One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Of course it was pence who wrote the NY times
Page <<first <prev 12 of 16 next> last>>
Sep 12, 2018 20:44:46   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
old marine wrote:
I came to terms with it years ago and picked up what was left and moved on.

Now I have close to 40 ex-military that were homeless living and working on the tree farm they are family and dozen have turned down good paying job's to stay where they are welcome and family.


That's very commendable.

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 20:51:22   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
straightUp wrote:
Welcome to the side of America that's willing to fight for liberty and justice. Yes, I admire them for speaking their minds and for standing up for what they believe. It's a lot more than I can say for the submissive sheep following Trump.
Liberal progs "willing to fight for liberty and justice"????

Oh, sweet Jesus!



Reply
Sep 12, 2018 21:05:19   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
StraightUp, you keep reciting this same issue of the "Trump Management Corporation being sued by the DOJ for violating the Fair Housing Act of 1968 because he refused to rent to black people" as if you were some sort of broken record.

I've mentioned it once. Feel free to look through my posts. Maybe you are confusing me with someone else.

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

Let us set the record straight once again. Those charges were dropped after NY attorney Roy Cohen, (an arch conservative consultant to both Joseph McCarthy and Ronald Reagan) looked into the problem of Papa Fred Trump's low income housing complex rentals. The "c" next to the denied applicants' names was for a "bad credit rating," not for being "colored" as the DOJ insisted.

Your missing the point. If you go back through the conversation you will notice that I was responding to the statement that Trump was never accused of being a racist until the 2016 election. The fact is, he WAS accused; whether or not the charges were dismissed doesn't change that fact.

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

The politicians in New York City are subsidized by real estate sharks vying for the lucrative government contracts. Things got even dicier once the Supreme Court extended the realm of Eminent Domain to include government seizing private property of one poor citizen and giving it to another rich private citizen merely to collect more property taxes. Public schools should be funded by state income taxes, not property taxes, for greater equality in school districts, but that's a whole other debate.
br The politicians in New York City are subsidize... (show quote)

Yes, that is a whole other debate, but you would find me partially agreeing with you on that one. I oppose ALL income tax but I agree that property tax creates inequality between school districts.

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

Roy Cohen is a very famous lawyer, having been a prosecuting attorney for the Southern District Court of New York down on Avenue A, indicting and convicting the head of the American Communist Party, "William Z. Foster et al" with 11 other co-conspirators for violation of the Smith Act, (overthrowing to US government by force and violence). The secrets of the Foster Grand Jury have never been released. It troubles me that the Democrats are so ignorant of their own sordid history. Because Donald Trump chose Roy Cohen for assistance, I know Trump is a just man.
br Roy Cohen is a very famous lawyer, having been... (show quote)

First of all, I'm not a Democrat, so your barking up the wrong tree here, but more than that... the REASON why I am not a Democrat is because I am driven by ideas not identity politics. What troubles me is how people who ARE driven by identity politics spend so much time stressing the history of political parties that they forget to pay attention to the ideas that are making or breaking the republic right now.

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 21:08:23   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Owl32 wrote:
yes the Demorats may have invited the Ruskies to help them as BO promised on an open mike that he would be more flexable after he was elected the 2nd time. Hillary even carried them a stupid reset button. Brillant idea.

I'm not actually sure what you're talking about. Sorry.

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 21:35:23   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
straightUp wrote:
First of all, I've only had one ID the whole time I've been here. Secondly, there is no way for anyone to KNOW who else has had multiple IDs, not even the admin. So, you are either extremely ignorant or so frustrated that you you can't help but lash out with baseless assertions. One thing is very clear though, you've proven yourself to be full of sh*t.



". Secondly, there is no way for anyone to KNOW who else has had multiple IDs, not even the admin"

That proves my point. How could you know that!? Lol!

Gotcha!

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 22:00:48   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Kazudy wrote:
There is civil disobedience and there is making fools of yourselves. I have attended both school board and city hall meetings where some citizens disagree with certain policies. The compaintant is recognized by the chairperson, then that person expresses the concerns and a DISCUSSION on that subject opens up. Then either the complaints concerns are addressed and corrected OR it is explained WHY they must remain the same. That's how things were done here, then Hillary's mentor Saul Alinski wrote a book"Rules for Radicals" and Shazam snowflakes were created....smh
There is civil disobedience and there is making fo... (show quote)

What you witnessed at the school board and city hall meetings according to your description is NOT civil disobedience... it would be better described as compliant proceedings. You DO know what "disobedience" means, right? Now, you may never have experienced a situation where compliant proceedings threaten your freedom or your life (cities and schools rarely have that power) but state and federal proceedings sometimes do and this is where non-violent civil disobedience comes into the picture. If THAT doesn't work, violent rebellion is the next step to take (if the issue is worth the chaos). It's fortunate for us that civil disobedience is part of the American tradition and is in fact the reason for almost all the civil rights we have today. In many places like China and North Korea compliant proceedings are the final stand and civil disobedience will land you in prison.

Saul Alinski's book is a primer on civil disobedience and it's a mistake to write it off as an association with any specific party or movement. Rules for Radicals is universal, much like the Art of War. In fact it was the Tea Party (the first ever conservative movement with the balls to oppose the establishment) that brought the book out of obscurity. Unfortunately for them they didn't seem to have the fortitude to use it effectively.

I would advise you to read it, instead of using it as a rhetorical prop.

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 22:04:01   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
". Secondly, there is no way for anyone to KNOW who else has had multiple IDs, not even the admin"

That proves my point. How could you know that!? Lol!

Gotcha!

No, that proves MY point. YOU were the one saying that I'm on my 3rd id AND calling it a "fact"... remember?

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 22:07:39   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
straightUp wrote:
No, that proves MY point. YOU were the one saying that I'm on my 3rd id AND calling it a "fact"... remember?


Incorrect. I've seen it many times. Der. Your claim that no one could know is the kicker, dude. LOL!

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 22:17:53   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Liberal progs "willing to fight for liberty and justice"????

Oh, sweet Jesus!

You're going to love this one then... If you value your freedom, thank a liberal.

I know this is where I piss a lot of people off, but if you're thinking we owe our freedom to soldiers, you're wrong. There is not a soldier alive today that has fought for our freedom. We owe it all to progressives, good lawyers and the idealism of our founding fathers.

If you disagree, feel free to counter but be prepared - this will not be the first time I've had this argument.

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 22:38:40   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Incorrect.

Let's review...

nwtk2007 wrote: In fact, you're on about your third ID here on opp. https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=2560621&t=140070

straightUp wrote: there is no way for anyone to KNOW who else has had multiple IDs, not even the admin. https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=2561640&t=140070

nwtk2007 wrote: That proves my point. How could you know that!? https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=2561677&t=140070

straightUp wrote: YOU were the one saying that I'm on my 3rd id AND calling it a "fact"... remember? https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=2561705&t=140070

nwtk2007 wrote:

I've seen it many times. Der.

You've seen WHAT many times?

nwtk2007 wrote:

Your claim that no one could know is the kicker, dude. LOL!

(scratching my head) Are you actually trying to beat me with nonsense?

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 22:43:06   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
straightUp wrote:
You're going to love this one then... If you value your freedom, thank a liberal.



Reply
Sep 12, 2018 23:40:59   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
straightUp wrote:
You're going to love this one then... If you value your freedom, thank a liberal.

I know this is where I piss a lot of people off, but if you're thinking we owe our freedom to soldiers, you're wrong. There is not a soldier alive today that has fought for our freedom. We owe it all to progressives, good lawyers and the idealism of our founding fathers.

If you disagree, feel free to counter but be prepared - this will not be the first time I've had this argument.


We fought and fight for the right to be free, no matter what the arena. You want to denigrate us, fine, eat a bullet. I don't care.
quote=straightUp You're going to love this one th... (show quote)

I'm not trying to denigrate anyone. I'm just saying what other people don't understand or are too scared to say. You might *think* you fought for the right to be free and for you that's probably all that matters but the fact is you didn't. This doesn't take away from your courage or your dedication or the fact that soldiers put their lives on the line. I am simply stating that you aren't responsible for any of our freedoms.

nwtk2007 wrote:

WE represent those who stand armed against idiots like you who would allow us to be vulnerable to a take over.

The problem here is that "idiots like you" don't realize that our greatest vulnerability is the market not the battlefield. It's "idiots like you" that have been allowing globalists to privatize the assets of our nation that have previously been under the sovereign protection of our republic. In a nutshell, there is no point in attacking us if everything that could possibly be gained is already up for sale on the free market.

And the only people you stand armed against are the people who dare challenge the oppressors that own and operate you.

nwtk2007 wrote:

That, will NEVER happen. No matter what your politics, no matter what your theories or beliefs, we sill remain free.

That will never happen because no one gives a sh*t about attacking us in the first place for reasons I just explained. I understand, you need to validate yourself. Just don't expect me to buy your sh*t.

nwtk2007 wrote:

We will NEVER be taken, NEVER be conquered.. Ever. WE are armed to the teeth. Not a single army could take us. Not one.

I wouldn't bet on that. Being armed to the teeth doesn't make you the best fighters. The U.S. military has a world-wide reputation for being over-dependent on equipment and weapons. This is why after 17 years we STILL can't beat the Taliban in Afghanistan, because we are limited by our reliance on 2nd generation warfare (radios and air strikes), which is much less effective in mountainous terrain. I can go on but I'm sure you're already seething.

nwtk2007 wrote:

Talk all your crap, we will stand and you will want our help.

Unless you're going to vote against Trump, we don't need your "help".

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 00:04:28   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
straightUp wrote:
Unless you're going to vote against Trump, we don't need your "help".


Who is your "we?"

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 02:23:35   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

There it is !

But the 6 media conglomerates will continue lock Step as they are to create the narratives in destroying Trump 24/7

This is in full deployment now.

Same families
Same collective in the chain of ownership to protect their Clique’

Most people will never get it.


It is these 6 "lock-step" media moguls who are members of the Bilderberg Group, founded by the Pizzagate royalty of the Netherlands, Queen Beatrice and her husband Prince Bernhard, a former employee of I.G. Farben Bilder, the chemical and munitions combine under the 3rd Reich, one of the IG's 800 subsidiaries with a plot to take over the world if Hitler failed. Many of IG's subsidizries were located deep inside the Soviet Union, hard communists alied with the Nazis.

Application of the anti-trust laws to break up this media monopoly would go a long, long way to remedy the stranglehold they have on the press. The DOJ should List the Bilderberg Group as an international terrorist organization would also make it a crime for these corporations to subsidize these sponsors of pedophiles, drug and sex trafficing which funds terrorism. The problem is that our CIA guards their assemblies around the globe. This is why the CIA needs to be shut down.

Read Daniel Estulin's "The True Story of the Bilderberg Group" for all the details of this international criminal organization of royalty, politicians, media moguls, and galloping global corporations.
https://www.amazon.com/True-Story-Bilderberg-Group/dp/0979988624/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1536820541&sr=1-1&keywords=the+true+story+of+the+bilderberg+group+by+daniel+estulin
see page 329 "Companies listed as corporate members" of the Council of Foreign Relations that heavily staffs the Bilderberg Group and page 330 listing Google. Inc.

Now try to pull up the founders of the Bilderberg Group that the CIA protects - the Dutch Royal family, and keep in mind that the Clintons are members of the Bilderberg Group that launched Bill Clinton's bid for the White House in 1993:

Just google IMAGES "pizzagate queen beatrice and marina abramovic"
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1658833

Now, Google won't allow copy and pasting these images of the Dutch Royal Family celebrating with the Serbian Witch because they are cronies of the pdeophile Podesta brothers and Hillary Clinton, of whom whose 2016 campaign Google helped manage.

Why is our CIA guarding this lowlife?

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 03:07:36   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
nwtk2007, you write: "There is not a soldier alive today that has fought for our freedom. We owe it all to progressives, good lawyers and the idealism of our founding fathers."

The Progressives of Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt did everything in their power to advance the alliance of Kaiser Wilhelm with the Bolsheviks and Stalin with Hitler. thank God we have a Congress. And yes, there are soldiers alive today who fought bravely in the World Wars, the Korean War, the Cold War, the Vietnam War, Desert Storm and Iraq to spare us the advances of communism, fascism and despotism of madmen and a takeover of international energy reserves.

The depth of your historical ignorance is shining through tonight - or are you attributing this statement above to StrightUp?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 12 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.