One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
If Trump is loosing his marbles should he go?
Page <<first <prev 13 of 15 next> last>>
Dec 16, 2017 13:41:17   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Airforceone wrote:
32% that support Trump are the KKK, White Supremist, Neo Nazies, Evangelicals that support Pedaphile’s and Serial Sex Abusers and the practice of incest in the South, that’s actually a southern traditions


Airhead; thank you for showing how ignorant you really are. If I was debating along side you; I would be embarrassed. I am sure there some here that are.

BTW; what is it you used to call yourself on OPP?

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 02:04:51   #
E
 
Dummy Boy wrote:
Where is that written, which amendment?

..."The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices.

That is the only mention...no where is Christian or Judaic mentioned, in the constitution...or the laws. Because we don't live in a Theocracy.


Sometimes you have to excuse some people when they go overboard living up to their names.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 03:18:07   #
PeterS
 
JFlorio wrote:
So you're saying the witch has been sick for over five years? I finally agree with you. Seriously, since Trump sleeps very little and the job he has is full of stress he could easily have a bad day. As usual your hopes and dreams are just that.

And what president has had it easy? Aside from Reagan no president has slid as quickly as Trump and Reagan didn't slide until his second term.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2017 03:55:49   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
PeterS wrote:
And what president has had it easy? Aside from Reagan no president has slid as quickly as Trump and Reagan didn't slide until his second term.


No President had it easier than the muhammedest Barak Hussein Obama..he was a token office holder...and then his hardest work was subversive activism against the United States of America...and he should have been arrested for his actions..as a matter of fact, he still should go to prison....(Guantanamo in a orange jump suit)...

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 08:43:19   #
pappadeux Loc: Phoenix AZ
 
PeterS wrote:
And what president has had it easy? Aside from Reagan no president has slid as quickly as Trump and Reagan didn't slide until his second term.
another "New AmeriKa" clown speaks his mindless mind

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 09:05:37   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
Kazudy wrote:
Let me take a guess, I would say that at least 75% of the American people consider themselves Judeo-Christian. Our freedom of religion is being eroded. Let's think about this for a minute, who is behind that?


Where do KNOW where your freedom to practice religion is being prohibited?

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 09:11:07   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
Not only are you dumb, but profoundly stupid, for which there is no cure. So just keep trolling for your own amusement.


You demonstrate a similar detachment from intelligence. Is the first amendment complicated and may be, it isn't. It is most amusing to listen to you waffle and project ad hominems to protect you hegemony, that never existed and by further posturing you are destroying the weak hold that the church has on society, because people actually read and assimilate information for all to see.

Yes, indeed, there is "no cure" for me, sorry, but you can distribute your crap some place else.

Let's just consider marriage in the US and how it doesn't comply to Judaic/Christian rules, shall we:

A. Marriage in the United States shall consist of a union between one man and one or more women. (Gen 29:17-28; II Sam 3:2-5) Please note that NOTHING in the Old or New Testament condemns polygamy. Polyandry, though (i.e., a woman taking more than one husband) is an abomination.

B. Marriage shall not impede a man's right to take concubines in addition to his wife or wives. (II Sam 5:13; I Kings 11:3; II Chron 11:21)

C. A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed. (Deut 22:13-21)

D. Marriage of a believer and a non-believer shall be forbidden. (Gen 24:3; Num 25:1-9; Ezra 9:12; Neh 10:30) Also, to bolster this assertion, the New Testament plainly states that Christians ought not "yoke themselves unto unbelievers" (2 Cor. 6:14). Therefore, all mixed marriages must be declared null and void -- period, end of discussion.

E. Since marriage is for life, neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor any state or federal law, shall be construed to permit divorce. (Deut 22:19; Mark 10:9) Exceptions MIGHT be made for husbands to "put away" their wives in case of adultery, but even that's kinda iffy. All this "Well, he beats me black and blue" crap just doesn't hold water with the word of God.

F. If a married man dies without children, his brother shall marry the widow. If he refuses to marry his brother's widow or deliberately does not give her children, he shall pay a fine of one shoe and be otherwise punished in a manner to be determined by law. (Gen. 38:6-10; Deut 25:5-10) I'm sure that Payless and Thom McAn will be happy to hear about the shoe thing.

G. In lieu of marriage, if there are no acceptable men in your town, it is required that you get your dad drunk and have sex with him (even if he had previously offered you up as a sex toy to men young and old), tag-teaming with any sisters you may have. Of course, this rule applies only if you are female. (Gen 19:31-36)

It looks to me like the Constitution and State Laws are in fact NON-BIBLICAL and therefore DO NOT COMPLY to Judaic/Christian principles, values and so on and so forth. With the exception of divorce it looks like none of these VALUES would or could substitute for anyone's morals or common sense, would you agree?

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2017 09:12:01   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
Being the progeny of an incestuous relationship should make you an authority on the subject.


...which you comprehend, because of your own conception and perverse existence?....

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 09:50:45   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
E wrote:
Sometimes you have to excuse some people when they go overboard living up to their names.


...says a CONSONANT...

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 10:00:02   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
You are sorely lacking in comprehension. Nowhere did I state we are any type of religion. What I aid was, we were FOUNDED on Judean/Christian morals and principles, not the religion. Sheesh...


I've been wanting to get back to you, I actually work for living...

The TEN Commandments as they relate to the Constitution:

1. I am the LORD your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt. You shall have no other gods before me.

The U.S. Constitution does not mention God, Creator, Jesus, or Christianity anywhere. Nor does Constitutional law require U.S. citizens to worship a God. Nor does it prevent anyone from worshiping other gods or no god at all. (i.e. that "pesky first amendment, when will end????)

2. You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain:

This commandment, to never take the name of God in vain, appears nowhere in the Constitution. We citizens can swear and curse any god, in any way we wish. (..except if we lived in a Theocracy)

3. Observe the sabbath day, to keep it holy, as the LORD your God commanded you

Not only can American citizens not keep the Sabbath, but we can ignore it entirely without out violating the Constitution.

4. Honor your father and mother...

Sorry, but the Constitution does not require anyone to honor fathers and mothers. We can even despise and hate our parents all we want (just as the alleged Jesus taught his disciples in Luke 14:26), without violating Constitutional law.

5. You shall not kill (murder).

At first this may seem Constitutional but it cannot possibly agree with it for the very reason that the Constitution allows the declaration of war, which of course kills and murders many innocent human beings. Murdering innocent human beings doesn't even seem to bother many Christians!

6. You shall not commit adultery.

The Constitution says nothing about adultery. A man or woman can have sex with as many married people as they like without violating the Constitution.

7. You shall not steal.

Although states have laws against stealing that remain consistent with the Constitution, the Federal government, by using "eminent domain," can rob and steal from its citizens all it wants (taking private property for "public use," for example), without violating the Constitution. Close but no cigar.

8. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Although one cannot lie in a court of law, while under oath, it says nothing about lying outside the court unless it constitutes slander. American citizens and sitting Presidents lie all the time without violating the Constitution. Moreover the Constitution specifically allows spying and countersurveillance, which guarantees lying to others. Close in some narrow cases, but not at all in most.

9. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife..."

The U.S. Constitution says nothing against not coveting wives. You can desire your neighbor's wife all you want. Sorry.

10. You shall not desire your neighbor's house, his field, or his manservant, or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or anything that is your neighbor's.

The Constitution does not prevent you from desiring anything in, on, or around your neighbor's house, or any other house or thing for that matter.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 10:04:38   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
byronglimish wrote:
The pilgrims were fleeing the Church of England and the Catholic Church..that was the religious freedom being sought after..to honor God without being persecuted...the original protesters.."Protestants"..


"For we know that the common law is that system of law which was introduced by the Saxons on their settlement in England, and altered from time to time by proper legislative authority from that time to the date of Magna Charta, which terminates the period of the common law. . . This settlement took place about the middle of the fifth century. But Christianity was not introduced till the seventh century; the conversion of the first christian king of the Heptarchy having taken place about the year 598, and that of the last about 686. Here then, was a space of two hundred years, during which the common law was in existence, and Christianity no part of it."

--Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 10 February, 1814

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2017 10:15:49   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Dummy Boy wrote:
"For we know that the common law is that system of law which was introduced by the Saxons on their settlement in England, and altered from time to time by proper legislative authority from that time to the date of Magna Charta, which terminates the period of the common law. . . This settlement took place about the middle of the fifth century. But Christianity was not introduced till the seventh century; the conversion of the first christian king of the Heptarchy having taken place about the year 598, and that of the last about 686. Here then, was a space of two hundred years, during which the common law was in existence, and Christianity no part of it."

--Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 10 February, 1814
"For we know that the common law is that syst... (show quote)


No history lesson today, Dummy Boy.
BUT go study the migrations of the 10 tribes of Israel, from the Assyrian captivity on. Study the heraldry of England, Scotland, etc. Study their king's bloodlines. That would be a start.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 11:06:19   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
eagleye13 wrote:
No history lesson today, Dummy Boy.
BUT go study the migrations of the 10 tribes of Israel, from the Assyrian captivity on. Study the heraldry of England, Scotland, etc. Study their king's bloodlines. That would be a start.


For some reason a thorough study of the pilgrims ancestry is taboo, people are more inclined to study and observe the dung beetle..

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 11:24:32   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
byronglimish wrote:
For some reason a thorough study of the pilgrims ancestry is taboo, people are more inclined to study and observe the dung beetle..


Well that covers it.
Case closed.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 11:51:04   #
Kazudy
 
Dummy Boy wrote:
Where do KNOW where your freedom to practice religion is being prohibited?


How about those bakers that would not bake a cake with homosexuals as the theme on the cake becouse it goes against their religion(and mine)? Now citizens will be forced to go contrary to their religion or go to prison and pay fines. That's just a start, you guys won't be happy till all the Church's that preach God's Word are shut down. Who is behind that movement?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.