Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
I’m also suspecting Pence is a RAT just like Mattis, Kelly, Bolton and some others... all of them work for the Swamp.
I'm confused about this Swamp thing. I thought the Swamp was what Trump came to town to drain and yet Trump hired everyone you just accused of working for the swamp. Can you explain that one for me please?
kemmer wrote:
I bet you really and truly believe Trump could get away with that. The last thing Trump would do is sue the NYT. Just think of all Trump’s dirty laundry that would be spread in the public marketplace.
Kemmer, your IQ must be a single digit number. All of Trump's"dirty laundry"is out there no matter f it's true or not. One example Trump is a racist. The ones calling him a racist didn't think that till after he ran AGAINST HILLARY!!!!
Kazudy wrote:
Kemmer, your IQ must be a single digit number. All of Trump's"dirty laundry"is out there no matter f it's true or not. One example Trump is a racist. The ones calling him a racist didn't think that till after he ran AGAINST HILLARY!!!!
Kemmer needs to hear from a black man about racism. We can start with Aretha Franklin's funeral speakers.
http://mobile.wnd.com/2018/09/arethas-funeral-trump-haters-and-1-truth-teller/
straightUp wrote:
LOL... These Trump fans have no chance. I never knew there were so many illiterate, senile or just plain retarded people in America until Trump brought them out of their holes.
You want to see "retarded" sU?
bdamage wrote:
You want to see "retarded" sU?
Thank you for proving my point by posting a meme (of all things) as any kind of as evidence of anything. The comedy just never stops LOL
Kazudy wrote:
Kemmer, your IQ must be a single digit number. All of Trump's"dirty laundry"is out there no matter f it's true or not. One example Trump is a racist. The ones calling him a racist didn't think that till after he ran AGAINST HILLARY!!!!
LOL... It's always a safe bet that there is already some kind of fact check on anything Trump Twits have to say because they have no minds of their own; everything they say is parroted, usually from easy-to-read memes with minimal words and big pictures. Let's see... Oh, here it is...
LOL... And the fact checks are just as easy to find, like this one that reminds of the fact that Trump has been accused of racism since the 1973 when the Trump Management Corporation was sued by the Department of Justice and charged for violating the Fair Housing Act of 1968 because he refused to rent to black people.
So, I don't get it... Are you TRYING to prove your stupidity or do you really not know how easy it is to see it?
straightUp wrote:
Thank you for proving my point by posting a meme (of all things) as any kind of as evidence of anything. The comedy just never stops LOL
Shout, arrest, repeat.
Here are your bat-crap hysterical freaks you so admire....of coarse bought and paid for by the Dems and get bonus pay for making faces and screaming extra loud.
straightUp wrote:
I'm confused about this Swamp thing. I thought the Swamp was what Trump came to town to drain and yet Trump hired everyone you just accused of working for the swamp. Can you explain that one for me please?
Simple. You know who your friends are, it's your enemies you keep closer so you can watch them.
bdamage wrote:
Shout, arrest, repeat.
Here are your bat-crap hysterical freaks you so admire....of coarse bought and paid for by the Dems and get bonus pay for making faces and screaming extra loud.
Let me explain how you are demonstrating your own stupidity...
1. The use of the terms "bat-crap" and "freaks" says more about your own emotional reaction than it does about the people in the photos.
2. There is no evidence in ANY of these photos that these people were being hysterical. All that is evident is that they were vocalizing, a few look like they were shouting while others look more like they were singing or chanting.
3. The photos offer no context other than being in a court room, so we don't know what they were protesting or even what political side they stand for. I've seen enough Tea Party rallies to know that expressions of anger and defiance look the same on all sides.
4. There is no evidence that these people were paid by anyone to protest.
5. There is no evidence that any political party pays ANYONE to protest and very suggestion is incredibly childish.
Finally...
6. This is what civil disobedience looks like. Welcome to the side of America that's willing to fight for liberty and justice. Yes, I admire them for speaking their minds and for standing up for what they believe. It's a lot more than I can say for the submissive sheep following Trump.
old marine wrote:
Simple. You know who your friends are, it's your enemies you keep closer so you can watch them.
That's just a really stupid thing to say. We're talking about the presidency, not some Hollywood version of a mob boss.
straightUp wrote:
Let me explain how you are demonstrating your own stupidity...
1. The use of the terms "bat-crap" and "freaks" says more about your own emotional reaction than it does about the people in the photos.
2. There is no evidence in ANY of these photos that these people were being hysterical. All that is evident is that they were vocalizing, a few look like they were shouting while others look more like they were singing or chanting.
3. The photos offer no context other than being in a court room, so we don't know what they were protesting or even what political side they stand for. I've seen enough Tea Party rallies to know that expressions of anger and defiance look the same on all sides.
4. There is no evidence that these people were paid by anyone to protest.
5. There is no evidence that any political party pays ANYONE to protest and very suggestion is incredibly childish.
Finally...
6. This is what civil disobedience looks like. Welcome to the side of America that's willing to fight for liberty and justice. Yes, I admire them for speaking their minds and for standing up for what they believe. It's a lot more than I can say for the submissive sheep following Trump.
Let me explain how you are demonstrating your own ... (
show quote)
You FAIL!
They were ALL paid!
They were right on queue when they were instructed to commence the fake protest outbursts.
The Dems know they can't stop Kavanaugh from being confirmed so they are trying to delay the constitutional process as long as possible.
Cory Booker was their lead imbecile....promoting himself for 2020, his delusional "Spartacus" moment, and requesting things already released.
"Fight for liberty and justice" as you say?
Are you "retarded"?
I don't think so.
bdamage wrote:
They were ALL paid!
Where's the proof?
bdamage wrote:
They were right on queue when they were instructed to commence the fake protest outbursts.
How do you know they were right on queue? Even if they were, chances are they were simply coordinating among themselves... Have you NEVER been to a protest? And what exactly makes a protest outburst "fake" anyway? I'd LOVE to hear that explanation. ;)
bdamage wrote:
The Dems know they can't stop Kavanaugh from being confirmed so they are trying to delay the constitutional process as long as possible.
No, they CAN stop the confirmation and and they are only trying to delay the process so they can review the 488,000 pages of documents related to Kavenaugh's record that the Republicans refused to release until 12:00 am on the first day of the hearing. Obviously, the whole reason why this is turning into such a circus is because the Republicans want to force the confirmation before giving the Senate the chance to review the documents. Look, given what happened when Obama's nomination for Scalia's replacement was delayed by Republicans on the stated basis that they simply didn't want to confirm anyone nominated by Obama, there is no way you can attack the Democrats without being a hypocrite.
bdamage wrote:
Cory Booker was their lead imbecile....promoting himself for 2020, his delusional "Spartacus" moment, and requesting things already released.
"Fight for liberty and justice" as you say?
Are you "retarded"?
There's nothing retarded about fighting for liberty and justice. You would know that if you weren't so submissive. And before you go back to laying prostrate before Trump's feet, give some thought to the fact that Kavenaugh's refusal to confront presidential power might work against you when Democrats return to the White House.
You should be a lot smarter about this. You should be judging this situation on principals not party loyalty. You would know that if you weren't such a mindless groupie.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.