Does this portrate look like Michelle Obama to you?
Feb 19, 2018 18:05:13 #
Feb 19, 2018 18:42:55 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Mikeyavelli wrote:
...you know, they both were painted as if they were on the toilet. Obama's artist mercifully omitted the role of toilet paper beside him.
The artist might have been trying to say that ohomo wipes on leaves.. I been told that art is all interpretive ..
Feb 19, 2018 18:52:44 #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
...you know, they both were painted as if they were on the toilet. Obama's artist mercifully omitted the role of toilet paper beside him.
=================
Everything in the Obama's are fake. From birth certificate to school records, and social security numbers, their words said, like the "police acted stupidly", or like "your premiums will go down $2500/year, you can keep you doctor, you can keep your insurance" . US has 57 states, 'ISIS just a JV Team." "That deserter Muslim Bergdahl was a hero."
Then they painted a portrait of them that look entirely different people. Who are they?
Deceptions and lies are their SOP's of living.
Feb 19, 2018 19:41:47 #
permafrost wrote:
I hate it when things are my fault... I do not believe it......
Feb 19, 2018 20:57:34 #
Feb 19, 2018 21:40:02 #
2wheeljunkie wrote:
No it looks like💩
Not enough beef, no adams apple, and one eyebrow to many.
Feb 19, 2018 21:42:09 #
Radiance3 wrote:
================= br Everything in the Obama's ar... (show quote)
You forgot "it will take a generation to stop ISIS."
Feb 19, 2018 21:43:58 #
boatbob2 wrote:
YES,he needed that roll of TP,to wipe his lips....
as his butt is chapped beyond repair.
Feb 19, 2018 23:01:52 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
What goes around comes around!
************************
I'ts Karma. A word he wouldn't know.
Feb 19, 2018 23:13:21 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
ghostgotcha wrote:
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PA_NPG_18_57-M-Obama-R-2-640x768@2x.jpg
*****************************
The portrait does show the essence of Michelle. FYI: Since the camera was discovered, it was no longer necessary for artists to create exact replicas. The camera freed them to express what they "felt" rather than what they saw. You ought to keep up with the world of art. You've missed the entire Impressionistic era.
Feb 19, 2018 23:17:51 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Alicia wrote:
*****************************
The portrait does show the essence of Michelle. FYI: Since the camera was discovered, it was no longer necessary for artists to create exact replicas. The camera freed them to express what they "felt" rather than what they saw. You ought to keep up with the world of art. You've missed the entire Impressionistic era.
The portrait does show the essence of Michelle. FYI: Since the camera was discovered, it was no longer necessary for artists to create exact replicas. The camera freed them to express what they "felt" rather than what they saw. You ought to keep up with the world of art. You've missed the entire Impressionistic era.
She looks much prettier then the real one...
Feb 19, 2018 23:19:37 #
youngwilliam
Loc: Deep in the heart
Alicia wrote:
*****************************
The portrait does show the essence of Michelle. FYI: Since the camera was discovered, it was no longer necessary for artists to create exact replicas. The camera freed them to express what they "felt" rather than what they saw. You ought to keep up with the world of art. You've missed the entire Impressionistic era.
The portrait does show the essence of Michelle. FYI: Since the camera was discovered, it was no longer necessary for artists to create exact replicas. The camera freed them to express what they "felt" rather than what they saw. You ought to keep up with the world of art. You've missed the entire Impressionistic era.
It is supposed to be a portrait, not an impression. WEAK
Feb 20, 2018 02:41:58 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Remind us! Wasn't it you who said no one cares about Trump going bald??????????????
That's right nimrod. That's is of course you.
And you ant anybody. Your a delegation of one, that is, no one.
Feb 20, 2018 05:53:27 #
proud republican wrote:
I always thought that on the outside Moochelle wasn't a bad looking gal.She looks much prettier then the real one...
It was that pit in her that was supposed to house a soul that was ugly to me.
Feb 20, 2018 06:04:47 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
What goes around comes around!
The subject was a portrait of Michelle Obama. It doesn't show the grim creases in her face or the anthropoid shape. The rendering is very flattering to Ms. Obama. The real Ms Obama looks like the stretched back end of a female baboon
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.