I hope I can find the article I found late last night. Damn I pad. Probably more myself. I'm a bit techtarded. The question asked that gives global warming proponents that 97% scientists agree on man made global warming is generally stated. Do you believe the activities of man add to global warming? The article went on to point out if those same scientists were asked do you think man has a significant impact on the climate the percentage drops dramatically. Most believe man has some impact. Just like trees, sun, wildlife, earth tilt. Many, many factors are involved.You say the true evidence. What's that? Taking a minute sample size, couple hundred years and draw conclusions from a base of billions of years? Mathematicians would scoff at this size sample being used to predict anything. Other factors were brought up that frankly I never thought about.
Many of the temperature reading stations (whatever that is) have had buildings, blacktop and other structures put near them, affecting the accuracy of their reporting. NOAA, has admitted to fudging the numbers on temperatures. In the last 50 years the problem's name has been changed every time when the original prediction didn't happen. Can you imagine what they'd have been saying if this climate change craze had been discussed during the dust bowl years? I wish we could quit worrying about climate change and start working on what we can see. Pollution and dirty water.

Ah, yes-s-s-s, HOLLYWOOD.

Those in perfect control of Hollywood are designing their biggest gold trophy ever- a two-ton solid gold item commemorating their immense hypocrisy.

That subterranean kingdom of liars, cheats, rapists, whores is going to present that trophy to all present in the room as all who would attend will be what Hollywood would call real *winners*.

We're going to be able, once more, to tune in to watch them lick themselves all over like great, fat cats.

Can't wait.

What do you have to say about the attack on the ranchers in Nevada to save the dessert tortoise?
Or going after the ranchers (the Hammonds) in Oregon?

Are you for the family ranchers and family farmers being something from the past?
That is what is what the federal agenda is, and more Americans better wake up.
Who wants to be dependent on corporate farming like Monsanto for their food supply?
I sure don't.