One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This might be Trump’s boldest lie yet
Oct 23, 2018 05:07:45   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/might-trumps-boldest-lie-yet-210637690.html

With the midterm elections two weeks away, Trump now says the White House is planning a “major tax cut for middle-income people” that he’ll reveal right before the election. Trump told reporters Oct. 22 that he’ll produce a “resolution” calling for a 10% tax cut for middle-income earners.
For those wondering if it really works this way—no, the president can’t roll out a tax cut on short notice like this. There’s no procedure for cutting taxes via presidential resolution. Only Congress can initiate a tax cut (or hike) and Congress is out of session until after the midterms. So it’s impossible for Trump to cut taxes in time to buy your vote, as he seems to wish he could.
Trump mentioned this new tax cut idea in a session with reporters after a Nevada rally on Oct. 20. One can only imagine the urgent questions among Trump’s aides: Does he really mean it? Are we now going to make it look like there’s an actual plan for this? Or will this be a one-time, fire-and-forget Trumpism?
Looks like it’s a keeper. On Sunday, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin tried to make it sound like there’s a thorough plan in the works, telling the New York Times, “this is specifically focused on the middle class and not beyond that.” But he didn’t have details on what tax brackets might quality for a reduction, or anything else. But don’t worry, a crack team of panderers is working on it.
Key Congressional Republicans, such as House Speaker Paul Ryan and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, apparently knew nothing about the express tax cut Trump had in mind–even though all tax legislation must originate in the House. But now, they say, oh, yeah, sure, Trump can outline a tax plan Congress can vote on later. So now it seems likely Trump and perhaps some other Republicans will make this part of their closing argument as voters decide whom to vote for.
If this all seems redundant, here’s why. Last year Trump signed a large, $1.5 trillion tax cut, with zero Democratic support, that was supposed to grease the midterm elections as voters everywhere thanked Republicans for all the extra money. Except many voters don’t feel they got any tax cut at all. Instead, they think the bulk of the tax cuts went to businesses and the wealthy, with crumbs left for middle-income families.
Data support that. The Trump tax cuts slashed the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, which has pushed taxes paid by businesses to record lows. Federal revenue from business taxes in fiscal 2018, which ended in September, plummeted by 31%. Taxes paid by individuals, however, rose by 6.1%.
Corporate profits, meanwhile, are up 15.4% this year. Average incomes are up by just 2.8%. And the annual deficit jumped 17%, to $779 billion, and is probably headed past $1 trillion for fiscal 2019. You can kinda understand why voters are skeptical. Two weeks before the election, tax cuts that were supposed to clinch the midterms for Republicans instead threaten a Democratic takeover of the House, with more people disapproving than approving. So Trump had the bright idea to try for a redo. Oh, wait—there’s already one redo effort underway—a “second phase” Republican tax-cut plan that passed the House in September, but seems to have no chance of getting the 60 votes needed to pass the Senate.
Trump seems to be trying to convince voters that a theoretical tax cut he lacks the authority to implement will resolve all the things they don’t like about the tax cut Republicans have already passed. Just close your eyes and wish your paycheck were larger. Then cast your vote before you open them.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 05:14:25   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Bad Bob wrote:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/might-trumps-boldest-lie-yet-210637690.html

With the midterm elections two weeks away, Trump now says the White House is planning a “major tax cut for middle-income people” that he’ll reveal right before the election. Trump told reporters Oct. 22 that he’ll produce a “resolution” calling for a 10% tax cut for middle-income earners.
For those wondering if it really works this way—no, the president can’t roll out a tax cut on short notice like this. There’s no procedure for cutting taxes via presidential resolution. Only Congress can initiate a tax cut (or hike) and Congress is out of session until after the midterms. So it’s impossible for Trump to cut taxes in time to buy your vote, as he seems to wish he could.
Trump mentioned this new tax cut idea in a session with reporters after a Nevada rally on Oct. 20. One can only imagine the urgent questions among Trump’s aides: Does he really mean it? Are we now going to make it look like there’s an actual plan for this? Or will this be a one-time, fire-and-forget Trumpism?
Looks like it’s a keeper. On Sunday, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin tried to make it sound like there’s a thorough plan in the works, telling the New York Times, “this is specifically focused on the middle class and not beyond that.” But he didn’t have details on what tax brackets might quality for a reduction, or anything else. But don’t worry, a crack team of panderers is working on it.
Key Congressional Republicans, such as House Speaker Paul Ryan and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, apparently knew nothing about the express tax cut Trump had in mind–even though all tax legislation must originate in the House. But now, they say, oh, yeah, sure, Trump can outline a tax plan Congress can vote on later. So now it seems likely Trump and perhaps some other Republicans will make this part of their closing argument as voters decide whom to vote for.
If this all seems redundant, here’s why. Last year Trump signed a large, $1.5 trillion tax cut, with zero Democratic support, that was supposed to grease the midterm elections as voters everywhere thanked Republicans for all the extra money. Except many voters don’t feel they got any tax cut at all. Instead, they think the bulk of the tax cuts went to businesses and the wealthy, with crumbs left for middle-income families.
Data support that. The Trump tax cuts slashed the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, which has pushed taxes paid by businesses to record lows. Federal revenue from business taxes in fiscal 2018, which ended in September, plummeted by 31%. Taxes paid by individuals, however, rose by 6.1%.
Corporate profits, meanwhile, are up 15.4% this year. Average incomes are up by just 2.8%. And the annual deficit jumped 17%, to $779 billion, and is probably headed past $1 trillion for fiscal 2019. You can kinda understand why voters are skeptical. Two weeks before the election, tax cuts that were supposed to clinch the midterms for Republicans instead threaten a Democratic takeover of the House, with more people disapproving than approving. So Trump had the bright idea to try for a redo. Oh, wait—there’s already one redo effort underway—a “second phase” Republican tax-cut plan that passed the House in September, but seems to have no chance of getting the 60 votes needed to pass the Senate.
Trump seems to be trying to convince voters that a theoretical tax cut he lacks the authority to implement will resolve all the things they don’t like about the tax cut Republicans have already passed. Just close your eyes and wish your paycheck were larger. Then cast your vote before you open them.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/might-trumps-boldes... (show quote)


Give it up Bob, no one except other stupid liberals believe any of the trash you guys are trying to sell.You people are trying to give your own country over to people that just want ultimate power,how dumb are you anyway ?

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 05:19:56   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Bad Bob wrote:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/might-trumps-boldest-lie-yet-210637690.html

With the midterm elections two weeks away, Trump now says the White House is planning a “major tax cut for middle-income people” that he’ll reveal right before the election. Trump told reporters Oct. 22 that he’ll produce a “resolution” calling for a 10% tax cut for middle-income earners.
For those wondering if it really works this way—no, the president can’t roll out a tax cut on short notice like this. There’s no procedure for cutting taxes via presidential resolution. Only Congress can initiate a tax cut (or hike) and Congress is out of session until after the midterms. So it’s impossible for Trump to cut taxes in time to buy your vote, as he seems to wish he could.
Trump mentioned this new tax cut idea in a session with reporters after a Nevada rally on Oct. 20. One can only imagine the urgent questions among Trump’s aides: Does he really mean it? Are we now going to make it look like there’s an actual plan for this? Or will this be a one-time, fire-and-forget Trumpism?
Looks like it’s a keeper. On Sunday, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin tried to make it sound like there’s a thorough plan in the works, telling the New York Times, “this is specifically focused on the middle class and not beyond that.” But he didn’t have details on what tax brackets might quality for a reduction, or anything else. But don’t worry, a crack team of panderers is working on it.
Key Congressional Republicans, such as House Speaker Paul Ryan and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, apparently knew nothing about the express tax cut Trump had in mind–even though all tax legislation must originate in the House. But now, they say, oh, yeah, sure, Trump can outline a tax plan Congress can vote on later. So now it seems likely Trump and perhaps some other Republicans will make this part of their closing argument as voters decide whom to vote for.
If this all seems redundant, here’s why. Last year Trump signed a large, $1.5 trillion tax cut, with zero Democratic support, that was supposed to grease the midterm elections as voters everywhere thanked Republicans for all the extra money. Except many voters don’t feel they got any tax cut at all. Instead, they think the bulk of the tax cuts went to businesses and the wealthy, with crumbs left for middle-income families.
Data support that. The Trump tax cuts slashed the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, which has pushed taxes paid by businesses to record lows. Federal revenue from business taxes in fiscal 2018, which ended in September, plummeted by 31%. Taxes paid by individuals, however, rose by 6.1%.
Corporate profits, meanwhile, are up 15.4% this year. Average incomes are up by just 2.8%. And the annual deficit jumped 17%, to $779 billion, and is probably headed past $1 trillion for fiscal 2019. You can kinda understand why voters are skeptical. Two weeks before the election, tax cuts that were supposed to clinch the midterms for Republicans instead threaten a Democratic takeover of the House, with more people disapproving than approving. So Trump had the bright idea to try for a redo. Oh, wait—there’s already one redo effort underway—a “second phase” Republican tax-cut plan that passed the House in September, but seems to have no chance of getting the 60 votes needed to pass the Senate.
Trump seems to be trying to convince voters that a theoretical tax cut he lacks the authority to implement will resolve all the things they don’t like about the tax cut Republicans have already passed. Just close your eyes and wish your paycheck were larger. Then cast your vote before you open them.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/might-trumps-boldes... (show quote)


Your source seems to think that "revealing" and "implementing" are one and the same. They are not. Oh, the comment about the deficit? You should really learn to do proper research instead of spending so much time posting childish pictures.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/obama-has-presided-over-5-6-largest-deficits-us-history


In fiscal 2012, the deficit was $1.089193 trillion; in fiscal 2011, it was $1.296791 trillion; in fiscal 2010, it was $1.294204 trillion; and, in fiscal 2009, it was $1.415724 trillion.

Reply
Check out topic: Trump Diapers
Oct 23, 2018 14:04:24   #
DASHY
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Your source seems to think that "revealing" and "implementing" are one and the same. They are not. Oh, the comment about the deficit? You should really learn to do proper research instead of spending so much time posting childish pictures.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/obama-has-presided-over-5-6-largest-deficits-us-history


In fiscal 2012, the deficit was $1.089193 trillion; in fiscal 2011, it was $1.296791 trillion; in fiscal 2010, it was $1.294204 trillion; and, in fiscal 2009, it was $1.415724 trillion.
Your source seems to think that "revealing&qu... (show quote)


More Trump BS about more tax cuts reveals just how desperate he is to help us forget that the first bigley business tax cut did not help anybody but the wealthiest Americans. They got richer while the rest of us got poorer. Even the most loyal Trumpsters must be getting pissed off with the Donald's constant lies. BTW, when is Mexico going to start funding the construction of that great big beautiful wall? The caravan is getting closer.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 15:07:51   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
DASHY wrote:
More Trump BS about more tax cuts reveals just how desperate he is to help us forget that the first bigley business tax cut did not help anybody but the wealthiest Americans. They got richer while the rest of us got poorer. Even the most loyal Trumpsters must be getting pissed off with the Donald's constant lies. BTW, when is Mexico going to start funding the construction of that great big beautiful wall? The caravan is getting closer.


The gap between rich and poor grew faster under your hero Obama than it is growing now. We will see how the caravan plays out if Mexico loses it's US financial aid.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 15:32:45   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
Bad boob ,how dumb are you anyway ?[/quote]

Is this a rhetorical question.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 15:53:10   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
youngwilliam wrote:
Bad boob ,how dumb are you anyway ?


Is this a rhetorical question.[/quote]

Not dumb enough to vote for trump.

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2018 15:56:42   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Not dumb enough to vote for trump.


Dumb enough to vote for beast?

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 19:04:20   #
DASHY
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
The gap between rich and poor grew faster under your hero Obama than it is growing now. We will see how the caravan plays out if Mexico loses it's US financial aid.


Do you think the US Government is giving financial aid to Mexico to help pay for the safe transport of brown people in the caravan? It is not possible to tell who wins the award for causing the biggest gap between rich and poor. It is easy to see it is still growing.

Reply
Oct 24, 2018 08:34:41   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
DASHY wrote:
Do you think the US Government is giving financial aid to Mexico to help pay for the safe transport of brown people in the caravan? It is not possible to tell who wins the award for causing the biggest gap between rich and poor. It is easy to see it is still growing.


I think that all financial aid to Mexico should be terminated immediately. I think every wetback caught sneaking into this country should be put in a work gang building the wall, then deported. This "caravan" is an invasion force. If police as inept as the ones in Guatemala can catch ISIS terrorists, how many do you think they missed? Mexico is perfectly capable of stopping the illegals. For that matter, so is Guatemala. Just how do you propose this country deal with thousands of illegal border jumpers? How about the ISIS members the Guatemalans didn't catch? Given the efficiency of the Guatemalan police, that would be most of them. By the way, how many of these wetbacks are you, personally, going to be responsible for?

Reply
Oct 24, 2018 18:49:45   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Most of the middle-class doesn't pay federal income tax.

Reply
Oct 26, 2018 11:08:56   #
DASHY
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Most of the middle-class doesn't pay federal income tax.


Are you a non-paying member of the middle class?

Reply
Oct 26, 2018 13:14:31   #
Mikeyavelli
 
DASHY wrote:
Are you a non-paying member of the middle class?


I ain't releasing my tax returns either.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.