Supreme Court rejects anti-abortionists activist's, undercover videos posted on OPP! More right wing nonsense proven to be wrong!

Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth

More right wing nonsense proven to be wrong!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-rejects-anti-abortion-activists-undercover-video-cases/ar-AAvnnCu?li=BBnbcA1

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/search-topic-list?q=fetal+tissue&sectnum=0&username=

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Raylan Wolfe wrote:

More right wing nonsense proven to be wrong!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-rejects-anti-abortion-activists-undercover-video-cases/ar-AAvnnCu?li=BBnbcA1

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/search-topic-list?q=fetal+tissue&sectnum=0&username=

If what they were doing was not illegal, then why go through all the effort of blocking the release of the video. Are you implying that people viewing a video of them profiting off the sale of aborted fetal tissue is not the image they wish to portray. Are they not proud of their work? Shouldn't they want the public seeing what they do?

Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth

ACP45 wrote:

If what they were doing was not illegal, then why go through all the effort of blocking the release of the video. Are you implying that people viewing a video of them profiting off the sale of aborted fetal tissue is not the image they wish to portray. Are they not proud of their work? Shouldn't they want the public seeing what they do?

The videos are illegal for filming people without their consent, dumass!

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-abortion/supreme-court-rejects-anti-abortion-activists-undercover-video-cases-idUSKCN1H918T

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

ACP45 wrote:

If what they were doing was not illegal, then why go through all the effort of blocking the release of the video. Are you implying that people viewing a video of them profiting off the sale of aborted fetal tissue is not the image they wish to portray. Are they not proud of their work? Shouldn't they want the public seeing what they do?

Courts don't like BS.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Raylan Wolfe wrote:

The videos are illegal for filming people without their consent, dumass!

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-abortion/supreme-court-rejects-anti-abortion-activists-undercover-video-cases-idUSKCN1H918T

So what? If they don't feel ashamed or that it would reflect negatively upon them, then why the big deal. You know why. They don't want the public to see them selling fetal tissue, so they use the courts to keep this from the public...dumass!

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

ACP45 wrote:

So what? If they don't feel ashamed or that it would reflect negatively upon them, then why the big deal. You know why. They don't want the public to see them selling fetal tissue, so they use the courts to keep this from the public...dumass!

Are you Catholic 45?

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Bad Bob wrote:

Are you Catholic 45?

I was raised Catholic, but turned away from the church at an early age. I do not follow or believe in any organized religion. I do believe in the sanctity of live, and thus I am against abortions because I feel it it morally wrong.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

ACP45 wrote:

I was raised Catholic, but turned away from the church at an early age. I do not follow or believe in any organized religion. I do believe in the sanctity of live, and thus I am against abortions because I feel it it morally wrong.

And you now support birth control to prevent abortions?

Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth

Tell me ac are you children as stupid as you are!

Selling fetal parts after abortion is a right wing myth that only the lowest class of people believe!

http://gawker.com/no-planned-parenthood-is-not-selling-aborted-fetal-bod-1717823538

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/planned-parenthood-is-not-harvesting-baby-parts-20151008

https://www.npr.org/2016/01/28/464594826/in-wake-of-videos-planned-parenthood-investigations-find-no-fetal-tissue-sales

ACP45 wrote:

So what? If they don't feel ashamed or that it would reflect negatively upon them, then why the big deal. You know why. They don't want the public to see them selling fetal tissue, so they use the courts to keep this from the public...dumass!

karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!

Raylan Wolfe wrote:

More right wing nonsense proven to be wrong!

Raylan Wolfe wrote:

The videos are illegal for filming people without their consent, dumass!

You Insinuated The Claim Of Selling The Parts And Tissue Are False
The Opponents Just Don't Want Us To Know If It's True

Like This Guy Brought Down ACORN
For Pointers On How To Set Up Kiddie Prostitution Houses

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Bad Bob wrote:

And you now support birth control to prevent abortions?

I don't have a problem with birth control. I do have a problem aborting a human life unless the life of the mother is involved. In my opinion, one of the largest problems we have today is that people don't want to take responsibility for their actions.

I subscribe to the libertarian view that all individuals have the right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose. Taking the life of an unborn baby violates that position.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

ACP45 wrote:

I don't have a problem with birth control. I do ha... (show quote)

Does your "red line" start at conception?

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Bad Bob wrote:

Does your "red line" start at conception?

I really don't have a theological viewpoint on this issue. Clearly once a fetus is capable of sustaining life on it's own, somewhere in the 22 to 24 week period, I would view the fetus as a viable human being, and terminating it's life as being morally wrong.

Before that period of time, I would side with how the courts have typically looked at this issue as being one of the "potential for human life". Most abortions occur early in pregnancies and I don't claim any authority on judging the morality of early term abortions.

My only point in weighing in on this issue is why those abortion providers felt compelled to go to court in the first place to block distribution of the video exposing the sale of fetal tissue. If what they were doing was already ruled as not being a "criminal offense", then why the need to preclude the public from seeing what they were doing. In my view, they felt that there was a need to prevent the public from viewing what they were doing. I think we both know why.

kemmer

ACP45 wrote:

I don't have a problem with birth control. I do ha... (show quote)

Unless and until the gov't. starts issuing SS numbers to fetuses, women should have final and irrevocable say on what happens to their bodies.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

kemmer wrote:

Unless and until the gov't. starts issuing SS numbers to fetuses, women should have final and irrevocable say on what happens to their bodies.

Are you saying then that a woman who did not yet apply for a SS# for their child is entitled to terminate the life of that child if she so chooses?