Al Gore: 'It's Getting Colder Because It's Getting Warmer' (Page 39): The basic reason that you and your liberal associates cannot answer simple weather questions is because of simple...

Callan

The basic reason that you and your liberal associates cannot answer simple weather questions is because of simple arrogance. Man has been monitoring earth’s weather for just over 100 years, so how can man with limited knowledge of a very complex subject make concrete predictions on a subject they do not understand?

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

eagleye13 wrote:

br "You're not comprehending what I wrote an... (show quote)

"You're not comprehending what I wrote and that's something I really can't help you with, go take a climatology class to give you some basics and then come talk to me." - Morgan

Comprehending what you wrote was the whole point.
FUNNY how you do not understand what you learned in class, and what you wrote.
So here it is again:
Now pay attention!!!

"No, Gore is correct which I was taught decades ago in a climatology class years ago before global warming was ever in the media or even the forefront of an important issue. *****There are still many things in nature that are a mystery, one being the climate of the earth and it's natural attempt to rebalance itself, ***** . This law rings true once again and not crazy." - Morgan

Now really try to quit putting the cart before the horse.
Did your "teacher" some how twist what you just said you learned?
"There are still many things in nature that are a mystery, one being the climate of the earth and it's natural attempt to rebalance itself,..." - Morgan

"and we were taught that when the earth is very hot in summer it will be equally as extreme in the winter and visa -versa, hence the 3rd law of motion by Newton, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction... " - Morgan

It is the man made part you just refuse to get.
"hence the 3rd law of motion by Newton, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." - Morgan

It is the "equal" you just don't, won't, or can't comprehend.
The counter forces you refer to?
Try this one out;
Your breath is not going to cause a storm.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Morgan wrote:

Oh Brother, what a trenched in diatribe from the u... (show quote)

For lack of a better word, Bull Shit! You guys are great at lecturing. What do you ever do? Do you drive? Fly? Radical. You're a joke if you think wanting to fight water and air pollution, instead of contributing to the UN is radical. Just so you know, not all footprints are equal. Once again, what's your solution?

arapaho Loc: America

Callan wrote:

The basic reason that you and your liberal associates cannot answer simple weather questions is because of simple arrogance. Man has been monitoring earth’s weather for just over 100 years, so how can man with limited knowledge of a very complex subject make concrete predictions on a subject they do not understand?

The basic reason you and other wingnut fanatics misunderstand so many things is the willful gross ignorance that results from inability to learn. For example you think meteorology (the formal study and observation of weather) is just over 100 years old! What a hoot from a cretan!

Aristotle wrote "Meteorology" in 350 BC. That started the modern concept of a formal study, but of course the informal study preceeded that by probably thousands of years.

Morgan

archie bunker wrote:

Come on Morgan! What about all of these elitist leftists flying all over the world in private jets lecturing us about how 'we' have to sacrifice, and cut back to save the planet? Hell, AL Gore spends more to heat on swimming pool for a month than I do for of our energy use!
What do you reckon it might cost to heat, and cool the Obamas new mansion for a year?

Arch the argument isn't whether or not to use planes, cars, and ships or anything that uses fuel, but how to use different resources or to make what we use much more efficient. A car, for example, could run almost completely Co2 free. One has to ask why have biofuels and trains really taken a back seat?

Morgan

eagleye13 wrote:

"You're not comprehending what I wrote and th... (show quote)

There is nothing I can say to alter your point of view, therefore I'm not going to waste my time, not to mention I don't enjoy conversing with people who go out of their to be obnoxious. I'm here to converse with people who actually want a conversation and being condescending and obtuse doesn't work for me. You have a nice day.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Callan wrote:

The basic reason that you and your liberal associates cannot answer simple weather questions is because of simple arrogance. Man has been monitoring earth’s weather for just over 100 years, so how can man with limited knowledge of a very complex subject make concrete predictions on a subject they do not understand?

Well said I’ve argued the very same adding anything done by Science is subjective and changes frequently..

It’s like all these projections of temperatures millions of years ago, thousands of years ago etc they only give what is fed into the study about the temperature millions of years ago without evidence of what was.. Projection of not factual of..

Ice age and warmer climates go hand in hand with what the Earth does on her own..

Yes, we have warming and we have cooling.. Neither destructive to our way of life.. Keep it clean, be responsible, pick up the mess, and understand it is all part of what occurs naturally.. Heck I even read an article that now suggests/blames glaciers for melting and emitting more CO2...A natural transition for glaciers as well....

Morgan

JFlorio wrote:

For lack of a better word, Bull Shit! You guys are great at lecturing. What do you ever do? Do you drive? Fly? Radical. You're a joke if you think wanting to fight water and air pollution, instead of contributing to the UN is radical. Just so you know, not all footprints are equal. Once again, what's your solution?

I thought I had said not all footprints were the same, again no one is lecturing, it is called explaining a point of view. I never said anything about what you posted, doing one instead of the other.

Morgan

arapaho wrote:

The basic reason you and other wingnut fanatics misunderstand so many things is the willful gross ignorance that results from inability to learn. For example you think meteorology (the formal study and observation of weather) is just over 100 years old! What a hoot from a cretan!

Aristotle wrote "Meteorology" in 350 BC. That started the modern concept of a formal study, but of course the informal study preceeded that by probably thousands of years.

Is that the reason? I was wondering...and I believe you are correct. No one can force anyone to believe a fact or truth, they have to accept it. Do you think Newton had a had time explaining gravity?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Morgan, that is exactly the argument. What kind of pleasure do you and your ilk get from pointing fingers about climate change or anything else,
and then exempt yourself from combating the problem? What is your solution and what do you do personally to combat the problem you believe is man made? I'm gonna use Gore as the perfect example. Why should I change my lifestyle one iota because the guy screaming to the heavens about man made climate change and how it is created contributes more to the problem identified by him in one year than I will in a lifetime. In conclusion why would I listen to people like you who believe Al Gore and his rhetoric when he is a proven, and total hypocrite?

Morgan wrote:

Arch the argument isn't whether or not to use planes, cars, and ships or anything that uses fuel, but how to use different resources or to make what we use much more efficient. A car, for example, could run almost completely Co2 free. One has to ask why have biofuels and trains really taken a back seat?

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Morgan wrote:

Arch the argument isn't whether or not to use planes, cars, and ships or anything that uses fuel, but how to use different resources or to make what we use much more efficient. A car, for example, could run almost completely Co2 free. One has to ask why have biofuels and trains really taken a back seat?

There is a lot going on with bio fuel technology right now. What about trains? They are playing a big part in shortening trucking miles. Is it because they burn diesel?

Morgan

Callan wrote:

The basic reason that you and your liberal associates cannot answer simple weather questions is because of simple arrogance. Man has been monitoring earth’s weather for just over 100 years, so how can man with limited knowledge of a very complex subject make concrete predictions on a subject they do not understand?

Obviously they, the scientists and researchers do understand it, where did you get the idea they don't understand what they are experts in?For example, there are some very informative science programs that explains their analytical process if diagnosing ice cores by these experts. Fascinating, really.

Morgan

archie bunker wrote:

There is a lot going on with bio fuel technology right now. What about trains? They are playing a big part in shortening trucking miles. Is it because they burn diesel?

Yes, it's about time don't you think? Other countries not so entrenched with oil moguls, are way ahead of us in trains. I would love to see Maglev railways come here, especially going east to west.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

eagleye13 wrote:

"You're not comprehending what I wrote and th... (show quote)

Morgan

JFlorio wrote:

Morgan, that is exactly the argument. What kind of pleasure do you and your ilk get from pointing fingers about climate change or anything else,
and then exempt yourself from combating the problem?

What pleasure? We're trying to have the "right" acknowledge what changes need to be done, and these changes will not inconvenience you and even if there was a small inconvenience isn't it worth it order to ensure the earth's sustainability for humans to inhabit it long into the future.

JFlorio wrote:

br br What is your solution and what do you do ... (show quote)