One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Name calling, labeling and problem resolution
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
Feb 16, 2014 02:26:20   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Will I am wrote:
Yes, go on.


Thank you, I will. :mrgreen: I wasn't really sure how this post would go, as some of mine get derailed awful fast. I have noticed, from previous posts, that certain topics appear to scare off some folk. This was one of those, apparently, and I find that significant.

There are those who genuinely wish to learn more than what is immediately available to them, from ordinary people like us. I have discovered that many here on 1PP are only here to protect, defend and promulgate a particular parties rhetoric. They have that right. Some are here only to vent, bully and ridicule. They also have that right.

I tried experiments with name calling, labeling and insults, but I found it unfulfilling and unproductive. Ridiculing another's beliefs didn't change their minds, in fact, I think it did the opposite. I was diminished though and that's when I realized that such behavior is self destructive. When I responded to someone's insult to me, I became them, again self destructive.

I am not here to change anyone's mind, I don't have that right. I am here to EXCHANGE ideas, which means accepting a different idea sometimes. I can change my mind if I want to, but I won't have the chance if I refuse to consider anything other than what I think now. That would be self limiting.

Standing by one's beliefs is honorable, as long as one leaves the door open to the possibility that one is wrong, and maintain the ability to modify one's beliefs, when necessary. That is how one grows, keeps peace of mind and the only way to prosper.

Every idea is valuable, even the wrong one's, because no one knows everything or has had the same experiences. The very essence of discussion is an exchange of viewpoints where, if conducted in an amicable fashion, a more complete picture may be formed and a consensus reached. Our Country is in sore need of some consensus.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 04:28:45   #
Lily
 
AuntiE wrote:
I am sure the "trying" will become a reality. Your growth and happiness is showing in all of your posts. Your growth in wisdom is shining forth as well.

I will seek out mattresses, hopefully, with both those colors. If not both, I am VERY fond of the variegated shades available in the violet/purple family. Lily obtained the blue ones. Give me some time. I will see to it for you. :-D


I think I have found mattresses for her. They don't have blue. ....well a tiny bit. They have pansies in different colors of purple, white and medium purple.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 04:31:25   #
Lily
 
Duckie wrote:
You are officially my Aunt now! You would really find a variegated mattress for me? I am a lucky girl!

Thank you for your complement. Uncle Mike is a fantastic teacher, he does not just tell me that something is wrong, but he gives me the reasons that it is not correct. However, he has funny taste in music....he made me listen to an old LP, yes vinyl record, of Bob Marley. I came away bobbing my head and snapping my fingers. It is still running through my head.....please make it stop! And the entire family is here and laughing!!! What does "steer it up mean?"
You are officially my Aunt now! You would really ... (show quote)


I found some and told the Asylum Dorector, Aunti. She decides. Hope you like pansies.

Oh, welcome. Because of your age, you will be close to the Director and/or Searching.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 05:48:26   #
Art
 
lpnmajor wrote:
You are all idiots. Does that statement upset you? Would it be easier to swallow if I said I was an idiot too? The answers would be yes and no, respectively, I expect. No, I am not actually calling any of you idiots, that was a ploy. The point is, name calling doesn't do anything, except distract from the discussion. I AM an idiot sometimes, but I decide that, not you. When someone calls me a name, I either own it or forget it and then I'm done with it. It means nothing.

Labeling things or people doesn't change a thing about them or it, it only changes your attitude towards them. One person gives a dollar to a homeless man, another gives a sandwich. Which one is a liberal and which a conservative? I bet you tried to answer that question, but here's the thing, you can't, because you don't know WHY each person did what they did. You tried to label them anyway, with little information, because that's the way we have learned to do things. I suggest we stop "reading between the lines" and "mind reading" when dealing with people.. Labeling is actually SELF destructive, as it closes our minds to possibilities that might be of benefit to us.

Resolving problems first requires identifying the problem and the problem is NEVER ideology. The color orange is a certain frequency in the light spectrum and one's ideology has no effect on that. Accepting different viewpoints as valid, does not change ideology. From one perspective, the orange may appear more red, from another more yellow, but it is STILL orange. That means that all viewpoints have value and using the aggregate of them can lead to a more complete picture. Rejecting another viewpoint because it differs from one's own, is a self defeating action. Trying to get a glimpse of the bigger picture, REQUIRES examining other viewpoints. Those with a camera phone mentality will never have the IMAX 360 ability to deal effectively with problems. Too many people use "selfies" as their way of understanding the World.
You are all idiots. Does that statement upset you?... (show quote)


:thumbup:

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 06:19:54   #
martychristiansoldier Loc: PA
 
lpnmajor wrote:
You are all idiots. Does that statement upset you? Would it be easier to swallow if I said I was an idiot too? The answers would be yes and no, respectively, I expect. No, I am not actually calling any of you idiots, that was a ploy. The point is, name calling doesn't do anything, except distract from the discussion. I AM an idiot sometimes, but I decide that, not you. When someone calls me a name, I either own it or forget it and then I'm done with it. It means nothing.

Labeling things or people doesn't change a thing about them or it, it only changes your attitude towards them. One person gives a dollar to a homeless man, another gives a sandwich. Which one is a liberal and which a conservative? I bet you tried to answer that question, but here's the thing, you can't, because you don't know WHY each person did what they did. You tried to label them anyway, with little information, because that's the way we have learned to do things. I suggest we stop "reading between the lines" and "mind reading" when dealing with people.. Labeling is actually SELF destructive, as it closes our minds to possibilities that might be of benefit to us.

Resolving problems first requires identifying the problem and the problem is NEVER ideology. The color orange is a certain frequency in the light spectrum and one's ideology has no effect on that. Accepting different viewpoints as valid, does not change ideology. From one perspective, the orange may appear more red, from another more yellow, but it is STILL orange. That means that all viewpoints have value and using the aggregate of them can lead to a more complete picture. Rejecting another viewpoint because it differs from one's own, is a self defeating action. Trying to get a glimpse of the bigger picture, REQUIRES examining other viewpoints. Those with a camera phone mentality will never have the IMAX 360 ability to deal effectively with problems. Too many people use "selfies" as their way of understanding the World.
You are all idiots. Does that statement upset you?... (show quote)

It is all part of divided and conquer which is very real, and to many thrive on it. To some you have no view, so anything you say you are going to be an idiot. Basically, even if you are right you are wrong. This don't bother me anymore because I know what kind of people I am dealing with, and they can't change what I know to be the truth. Name calling is nothing more than intimidation, BUT, if we were all face to face, most would not say jit even if they had a mouth full.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 07:23:26   #
stan3186
 
AuntiE wrote:
The answer to your quandary is the two words "will not".

The ones who do not use insults "will not" comment as they need not do so.

The ones who do use insults "will not" comment because they will continue as usual.


okay, lpnMajor as one of the worst of the name callers here along with BoJester, Jon Hatfield, CWO retired, and so on,, mostly left wing liberals it would be nice to have a civil discussion for a change. I have also stooped to name calling but mostly because of retaliation of the above mentioned posters as well as other liberal posters. I will try to refrain from spewing my admittedly right wing spew, but I bet large that it won't last even a full day because it seems that screaming "your stupid, ignorant, haven't a brain in your head" is the liberals best form of argument.
You also have to understand that the posters to this forum have very strong and opinionated views. The vigor in which I attack Obama is truly heartfelt and the anger expressed is genuine and not just to spew rhetoric.
We shall see.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 07:37:35   #
Searching Loc: Rural Southwest VA
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Thank you, I will. :mrgreen: I wasn't really sure how this post would go, as some of mine get derailed awful fast. I have noticed, from previous posts, that certain topics appear to scare off some folk. This was one of those, apparently, and I find that significant.

There are those who genuinely wish to learn more than what is immediately available to them, from ordinary people like us. I have discovered that many here on OPP are only here to protect, defend and promulgate a particular parties rhetoric. They have that right. Some are here only to vent, bully and ridicule. They also have that right.

I tried experiments with name calling, labeling and insults, but I found it unfulfilling and unproductive. Ridiculing another's beliefs didn't change their minds, in fact, I think it did the opposite. I was diminished though and that's when I realized that such behavior is self destructive. When I responded to someone's insult to me, I became them, again self destructive.

I am not here to change anyone's mind, I don't have that right. I am here to EXCHANGE ideas, which means accepting a different idea sometimes. I can change my mind if I want to, but I won't have the chance if I refuse to consider anything other than what I think now. That would be self limiting.

Standing by one's beliefs is honorable, as long as one leaves the door open to the possibility that one is wrong, and maintain the ability to modify one's beliefs, when necessary. That is how one grows, keeps peace of mind and the only way to prosper.

Every idea is valuable, even the wrong one's, because no one knows everything or has had the same experiences. The very essence of discussion is an exchange of viewpoints where, if conducted in an amicable fashion, a more complete picture may be formed and a consensus reached. Our Country is in sore need of some consensus.
Thank you, I will. :mrgreen: I wasn't really sure... (show quote)


Yes, I agree with you that our country is in sore need of some consensus and every idea IS valuable. We all have that inalienable right to free speech, to have a voice. HOWEVER, I disagree that everyone has a right to be a bully, or incredibly rude, if they so choose. You know what, they don't. With free speech comes a responsibility, and it has been overlooked more often here on OPP than I am comfortable with. It is called civility. Civility translates to having no fear when you give voice to your inner thoughts -- that when you express an opinion or personal philosophy to see what other's take is that at the very least there will be respect shown for you as a fellow human being, that you won't be humiliated or looked down on in contempt. Lest anyone doubt, however, I understand having passion for an opinion and expressing it towards a concept they vehemently disagree with. I just wish it was only directed toward a concept and not the person. Invariably, that's where it seems to go. I grew up in a household filled with rage. I thought that made me better able to handle the venom encountered on OPP because, if for no other reason, there is a buffer of a screen with no physical proximity to those who would personally insult or rage. I was wrong. As time has gone by, it has only made me feel all the worse, for those of us on OPP who seek answers, to exchange ideas, not rage and ridicule, and for our country, because we seem to be a mirror of what is going on across this beautiful country of ours. It makes me sad.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 09:51:48   #
Viral
 
stan3186 wrote:
okay, lpnMajor as one of the worst of the name callers here along with BoJester, Jon Hatfield, CWO retired, and so on,, mostly left wing liberals it would be nice to have a civil discussion for a change. I have also stooped to name calling but mostly because of retaliation of the above mentioned posters as well as other liberal posters. I will try to refrain from spewing my admittedly right wing spew, but I bet large that it won't last even a full day because it seems that screaming "your stupid, ignorant, haven't a brain in your head" is the liberals best form of argument.
You also have to understand that the posters to this forum have very strong and opinionated views. The vigor in which I attack Obama is truly heartfelt and the anger expressed is genuine and not just to spew rhetoric.
We shall see.
okay, lpnMajor as one of the worst of the name cal... (show quote)


This is the type of thing that inevitably happens. I'm going to point out the problems with the post.


What purpose does a public naming and shaming serve? Why the generalization regarding liberals? It's not your fault you stooped to insults?

These words do not foster civility.

Naming and shaming will provoke, generalizing will alienate half your audience, and blaming others for your actions is disingenuous (responsibility is shared, them for provoking, you for taking the bait).

Strong and opinionated viewpoints are acceptable. Just remember that an opinion is not a fact, and shouldn't be presented as such. Also remember that *how* you present your ideas is just as (if not more) important as what you are presenting.

You can be angry. You can give biased opinions. Just keep in mind that your words are viewable to people with feelings with varying degrees of thickness of skin.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 09:56:47   #
Duckie
 
I am taking a large step and assuming that you are a lady, if I am wrong I ask forgiveness in advance. Thank you kind lady for going out of your way to find me a pretty mattress and for placing me close to very loving role models. As you know, Ms. Searching is my Gram and AuntiE is now my Aunt. If you are related, then I am so happy to meet you.

Lily wrote:
I found some and told the Asylum Dorector, Aunti. She decides. Hope you like pansies.

Oh, welcome. Because of your age, you will be close to the Director and/or Searching.

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 10:00:44   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Hang in there everybody
Viral wrote:
This is the type of thing that inevitably happens. I'm going to point out the problems with the post.


What purpose does a public naming and shaming serve? Why the generalization regarding liberals? It's not your fault you stooped to insults?

These words do not foster civility.

Naming and shaming will provoke, generalizing will alienate half your audience, and blaming others for your actions is disingenuous (responsibility is shared, them for provoking, you for taking the bait).

Strong and opinionated viewpoints are acceptable. Just remember that an opinion is not a fact, and shouldn't be presented as such. Also remember that *how* you present your ideas is just as (if not more) important as what you are presenting.

You can be angry. You can give biased opinions. Just keep in mind that your words are viewable to people with feelings with varying degrees of thickness of skin.
This is the type of thing that inevitably happens.... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 10:35:18   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Duckie wrote:
I am glad you are here. There are a few people that talk to hear themselves and has no interest in other opinions. Personally, I like a good discussion and at times it does take lots of space to explain a point. Just keep posting and soon you will recognize the people to whom I speak and learn to ignore them. Again. I am glad you are here, long threads with supporting information is great. I tend to use books rather than the internet because the internet is now so full of misinformation that it may as well be a comic strip.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
I am glad you are here. There are a few people th... (show quote)


The Vocabulary Visigoth would speak with you privately.



Reply
Feb 16, 2014 10:48:38   #
Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana
 
Duckie wrote:
There are over 600.000 comments on this site. Would it surprise you to know that over one half a million comments are angry? Yep, I ran a program to select particular words and it came back for this site that most of the posters are angry and try to out shout one another. There are other sites that are worse, by 4 percent. Would it also be a surprise to learn that the amiable comments are from your friends.....yes, AuntiE, Banjo, Searching, Slatten49. I will not name the offenders. That would be just rude.

It seems when patterns are initiated and not stopped that it becomes a habit. Habits are hard to break. I think that a nonresponse will kill the thread of the some offenders and the others will continue to post, but if you do not give them the attention they are looking for, they too will stop. If a conversation is worth your time, then ignore the hostile words and move on.

Everyone's opinion(s) give us insight. Insight into personalities, the current climate in various parts of the country, as well as an insight into how policies are affecting the nation.
There are over 600.000 comments on this site. Wou... (show quote)


Exactly ! Posting are mostly Opinions ( good or bad) and most references are opinion also , but a few people know how to push your button and get you going ! But you are right , ignoring the hostile people would be the best to do ! A lot of my postings are for information only but somehow it gets turned into "My ideas or way of life ) .

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 10:50:12   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
You are all right
Bigmac495 wrote:
Exactly ! Posting are mostly Opinions ( good or bad) and most references are opinion also , but a few people know how to push your button and get you going ! But you are right , ignoring the hostile people would be the best to do ! A lot of my postings are for information only but somehow it gets turned into "My ideas or way of life ) .

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 11:36:08   #
Tradition Loc: Staten Island, N.Y.
 
Insults are vile. Euphemisms, however, can be dangerous, and they are the weapons of liberals. Lately, however, our citizens seem to have realized that these phrases have now morphed into unmitigated lies which act as semantic ploys which DO NOT CHANGE THE PLAIN, UNADULTERATED TRUTH:

INVESTMENTS = Green Energy/Solar Company Failures (BILLIONS WORTH).

SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND AND/OR "SHARED" PROSPERITY = "Sharing" your life, your work, your mind, your goals, your aspirations, and your practical success with anyone and everyone the GOVERNMENT DEEMS IS ENTITLED TO A POUND OF YOUR FLESH.

TARGETED MEASURES = Stimulus Revenue Enhancement

SHARED SACRIFICES = More taxes on the way

TAX REFORM = Tax hikes

FAIR SHARE = Class Warfare

SNAP = Food Stamps

BUMPS IN THE ROAD = Attacks on American Embassies

NOT OPTIMAL = The Merciless Murder of Four Brave Americans in Benghazi

WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE? = What's the big deal?!! Nobody I love is dead!!

UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS = Illegal Aliens

IMMIGRATION REFORM = AMNESTY TO SCOFFLAWS

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATION = Global War On Terror

MAN-CAUSED DISASTERS = Terrorism

DETAINEES = Enemy Combatants

KINETIC MILITARY ACTION = War on Terror

IF YOU'VE GOT A BUSINESS, YOU DIDN'T BUILD THAT = The Government made it happen! You owe them!!

WORKPLACE VIOLENCE = 13 DEAD SOLDIERS and over 30 injuries, due to an AMERICAN MAJOR who shouted "Allahu Akbar" during this TERRORIST MASSACRE AT FORT HOOD.

CROSSING A RED LINE = Obama vs. Putin - Putin wins!! America humiliated!

TWO BORDER PATROL AGENTS MURDERED, HUNDREDS OF MEXICANS KILLED =
"PRIVILEGED" ATTORNEY GENERAL WILL NOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR "FAST AND FURIOUS"INCOMPETENCE BECAUSE HE HAS A BUDDY IN THE WHITE HOUSE WITH A PEN AND A PHONE.

SEQUESTER = I don't care if, on video, for all to see and hear, I DID ADMIT that I'd VETO any effort to STOP a Sequester. I'm the President and I can lie, say it wasn't my idea, and still get support from my adoring fans.

OBAMACARE = If you like your insurance plan, you can keep it - PERIOD! If you like your doctor you can keep him/her! PERIOD! - The ACA will save you $2,500.

TRAIN WRECK = A Website that was given 3-1/2 Years to construct, and experts said should cost no more that 5-10 MILLION DOLLARS, which has already cost the taxpayer ONE BILLION DOLLARS.

APOLOGY = "I am sorry that they(AMERICANS)are FINDING THEMSELVES IN THIS SITUATION based on ASSURANCES they got from me." (It's really not my fault - they're just lost!!)

ASSURANCES = LIES!! And BTW, American citizens aren't "FINDING themselves in this situation" - OBAMA MANDATED them there!! (APOLOGY? - BULL!!)

INCOME INEQUALITY = Wealth Distribution

Reply
Feb 16, 2014 11:42:41   #
stan3186
 
Viral wrote:
This is the type of thing that inevitably happens. I'm going to point out the problems with the post.


What purpose does a public naming and shaming serve? Why the generalization regarding liberals? It's not your fault you stooped to insults?

These words do not foster civility.

Naming and shaming will provoke, generalizing will alienate half your audience, and blaming others for your actions is disingenuous (responsibility is shared, them for provoking, you for taking the bait).

Strong and opinionated viewpoints are acceptable. Just remember that an opinion is not a fact, and shouldn't be presented as such. Also remember that *how* you present your ideas is just as (if not more) important as what you are presenting.

You can be angry. You can give biased opinions. Just keep in mind that your words are viewable to people with feelings with varying degrees of thickness of skin.
This is the type of thing that inevitably happens.... (show quote)


You don't like my post too bad. I don't want or need or like "holier than thou" attitudes.. You seem condescending in your post. A spade is a spade and the ones I named are well known for vicious attack post and people react to them like it or not.

If someone calls you a stupid wingnut asshole because you post your opinion on something, then most people are going to react to that post.
If you post links to back up you position and someone says that all the links were stupid republican rant articles, or that the person you are quoting is a stupid wingnut, then post no links themselves to back up their opinions, the human nature will require you to react viscerally.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.