amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

[Sahih Muslim, book 041, number 6981]. The rocks and trees cry out, there is a Jew hiding behind me. Come kill him. Google it.

emarine

In the 20s land was purchased from the King of Jorden who clamed ownership of large sections & the Britts who controlled all the other lands... the King bought up Palestinian farms for pennies on the dollar because they were not legally owned by Arabs & sold them to Jews for a huge profit... the 24.6% were probably Arabs from Jorden or what you call Palestinians...

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

Is humus made from ground up zionist beans?

emarine

Very impressive ... now if they only stopped teaching their children to explode in public maybe there's a chance for real peace...

Nickolai

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jews_purchasing_Arab_title_deed_in_Palestine.tif
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1920_demontration_Palestine.jpg
Jewish Rabbi's purchasing land from an Arab land owner in the 1920's and Amnti Zionist demonstration in 1920

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

That means the Rabbis own the land and didn't steal it. Maybe the Arabs in Jerusalem are looking for a good Realtor. Maybe you can tell us what this all means to those who can spell and compose in English.

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

Here is what Dr. King thinks of you, Nik

Nickolai

But the Zionist aren't Semitic people, they are Khazars, Yiddish speakers. They had to learn Hebrew not their natural language Khazars were a pagan people whos king Bulan decided in the 9th century to adopt a monotheistic religion and chose Judaism and brought Rabbis from Babylon to teach them the Talmud. They were a warlike people but were dispersed in to Russia and Eastern Europe by the Mongols in the early 13th century, they have no biblical connection to the Arabic lands in the Levant. So I'm not anti Semitic I'm Anti Zionist.

emarine

http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/evidence.html

straightUp Loc: California

Wait - I gotta stop here for a sec. So far in your rush history, you haven't mentioned anything about the displacement of the Palestinians. All of a sudden you're in 1933, like the displacement of Palestinians that started the moment Zionism started in the late 19th century is surgically removed from your narrative. I guess if it wasn't, you wouldn't be able to describe the demographics at the turn of the 19th century as being status quo over the previous thousand years. The truth is, Jews have already started mass migration from Eastern Europe and by the turn of the century it was becoming a new problem. A lot of these immigrants were not even Semitic people, they were Europeans, mostly Slavic, who had converted to Judaism and then, unfortunately to Zionism, which is a totally different thing.

Also, the Palestinians didn't spend 1000 years squatting on Ottoman land with a Jewish presence. The Jewish that were present WERE Palestinian. There were Palestinian Jews then just like there are Israeli Jews and American Jews today. And these Semitic people of Palestine, Arabs and Hebrews alike were not squatting anymore than the Greeks, Russians and Hungarians that were also ruled by the Turkish Empire.

unpause...


It didn't all start with the Haavara Agreement bro... that was just another episode in an already long-running season. It *did* result in a spike in immigration but it was by no means the start. And yes, there were some extreme reactions from some of the Arabs, but it's not like we can pretend to be much better when we ourselves have such a strong Nativist culture... I mean, I hear American conservatives say some pretty hateful things about immigrants from Mexico. So you would think they would understand how the Palestinians felt, with all these European immigrants coming in and literally taking what they want.


It's Jordan... and no, the Arabs they were refusing were not from Jordan they're from Palestine. Two different provinces. The Balfour Agreement would have displaced a lot of Arabs from Palestine and Jordan didn't feel they should have to absorb the refugees just because the Jews wanted to kick them out of Palestine.


From what I can tell, the relationships between the Arab leaders and Nazi Germany were inconsistent and wrought with ulterior motives and corruption. Also, the Muslim Brotherhood has been banned in Egypt since 1958.


The "really religious" Jews have apparently not forgotten that what makes a Jew, Jewish is his faith that God will lead them to Israel in Heaven. The Zionists are in the eyes of the true Rabbis, defiling God by leading people a material path to a material place they call Israel.


No, the people of Palestine are prisoners of Zionist terrorism. The will never be a solution as long as Zionists continue to push the Palestinian people out of existence.


I'm glad I inspired you to research... just be careful - there's a lot of bullshit out there. ;)

straightUp Loc: California

I have a lot of respect for Dr King... but if that's what he actually said (who can trust a meme anymore) then he was wrong... Nicholas is 100% correct, Zionists and Jews are not the same thing.

emarine

Ashkenazi Jews Are Not Khazars. Here’s The Proof.
Read more: http://forward.com/opinion/382967/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-khazars-heres-the-proof/

straightUp Loc: California

Well said.

It's actually quite ironic that Zionists will call our opposition "anti-Semitic" when the Palestinians are more Semitic than they are.

Nickolai

https://youtu.be/WZzIJDiedrQ

Watch Norman Finklestein debate the Zionist Nazi Allan Dershowitz on his book "A Case For Israel " where Finklestein exposes Dershowitz's lies and plagerism of Joan Peters controversial book.

Joan Peters book is -and was --controversial Critics of the book, including Norman Finkelstein, Edward Said and Noam Chomsky, contended that Ms. Peters had cherry-picked evidence that supported her conclusions, ignoring records and historians who disagreed with her. They regarded the book as polemical and her as an inexperienced historian.
In The New York Review of Books, Yehoshua Porath, a professor of Middle East history at Hebrew University, wrote that the book was symptomatic of “the two contrasting mythologies that the Arabs and the Jews have developed to explain their situations.”

“Like most myths, these generally contain some element of plausibility,” he continued, “some grain of historical truth, which through terminological ambiguity is then twisted into a false and grotesque shape. The unfortunate thing” about the book, he added, “is that from a position of apparently great learning and research, she attempts to refute the Arab myths merely by substituting the Jewish myths for them.” Ms. Peters stayed out of the spotlight as the debate raged and never published another book.

straightUp Loc: California

Interesting article - thanks.

I appreciate his disclaimer at the start about the "softness" of the science behind deciding who is who. The author, Alexander Beider, is basically saying there is no proof that there IS a link between the Ashkenazi Jews and the Khazars. That doesn't mean there isn't one... especially, if the science is a little soft anyway, right?

Does it matter?

I can tell just by looking at some of them... They're no more Semitic than I am. In fact the "Khazar Theory" is actually suggesting that there *IS* a link and I'm saying I don't see it. Beider and I seem to be in agreement there.