One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Once Again, for You Disbelievers, More Facts About Present-Day Climate Change
Page 1 of 13 next> last>>
Jul 28, 2018 07:21:34   #
Richard94611
 
'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will no longer be unprecedented.



Writing in the most recent issue of Nature Climate Change, lead author Andrew King and colleagues inform us that the data tell us a grim story of rising temperatures, even if we somehow avoid the worst case scenarios for carbon combustion induced heating of the planet:

On average, in the simulated 1.5oC [increase over current] world, 90 million people (or 11% of the estimated 2010 population of the continent) are exposed to hot summers beyond the observed record (that is, half of the summers would have more than 90 million people exposed to historically unprecedented summer average temperatures). (pg. 550)

The exposure of populations to historically unprecedented summer heat increases dramatically even at the relatively low global warming levels of the Paris Agreement. (pg. 550)

Few of us realize the scope of the public health effects caused by these extreme heat events, but they are dramatic. As Scientific American reports:

Researchers believe that global warming is already responsible for some 150,000 deaths each year around the world, and fear that the number may well double by 2030 even if we start getting serious about emissions reductions today.

A team of health and climate scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the University of Wisconsin at Madison published these findings last year in the prestigious, peer-reviewed science journal Nature. Besides killing people, global warming also contributes to some five million human illnesses every year, the researchers found. Some of the ways global warming negatively affects human health—especially in developing nations—include: speeding the spread of infectious diseases such as malaria and dengue fever; creating conditions that lead to potentially fatal malnutrition and diarrhea; and increasing the frequency and severity of heat waves, floods and other weather-related disasters.

How bad will this get? According to the World Health Organization:

Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250 000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhoea and heat stress.

The only rational response is to discontinue the use of carbon combustion, and begin massive mitigation efforts globally.

Of course, no one would accuse the GOP (currently in control of the federal government of two-thirds of the states) of being rational:

After receiving billions in tax cuts at the end of last year, oil and gas companies can expect another year of record-breaking profits. While Exxon alone received $5.9 billion in tax breaks, companies that do oil exploration can expect an additional $190 billion in profits. And yesterday, the second-largest coal company in the country, Arch Coal, announced the new tax plan would lower their tax rate to “effectively zero.” To pay for these giveaways, the Trump budget proposes cutting several programs that enforce pollution laws, fund clean energy innovation, and protect outdoor places. Trump’s cuts effectively subsidize oil, gas, and coal companies, severely hamper renewable energy growth, all while weakening protections for public health and the outdoors.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 07:48:01   #
Chocura750
 
How does the phrase go: you can't make this stuff up? I think it will get a lot worse a lot sooner.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 07:56:17   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
Richard94611 wrote:
'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will no longer be unprecedented.



Writing in the most recent issue of Nature Climate Change, lead author Andrew King and colleagues inform us that the data tell us a grim story of rising temperatures, even if we somehow avoid the worst case scenarios for carbon combustion induced heating of the planet:

On average, in the simulated 1.5oC [increase over current] world, 90 million people (or 11% of the estimated 2010 population of the continent) are exposed to hot summers beyond the observed record (that is, half of the summers would have more than 90 million people exposed to historically unprecedented summer average temperatures). (pg. 550)

The exposure of populations to historically unprecedented summer heat increases dramatically even at the relatively low global warming levels of the Paris Agreement. (pg. 550)

Few of us realize the scope of the public health effects caused by these extreme heat events, but they are dramatic. As Scientific American reports:

Researchers believe that global warming is already responsible for some 150,000 deaths each year around the world, and fear that the number may well double by 2030 even if we start getting serious about emissions reductions today.

A team of health and climate scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the University of Wisconsin at Madison published these findings last year in the prestigious, peer-reviewed science journal Nature. Besides killing people, global warming also contributes to some five million human illnesses every year, the researchers found. Some of the ways global warming negatively affects human health—especially in developing nations—include: speeding the spread of infectious diseases such as malaria and dengue fever; creating conditions that lead to potentially fatal malnutrition and diarrhea; and increasing the frequency and severity of heat waves, floods and other weather-related disasters.

How bad will this get? According to the World Health Organization:

Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250 000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhoea and heat stress.

The only rational response is to discontinue the use of carbon combustion, and begin massive mitigation efforts globally.

Of course, no one would accuse the GOP (currently in control of the federal government of two-thirds of the states) of being rational:

After receiving billions in tax cuts at the end of last year, oil and gas companies can expect another year of record-breaking profits. While Exxon alone received $5.9 billion in tax breaks, companies that do oil exploration can expect an additional $190 billion in profits. And yesterday, the second-largest coal company in the country, Arch Coal, announced the new tax plan would lower their tax rate to “effectively zero.” To pay for these giveaways, the Trump budget proposes cutting several programs that enforce pollution laws, fund clean energy innovation, and protect outdoor places. Trump’s cuts effectively subsidize oil, gas, and coal companies, severely hamper renewable energy growth, all while weakening protections for public health and the outdoors.
b 'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will n... (show quote)


I take it you no longer drive a car and walk instead of taking the bus !

You get your food from the grocery store where no fossil fuel was used to produce it !

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 08:50:19   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
Chocura750 wrote:
How does the phrase go: you can't make this stuff up? I think it will get a lot worse a lot sooner.



Your statement that "you can't make this stuff up" is interesting. The irony here is that you CAN make this stuff up and it IS made up all the time. The statements frequently made use terms like "possibly" or "scientists expect" without any solid information. If one looks carefully at the REAL temperatures over the past 20 years, you will find very little if any increase. When we have a somewhat warm summer the warmists come out of the woodwork to proclaim we are going to burn up in a few years. Cold winters don't seem to interest them because they don't go along with the plan. Last winter, I would have given anything for a few degrees warmer most of the time. I don't think that most so-called deniers so that there is no climate change occurring, they simply don't see enough evidence that it is caused by humans.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 08:52:32   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Less people. Less carbon footprint. Mother earth is happy, so shut up. Doesn't matter the nuclear meltdown still going on in Japan will end us way sooner than some BS global warming.
Richard94611 wrote:
'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will no longer be unprecedented.



Writing in the most recent issue of Nature Climate Change, lead author Andrew King and colleagues inform us that the data tell us a grim story of rising temperatures, even if we somehow avoid the worst case scenarios for carbon combustion induced heating of the planet:

On average, in the simulated 1.5oC [increase over current] world, 90 million people (or 11% of the estimated 2010 population of the continent) are exposed to hot summers beyond the observed record (that is, half of the summers would have more than 90 million people exposed to historically unprecedented summer average temperatures). (pg. 550)

The exposure of populations to historically unprecedented summer heat increases dramatically even at the relatively low global warming levels of the Paris Agreement. (pg. 550)

Few of us realize the scope of the public health effects caused by these extreme heat events, but they are dramatic. As Scientific American reports:

Researchers believe that global warming is already responsible for some 150,000 deaths each year around the world, and fear that the number may well double by 2030 even if we start getting serious about emissions reductions today.

A team of health and climate scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the University of Wisconsin at Madison published these findings last year in the prestigious, peer-reviewed science journal Nature. Besides killing people, global warming also contributes to some five million human illnesses every year, the researchers found. Some of the ways global warming negatively affects human health—especially in developing nations—include: speeding the spread of infectious diseases such as malaria and dengue fever; creating conditions that lead to potentially fatal malnutrition and diarrhea; and increasing the frequency and severity of heat waves, floods and other weather-related disasters.

How bad will this get? According to the World Health Organization:

Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250 000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhoea and heat stress.

The only rational response is to discontinue the use of carbon combustion, and begin massive mitigation efforts globally.

Of course, no one would accuse the GOP (currently in control of the federal government of two-thirds of the states) of being rational:

After receiving billions in tax cuts at the end of last year, oil and gas companies can expect another year of record-breaking profits. While Exxon alone received $5.9 billion in tax breaks, companies that do oil exploration can expect an additional $190 billion in profits. And yesterday, the second-largest coal company in the country, Arch Coal, announced the new tax plan would lower their tax rate to “effectively zero.” To pay for these giveaways, the Trump budget proposes cutting several programs that enforce pollution laws, fund clean energy innovation, and protect outdoor places. Trump’s cuts effectively subsidize oil, gas, and coal companies, severely hamper renewable energy growth, all while weakening protections for public health and the outdoors.
b 'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will n... (show quote)

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 09:04:43   #
Gatsby
 
Richard94611 wrote:
'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will no longer be unprecedented.



Writing in the most recent issue of Nature Climate Change, lead author Andrew King and colleagues inform us that the data tell us a grim story of rising temperatures, even if we somehow avoid the worst case scenarios for carbon combustion induced heating of the planet:

On average, in the simulated 1.5oC [increase over current] world, 90 million people (or 11% of the estimated 2010 population of the continent) are exposed to hot summers beyond the observed record (that is, half of the summers would have more than 90 million people exposed to historically unprecedented summer average temperatures). (pg. 550)

The exposure of populations to historically unprecedented summer heat increases dramatically even at the relatively low global warming levels of the Paris Agreement. (pg. 550)

Few of us realize the scope of the public health effects caused by these extreme heat events, but they are dramatic. As Scientific American reports:

Researchers believe that global warming is already responsible for some 150,000 deaths each year around the world, and fear that the number may well double by 2030 even if we start getting serious about emissions reductions today.

A team of health and climate scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the University of Wisconsin at Madison published these findings last year in the prestigious, peer-reviewed science journal Nature. Besides killing people, global warming also contributes to some five million human illnesses every year, the researchers found. Some of the ways global warming negatively affects human health—especially in developing nations—include: speeding the spread of infectious diseases such as malaria and dengue fever; creating conditions that lead to potentially fatal malnutrition and diarrhea; and increasing the frequency and severity of heat waves, floods and other weather-related disasters.

How bad will this get? According to the World Health Organization:

Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250 000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhoea and heat stress.

The only rational response is to discontinue the use of carbon combustion, and begin massive mitigation efforts globally.

Of course, no one would accuse the GOP (currently in control of the federal government of two-thirds of the states) of being rational:

After receiving billions in tax cuts at the end of last year, oil and gas companies can expect another year of record-breaking profits. While Exxon alone received $5.9 billion in tax breaks, companies that do oil exploration can expect an additional $190 billion in profits. And yesterday, the second-largest coal company in the country, Arch Coal, announced the new tax plan would lower their tax rate to “effectively zero.” To pay for these giveaways, the Trump budget proposes cutting several programs that enforce pollution laws, fund clean energy innovation, and protect outdoor places. Trump’s cuts effectively subsidize oil, gas, and coal companies, severely hamper renewable energy growth, all while weakening protections for public health and the outdoors.
b 'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will n... (show quote)


"The only rational response is to discontinue the use of carbon combustion, and begin massive mitigation efforts globally."

Without "carbon combustion", how do you propose to grow, process and transport the food that feeds 8 billion people?

While you are solving that problem, how many billions of people will starve to death?

So much for for that claim of "rationality".

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 12:49:37   #
Richard94611
 
Use renewable energy instead.. Several countries have already announced that they will be “carbon-free” within a few years.


Gatsby wrote:
"The only rational response is to discontinue the use of carbon combustion, and begin massive mitigation efforts globally."

Without "carbon combustion", how do you propose to grow, process and transport the food that feeds 8 billion people?

While you are solving that problem, how many billions of people will starve to death?

So much for for that claim of "rationality".

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2018 13:08:23   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
Richard94611 wrote:
Use renewable energy instead.. Several countries have already announced that they will be “carbon-free” within a few years.


What countries are those ?

If that's the case they certainly won't be having any farms so will have to import the biggest share of their food !

Personally I think they're nuts and it'll never be achieved !

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 13:19:13   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Do us a favor and move there. Then you can tell us how great it is.
Richard94611 wrote:
Use renewable energy instead.. Several countries have already announced that they will be “carbon-free” within a few years.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 13:27:07   #
Richard94611
 
You are wrong. Do your own research.
4430 wrote:
What countries are those ?

If that's the case they certainly won't be having any farms so will have to import the biggest share of their food !

Personally I think they're nuts and it'll never be achieved !

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 13:27:10   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Richard94611 wrote:
'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will no longer be unprecedented.



Writing in the most recent issue of Nature Climate Change, lead author Andrew King and colleagues inform us that the data tell us a grim story of rising temperatures, even if we somehow avoid the worst case scenarios for carbon combustion induced heating of the planet:

On average, in the simulated 1.5oC [increase over current] world, 90 million people (or 11% of the estimated 2010 population of the continent) are exposed to hot summers beyond the observed record (that is, half of the summers would have more than 90 million people exposed to historically unprecedented summer average temperatures). (pg. 550)

The exposure of populations to historically unprecedented summer heat increases dramatically even at the relatively low global warming levels of the Paris Agreement. (pg. 550)

Few of us realize the scope of the public health effects caused by these extreme heat events, but they are dramatic. As Scientific American reports:

Researchers believe that global warming is already responsible for some 150,000 deaths each year around the world, and fear that the number may well double by 2030 even if we start getting serious about emissions reductions today.

A team of health and climate scientists from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the University of Wisconsin at Madison published these findings last year in the prestigious, peer-reviewed science journal Nature. Besides killing people, global warming also contributes to some five million human illnesses every year, the researchers found. Some of the ways global warming negatively affects human health—especially in developing nations—include: speeding the spread of infectious diseases such as malaria and dengue fever; creating conditions that lead to potentially fatal malnutrition and diarrhea; and increasing the frequency and severity of heat waves, floods and other weather-related disasters.

How bad will this get? According to the World Health Organization:

Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250 000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhoea and heat stress.

The only rational response is to discontinue the use of carbon combustion, and begin massive mitigation efforts globally.

Of course, no one would accuse the GOP (currently in control of the federal government of two-thirds of the states) of being rational:

After receiving billions in tax cuts at the end of last year, oil and gas companies can expect another year of record-breaking profits. While Exxon alone received $5.9 billion in tax breaks, companies that do oil exploration can expect an additional $190 billion in profits. And yesterday, the second-largest coal company in the country, Arch Coal, announced the new tax plan would lower their tax rate to “effectively zero.” To pay for these giveaways, the Trump budget proposes cutting several programs that enforce pollution laws, fund clean energy innovation, and protect outdoor places. Trump’s cuts effectively subsidize oil, gas, and coal companies, severely hamper renewable energy growth, all while weakening protections for public health and the outdoors.
b 'Historically unprecedented summer heat' will n... (show quote)


Historically unprecedented summer heat' will no longer be unprecedented

Historic since when? Let's start at the beginning.

I believe in climate change.

What I'm not convinced of is that throwing a bazillion dollars in a Quixotical quest to quickly quench the inferno of climate change will make much difference.

I think the people pushing such nonsense rely the general ignorance of people to pull the charade off.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 13:28:06   #
Richard94611
 
After you. ladies before gentlemen.

JFlorio wrote:
Do us a favor and move there. Then you can tell us how great it is.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 13:30:27   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Your statement that "you can't make this stuff up" is interesting. The irony here is that you CAN make this stuff up and it IS made up all the time. The statements frequently made use terms like "possibly" or "scientists expect" without any solid information. If one looks carefully at the REAL temperatures over the past 20 years, you will find very little if any increase. When we have a somewhat warm summer the warmists come out of the woodwork to proclaim we are going to burn up in a few years. Cold winters don't seem to interest them because they don't go along with the plan. Last winter, I would have given anything for a few degrees warmer most of the time. I don't think that most so-called deniers so that there is no climate change occurring, they simply don't see enough evidence that it is caused by humans.
Your statement that "you can't make this stuf... (show quote)


"Qualifiers". I get the Science Daily newsletter. Every peer reviewed article is peppered with qualifiers. People don't know how to read for content anymore. They just accept what they're told.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 13:31:51   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
JFlorio wrote:
Less people. Less carbon footprint. Mother earth is happy, so shut up. Doesn't matter the nuclear meltdown still going on in Japan will end us way sooner than some BS global warming.


...and they're planning a world war! Won't help the carbon footprint in the short run.

Reply
Jul 28, 2018 15:00:24   #
Richard94611
 
Whoopie do for you ! I get it, too. Your objection is based on your need for certainty, a fairly common personality attribute among conservatives. Science doesn’t work that way, which you should know but evidently don’t.

BigMike wrote:
"Qualifiers". I get the Science Daily newsletter. Every peer reviewed article is peppered with qualifiers. People don't know how to read for content anymore. They just accept what they're told.

Reply
Page 1 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.