The knee is not the problem-----68 children by 52 women! 7 players!
The knee's not the problem . . .
Children raised in fatherless homes, especially black children, are far more likely than children raised in two parent homes to engage in criminal behavior and thus, have contact with police. Ergo when they father a child with a woman to whom they are not married - or at least living with -they are contributing to the problem against which these football players are taking a knee.
If you look at many of these players' records on out-of-wedlock children, you find that they are contributing significantly to the problem against which they are protesting.
For example, Antonio Cromartie has 12 children by 9 different women. Apparently the NFL had to shell out $500,000 before he could even play football for them. Travis Henry has 11 children by 10 women, Willis McGahee has 9 children by 8 women, Derrick Thomas has 7 children by 5 different women, Bennie Blades has 6 children by 6 women, Ray Lewis has 6 children by 4 women and Marshall Faulk has 6 children by 3 women.
They forgot to include Adrian Peterson. 11 kids from 7 different women?
Before these guys take a knee they should take a good look in the mirror. It appears that their problem is not the knee. Its the weenee.
Oldsailor65 wrote:
The knee is not the problem-----68 children by 52 women! 7 players!
The knee's not the problem . . .
Children raised in fatherless homes, especially black children, are far more likely than children raised in two parent homes to engage in criminal behavior and thus, have contact with police. Ergo when they father a child with a woman to whom they are not married - or at least living with -they are contributing to the problem against which these football players are taking a knee.
If you look at many of these players' records on out-of-wedlock children, you find that they are contributing significantly to the problem against which they are protesting.
For example, Antonio Cromartie has 12 children by 9 different women. Apparently the NFL had to shell out $500,000 before he could even play football for them. Travis Henry has 11 children by 10 women, Willis McGahee has 9 children by 8 women, Derrick Thomas has 7 children by 5 different women, Bennie Blades has 6 children by 6 women, Ray Lewis has 6 children by 4 women and Marshall Faulk has 6 children by 3 women.
They forgot to include Adrian Peterson. 11 kids from 7 different women?
Before these guys take a knee they should take a good look in the mirror. It appears that their problem is not the knee. Its the weenee.
The knee is not the problem-----68 children by 52 ... (
show quote)
And society pays the bill for the actions of these jackasses.
Weasel
Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
Oldsailor65 wrote:
The knee is not the problem-----68 children by 52 women! 7 players!
The knee's not the problem . . .
Children raised in fatherless homes, especially black children, are far more likely than children raised in two parent homes to engage in criminal behavior and thus, have contact with police. Ergo when they father a child with a woman to whom they are not married - or at least living with -they are contributing to the problem against which these football players are taking a knee.
If you look at many of these players' records on out-of-wedlock children, you find that they are contributing significantly to the problem against which they are protesting.
For example, Antonio Cromartie has 12 children by 9 different women. Apparently the NFL had to shell out $500,000 before he could even play football for them. Travis Henry has 11 children by 10 women, Willis McGahee has 9 children by 8 women, Derrick Thomas has 7 children by 5 different women, Bennie Blades has 6 children by 6 women, Ray Lewis has 6 children by 4 women and Marshall Faulk has 6 children by 3 women.
They forgot to include Adrian Peterson. 11 kids from 7 different women?
Before these guys take a knee they should take a good look in the mirror. It appears that their problem is not the knee. Its the weenee.
The knee is not the problem-----68 children by 52 ... (
show quote)
Yes! Very DISCUSTING.
They bow their heads in protest, but want to be treated like GODS.
What does family time look like where they live.
They should take salt peter
Weasel wrote:
Yes! Very DISCUSTING.
They bow their heads in protest, but want to be treated like GODS.
What does family time look like where they live.
Richard Rowland wrote:
And society pays the bill for the actions of these jackasses.
The women were equally jackassey.
OldSailor65, take all the money away from these “dads”. Take the money and give it to the woman and never allow them back on welfare. Let the “dads” experience living on 150.00 per week and see how many more little bastards they don’t have.
Justsss wrote:
OldSailor65, take all the money away from these “dads”. Take the money and give it to the woman and never allow them back on welfare. Let the “dads” experience living on 150.00 per week and see how many more little bastards they don’t have.
Paying women $Millions to get knocked up by a jock isn't a good policy.
The jock should be responsible for his children, not his groupies.
Super Dave wrote:
Paying women $Millions to get knocked up by a jock isn't a good policy.
The jock should be responsible for his children, not his groupies.
Super Dave, I believe we’re already paying some of these woman BIG money who have 8/9 kids ( or are at least claiming that many). The point was to make it hurt for the “hero’s” on their knees.
Justsss wrote:
Super Dave, I believe we’re already paying some of these woman BIG money who have 8/9 kids ( or are at least claiming that many). The point was to make it hurt for the “hero’s” on their knees.
Breeding and kneeling are unrelated.
Some do one and not the other. Some do neither.
I prefer to address each action separately.
Super Dave wrote:
The women were equally jackassey.
While it's probably natural that many would think, I'm referring to the men in this case. And that would be a correct assumption, for actually, I was referring to them at the time of writing. However, your comment has caused a re-evaluation of my post. I think I've accidentally written it as being gender neutral. Being a jackass can apply to both genders.
Thanks, Super Dave, I should have considered it works both ways.
Richard Rowland wrote:
And society pays the bill for the actions of these jackasses.
You've got to be kidding...these are some lucky baby mamas, they hit the NFL lottery, they sure as hell aren't on welfare so why do you say such ignorant things?
woodguru wrote:
You've got to be kidding...these are some lucky baby mamas, they hit the NFL lottery, they sure as hell aren't on welfare so why do you say such ignorant things?
Woodguru, you might want to ck. on that. My moneys on the fact that these baby daddies aren’t on the hook for much.
Don’t you think that they’re all lawyered up ?
They should have to forfeit all pay !
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.