One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
No More Same Sex Cakes, Pizzas, Or Ice Cream Cones
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Jun 5, 2018 22:22:49   #
Sicilianthing
 
Dr. Evil wrote:
Maybe a park bench, bitch is asleep half the time anyway.


>>>>

Ha... Yeaaaahhhhhhh !

You nailed it dude that was off the Charts....

I’m in tears on the floor... woooooo hooooooooooooo totally !

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 00:01:39   #
Mutton Dressed As Lamb
 
lindajoy wrote:
The ruling is for Religious liberties .. As it should have been.. It was never discrimination by the baker, it was religious objection..He is just as much entitled to his belief as any one else is to theirs..


Well said. It is no more discrimination than if a Professional wildlife photographer refusing to photograph a wedding.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 00:52:06   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
karpenter wrote:
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In Favor Of Colorado Baker

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-against-gay-wedding-exemptions/1052989001/

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented

This Is Not To Say
Gays, Etc.'s Can Be Discriminated Against Or Refused Service
When Seeking Other Goods And Services In An Open Market
This Ruling Only Applies (So Far) To The Creation Of Same-Sex Wedding Accessories

The Phillips' Have Been Equated To Perpetrators Of The Holocaust

The Holocaust And Hitler Hyperbole Is Seriously Out Of Hand
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In... (show quote)


The Supreme Court made a very narrow, specific decision here...it's not a precedent setting ruling. It was, actually, more about the State's attack on the baker's religion and its hostile attitude toward him while allowing other bakeries to refuse to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples without attention. As a result, the long-awaited decision did not resolve whether other opponents of same-sex marriage, such as photographers, bakers, florists and videographers can refuse their services to same-sex couples over religious beliefs.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 01:05:38   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
Peewee wrote:
Please wake up. The couple entered "his" business and could have purchased anything already prepared on his shelves. He would have made them a cake until they "voluntarily" informed him it "had to" celebrate a same-sex marriage. That's when he referred them to others. He, as a Christian, already knew we are all sinners. He was specifically targeted because they knew he was a Christian. One out of one die, the punishment for sin has already been in force since Adam and Eve. The baker "didn't exhibit hate" in any shape, form, or fashion. Only the "intolerant" gay couple did that. Whatever your source of news and information is, you need to change it.
All sin isn't equal, you missed the one about cursing the Holy Spirit, and there are other sins with adjectives preceding them showing some are worse than others. The entire Bible is about Jesus, Yahshua, and Salvation which resolves the sin problem. The baker was living his faith.
Please wake up. The couple entered "his"... (show quote)


I must have missed the part that he was "specifically targeted because...he was a Christian". I don't know what your source is, but it sounds like a Baptist or Nazarene whitewash. He refused to accommodate them because they were a gay couple, anathema to him, period. Living his faith? No, he showed his true colors as a bigot. No true Christian that I have ever known has compromised his faith by declaring judgment, whether visibly or audibly, on another.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 01:08:55   #
kemmer
 
karpenter wrote:
As These Two Little Fascists Wanted To Do To The Baker
By Forcing Him To Condone Their Twisted Carnal Perversions

Trump is very well acquainted with carnal perversions. He likes to get spanked with magazines.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 01:11:31   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
karpenter wrote:
As These Two Little Fascists Wanted To Do To The Baker
By Forcing Him To Condone Their Twisted Carnal Perversions


Twisted Carnal Perversions? Did you really just say that? Do you actually know any gay people (you might, without knowing)? Theoretically, all humans are designed to be bisexual...or the prostate would be placed elsewhere, as would the clitoris! Put that in your pipe and smoke it!

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 01:12:54   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
Peewee wrote:
You said it all when you said, "for all I know".


Funny, I didn't see a "For all I know" in the post...

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 01:15:02   #
kemmer
 
Iamdjchrys wrote:
Twisted Carnal Perversions? Did you really just say that? Do you actually know any gay people (you might, without knowing)? Theoretically, all humans are designed to be bisexual...or the prostate would be placed elsewhere, as would the clitoris! Put that in your pipe and smoke it!

Straights don't know the prostate is the male "G-spot".

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 01:18:28   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
kemmer wrote:
Trump is very well acquainted with carnal perversions. He likes to get spanked with magazines.



Reply
Jun 6, 2018 01:19:40   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
kemmer wrote:
Straights don't know the prostate is the male "G-spot".



Reply
Jun 6, 2018 01:22:56   #
Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas
 
lpnmajor wrote:
I knew this would happen, so did Ginsberg. The ruling did NOT give business owners the right to refuse service to anyone, it merely confirmed a lower court ruling that the Colorado commission violated that States Constitution. The same ruling ALSO reaffirmed that discrimination for ANY reason is un-Constitutional, and recognized that there will be many more such cases. The same opinion stated that the LGBT community are entitled to live free from discrimination and actions that diminish their dignity.

It would have helped if you had examined the whole ruling and not jumped to conclusions.
I knew this would happen, so did Ginsberg. The rul... (show quote)


Exactly!

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 02:19:19   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Iamdjchrys wrote:
I must have missed the part that he was "specifically targeted because...he was a Christian". I don't know what your source is, but it sounds like a Baptist or Nazarene whitewash. He refused to accommodate them because they were a gay couple, anathema to him, period. Living his faith? No, he showed his true colors as a bigot. No true Christian that I have ever known has compromised his faith by declaring judgment, whether visibly or audibly, on another.


BS, your anti-Christian bias is showing. You sound sad that Christians are standing up and saying enough. Gay rights are a recent event and they are the ones who seem to think these new rights trump the Constitutional rights of Christians. We have over two centuries of precedent and gays have a few years. So who is being intolerant? You expected all of us to turn both cheeks and let you run over us. Jesus also told us to sell our cloak and buy a sword. He offered to bake any other type of cake but you wanted him to submit and compromise his faith. Shame on you! The report didn't say he was specifically targeted. But they refused any other accommodation, and then sued. Circumstantial evidence says he was targeted like the clerk who refused to sign the marriage license.
To me, it looks like, at the state level, the fix was in. You may believe what you want and so can I. Don't twist scripture to accommodate your views, it weakens your argument and contradicts what the scriptures do say and say clearly. When man's law contradicts God's law, Christians are told to stand fast, some will punch back and then resume their stance. Live and let live and there would not have been a problem. The gay couple was clearly the aggressors.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 02:31:12   #
Ricktloml
 
Peewee wrote:
BS, your anti-Christian bias is showing. You sound sad that Christians are standing up and saying enough. Gay rights are a recent event and they are the ones who seem to think these new rights trump the Constitutional rights of Christians. We have over two centuries of precedent and gays have a few years. So who is being intolerant? You expected all of us to turn both cheeks and let you run over us. Jesus also told us to sell our cloak and buy a sword. He offered to bake any other type of cake but you wanted him to submit and compromise his faith. Shame on you! The report didn't say he was specifically targeted. But they refused any other accommodation, and then sued. Circumstantial evidence says he was targeted like the clerk who refused to sign the marriage license.
To me, it looks like, at the state level, the fix was in. You may believe what you want and so can I. Don't twist scripture to accommodate your views, it weakens your argument and contradicts what the scriptures do say and say clearly. When man's law contradicts God's law, Christians are told to stand fast, some will punch back and then resume their stance. Live and let live and there would not have been a problem. The gay couple was clearly the aggressors.
BS, your anti-Christian bias is showing. You sound... (show quote)


It seems I read that the baker even offered a generic wedding cake, but refused to specifically design one for them. They weren't interested, their goal was to FORCE him to violate his beliefs. And many of these disputes are because homosexuals targeted Christian businesses.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 04:07:02   #
Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face
 
kemmer wrote:
Straights don't know the prostate is the male "G-spot".

So do you boys like penzoil or mobil1 for your lube?

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 06:00:35   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
Iamdjchrys wrote:
No true Christian that I have ever known has compromised his faith by declaring judgment, whether visibly or audibly, on another.
Because The Kind Of 'Christians' You Claim To Know
Would Be Glad To Make Pornographic Pastries All Day
Thinking It's Great Ribald Fun !!

Sorry Bud, But People Have To Make Judgements All Day Long
We All Have To
To Say Not To Judge At All Is A Deliberate Mis-Interpretation
And Always A Self-Serving Con Job

Life May Very We Be The Harper Valley PTA
But That Isn't How We Are Supposed To Live

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.