One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This does not look good for police!!!
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Mar 23, 2018 02:14:30   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im always on police side, but not this time....I could never understand why police have to use deadly force when apprehending someone with a gun..Why cant they shoot them in the arm or a leg??? Dont they train for that??/Maybe im wrong, but this police officer shot this man 20 times..Can you spell OVERKILL???...Anyways here's what happened....

https://www.nasdaq.com/article/video-of-police-shooting-unarmed-black-man-sparks-protests-in-sacramento-20180323-00030

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 02:26:46   #
Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face
 
proud republican wrote:
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im always on police side, but not this time....I could never understand why police have to use deadly force when apprehending someone with a gun..Why cant they shoot them in the arm or a leg??? Dont they train for that??/Maybe im wrong, but this police officer shot this man 20 times..Can you spell OVERKILL???...Anyways here's what happened....

https://www.nasdaq.com/article/video-of-police-shooting-unarmed-black-man-sparks-protests-in-sacramento-20180323-00030
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im ... (show quote)

Shooting anything in the arm or leg is difficult, especially under duress, if you don't go for center mass you'd be the one killed if someone had a gun on you. Already heard the reports of the incident, need all the facts.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 02:29:37   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Dr. Evil wrote:
Shooting anything in the arm or leg is difficult, especially under duress, if you don't go for center mass you'd be the one killed if someone had a gun on you. Already heard the reports of the incident, need all the facts.


But you dont think shooting somebody 20 times is a little much??

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 03:52:15   #
Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face
 
proud republican wrote:
But you dont think shooting somebody 20 times is a little much??

Yes I do, but would it have made a diff if he was only shot twice if it still killed him? Sicilianthing reported early that he was suspected of vandalism and they caught up with him. Not sayin killing him is right, but we need to know the facts😊

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 05:16:46   #
phenry
 
proud republican wrote:
But you dont think shooting somebody 20 times is a little much??


They didn’t shoot him 20 times,20 shots were fired,big difference.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 06:05:42   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
phenry wrote:
They didn’t shoot him 20 times,20 shots were fired,big difference.


According to what I read, he had a cell phone and one cop thought it was a gun. If one of the cops yelled out, gun, that explains the reason they shot him. I apprehended a kid once who I caught climbing into a neighbors window and after I got the cuffs on him and looked up there were about ten of his friends within twenty feet of me. I pulled my gun and they stopped but if even one had taken another step I would have shot. Sometimes you only have seconds to react.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 07:30:02   #
phenry
 
Peewee wrote:
According to what I read, he had a cell phone and one cop thought it was a gun. If one of the cops yelled out, gun, that explains the reason they shot him. I apprehended a kid once who I caught climbing into a neighbors window and after I got the cuffs on him and looked up there were about ten of his friends within twenty feet of me. I pulled my gun and they stopped but if even one had taken another step I would have shot. Sometimes you only have seconds to react.


The cops may be guilty or not but one thing is for sure they don’t have to get shot before they react.No matter how it works out the fact is if the kid wasn’t out there acting up nothing would have happened.

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 08:05:16   #
Kevyn
 
phenry wrote:
The cops may be guilty or not but one thing is for sure they don’t have to get shot before they react.No matter how it works out the fact is if the kid wasn’t out there acting up nothing would have happened.

Acting up? He was in his grandparents back yard. How many people wear earpieces or headphones now? Picture you are taking the trash to the alley listening to music on headphones or taking a call with a headset on then turn around surprised to see why there are flashlights in your yard and immediately get shot twenty times.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 09:25:55   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
proud republican wrote:
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im always on police side, but not this time....I could never understand why police have to use deadly force when apprehending someone with a gun..Why cant they shoot them in the arm or a leg??? Dont they train for that??/Maybe im wrong, but this police officer shot this man 20 times..Can you spell OVERKILL???...Anyways here's what happened....

https://www.nasdaq.com/article/video-of-police-shooting-unarmed-black-man-sparks-protests-in-sacramento-20180323-00030
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im ... (show quote)


I see police here all carrying tasers, but they rarely use them. A police officer killed a mentally diseased woman who was brandishing a knife, instead of using their tasers. I asked a cop why his taser was on his off side, instead of his dominant side and he said he would be afraid that he might get shot before he could draw his firearm. I tested this theory................it took an additional second to reach over to draw a firearm from the off side.

Police are not trained adequately enough, and their training concentrates on firearm use, instead of on non lethal weapons. Hint: most police departments have their trainees get shot with a taser under controlled conditions, to teach them what it feels like. Maybe we need to shoot them during training, so they know what THAT feels like.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 09:46:31   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
proud republican wrote:
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im always on police side, but not this time....I could never understand why police have to use deadly force when apprehending someone with a gun..Why cant they shoot them in the arm or a leg??? Dont they train for that??/Maybe im wrong, but this police officer shot this man 20 times..Can you spell OVERKILL???...Anyways here's what happened....

https://www.nasdaq.com/article/video-of-police-shooting-unarmed-black-man-sparks-protests-in-sacramento-20180323-00030
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im ... (show quote)


This is atrocious!! Saw it last night, 20 shots to man already down is inexcusable and did you see how they turned their sound off after it?

Everyobe one of those cops should be arrested!!!!

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 10:49:35   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
The initial reports NEVER look good for police officers involved in shootings and the person shot is always portrayed as "innocent kids" just minding their own business. Stop for a moment and think about "hands up, don't shoot" fiasco and how many marches were in honor of that "innocent" man.....who turned out to not be so innocent. Or the one in NYC who was painted as a saint and "strangled" by officers.... Or the shooting by the female of the "innocent motorist" who had the misfortune of being broken down on the highway. And if the one being shot is black..... then the reports are without fail, biased against the cop.....even if that cop is also black!

Here is what Law Enforcement face ..... innocent man with a cell phone..... watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=884W4l3eoQg or this one....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnZx0mYfvJs Or just select from this list: https://www.google.com/search?q=COP+AMBUSHED&client=opera&hs=exP&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwji1p7JzILaAhVM0GMKHWu1BbQQ_AUICygC&biw=1239&bih=609 This is a sample of what they face. Where was the outrage? Where was the protests? Who was "angered" enough to set fire to neighborhoods? None? The news ran the story one time and then these dead officers were laid to rest in cemeteries across America and most people were unaware, or just ignored that these men and women were murdered.

Now then back to your "innocent" black man and South Sacramento. Did you know that crime rate in South Sacramento is 34 percent higher than other areas of America and you have a 1 in 27 chance of becoming a victim of crime. http://www.areavibes.com/sacramento-ca/crime/ Now then Stephen (not Stephon) Clark...... a report when this first happened a few days ago.... said that he ran from the police. Next, you can plainly hear the cops shouting "Stop, show me your hands" but, he did not stop, and in his hands was an object. Said object was pointed at the cop. Now check out how the cops are made out to be murders of innocent: "Clark was never running from the police. He was already running through backyards and hopping fences in his neighborhood.." And the cops were supposed to know this..... how? " They yell at him to show his hands, say that he has a gun and begin shooting at him. They fire at him 20 times." Then going on: "The police claimed that they saw him with a gun, and the excuse everyone is making for that is, “Well, it was dark.” Well, guess what? Stephon Clark was in that same darkness and had no way of knowing who was coming toward him in that darkness as he stood in his own backyard. Have you ever been on the other side of a police flashlight? Those things are blinding and make it impossible for you to see anything. If the police didn’t identify themselves as officers, how was he supposed to know who they were? " Let that sink in..... the cops singled out this innocent black man just standing in his own backyard..... wait, what about " He was already running through backyards and hopping fences..." Which was it, was he just standing in his backyard or had he just gotten there after running and hopping fences? And Clark could not know they were cops....wait, what about " Have you ever been on the other side of a police flashlight?" And "Stop, show me your hands" and the police helicopter circling above? I could pick this whole thing apart..... as could you, if you stopped and look at the tape, without emotions.

Now for your question.... why did they not just shoot him in the leg or arm..... watch this....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7TcXg9dPAI Look at the human torch, he is high on drugs and is on fire. He removes his clothes and calmly walks away, unaware of the fire or the danger he was in..... so shoot them in the leg and give them opportunity to kill you? Really??

Now watch the helicopter video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=192&v=VTlZqEsPY78

proud republican wrote:
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im always on police side, but not this time....I could never understand why police have to use deadly force when apprehending someone with a gun..Why cant they shoot them in the arm or a leg??? Dont they train for that??/Maybe im wrong, but this police officer shot this man 20 times..Can you spell OVERKILL???...Anyways here's what happened....

https://www.nasdaq.com/article/video-of-police-shooting-unarmed-black-man-sparks-protests-in-sacramento-20180323-00030
What this police officer did was un excusable. Im ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 19:25:05   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
According to what you read just made a huge fool of yourself! In reference to your new topic titled "Obama has to pay it back" is totally false, taken from a satirical website and only believed by right wing idiots! Below is the proof!

No, Obama does not have to pay it back!

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/obama-not-ordered-pay-400m-restitution/



Peewee wrote:
According to what I read, he had a cell phone and one cop thought it was a gun. If one of the cops yelled out, gun, that explains the reason they shot him. I apprehended a kid once who I caught climbing into a neighbors window and after I got the cuffs on him and looked up there were about ten of his friends within twenty feet of me. I pulled my gun and they stopped but if even one had taken another step I would have shot. Sometimes you only have seconds to react.



Reply
Mar 23, 2018 20:59:07   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
What does this have to do with the current topic?
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
According to what you read just made a huge fool of yourself! In reference to your new topic titled "Obama has to pay it back" is totally false, taken from a satirical website and only believed by right wing idiots! Below is the proof!

No, Obama does not have to pay it back!

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/obama-not-ordered-pay-400m-restitution/

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 21:36:29   #
phenry
 
Kevyn wrote:
Acting up? He was in his grandparents back yard. How many people wear earpieces or headphones now? Picture you are taking the trash to the alley listening to music on headphones or taking a call with a headset on then turn around surprised to see why there are flashlights in your yard and immediately get shot twenty times.


Did not get shot 20 times liar,the officers shot 20 rounds but he was not hit 20 times, liar.He also was not taking grandmas trash out,liar,he was vandalizing area homes and one neighbor called police.He had a long pipe and had just finished off a large window when police arrived.He also did not have a headset on liar,it was not an alley liar it was neighbors back yards,liar. This is how liberals see the world with all their lies built into anything they repeat.You forgot to mention he would not put his hands up after the officers repeatedly ordered him too.You also “forgot “there was a helicopter flying right over him.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 22:41:16   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
According to what you read just made a huge fool of yourself! In reference to your new topic titled "Obama has to pay it back" is totally false, taken from a satirical website and only believed by right wing idiots! Below is the proof!

No, Obama does not have to pay it back!

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/obama-not-ordered-pay-400m-restitution/


WTF???

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.