Cripple wrote:
Thank you Linda. Your help well no price-tag could be applied, you're a very good person! I will concentrate on which is illegal. Reading so much my eyes are about to fall out, lol. You're doing quite well.
Thank You, Cripple...
Im so torn over how haphazardly our votes can be changed and how easy it is to do so...A true mission in finding that needle in the haystack or at least whom needs to be called out over this injustice!!!
Here’s another to read when you have a moment...🙃😉 paper trails a must if there is to be no room for fraud..
Congrss passed out 350 million for the country to fix their problems which is not enough money for say just three states to buy new ones.. Some are 10 and 15 years old and one state says they need 150 million to replace machines~~pppfffttt
Why can’t the feds set up a purchase agreement with x company (ies) for a centralized buyer where all states may use and require all states to in fact use them...Right along with verifiable inspection and test results??.
Reuters) - U.S. election officials responsible for managing more than a dozen close races this November share a fear: Outdated voting machines in their districts could undermine confidence in election results that will determine which party controls the U.S. Congress.
In 14 of the 40 most competitive races, Americans will cast ballots on voting machines that do not provide a paper trail to audit voters' intentions if a close election is questioned, according to a Reuters analysis of data from six states and the Verified Voting Foundation, a non-political group concerned about verifiable elections.
These include races in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Texas, Florida, Kansas and Kentucky. Nationwide, of 435 congressional seats up for grabs, 144 are in districts where some or all voters will not have access to machines using paper records, the analysis shows. While something could go wrong in any of those districts, it is in the close elections where a miscount or a perception of a miscount matters most.
Most of the dozen-plus state and local election officials interviewed by Reuters said they worry about bad actors hacking the older electronic voting machines to alter ballots, and then being unable to verify the results because there will be no paper trail. But the officials worry most about voters losing trust in elections, because officials would not be able to visibly demonstrate that the tally was indeed accurate.
"Voter confidence is a really big thing, and it's the battle I worry about losing," said Pennsylvania's elections commissioner, Jonathan Marks. His state has four of the country’s most hotly contested elections – all of them in counties that use the older machines.
While there is no evidence that any voting machines were hacked in the 2016 presidential election of Donald Trump, there is increased anxiety, in large part because of U.S. intelligence findings that Russia actively sought, mostly through manipulation of social media, to sow distrust.
How do they know there was no evidence when no one does any checks on these machines?? And when found out there is a problem the vendor snatches them back to cover their errors...What a racket!!! holy hell they aren’t even wiped when resold....Pure deriliction!!!!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1IW16Z