How does this float your boat...
kenvrla wrote:
Perm, do you still think we need the technnlogical aspects of the wall? I think that Pres. Trump's proposal includes these aspects. As for the cost, I think we give much more than the 18B projected total cost (1.8 B annual cost over 10 years) to illegals every year, so although not a perfect business model. it works on paper. Still think electronic aspect should go in first, along with more border agents first. Texas and other border states are much more attuned to the problems of current open borders than the rest of the country, as we deal with it first-hand, and the rest of the country deals with only the "filtered" aspects.
Perm, do you still think we need the technnlogical... (
show quote)
Ken,
I agree with most of your post..
The proposal is for about 30 billion, the wall is 18 billion of that.
I would vote for (if i got to vote) expansion of the BP and increase in electronic and other updating.
Both Bush and Obama made large increases in the BP budget, if more is needed, then we should do it..
Yes, this is much more of a concern in any of the border states then up here in the snow land..
We have had a couple of raids on packing plants and one other..
Loki wrote:
Illegals cost this country anywhere from 80 billion to well over one hundred billion per year, depending on whose statistics you use. Personally, I think the wall is a non-starter in many areas. It would work well in some areas; in others it is a joke. In many places the money would be better spent on more electronic or drone surveillance, more Border Patrol and better rapid response capability.
US employers who knowingly hire wetbacks should face severe penalties. Wetbacks who break this country's laws should face far stiffer penalties than they do now. Stop making this country so attractive to poorly educated sponges.
Illegals cost this country anywhere from 80 billio... (
show quote)
By golly, Loki,
You are back to posting some things I agree with..
Not with your mention of cost on line one, but the rest seems on the spot..
goch1 wrote:
Wonder how much the wall in China cost???
"While it is impossible to know exactly what the Great Wall of China cost to build, modern calculations estimate the cost to be approximately $360 billion. The wall is 4,160 miles from end to end".
"RandomHistory.com reports that more than one million people died due to accidents during construction. The Great Wall was called “the longest cemetery on Earth” because of so many lost lives".
https://www.reference.com/geography/much-did-cost-build-great-wall-china-f5814b3c6b4b0f46#full-answerSo there you have it. $360 billion and a million lives. Now, put a value on a human life, multiply that by a million then add $360 billion and you have arrived at your answer.
Loki wrote:
Illegals cost this country anywhere from 80 billion to well over one hundred billion per year, depending on whose statistics you use. Personally, I think the wall is a non-starter in many areas. It would work well in some areas; in others it is a joke. In many places the money would be better spent on more electronic or drone surveillance, more Border Patrol and better rapid response capability.
US employers who knowingly hire wetbacks should face severe penalties. Wetbacks who break this country's laws should face far stiffer penalties than they do now. Stop making this country so attractive to poorly educated sponges.
Illegals cost this country anywhere from 80 billio... (
show quote)
Loki, wish one of POTUS priorities would be E-verify for ALL employers... would stop a lot of this. Other big problem is the massive handouts, as u pointed out.
permafrost wrote:
Your wall will be an issue in a few days..
write your congressman today and kill the wall, kill the wall, kill the wall..
Washington (CNN)The Trump administration has revealed its master plan for securing the border -- and it's going to cost $33 billion.
Of that total, $18 billion will be required for President Donald Trump's long-promised border wall, according to Customs and Border Protection documents obtained by CNN that were sent to lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
The remaining $15 billion would cover technology, personnel and readiness, the document says.
Titled "Critical CBP Requirements to Improve Border Security," the document says CBP has identified what a 2,026-mile border wall system would entail --comprising about 864 miles of new wall and about 1,163 miles of replacement or secondary wall -- even as administration officials and their allies insist they are not pursuing a wall "from sea to shining sea," as Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and her predecessor John Kelly have testified to Congress.
DHS nominee Kirstjen Nielsen: 'No need for a wall from sea to shining sea'
DHS nominee Kirstjen Nielsen: 'No need for a wall from sea to shining sea'
The document says the $18 billion investment will cover 722 miles of border wall -- about 316 new miles of primary structure and about 407 miles of replacement and secondary wall.
Your wall will be an issue in a few days.. br br... (
show quote)
BTW, thanks for facts update on border proposal....went back and read thru it.
kenvrla wrote:
Loki, wish one of POTUS priorities would be E-verify for ALL employers... would stop a lot of this. Other big problem is the massive handouts, as u pointed out.
There also needs to be a definitive ruling on birthright citizenship. As it is, the child of illegals is NOT a birth citizen of this country. The practice has been to sort of grant de facto citizenship to children born here while their parents are here legally; however this flies in the face of both SCOTUS rulings on the subject; particularly
US v Wong Kim Ark1898 in which Wong Kim Ark's birth citizenship status was derived from the fact that his parents were permanent legal residents at the time, NOT someone here on a temp visa.
Loki wrote:
There also needs to be a definitive ruling on birthright citizenship. As it is, the child of illegals is NOT a birth citizen of this country. The practice has been to sort of grant de facto citizenship to children born here while their parents are here legally; however this flies in the face of both SCOTUS rulings on the subject; particularly US v Wong Kim Ark1898 in which Wong Kim Ark's birth citizenship status was derived from the fact that his parents were permanent legal residents at the time, NOT someone here on a temp visa.
There also needs to be a definitive ruling on birt... (
show quote)
Yes, it surely is a convoluted problem. The wall is only the start. Hopefully, POTUS and Congree will adress all of these issues post-wall vote.
kenvrla wrote:
Yes, it surely is a convoluted problem. The wall is only the start. Hopefully, POTUS and Congree will adress all of these issues post-wall vote.
These "issues" should have been addressed 50 years ago.
kenvrla wrote:
Loki, wish one of POTUS priorities would be E-verify for ALL employers... would stop a lot of this. Other big problem is the massive handouts, as u pointed out.
***************************
Yes I agree--E-Verify ALL current employees also to make sure they are here legally and STOP Birth Right Citizenship immediately.
I say build the wall and bring in the president of the Philippine islands to enforce our drug laws. I Am tired of seeing illegals giving us the finger while hoisting the Mexican flag.
IF,we really want to MAKE Mexico,pay for that wall,Just make ALL Mexicans,that send money ,that was earned in the USA,to Mexico,,pay a 20% tax, on that money,IF,they try to get past that tax,take ALL of that money.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.