Ricktloml wrote:
Here's a question, since progressives don't base their outlook on life based on facts, do you think they would be appalled to learn they are operating on faith, they do seem to have as much disdain for faith as they do for facts.
Quite the conundrum, isn't it? There was a time when 'progressives' were better known as communists and socialists. From 1938 on, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), and the investigative activities of Senator Joe McCarthy in the early 1950s ('McCarthyism', anyone?) pretty much put paid to the idea of being known as either a communist or a socialist in the United States. About that time, communists and socialists banded together and commandeered the term 'liberal' to describe their movement. This was an egregious misrepresentation since 'liberalism' was the polar opposite of what these socialists and communists were espousing. There is no such thing as a free market under 1960s 'liberalism'.
Anyway, the use of the word 'liberal' sowed sufficient confusion among the electorate to sustain their political presence in the halls of power. This worked pretty well, until an actor and ex-governor from California named Ronald Reagan spoiled their party. Between Reagan in Washington, and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in London, the word 'liberal' was ridiculed to the point that it came to be associated with the realities of, yep, communism and socialism.
Having been 'outed' as the political deviants they were, the communists/socialists ('Liberals'? Are you kidding me?) looked around for yet another moniker to hide behind. Enter the 1990s and the emergence of the 'progressive' movement. This is yet another commandeering of an older term that means not what you think. From the 1890s through the 1920s, the main objective of the Progressive movement was the elimination of corruption in government. An admirable goal, to be sure. The movement primarily targeted political machines and their bosses and had absolutely nothing to do with communism or socialism. Perfect. Another era of mass confusion is introduced into the political arena, and now 'progressives' continue to 'move the ball' with the election of Barack Hussein Obama as the 44th President of the United States. Not once (that was bad enough), but twice!
So there we were. It was November 8, 2016, over 100 years after the communist/socialist movement first reared its ugly head, and the United States is starting to look every bit as dysfunctional as other tinpot dictatorships such as Venezuela, Zimbabwe and North Korea, to name a few. Finally, after being snowed over for nearly a hundred years, the American people began to see where they were being led. And they don't think much of it. They were being mocked and lied to by their own media, laughed at by their own politicians and misled by their intellectual leaders. And they knew it. They finally saw through the lies and hyperbole, they were ready to say "enough!".
Congratulations, America! You elected a political outsider who promised to secure your borders against criminals, promised to remove the corruption in your capital and promised to bring good paying jobs back to your economy. It was so entertaining to see how he mocked and belittled the political hacks who got in his way. It still is. He regularly 'blows up his twitter feed' with comments that would never see the light of day through the media filter. They hate the fact that our President has his own hotline to the American people, totally bypassing their censorship and approvals. It sucks the wind right out of their sails. For the rest of us, it's so much fun to watch.