspiracy theories. Learn to read BEFORE making such outlandish accusations.


Best you go read the link you provided. You cited the paragraphand sentence with the damaging information but neglected to read any more to determine its source.

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 21:46:26   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
pafret wrote:
Best you go read the link you provided. You cited the paragraphand sentence with the damaging information but neglected to read any more to determine its source.


Obviously your reading skills are VERY lacking, no problem, I will point out your lack right here and now.

Quote:
Originally launched with the intention of targeting a conservative and center-right audience,[3][4] OAN states a goal of delivering credible national and international news coverage throughout the day while its prime time political talk shows illustrate a conservative perspective.[5][6][7] According to The Washington Post, the channel has been noted for its pro-Trump coverage.[8] The channel has also been noted for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories.[9][10]


The pertinent sentence from that paragraph is:

Quote:
The channel has also been noted for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories


The UNRELATED sentence you keep pointing to is:

Quote:
According to The Washington Post, the channel has been noted for its pro-Trump coverage.


Those two sentences are WHOLLY UNRELATED to one another, neither lending credence or corroborating evidence to the other and are only vaguely related by being posted in same paragraph or more generically, on the same reference page. Only someone with VERY limited reading comprehension would relate the two together.


Let us look at this more closely.

Quote:
Murder of Seth Rich conspiracy theories
OANN promoted conspiracy theories about the murder of Seth Rich.[10]


Any mention of WAPO here?

Their source on this claim is: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-uk-crime-rate-oann-where-from-report-conspiracy-theories-a8012136.html

Quote:
Conspiracy theory about David Hogg
In February 2018, one of the hosts on OAN tweeted a conspiracy theory that a 17-year old survivor in the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting had been coached to speak out against Trump by his retired FBI agent father and that Hogg was "running cover" for his FBI agent father.[41][42] Donald Trump Jr. liked the OAN host's tweet.[42] The 17-year old responded, describing the conspiracy theory as "immature, rude, and inhuman".[43]


Or how about here? Any mention of WAPO here?

This one has multiple sources listed for various segments of this claim so if you are at all interested in truth, do your own verification (I am certain you won't as you don't seem concerned with truth but more about attacking others) but I assure you, I looked, no WAPO sources listed here either.

Quote:
Hiring of far-right conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec
In 2018, OANN hired far-right conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec as a political correspondent.[45][46][47][48]


Note, NOT an actual conspiracy theory, but fodder for additional conspiracy theories to be promoted in future by this channel, also no WAPO connection.



So, where is this WAPO connection in the fact that the channel spews conspiracy theories? Don't be so eager to attack others BEFORE you verify your attack points, it only makes you look stupid.


Edit: I didn't NEED to go re-read it, I read it correctly the first time, unlike some, I did however have to go open it again to point out your own stupidity.

Reply
Feb 3, 2019 05:48:07   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Kavanaugh Just Got News That Could Remove Him From The Supreme Court
http://mgemail.blackeyepolitics.net/c/eJx1kUtuhDAQRE8DS9Ru_xcsJhnNPYw_QDDGMIaQOX2YdRSpFq16Uqm7y7UeOUVZjy0C0YCARIAG2ZAG7zf9eX9QwR4fEvBWMeiisZP_8XmJYxnts0m-1EOruJfBG8sICZ5b1jmjrBBCWmm0AF7PrWIaKGId26GUXNFbhY9LZbsCmz-xdpnfnD7OEit61-lkBEfsktohwkbFmX3gci_sTMTJYGYsqQQ8ti8WInimqZ6G5VDSvZ7n9zaz_XuSYuAhhp0EDROQFzuzOU5YN6dozL0FS5N3Q3pGwWPBTfQ5FbE_YdgG2e9J8mlR1pnVyDx3L0nNEfa85jgLsh5JLzMZvXMrtxUKP157d94kb_roCb2e92OGZXmfVm_tf6S0xfQN4UwTpIKyhpOrnYYIrakASd-TwovxhiiGSirdCAKXK38BSiWOvA

Justice Brett Kavanaugh went through hell to get onto the Supreme Court.

Democrats did everything in their power to take him down.

But now that he’s finally in, he just got news that could remove him.

The confirmation of Justice Kavanaugh is one of President Donald Trump’s biggest accomplishments.

Throughout former President Barack Obama’s two terms he was only able to confirm two Justices to the Supreme Court.

And in Trump’s first two years he has been able to match him, with Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.

Needless to say, Democrats are furious.

They pulled every card in their playbook to prevent this from happening.

Using a series of phony sexual assault allegations, they put him through weeks of relentless attacks which nearly destroyed his confirmation process.

If they were able to succeed, some Democrats were hoping to hold back any other Supreme Court nominee until Trump’s term expires.

But their failure means that Kavanaugh can spend the rest of his life on the highest court.

That is unless they are able to remove him from his position.

And that is one thing that Democrats are pushing, now that they have control of the House of Representatives.

With their new power in the House, they are able to run investigations with little oversight.

Many of these investigations will be into the President, scouring into his business dealings prior to taking office, and into the same debunked Russia collusion conspiracy theory Special Counsel Robert Mueller is currently looking into.

But one investigation that Democrats are likely to focus heavily on is into Justice Kavanaugh.

And now one Democrat is making it clear that investigation will be into proving he committed perjury during his testimony in front of Congress.

Democrat Rep. Joe Neguse of Colorado said as much in a recent constituent panel.

“There’s no question [Kavanaugh] committed perjury during the confirmation hearings and so forth,” Neguse said when asked if the justice might be impeached. “I think the Judiciary Committee is likely to take that up.”

Perjury is a favorite charge to lie against those who otherwise have done no wrongdoing.

During testimony, it is often that individuals may misrepresent or mistake something, and whether unintentional or not, it can be used to levy perjury charges.

In the case of Kavanaugh, this charge is particularly sinister.

He is being questioned about decades-old events, so all that is needed to prove he perjured himself is to prove he misstated a date.

Kavanaugh’s testimony relating to his high school calendars makes that especially easy.

But it is also likely they will work off of a theory popularized in the media relating to when he first learned of an allegation from a classmate at Yale.

In testimony, Kavanaugh claims that he first heard of the story in an article in The New Yorker.

But there are allegations that his team was discussing the allegation prior to publication, making it possible to create a case for perjury.

In the end, these pushes for perjury charges are ridiculous.

If they wanted to, it is likely that evidence leading towards perjury could be found in his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony.

That’s just what happens with recalling decade’s old information.

Do you think Democrats will be able to remove Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court?
Kavanaugh Just Got News That Could Remove Him From... (show quote)

It will never happen. It would never make it through the Senate. Even so, in order to prove perjury you have to prove intent. Proving someone intentionally lied about a minor detail that happened decades ago is a tall order.

Reply
Feb 3, 2019 06:52:58   #
Idaho
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Ok I’m just reaching out and apologizing to anyone I’ve offended in the past because OPP is going to ban me permanently soon.

Sorry and you have a friend in me.


Good Grief - Ban you for what? Having conservative views? We have a number of paid lefty shills who need banning long before you get the chop!

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2019 07:50:21   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
padremike wrote:
Your Progressive concepts of good and evil, right and wrong are skewed beyond reason. That's why you're a Progressive.


👍👍👍👍

Reply
Feb 3, 2019 09:05:52   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
Isn’t Epstein the one that Bill Clinton used to fly down with to his private island?


Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I could be wrong but I believe those parties were thrown by Jeffrey Epstein and since Trump supporters will NEVER believe anything taken from any source not deemed ultra-conservative, I will supply a link to a RWNJ site that posted their own story on the alleged incident.

Source for Trump supporters: https://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/04/29/donald-trump-named-lawsuit-alleging-rape-teen-girl/


P.S. I have seen the legal documents supporting those allegations though I don't recall where I actually found them anymore so take that tidbit with the credibility you think it deserves since, at this time, I can not offer proof.
I could be wrong but I believe those parties were ... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 3, 2019 10:56:18   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Note, NOT an actual conspiracy theory, but fodder for additional conspiracy theories to be promoted in future by this channel, also no WAPO connection.



So, where is this WAPO connection in the fact that the channel spews conspiracy theories? Don't be so eager to attack others BEFORE you verify your attack points, it only makes you look stupid.


Edit: I didn't NEED to go re-read it, I read it correctly the first time, unlike some, I did however have to go open it again to point out your own stupidity.
Note, NOT an actual conspiracy theory, but fodder ... (show quote)


You have a comprehension problem. The accusations against OAN originated with the Washington Post, yet you think there is no connection between the accusation and the maker of that accusation.

Further you cite tweets about conspiracy theories being propagated by OAN when in reality it was one of their employees exercising his first amendment right to say virtually anything. A tweet is not publication by OAN.

I am pleased that you laid out in excruciating detail all of your argument since it clearly displays your ill logic. TDS has infected you to the point you really should have custodial care.

In any case I am done with this topic, there is nothing more to be learned.

Reply
Feb 3, 2019 11:12:51   #
kemmer
 
woodguru wrote:
Whether he perjured himself is a matter of hard cold black and white recorded testimonies. If he is on the record lying about something he knew full well was a fact, why would anyone in the country want a liar on the supreme court?..

Why not? We have a consistent and regular liar in the White House.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.